Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New stationless bike rental scheme in Dublin - BleeperBike

Options
1568101116

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Yeah, even more than the usual bike-share bikes, the Mobike bikes seem to be dedicated to journeys of 1km or so. Solid tyres (I think?), one gear, no basket.


  • Registered Users Posts: 702 ✭✭✭LeoD


    Eamonnator wrote: »
    But what's to stop the local heroes throwing them in the nearest body of water?

    Nothing from what I can see! I'm going to guess that Mobike hope the novelty wears off those who would be entertained by this after the first few sink?


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Eamonnator wrote: »
    But what's to stop the local heroes throwing them in the nearest body of water?

    Same thing was said for DBs, never happened. Arguably stationless is more vulnerable but only time will tell there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 702 ✭✭✭LeoD


    tomasrojo wrote: »
    Yeah, even more than the usual bike-share bikes, the Mobike bikes seem to be dedicated to journeys of 1km or so. Solid tyres (I think?), one gear, no basket.

    Custom fittings so no point robbing them for parts either. I've used the Velib bikes in Paris and while I think they are great, I find it a bit of a pain registering for a 2-3 day ticket and subsequently releasing bikes from the stations. Mobikes on the otherhand look like the proverbial piece of piss.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    ED E wrote: »
    Same thing was said for DBs, never happened. Arguably stationless is more vulnerable but only time will tell there.

    But, as I understand it, these bikes are not locked to anything, The DBs are.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Eamonnator wrote: »
    But, as I understand it, these bikes are not locked to anything, The DBs are.

    DBs are most of the time, but are often left with their flimsy cable lock. A determined guerrier could easily depart with one if they were bothered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Yeah, I'll be interested to see how the Mobikes pan out in Manchester over the next year. They do have fewer obvious antisocial safeguards, but I guess they probably are coming here very soon, so we'll find out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Scobe vs Chav; FIGHT!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,580 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    worth mentioning that there was a chap at the DCC AGM from a dockless bike sharing company, who mentioned (probably quite deliberately) that they've been consulting with various local authorities about how best to launch; they intend to launch in several irish cities.

    http://fullspeedbikes.com/


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,904 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Draft Dublin City Council Control of Stationless On-Street Bicycle Hire Bye Laws 2017 4 week consultation https://consultation.dublincity.ie/traffic-and-transport/draft-dublin-city-council-control-of-stationless-o/ its always special when an org tell you how you can inspect a document at their offices that is online
    The City Council meeting of the 3rd July approved the initiation of a public consultation process. A copy of the Briefing Note on the proposed Bye-Laws together with a copy of the draft Bye-Laws may be viewed her or inspected during normal office hours over the period Wednesday 12th July to Thursday 10th August 2017 inclusive at the offices of the Environment & Transportation Department, Floor 6, Block 2, Civic Offices, Fishamble Street, Dublin 8. Copies of the Briefing Note, and the draft Bye-Laws are available free of charge from this office, telephone (01) 222 2232 or below.
    https://www.dublincity.ie/councilmeetings/documents/s10643/Stationless%20Bike%20Share%20Schemes.pdf


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,904 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    tomasrojo wrote: »

    do the matching paint scheme on the bike stand suggest new bike stands for obike?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Yeah, I was wondering that too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,904 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    a review of the obikes here https://www.gicentre.net/blog/2017/7/12/obike-london-first-impressions I wonder of the purposefully made to be uncomfortable so you won't use for them long


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    a review of the obikes here https://www.gicentre.net/blog/2017/7/12/obike-london-first-impressions I wonder of the purposefully made to be uncomfortable so you won't use for them long
    There are also exposed brake cables which may be vulnerable to malicious tampering (in contrast to the Santander bikes which are pretty much tamper-proof).

    The concern about the seat post is reasonable too.

    The standard Velib-style schemes are really well designed to avoid theft, blocking footpaths, tampering, component theft, etc. Maybe some of these dockless bikes meet the same criteria, at least partially, but I'm a little bit sceptical still.

    Nevertheless, we're going to find out, so I don't have to pontificating about it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Ahahaha, once one young fella discovers the saddles are removeable they'll all be gone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    I'm assuming the Mobike ones don't have that flaw, but I have no idea.

    I do wonder whether the Velib-style schemes could be made a bit cheaper by copying some of the dockless traits: e.g. switching to single-speed shaft gears and solid tyres. I mean, they'd be much worse bikes, but probably still ok for 1- to 5-km journeys.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    Obikes in the UK in trouble with claims of littering the streets with bikes and not having told the councils they're launching


    http://www.businessinsider.com/local-councils-unhappy-after-obike-littered-the-streets-of-london-with-thousands-of-yellow-bicycles-2017-7?r=UK&IR=T
    Hammersmith & Fulham Council published a blog post on Friday in which it criticised the way oBike launched its service. It said that around 400 bikes "appeared" on Thursday morning "without any consultation at all." It went on to say that "most [of the bicycles] had been left at right angles to the kerb, partially obstructing the footpath, and creating a potential hazard for pedestrians - particularly the disabled."

    Hackney Council also expressed its concern over the launch of oBike in London. Feryal Demirci, cabinet member for neighbourhoods, transport and parks, said in a statement that "we are disappointed that Obike have not tried to contact us to tell us the scheme is happening." She went on to reference issues with bikes being left on pavements, and said that Hackney Council was unaware of how the bikes would be redistributed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Add mobike to the mix.
    Two weeks on and I fear that a dream is all it was. There are Mobikes in the canal, Mobikes in bins and I am fed up with following the app to a residential street where there is clearly a Mobike stashed in someone’s garden. On launch day, the Chinese designer told me the bikes were basically indestructible and should last four years without maintenance. It took a matter of hours before local scallies worked out how to disable the GPS trackers and smash off the back wheel locks.

    And
    He finds comfort in the Mancs recovering Mobikes missing in action: a boat owner fished one out of the canal and it will be ready to ride again soon after a bit of TLC.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/16/manchesters-bike-share-scheme-isnt-working-because-people-dont-know-how-to-share?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

    Chavs 1 : Scobes 0


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭HivemindXX


    the bikes were basically indestructible and should last four years without maintenance

    To me this basically sounds like they don't plan to do any maintenance. Because that's cheaper.

    Anyone who thinks these bikes are not more vulnerable to petty vandalism is fooling themselves. However the Belfast bikes are basically the same system as Dublin Bikes and apparently they have significant problems with vandalism and theft. The only logical explanation I can see for the difference is that there are not as many people intent on mindless vandalism where the Dublin Bikes are generally located. Just because stationless bikes are having major problems in UK and some Chinese cities does not mean they cannot work here.

    I think a properly run operation could work well. I think this means actually having a significant number of staff to maintain the fleet of bikes and to relocate them when needed. They need a robust mechanism for ensuring that people don't leave them where they block footpaths or entrances or on private property (leaving it locked up in your own garden seems like a good scam to ensure you always have one available). I don't think some vague claims about having a points system will cut it.

    Luckily there seems to be multiple companies looking to compete in Dublin so I hope at least one does work out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,904 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    HivemindXX wrote: »
    To me this basically sounds like they don't plan to do any maintenance. Because that's cheaper.

    Luckily there seems to be multiple companies looking to compete in Dublin so I hope at least one does work out.

    and a mess it will be as they compete, same as happened elsewhere


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Look at the money.

    Stationed system: DCC Investment + Advertising Deal Revenue + User Subs+fares

    Stationless system:
    €5 top up gets 5 rides
    €25 top up gets 27 rides
    €75 for 12 month 2 rides a day membership

    Thats not a whole lot of cash to have re-deployment teams + a maintenance garage + live monitoring and repay their investment.

    I don't believe they'll really be moving misplaced bikes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    From twitter:
    I tested @ObikeUk v @SantanderCycles up Swaines Lane. Obike too heavy, gearing bad & dynamo intrusive. unusable on london #obike #borisbike

    https://twitter.com/mehimher/status/886860273159634944

    Santander cycles arent exactly swift (DBs are better IMO) so thats a pretty low bar to lose to.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,768 ✭✭✭✭tomasrojo


    Yeah, just saw the disillusioned Helen Pidd piece -- same journalist that wrote warmly about Mobike a week or so ago.

    Basically, though I'm happy to be proven wrong about dockless bikes, the dock-based system has substantial and proven safeguards against hoarding, vandalism, component theft, inconsiderate parking and dumping. We mostly don't appreciate what a clever system it is


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭queldy


    Has anyone been able to use the scheme?
    I downloaded the app, only finds one bike/station; either all the bikes are permanently used (good for the company!) or something is not working properly.
    Any advice?

    cheers


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    queldy wrote: »
    Has anyone been able to use the scheme?
    I downloaded the app, only finds one bike/station; either all the bikes are permanently used (good for the company!) or something is not working properly.
    Any advice?

    cheers

    They're still offline following DCCs cull I thought?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,465 ✭✭✭MOH


    ED E wrote: »
    Look at the money.

    Stationed system: DCC Investment + Advertising Deal Revenue + User Subs+fares

    Stationless system:


    Thats not a whole lot of cash to have re-deployment teams + a maintenance garage + live monitoring and repay their investment.

    I don't believe they'll really be moving misplaced bikes.

    Were they not gong to be selling advertising on the bikes themselves?


  • Registered Users Posts: 36,167 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Presumably (there's less space though).

    The advertising I mentioned was these JCD billboards the city sold for funding.
    Sky-HD_Macken-St-1.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Just got an android update. Wonder if relaunch 5 or is it 6 is immanent?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭petethedrummer


    ED E wrote: »
    Add mobike to the mix.
    Two weeks on and I fear that a dream is all it was. There are Mobikes in the canal, Mobikes in bins and I am fed up with following the app to a residential street where there is clearly a Mobike stashed in someone’s garden. On launch day, the Chinese designer told me the bikes were basically indestructible and should last four years without maintenance. It took a matter of hours before local scallies worked out how to disable the GPS trackers and smash off the back wheel locks.

    And
    He finds comfort in the Mancs recovering Mobikes missing in action: a boat owner fished one out of the canal and it will be ready to ride again soon after a bit of TLC.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/16/manchesters-bike-share-scheme-isnt-working-because-people-dont-know-how-to-share?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

    Chavs 1 : Scobes 0
    Mobikes, Mo Problems.
    biggie-crown.jpg


Advertisement