Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Awful news ! Sexy time decreasing !

Comments

  • #2
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Jobs OXO wrote: »
    Good god ! The repopulation of the world is at risk here ! Enough ! Get the sex sticks and vageens out and start doin' the do !!!

    http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170508-the-many-reasons-that-people-are-having-less-sex

    This planet can only support about 3.5 billion people. A few years where death's outnumber births would be a good thing.


  • #3
    The_Valeyard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Quality over quantity OP


  • #4
    Erik Shin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭Erik Shin


    Barbie! wrote: »
    This planet can only support about 3.5 billion people. A few years where death's outnumber births would be a good thing.

    Are you willing to sacrifice yourself so I can get my leg over?


  • #5
    Canis Lupus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    Why do you have to say sex stick in every second post?


  • #6
    The_Valeyard
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Canis Lupus wrote: »
    Why do you have to say sex stick in every second post?

    Would you prefer he said 'love flute'


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    SEPT 23 1989
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Those stats about young people "despising" sexual contact is odd


  • #8
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Erik Shin wrote: »
    Are you willing to sacrifice yourself so I can get my leg over?

    I've had the snip so I'm good to keep going.


  • #9
    Armchair Andy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭Armchair Andy


    Erik Shin wrote:
    Are you willing to sacrifice yourself so I can get my leg over?


    Not many would admit to necrophilia, fair play.


  • #10
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Canis Lupus wrote: »
    Why do you have to say sex stick in every second post?

    In fairness I've only noticed him use the term 5 times in the past week.


  • #11
    greencap
    Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    The_Valeyard wrote: »
    Quality over quantity OP

    emmm yeah, about that.

    1 or 2 minor snags. nothing that cant be fixed. probably.

    discussion/2058195983/russia-threadbanned-users-in-op/p3135

    😁



  • Advertisement
  • #12
    skankkuvhima
    Closed Accounts Posts: 281 ✭✭skankkuvhima


    Barbie! wrote: »
    This planet can only support about 3.5 billion people.

    Source please.


  • #13
    andekwarhola
    Registered Users Posts: 4,639 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »
    Those stats about young people "despising" sexual contact is odd

    Messes up the hair.

    Maybe provide state-subsidized GHD stations outside night clubs.


  • #14
    Erik Shin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭Erik Shin


    Barbie! wrote: »
    I've had the snip so I'm good to keep going.

    I'm firing blanks....think we need 2 volunteers to take our place


  • #15
    HenryHill
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 173 ✭✭HenryHill


    Sounds about right.


  • #16
    Richard Hillman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    It takes a lot of time to have your consent form filled out and processed by the legal team, whilst negotiating issues such as lights on/off, time, positions etc.

    We are better off just going to Pornhub, 2minutes, bam.


  • #17
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    skankkuvhima wrote: »
    Source please.


    Straight from the horses mouth,what further proof do you need


  • #18
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    skankkuvhima wrote: »
    Source please.

    It's already at 7.5 billion. A recent Harvard study suggested the maximum sustainable to be 9 to 10 billion.


  • #19
    drunkmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,339 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    andekwarhola wrote: »

    Maybe provide state-subsidized GHD stations outside night clubs.

    Back in my day it was GBH.


  • #20
    One eyed Jack
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Jobs OXO wrote: »
    Good god ! The repopulation of the world is at risk here ! Enough ! Get the sex sticks and vageens out and start doin' the do !!!

    http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170508-the-many-reasons-that-people-are-having-less-sex


    That whole article can be summed up with this clip:




    :D


  • #21
    MyStubbleItches
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭MyStubbleItches


    skankkuvhima wrote: »
    Source please.

    Might be no harm if population decreases wiped out people who think they're smart looking for linked sources for every statement.


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    One eyed Jack wrote: »
    That whole article can be summed up with this clip:




    :D

    Best documentary ever made.


  • #23
    Phoebas
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,371 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Erik Shin wrote: »
    Are you willing to sacrifice yourself so I can get my leg over?

    Is that how you proposition your missus?


  • #24
    skankkuvhima
    Closed Accounts Posts: 281 ✭✭skankkuvhima


    Barbie! wrote: »
    Straight from the horses mouth,what further proof do you need
    Khloe Yummy Mourner wrote: »
    It's already at 7.5 billion. A recent Harvard study suggested the maximum sustainable to be 9 to 10 billion.
    MyStubbleItches wrote: »
    Might be no harm if population decreases wiped out people who think they're smart looking for linked sources for every statement.

    Right so, none of ye posted a source which supports the view that the planet can only support 3.5 billion people. Why did ye even quote me?


  • #25
    MyStubbleItches
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭MyStubbleItches


    skankkuvhima wrote: »
    Right so, none of ye posted a source which supports the view that the planet can only support 3.5 billion people. Why did ye even quote me?

    It's irrelevant (for me) what the argument is. It's this incessant trend in after hours of looking for a source for every single opinion, even if that opinion is glaringly, obviously correct (which this one isn't to be fair). It's a pathetic rebuke in place of debate.

    You think an opinion is incorrect? Debate it, don't take the easy way out by demanding a 'source'. That's just lazy and leads to a dumbing down of your own intelligence.


  • #26
    ytpe2r5bxkn0c1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    skankkuvhima wrote: »
    Right so, none of ye posted a source which supports the view that the planet can only support 3.5 billion people. Why did ye even quote me?

    Jeez, relax for goodness sake. I was giving you the correct figures, not 3.5 billion for a start, and told you it was a Harvard study. It's not rocket science to look it up if you have the wherewithal to use Boards. This posting of replies that simply ask for a link to a source is not a discussion.


  • #27
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    MyStubbleItches wrote: »
    It's irrelevant (for me) what the argument is. It's this incessant trend in after hours of looking for a source for every single opinion, even if that opinion is glaringly, obviously correct (which this one isn't to be fair). It's a pathetic rebuke in place of debate.

    You think an opinion is incorrect? Debate it, don't take the easy way out by demanding a 'source'. That's just lazy and leads to a dumbing down of your own intelligence.

    I provided a source. My sources say that that source is 100% solid. I'll now get my cat to mash the keyboard to verify it.

    nnnn nbftgvn


  • #28
    Biggest lickspittle on boardz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Biggest lickspittle on boardz


    Barbie! wrote: »
    This planet can only support about 3.5 billion people. A few years where death's outnumber births would be a good thing.

    This reminds me of a quote from REM's Michael Stipe: "The planet is going to be just fine. It's our own asses we're worried about."


    If it's any consolation, I was openly rooting for ebola the last time around.


  • #29
    Jobs OXO
    Closed Accounts Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Jobs OXO


    Anyway I'm off to do some pummelling to sort this out


  • #30
    MyStubbleItches
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭MyStubbleItches


    Barbie! wrote: »
    I provided a source. My sources say that that source is 100% solid. I'll now get my cat to mash the keyboard to verify it.

    nnnn nbftgvn

    I'm not at all disputing your statement or source. I was just saying that it isn't glaringly obvious that it's correct. The cat can live another while!


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    silverharp
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,691 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    MyStubbleItches wrote: »
    It's irrelevant (for me) what the argument is. It's this incessant trend in after hours of looking for a source for every single opinion, even if that opinion is glaringly, obviously correct (which this one isn't to be fair). It's a pathetic rebuke in place of debate.

    You think an opinion is incorrect? Debate it, don't take the easy way out by demanding a 'source'. That's just lazy and leads to a dumbing down of your own intelligence.

    you could be right but if someone comes out with a very specific number in this case then someone has put a list of very specific arguments together

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • #32
    Nabber
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,855 ✭✭✭Nabber


    Barbie! wrote: »
    This planet can only support about 3.5 billion people. A few years where death's outnumber births would be a good thing.


    Nonsense.

    We are on a planet where can crops are king. Crops that don't sustain life but instead used to 'enhance' life.

    Tea, coffee and cacao. Do away with them.
    Cut down meat to 10% of diet.

    Eventually we will see salt water desalinated and used to turn dry arid lands into crop producing areas.

    Planet is barely utilised. What ever is used, is used poorly


  • #33
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Nabber wrote: »
    Nonsense.

    We are on a planet where can crops are king. Crops that don't sustain life but instead used to 'enhance' life.

    Tea, coffee and cacao. Do away with them.
    Cut down meat to 10% of diet.

    Eventually we will see salt water desalinated and used to turn dry arid lands into crop producing areas.

    Planet is barely utilised. What ever is used, is used poorly

    Read the rest of my posts to get the joke,


Advertisement