WW XIV - Marvel & DC

Katie WW

gufc21 wrote: »

I get that but look at her post construction, short and concise sentances. Again its early and for some reason, wendy's posts are the only ones ive looked at. Obviously nothing damming but i am suspicious... maybe just paranoid

You don't mess up now A aron

Phil WW

Jesus, over a third of us are baddies, that is a lot. Hopefully that means the chances of getting one lynched tonight are good. Only one or two posts have pinged for me so far but am sure a few more will as the day unfolds.

Katie WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Jesus, over a third of us are baddies, that is a lot. Hopefully that means the chances of getting one lynched tonight are good. Only one or two posts have pinged for me so far but am sure a few more will as the day unfolds.

Do tell us of these suspicious posts

Conor WW

Anyone have a list of all our anon accounts handy?

Abigail WW

gufc21 wrote: »

I get that but look at her post construction, short and concise sentances. Again its early and for some reason, wendy's posts are the only ones ive looked at. Obviously nothing damming but i am suspicious... maybe just paranoid

Oops; there's always three.

Nigel WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Well she's nice we have to lynch someone and I have to do what ever it is Abigail's do I suggest a Ffa but with a twist.
Do consider lynching Jake and Isla.
Do consider not lynching Nigel and Gertrude.
We should all state 4 players 2 that we suspect and 2 that we feel are appropriately trustworthy.

Why do you wanna lynch those? Sell me on them?

For what its worth Ive seen nothing yet to make any assumptions yet, I have my suspeciouns but tehy are very very light

Vernon WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Anyone have a list of all our anon accounts handy?

see #139

Phil WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Anyone have a list of all our anon accounts handy?

Abigail WW - 
Angus WW - 
Barbara WW - 
Brendan WW 
Clodagh WW - 
Conor WW - 
Derry WW - 
Doris WW - 
Eva WW - 
Ewan WW - 
Fiona WW - 
Frank WW - 
Gabriel WW - 
Gertrude WW - 
Henry WW - 
Holly WW - 
Isla WW - 
Jake WW - 
Katie WW - 
Liam WW - 
Mary WW - 
Nigel WW - 
Orla WW - 
Phil WW - 
Riona WW - 
Steve WW -
Tegan WW - 
Vernon WW - 
Wendy WW - 

Steve WW

Nigel WW51
Abigail WW41
Steve WW18
Mary WW18
Liam WW17
Wendy WW17
Gertrude WW17
Vernon WW16
WerewolfGM15
Jake WW13
Phil WW13
Isla WW13
Fiona WW8
Derry WW7
Frank WW7
Holly WW7
Ewan WW6
Conor WW6
Gabriel WW6
Clodagh WW6
Katie WW6
Riona WW5
Angus WW5
Henry WW3
Eva WW3
Tegan WW2
Doris WW

Phil WW

Alphebetised for your pleasure

Vernon WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Abigail WW - 
Angus WW - 
Barbara WW - 
Brendan WW 
Clodagh WW - 
Conor WW - 
Derry WW - 
Doris WW - 
Eva WW - 
Ewan WW - 
Fiona WW - 
Frank WW - 
Gabriel WW - 
Gertrude WW - 
Henry WW - 
Holly WW - 
Isla WW - 
Jake WW - 
Katie WW - 
Liam WW - 
Mary WW - 
Nigel WW - 
Orla WW - 
Phil WW - 
Riona WW - 
Steve WW -
Tegan WW - 
Vernon WW - 
Wendy WW - 

Removed the dead .

Abigail WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Why do you wanna lynch those? Sell me on them?

For what its worth Ive seen nothing yet to make any assumptions yet, I have my suspeciouns but tehy are very very light

I don't want to lynch anyone, but if we have to then it should, in my opinion, be either Jake or Isla. Conversely I believe that you and Gerty would be assets to the game even if you two are bad as your problem solving skills will root out baddies at this stage either way.

Steve WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

I don't want to lynch anyone, but if we have to then it should, in my opinion, be either Jake or Isla. Conversely I believe that you and Gerty would be assets to the game even if you two are bad as your problem solving skills will root out baddies at this stage either way.

Why jake and isla, what has them top of your list?

Nigel WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Jesus, over a third of us are baddies, that is a lot. Hopefully that means the chances of getting one lynched tonight are good. Only one or two posts have pinged for me so far but am sure a few more will as the day unfolds.

Anything you wish to share about the posts that pinged for you?

Abigail WW

Steve WW wrote: »

Why jake and isla, what has them top of your list?

First I think everyone should do the free for all then we can discuss the why's and wherefores.

Fiona WW

Steve WW wrote: »

The sk kills on day 2, correct? The snakey feckers have to compete for the privilege tomorrow to kill the following day i believe. This morning's kill was day 0? Maybe a MOD can clarify?

@mod

will the sk's first kill be tomorrow or wed (ignoring any possible speed event)

May have missed it in the op, does the sk kill at night or in the morning? If night id assume it would be tomorrow night.

Yeah if a mod could clarify that would be good because I don't understand the timings. The OP says ever second night, so I was assuming nights 2,4,6 but surely if last night (night 1? Night 0?!) counts then the SK gets a kill from tonight?

Steve WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

First I think everyone should do the free for all then we can discuss the why's and wherefores.

How can we do a ffa on the info we have atm? I mean a few people have yet to post even.

Phil WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Anything you wish to share about the posts that pinged for you?

One was Wendy's and one was Katie's. Big Phil only has eyes for the ladies so far. They were more mild tingles than red alerts and I want to see a bit more before I start jumping up and down about them.

Abigail WW

Steve WW wrote: »

How can we do a ffa on the info we have atm? I mean a few people have yet to post even.

Well what do you suggest? It's a fact that we have to lynch someone and I'm trying to bring up everyone's top two wolves and top two villagers. Otherwise we will simply be running around like headless 🐔.

Fiona WW

Liam WW wrote: »

Christ the spelling and grammar here will be brutal for the next few days without the edit :pac:

I don't understand this, surely it'll be the same as every other game because no one was allowed to edit before? Nothing has changed?

Steve WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Yeah if a mod could clarify that would be good because I don't understand the timings. The OP says ever second night, so I was assuming nights 2,4,6 but surely if last night (night 1? Night 0?!) counts then the SK gets a kill from tonight?

Ah if its every second night, it is tomorrow night so. Reading op better would have clarified this. It will take place after the lynch, irregardless of wether the sk is lynched or not. Last night was prelims, tonight is night 1, tomorrow night 2 and sk kill.

Katie WW

Phil WW wrote: »

One was Wendy's and one was Katie's. Big Phil only has eyes for the ladies so far. They were more mild tingles than red alerts and I want to see a bit more before I start jumping up and down about them.

Well you are wrong and did you just make an obvious role claim?

Abigail WW

Can the evil teams cross communicate in the back room ?

Abigail WW

Katie WW wrote: »

Well you are wrong and did you just make an obvious role claim?

🕷

Fiona WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Well she's nice we have to lynch someone and I have to do what ever it is Abigail's do I suggest a Ffa but with a twist.
Do consider lynching Jake and Isla.
Do consider not lynching Nigel and Gertrude.
We should all state 4 players 2 that we suspect and 2 that we feel are appropriately trustworthy.

I find anyone calling any player trustworthy at this early stage wolfy to be honest. Most people only have a handful of posts. I could understand thinking someone is bad, but thinking someone is good is strange.

Steve WW

Katie WW wrote: »

Well you are wrong and did you just make an obvious role claim?

Why do people have an obsession with highlighting possible good role claims for the wolves??

Tegan WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Well what do you suggest? It's a fact that we have to lynch someone and I'm trying to bring up everyone's top two wolves and top two villagers. Otherwise we will simply be running around like headless ðŸ”.

So far....

To follow the ffa idea

Phil is a wolf
Wendy is a wolf

Jake the Hake and isla the fisher queen may be wolves

Abigail is worth keeping around as village for now. So is nigel

So far.....

Katie WW

Steve WW wrote: »

Why do people have an obsession with highlighting possible good role claims for the wolves??

Why do people day one clearly go I am claiming this character. You would have to be completed clueless not to of seen that claim

Ewan WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Well she's nice we have to lynch someone and I have to do what ever it is Abigail's do I suggest a Ffa but with a twist.
Do consider lynching Jake and Isla.
Do consider not lynching Nigel and Gertrude.
We should all state 4 players 2 that we suspect and 2 that we feel are appropriately trustworthy.

How in God's name can I name someone who I think is appropriately trustworthy in this game? Especially at this early stage.

Abigail WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

I find anyone calling any player trustworthy at this early stage wolfy to be honest. Most people only have a handful of posts. I could understand thinking someone is bad, but thinking someone is good is strange.

Good and bad is largley irrelevant at this early stage, we effectively have 5 teams;
Sk1
Sk2
Marvel bad
Dc bad
Villagers

So the players that are contributing and solving the baddies are worth keeping around even if they are bad themselves. I clarified this with a later post.