Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What I log about when I log about running

11011121416

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 183 ✭✭Strawberry Swan


    Heh, yeah my log would be a disaster. Still haven't completed base plan yet :-P And as for paces, it's almost entirely subjective and feelings based. Don't wear a watch, just my phone. There would be a tonne of sleeping in it and rest days too :-) But I need to increase my volume a lot, keep up with consistency and run at correct paces.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Tuesday, 12 February, 1 hr very easy@7:51/pm 144avg HR
    Wednesday, 13 February, 20 minutes very easy@7:17/pm 139avg HR
    Thursday, 14 February, 1 hr very easy@7:43/pm 142avg HR
    Friday, 15 February, session: 4, 3, 2,1 Threshold, CV, AP, VO2 w/equal recoveries
    Saturday, 16 February, 1.45 easy@7.18/km

    An easy, no-pressure week of running. I ran when I felt like it. I did the session on the treadmill as I was under time pressure, so no point in recording the splits. I re-calculated appropriate HR levels and happy that the paces and effort are matching up.

    Lol - I just realised I was super speedy last week. I'd be doing well to run one mile at 7:17. Obviously, the above paces should be /km and not /m (in case there was any doubt!) :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Tuesday, 12 February, 1 hr very easy@7:51/pm 144avg HR
    Wednesday, 13 February, 20 minutes very easy@7:17/pm 139avg HR
    Thursday, 14 February, 1 hr very easy@7:43/pm 142avg HR
    Friday, 15 February, session: 4, 3, 2,1 Threshold, CV, AP, VO2 w/equal recoveries
    Saturday, 16 February, 1.45 easy@7.18/km

    An easy, no-pressure week of running. I ran when I felt like it. I did the session on the treadmill as I was under time pressure, so no point in recording the splits. I re-calculated appropriate HR levels and happy that the paces and effort are matching up.

    Hi E. You mind if i ask what mean by the line in bold above, recalculate the appropriate HR levels - do you do a Max HR test or how do you base the HR levels?

    I hope you're feeling better after this week, i like the idea of a no pressure week of running and running for the love of it - it's just a hobby after all and important we all remind ourselves why we do it occasionally :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    ariana` wrote: »
    Hi E. You mind if i ask what mean by the line in bold above, recalculate the appropriate HR levels - do you do a Max HR test or how do you base the HR levels?

    I hope you're feeling better after this week, i like the idea of a no pressure week of running and running for the love of it - it's just a hobby after all and important we all remind ourselves why we do it occasionally :)

    Sure, I always have a firm eye on HR because I'm not very honest with myself otherwise. I've been known to chat during tempo runs, so that's not a useful test for me, either.

    I used to do most of my training by HR using the Pfitzinger ranges and I still use them even where I'm doing pace-based plans. But I recently hit a new max HR and have hit it more than once since, so it's not an anomaly. I went from 190 to 196, so, after a discussion on how difficult we were finding it to stay in the very easy range, out of interest, I looked up the percentages again. I'd been thinking recovery should be less than 148 and that turned out to be bang on. It's helped me be more disciplined in hitting the very easy paces even if the results are woefully slow runs :o

    As an aside, Jack Daniels suggest a HR of less than 127! I would literally have to walk :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Sure, I always have a firm eye on HR because I'm not very honest with myself otherwise.


    Do you use a chest strap or just whatever the watch is capable of?


    I glance at my HR now and again but have never really focussed on where it is / should be...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    ReeReeG wrote: »
    Do you use a chest strap or just whatever the watch is capable of?


    I glance at my HR now and again but have never really focussed on where it is / should be...

    Chest strap. I don't have optical HR on my watch.

    Ah, it's by no means a foolproof method, I just find it helps me with discipline. I also found it useful for adjusting to hills - I was able to do LT runs as part of the runmute, but obviously, couldn't hit the paces, but once the HR was in the appropriate zone, though, I was happy I was getting the appropriate response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Thanks Huzzah. I ask because i'm finding myself increasingly interested in my HR readings recently. In the absence of anything else to measure progress by it's reassuring to track the drop in my HR drop on like-for-like runs.

    Ideally I'd like to my HR zones prescribed through LT testing done in a lab scenario though if i was to go down the route of committing to training by HR, which i'm seriously considering. It's seems obvious that in the absence of having the confidence & experience to run by one's own perceived effort, surely HR has to be more reliable as an indication of effort than pace alone derived from a text book with no account for environmental factors :cool:

    127 though LOL - i'd have to be walking too :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    As an aside, Jack Daniels suggest a HR of less than 127! I would literally have to walk :rolleyes:
    eek.png Not a hope for me either. I'm always envious of people who can maintain really low hearts while running, mine's always high!
    ariana` wrote: »
    Thanks Huzzah. I ask because i'm finding myself increasingly interested in my HR readings recently. In the absence of anything else to measure progress by it's reassuring to track the drop in my HR drop on like-for-like runs.

    Ideally I'd like to my HR zones prescribed through LT testing done in a lab scenario though if i was to go down the route of committing to training by HR, which i'm seriously considering. It's seems obvious that in the absence of having the confidence & experience to run by one's own perceived effort, surely HR has to be more reliable as an indication of effort than pace alone derived from a text book with no account for environmental factors :cool:
    I think it's an excellent way to train ariana, at least for a period of time. You learn a massive amount about how your body responds and what effort you're really putting in. I also suspect it's particularly useful for women, since I find HR/actual effort varies significantly throughout the month and you wouldn't necessarily notice or know why otherwise, but it helps you hit the right effort if not the same pace. I also think you can probably do it well enough by working off a max HR reading from a 5k race or similar.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    ariana` wrote: »
    Thanks Huzzah. I ask because i'm finding myself increasingly interested in my HR readings recently. In the absence of anything else to measure progress by it's reassuring to track the drop in my HR drop on like-for-like runs.

    Ideally I'd like to my HR zones prescribed through LT testing done in a lab scenario though if i was to go down the route of committing to training by HR, which i'm seriously considering. It's seems obvious that in the absence of having the confidence & experience to run by one's own perceived effort, surely HR has to be more reliable as an indication of effort than pace alone derived from a text book with no account for environmental factors :cool:

    127 though LOL - i'd have to be walking too :pac:

    I think Murph_D had his LT tested. It sounds wicked hard, though, so I've been too afraid to get it done.
    eyrie wrote: »

    I think it's an excellent way to train ariana, at least for a period of time. You learn a massive amount about how your body responds and what effort you're really putting in. I also suspect it's particularly useful for women, since I find HR/actual effort varies significantly throughout the month and you wouldn't necessarily notice or know why otherwise, but it helps you hit the right effort if not the same pace. I also think you can probably do it well enough by working off a max HR reading from a 5k race or similar.

    Yeah, I think it's just a really good sense check. Like, I'm way slower now and it would be easy to suggest that the paces prescribed are incorrect but the HR just confirms to me that the paces are actually spot on. I'm just running slower for the same HR for whatever reason but running quicker isn't going to fix it.

    Also, am I the only one who finds that moderate paced runs nearly always feel "easier" than super easy runs? I'm convinced it's because I pick my feet up more and there's a bit more of a rush from the tougher effort, so I feel great whereas on the easier runs, sometimes they're a bit of a trudge. I think it would be easy to convince myself that these are "easy" when they take a bigger toll on the body.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,022 ✭✭✭Kellygirl


    I totally agree on the moderate paced runs being easier - I much prefer them here as I find the super easy a bit boring sometimes. I do try the not break a swea on the super easy ones and that feels like the only target I have to keep me amused!

    I only got my HR chest monito in December and think I’ve broken it already. Seems to record for the start of the run and not recording properly after a bit for some reason. I was using Bodyglide as it chaffed me the first few times so don’t know if I’ve damaged it. Have you ever had any issues with yours?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Huzzah! wrote:
    Also, am I the only one who finds that moderate paced runs nearly always feel "easier" than super easy runs? I'm convinced it's because I pick my feet up more and there's a bit more of a rush from the tougher effort, so I feel great whereas on the easier runs, sometimes they're a bit of a trudge. I think it would be easy to convince myself that these are "easy" when they take a bigger toll on the body.

    YES. I feel like my form is absolutely sh*te on very easy or even easy runs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Kellygirl wrote: »
    I totally agree on the moderate paced runs being easier - I much prefer them here as I find the super easy a bit boring sometimes. I do try the not break a swea on the super easy ones and that feels like the only target I have to keep me amused!

    I only got my HR chest monito in December and think I’ve broken it already. Seems to record for the start of the run and not recording properly after a bit for some reason. I was using Bodyglide as it chaffed me the first few times so don’t know if I’ve damaged it. Have you ever had any issues with yours?

    Yep, it used to chafe but I just got used to it and it doesn't seem to anymore. I make sure to wash it fairly frequently too. Most recently, I had issues with cadence lock but that seems to have been resolved with a battery change.

    Does it come loose as the run progresses? I wear mine just beneath my bra strap and don't even notice it. I wear it pretty tight. I don't think Bodyglide would damage it as I've seen recommendations to use Aloe Vera gel.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    ReeReeG wrote: »
    YES. I feel like my form is absolutely sh*te on very easy or even easy runs.

    And I feel a bit more energised or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,022 ✭✭✭Kellygirl


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Yep, it used to chafe but I just got used to it and it doesn't seem to anymore. I make sure to wash it fairly frequently too. Most recently, I had issues with cadence lock but that seems to have been resolved with a battery change.

    Does it come loose as the run progresses? I wear mine just beneath my bra strap and don't even notice it. I wear it pretty tight. I don't think Bodyglide would damage it as I've seen recommendations to use Aloe Vera gel.

    I think I had it too tight initially and probably didn’t need to wear the Bodyglide once I loosened it. There hasn’t been any movement so I think I have it just right now. I was wondering if I was washing it too much as I was running the tap and letting it soak while I had a shower but it said it is waterproof to 5 atm so can’t see how that would be a problem. I;m not sure what to do with it now.

    How do you know if you are having issues with cadence lock?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Kellygirl wrote: »
    I think I had it too tight initially and probably didn’t need to wear the Bodyglide once I loosened it. There hasn’t been any movement so I think I have it just right now. I was wondering if I was washing it too much as I was running the tap and letting it soak while I had a shower but it said it is waterproof to 5 atm so can’t see how that would be a problem. I;m not sure what to do with it now.

    How do you know if you are having issues with cadence lock?

    If the readings are high but I feel fine, I have a look at what the cadence was and it usually matches.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    eyrie wrote: »
    eek.png Not a hope for me either. I'm always envious of people who can maintain really low hearts while running, mine's always high!

    I think it's an excellent way to train ariana, at least for a period of time. You learn a massive amount about how your body responds and what effort you're really putting in. I also suspect it's particularly useful for women, since I find HR/actual effort varies significantly throughout the month and you wouldn't necessarily notice or know why otherwise, but it helps you hit the right effort if not the same pace. I also think you can probably do it well enough by working off a max HR reading from a 5k race or similar.

    You're probably right eyrie, i guess i'll just have to race a 5k or Parkrun so :pac:
    Huzzah! wrote: »
    I think Murph_D had his LT tested. It sounds wicked hard, though, so I've been too afraid to get it done.



    Yeah, I think it's just a really good sense check. Like, I'm way slower now and it would be easy to suggest that the paces prescribed are incorrect but the HR just confirms to me that the paces are actually spot on. I'm just running slower for the same HR for whatever reason but running quicker isn't going to fix it.

    Also, am I the only one who finds that moderate paced runs nearly always feel "easier" than super easy runs? I'm convinced it's because I pick my feet up more and there's a bit more of a rush from the tougher effort, so I feel great whereas on the easier runs, sometimes they're a bit of a trudge. I think it would be easy to convince myself that these are "easy" when they take a bigger toll on the body.

    Yeah i'd say sometimes my legs feel a bit lethargic for want of a better word at very easy pace.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Also, am I the only one who finds that moderate paced runs nearly always feel "easier" than super easy runs? I'm convinced it's because I pick my feet up more and there's a bit more of a rush from the tougher effort, so I feel great whereas on the easier runs, sometimes they're a bit of a trudge. I think it would be easy to convince myself that these are "easy" when they take a bigger toll on the body.
    Amen to this! I think with the moderate ones you can get into a nice rhythm with and it flows, and feels a bit more natural maybe? Whereas easy pace often doesn't give you that momentum. I *heart* moderate runs :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Monday, 16 February - 1 hour easy plus a wee bit@8:01/km HR: 146(160). Found this tough for no discernable reason.

    Tuesday, 17 February Club session. Another tough run not helped by me overcooking the first set of 300s:

    Club session: 3x300; 1x1,500; 1x400; 1x200; + 1x100
    Avg HR: 170 Max HR 184
    |Lap|Time|
    |300|89s|
    |300|84s|
    |300|85s|
    |1,500|7:45|
    |400|126|
    |400|119|
    |200|:46|
    |100|0:19|

    Surprised to see they’re all quicker apart from the 1500 than last month. Not much to be taken from that as it was slippy when I did that session but Tuesday night felt slllooooww.

    Wednesday, 18 February, 90 minutes very easy@7:49/km HR: 145(159). Feeling better.

    Thursday, 19 February, 1 hr very easy@7:51/km HR: 147(158) and better again.

    Friday, 20 February, session: 3x8@Threshold: 5:44; 5:41; and 5:40. Had a heavy right quad, so I did this on the track in case I needed to bail. Locked into the pace pretty easily. Maybe this is my 10K pace after all.

    Saturday, 21 February, 90 easy@7.20/km. HR: 143(166) Just within the bounds of decency in terms of pace. Properly tired by the end.

    A better week from me. I spent a bit of time looking over my runs from this time last year and my pace is about 15-30 seconds per k slower for the same effort. I’m not going to over analyse it and have resolved to just try and train at the appropriate effort for me. At the business end of the plan now with only one more “long” run left. In other news, the FFL coach got in contact with me saying to message him with any queries, which is a nice touch, I have to say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,022 ✭✭✭Kellygirl


    Well done E. Toying with the idea of joining a club myself. Are you enjoying it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Kellygirl wrote: »
    Well done E. Toying with the idea of joining a club myself. Are you enjoying it?

    I am enjoying it. I was actively looking forward to going on Tuesday. It's good for me to cede control, although I find it difficult. There are advantages and disadvantages. You should definitely just go along for a trial.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Monday, 4 March 1 hour easy plus a wee bit. The 10k runmute home. I’d lost my watch but sang bits of Frozen sporadically to ensure the pace was in the recovery zone.

    Tuesday, 5 March Club session 3x300, 3x400 Fartlek, 2x400 and 1x800. I took the hand a bit as I didn’t have my watch and settled into the back of the pack until after the Fartlek when I injected a bit of effort.

    Wednesday, 6 March 1 hour plus a wee bit very easy@7:38/km

    Thursday, 7 March 30 very easy@7:39/km Really tough, so I left it at 30.

    Saturday, 9 March session: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 @Threshold, CV, AP, VO2 and 110%w/equal recoveries: actual(aim): 5:40 (5:48 - 5:40); 5:28 (5:32 - 5:25); 5:17 (5:18 - 5:12); 5:00 (5:06 - 5:00); and 4:21:o(flat to the mat). Dee-lighted with this. Did it on the quay and was worried the wind would be a factor. It was but it was to my back for most of the reps. Spent most of the first interval with my eyes glued to the watch but the rest were mainly done by feel, with a little bit of assistance from the watch. Cringey that that’s my flat-to-the-mat pace but sure! Felt great on the cool down, with a nice wee bounce to my stride.

    Sunday, 10 March 80 easy@7.17/km. HR: 146(198) Too fast but the effort was in the very easy zone, so no harm done. The best long run of the plan, starting to feel a bit of rhythm come back.

    I missed a week of running for (valid) reasons I won’t go into, but I am downgrading MSB from a “goal” race to a, “best-effort” race as a result. Next week will involve a bit of making it up as I go along, trying to stretch a 7-day plan to 8 days.

    Delighted to see all the successful runs at Bohermeen today. D completed the Grads plan with a cracking run. Looking forward to reading the reports.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,673 ✭✭✭juke


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Monday, 4 March 1 hour easy plus a wee bit. The 10k runmute home. I’d lost my watch but sang bits of Frozen sporadically to ensure the pace was in the recovery zone.

    :pac: I love it
    Huzzah! wrote: »
    Delighted to see all the successful runs at Bohermeen today. D completed the Grads plan with a cracking run. Looking forward to reading the reports.

    Great, given the conditions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Huzzah! wrote:
    I’d lost my watch but sang bits of Frozen sporadically to ensure the pace was in the recovery zone.

    I am so here for this!
    Huzzah! wrote:
    Saturday, 9 March session: 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 @Threshold, CV, AP, VO2 and 110%w/equal recoveries: actual(aim): 5:40 (5:48 - 5:40); 5:28 (5:32 - 5:25); 5:17 (5:18 - 5:12); 5:00 (5:06 - 5:00); and 4:21 (flat to the mat). Dee-lighted with this. Did it on the quay and was worried the wind would be a factor. It was but it was to my back for most of the reps. Spent most of the first interval with my eyes glued to the watch but the rest were mainly done by feel, with a little bit of assistance from the watch. Cringey that that’s my flat-to-the-mat pace but sure! Felt great on the cool down, with a nice wee bounce to my stride.

    Great work!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    There's no issue with doing an early tempo fasted if you ate well the evening before. Thanks again for the transfer today...even if I was calling you terrible names after 11 miles! Haha


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    That's a great session, well one! I've been looking forward to that one coming my way for a while :p
    Hope all's ok now. Glad D had a good outing today! The Grads plan is getting around, eh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭Baby75


    Great week Huzzah :) and so glad I am not the only one who sings during my run when keeping pace in check :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,968 ✭✭✭aquinn


    ariana` wrote: »
    Thanks Huzzah. I ask because i'm finding myself increasingly interested in my HR readings recently. In the absence of anything else to measure progress by it's reassuring to track the drop in my HR drop on like-for-like runs.

    Ideally I'd like to my HR zones prescribed through LT testing done in a lab scenario though if i was to go down the route of committing to training by HR, which i'm seriously considering. It's seems obvious that in the absence of having the confidence & experience to run by one's own perceived effort, surely HR has to be more reliable as an indication of effort than pace alone derived from a text book with no account for environmental factors :cool:

    127 though LOL - i'd have to be walking too :pac:

    Heya,

    Playing catch-up on the logs and I have this link saved down for years and under HR training. Might be helpful:

    https://www.angio.net/personal/run/hadd.pdf

    Can't remember if I read it all in the end. A bulky enough document and so hopefully relevant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    aquinn wrote: »
    Heya,

    Playing catch-up on the logs and I have this link saved down for years and under HR training. Might be helpful:

    https://www.angio.net/personal/run/hadd.pdf

    Can't remember if I read it all in the end. A bulky enough document and so hopefully relevant.

    Thanks - I tried this before but I had my incorrect MAX HR, so it was pretty hard. With an accurate HR, it aligns pretty much with the zones I'm using now. I probably should do a big block of base building at some point, to be fair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭OOnegative


    Best of luck in the MSB5k in the morning, run well!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Monday, 11 March No recall of why there was no run today. Bad start to the week.

    Tuesday, 12 March, 1 hour very easy@7:14/km HR 138avg Left work too late to make the club session. Some group chat about the weather meant I took to the treadmill. Always feel like a drunk when I get off the tready after an hour.

    Wednesday, 13 March 1, 2, 3, 2,1 at CV w/equal recoveries I’d a look at the runfastcoach calculator and noticed that the 5k time predicted off my Raheny time was at the fast end of CV, so I decided to try a session at that pace. I ran along the coast to Blackrock, so the wind was at my back the entire way. Had to stop mid 2 minute interval at the Merrion Gates and the longest interval still wasn’t as comfortable as I would’ve liked. Aim was 5:22/km. Actual: 5:15; 5:17; 5:18; 5:11; and 5:24.

    Friday, 15 March, 45 very easy@7:36/km HR124(137) HR is a beauty. Another Friday, another treadmill run.

    Sunday, 17 March, 20 minutes very easy@7:36 If I’d my time back again, I’d have done 45 minutes or so on the Saturday and maybe rested today. HR was skewed by the copious amounts of tea I drank before the off and possibly by the cost of houses in Wexford at the minute.

    Monday, 18 March. MSB5k Race Splits: 5:22; 5:20; 5:24; 5:32; 5:24; 5:32 :(; and 5:24 (5:24/km) HR: 176(184) An interesting race and one I’ve wanted to do for a while. I didn’t, however, want to do it when it came down to it. Standard for me before a race. Had to keep my mouth shut as D wasn’t able to race and had instead decided to walk it. Applegirl and Juke were also on my mind.

    Start - 2k

    I started too far back and started my watch too early. I now know enough people at races to figure out where I should be, but I don’t like to push forward. It didn’t take too long to work my way to an appropriate spot once we started running but I was already thinking of just stopping and waiting for D. When the first kilometre clicked in at 5:22, and my A goal, I decided to keep going. My breathing was already a bit ragged but I reasoned that that’s probably how it should be. Turned onto Leeson Street and the wind was to our backs. I found it hard to not run too quickly here. I appreciate in a 5k, you’re just supposed to run flat out but I didn’t want to run into difficulties later on given my last race. A mild stitch had started. I don’t have much of a memory but I thought that the course felt more downhill than anything and I worried that this would mean a tough latter half.


    2k - 4k


    I was really feeling the effort when we turned onto Wilton Place and just willed myself to get to the third kilometre. As is usual, there was no clock watching from this point on and I merely glanced at it when each kilometre buzzed. We turned onto Leeson Street and the wind and nausea hit at much the same time. This was my slowest kilometre and I was really struggling. I remember seeing 5:45 avg and I did up the pace, hoping I wouldn’t regret it later. It was around here that I swore off racing for life. I was happy to do DCM, like, I'd paid for that, but that would be the last one.

    5k

    All I remember about the 5th kilometre is nausea. I passed a woman, who was much shorter than me, and she decided to come with me. She sat in to my right and the top of her head reached my shoulder. All I could think about was how horrible it would be for her if I did puke on her :P She soon dropped off and I turned onto the finishing stretch. I picked it up a bit here but was battling nausea. I fell over the line and stopped my watch to a disappointing 27:33. I knew i’d started my watch late but not by a huge margin. Both my calfs threatened to cramp - a sensation I haven't had since completing my first half. To my addled brain, my splits should’ve added up to closer to the 27 mark, but of course, splits in a city centre run are never going to be accurate. Chip time was 27:26. I did want a sub27 but I missed some valuable training, so I can’t complain. I mean I will complain but I shouldn't.

    Sorry not to have seen people at the end. I finished way behind most of you, so you were probably long gone. I also ran back to keep D company as he finished his race to a celebratory handshake from the Lord Mayor himself, no less.

    In hindsight, it’s funny talking about goals. Really, all you can do in a 5k after a certain point is keep moving forward. A goal, I suppose, is good to keep a small bit of smácht in the early stages and to try and keep momentum in the middle stages, but I really ran mostly to effort yesterday. What is interesting to me is that I was nowhere near my max at any point, so why the nausea? I agree with previous suggestions made by ariana` and ReeRee that I need more 5k practice and endurance, 'll always need a bit more of that.

    So that was the A goal that got demoted to just another race after some lacklustre training on my part. I was going to sneak off and do the K-Club 10k as my goal race without telling anybody, but I’m not actually sure I can be bothered. No idea what to do next now that I’ve finished my version of the Grads plan. I’ll just keep runmuting/clubbing/long running till I decide.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Well done on keeping at it! You didn't give in, despite the stitch, nausea and winds. It's not easy to keep the chin up in those circumstances. Also hard when you're feeling like you're not where you used to be.

    Regarding the nausea, I'm lucky that I don't tend to get that mid-race (DCM aside), but could it be something to do with the sustained effort? In sessions, you get that recovery after a rep, which might be keeping some nausea at bay for you? I assume you didn't do anything odd pre-race foodwise?
    Would you consider the K-Club 10k for practice even?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,673 ✭✭✭juke


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    I didn’t, however, want to do it when it came down to it. Standard for me before a race. Had to keep my mouth shut as D wasn’t able to race and had instead decided to walk it. Applegirl and Juke were also on my mind.

    Goway outta that....my silly calf is loving the gym right now :P
    Huzzah! wrote: »

    2k - 4k


    I was really feeling the effort when we turned onto Wilton Place and just willed myself to get to the third kilometre. As is usual, there was no clock watching from this point on and I merely glanced at it when each kilometre buzzed. We turned onto Leeson Street and the wind and nausea hit at much the same time. This was my slowest kilometre and I was really struggling. I remember seeing 5:45 avg and I did up the pace, hoping I wouldn’t regret it later. It was around here that I swore off racing for life. I was happy to do DCM, like, I'd paid for that, but that would be the last one.

    :( Tough day. Well done for sticking through. The whole nausea thing has me questioning things too. I'm noticing it mentioned in more and more race reports recently, when I never did before. Perhaps only because it's on my mind.

    You love racing though - maybe it's just the 5k distance you don't like or doesn't suit you?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    ReeReeG wrote: »
    Well done on keeping at it! You didn't give in, despite the stitch, nausea and winds. It's not easy to keep the chin up in those circumstances. Also hard when you're feeling like you're not where you used to be.

    Regarding the nausea, I'm lucky that I don't tend to get that mid-race (DCM aside), but could it be something to do with the sustained effort? In sessions, you get that recovery after a rep, which might be keeping some nausea at bay for you? I assume you didn't do anything odd pre-race foodwise?
    Would you consider the K-Club 10k for practice even?

    Nope. Plain old porridge. Now, having seen the stats, I just feel like I did give up, even though at the time I thought I was DYING.

    I kind of thought K-Club was further away. It always seems like a decent drive. Still think a parkrun might do the same job.
    juke wrote: »

    :( Tough day. Well done for sticking through. The whole nausea thing has me questioning things too. I'm noticing it mentioned in more and more race reports recently, when I never did before. Perhaps only because it's on my mind.

    You love racing though - maybe it's just the 5k distance you don't like or doesn't suit you?

    I used to quite like 5ks. Sure they hurt but they were over and done with in approximately 27 minutes or less :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Huzzah! wrote: »
    I kind of thought K-Club was further away. It always seems like a decent drive. Still think a parkrun might do the same job.


    Yeah I guess a parkrun would alright. Let me know if you ever want company :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Huzzah, i was very disappointed to see you didn't get sub 27 but you did put in a great effort, your splits were so even and your work rate was enviable. I didn't think you missed a significant amount of training, in fact I'm quite envious your work ethic in relation to running. There's a great bunch of ladies around here in this past year whom i have to say i can only aspire to on the training front and you're definitely firmly placed in that collective.

    You've been very unlucky with nausea in races :( Do you ever experience it doing sessions? I get dry retching occasionally in races, i put it down to the sustained effort but i've no idea why it happens sometimes and not every time.You did great to plough on despite how you were feeling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,968 ✭✭✭aquinn


    ReeReeG wrote: »
    Yeah I guess a parkrun would alright. Let me know if you ever want company :)

    It is pacer Saturday in St Anne's?

    Sorry yesterday didn't go as well as hoped.

    What breakfast or food did you have in the morning? Does your routine maybe need to be looked at? Maybe too little or too much of food or liquids.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    ReeReeG wrote: »
    Yeah I guess a parkrun would alright. Let me know if you ever want company :)

    Oh, always!
    ariana` wrote: »
    Huzzah, i was very disappointed to see you didn't get sub 27 but you did put in a great effort, your splits were so even and your work rate was enviable. I didn't think you missed a significant amount of training, in fact I'm quite envious your work ethic in relation to running. There's a great bunch of ladies around here in this past year whom i have to say i can only aspire to on the training front and you're definitely firmly placed in that collective.

    You've been very unlucky with nausea in races :( Do you ever experience it doing sessions? I get dry retching occasionally in races, i put it down to the sustained effort but i've no idea why it happens sometimes and not every time.You did great to plough on despite how you were feeling.

    I think training has been a mixed bag. I tapered a bit too much before Raheny and Enniscorthy and missed a week entirely. Then, there's also being hard on myself and feeling like I'm failing when I only run for an hour instead of completing the full runmute. I really think your work rate equals anyone's on here to be honest but perhaps we hold being hard on ourselves in common.

    On the nausea, I don't think I'd push myself hard enough in training to experience it. It does seem to be getting worse and I think it's going hand in hand with a significant loss in fitness.

    It's grand - all I can do is get fitter. I'll have to reverse the trend at some stage.

    I also still PBd by a nice amount in Raheny :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    aquinn wrote: »
    It is pacer Saturday in St Anne's?

    Sorry yesterday didn't go as well as hoped.

    What breakfast or food did you have in the morning? Does your routine maybe need to be looked at? Maybe too little or too much of food or liquids.

    Think Pacer Saturday is the following week and I will be in Seville. Spain has not yet embraced parkrun, which is disappointing.

    Em, I honestly think the nausea is related to a lack of fitness. No doubt it will improve once I get some endurance back. It will always be there to a greater or lesser degree, I think.

    As I said, it'll be grand. I'll just keep plugging away and the trend will reverse itself at some point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,968 ✭✭✭aquinn


    No, it is definitely this week. BHAA on next week in St Anne's.

    Seville is fabulous. Really beautiful. Lovely.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    aquinn wrote: »
    No, it is definitely this week. BHAA on next week in St Anne's.

    This is excellent news - thanks!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    I think you race really well E, so it's really crap that you've had a few rough experiences recently, with the nausea and the rest. But reading your reports I'm always impressed by how hard you race even when everything isn't going as planned.
    You were really unlucky yesterday with the stitch so early on AND the nausea. I have no useful suggestions about feeling sick but I do think that if you manage to get a break from it during a race soon, things are bound to come good given the super solid training over the long haul (I know you say you missed a bit in the last few months but over the last two years it has been ridiculously consistent).
    Oh and Strava gives you the sub 27.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,022 ✭✭✭Kellygirl


    God that’s tough - fair play for keeping going with the nausea. I don’t think I would. Could it be nerves? Do you suffer with it at any other times besides running races?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    On the nausea thing I'm sorry but I have nothing to add...it has never happened me so I never looked into it.

    The comment you made about never racing again struck a chord. I think this is normal when really racing hard. Only in the Bob Heffernan and DCM last year did I actually enjoy it from beginning to end. In every other race over the last 15 months I wanted to stop or slow to a jog. I felt I had nothing left to give and too far to go to the finish. The pleasure is in knowing you have overcome this. Races, in the moment, will be horrible. The strong you overcoming the weak you is the achievement every time. Well done!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    eyrie wrote: »

    Oh and Strava gives you the sub 27.

    Strava lies. I thought I was near enough my target the entire way around, but the GPS was way off probably because of the location. Feeling close to target helped push me on. No doubt you suffered too - it wouldn't be a race without some suffering!
    Kellygirl wrote: »
    God that’s tough - fair play for keeping going with the nausea. I don’t think I would. Could it be nerves? Do you suffer with it at any other times besides running races?

    No, it's just down to a lack of fitness and practice.
    skyblue46 wrote: »
    On the nausea thing I'm sorry but I have nothing to add...it has never happened me so I never looked into it.

    The comment you made about never racing again struck a chord. I think this is normal when really racing hard. Only in the Bob Heffernan and DCM last year did I actually enjoy it from beginning to end. In every other race over the last 15 months I wanted to stop or slow to a jog. I felt I had nothing left to give and too far to go to the finish. The pleasure is in knowing you have overcome this. Races, in the moment, will be horrible. The strong you overcoming the weak you is the achievement every time. Well done!

    Yep - I usually want to stop pretty early on, then find my groove, then want to stop again. All standard racing. Would like to be able to hit the effort levels that you, aquinn and Eyrie did. I need to toughen up!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    Do you know your max HR? Because it looks to me like your effort was high, sustained and kept increasing progressively throughout. So unless you think it should have been significantly higher throughout the graph looks spot on to me?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    eyrie wrote: »
    Do you know your max HR? Because it looks to me like your effort was high, sustained and kept increasing progressively throughout. So unless you think it should have been significantly higher throughout the graph looks spot on to me?

    Yep - 196. Just basing it on the zones given by Strava, that may or may not be hokey. My effort was nearly all in the LT zone. You all spent a significant portion of the race in the anaerobic zone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,968 ✭✭✭aquinn


    Normally a test is to do a 5km and then the max effort at the finish is your max HR. What does Monday's say?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    aquinn wrote: »
    Normally a test is to do a 5km and then the max effort at the finish is your max HR. What does Monday's say?

    I didn't get near my max on Monday, so I was wondering why I felt so pukey. Anyway, it was kind of an off-the-cuff remark as I still think the nausea was just down to lack of fitness.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭eyrie


    Have you gotten close to your max in races before? I don't know enough about how this stuff works, to be honest, so probably don't have anything useful to contribute! But if you have experienced working far harder previously and didn't get there this time despite feeling it was '5k-tough' anyway, maybe there was something else physical going on (tiredness, lingering or oncoming illness, etc) that contributed? Like I said I don't know much, so feel free to disregard all my comments!


  • Registered Users Posts: 183 ✭✭Strawberry Swan


    That's a great time even though it's not the one you want. It sounds like you tried your absolute best to fight through the race to just make it to the end. If I was feeling as pukey as you described, I don't know if I would have continued. It's a very valid excuse for dropping out, but you didn't. It might be worth looking into why you are feeling so unwell in recent races. I don't think it's something you should be experiencing at all really, outside of eating too close to the race.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement