WW XIV - Marvel & DC

Steve WW

Given the speed of holly's responses id be inclined to think that holly is definitely kilgrave though.... hmm

Mary WW

Eva WW wrote: »

Because it's better that Luke gets munched than a seer, vigilante, bodyguard, etc.

And if he doesn't get munched, then a seer won't waste a peek on him.

It's a leader for the village. A guaranteed villager is always a useful thing to have.

But then, I leave it up to Luke themselves to decide what to do.

Exactly Eva, not saying that Luke should out themselves but I think it outweighs the potential cons.

Holly WW

Steve WW wrote: »

Given the speed of holly's responses id be inclined to think that holly is definitely kilgrave though.... hmm

That or and its a big or someone has control of my account

Gertrude WW

Steve WW wrote: »

Given the speed of holly's responses id be inclined to think that holly is definitely kilgrave though.... hmm

You see my point. I'd prefer not to lynch you as I do believe you as much as I can without confirmation. If only there was a way - we need Luke to confirm you and I'd switch my vote I think.

Mary WW

Holly WW wrote: »

After the jessica claim???

Yeah, but after you said I Am Luke Cage ...

I think a few others said you might be being controlled. I was firmly in the you're Kilgrave camp.

Holly WW

Actually I take it back lynch me for the craic

Eva WW

Jake has gone very quiet recently. Maybe hard for Kilgrave to keep posts up for both him and Holly.

Doris WW

Mary WW wrote: »

So you don't think there is merit to having a villager lynched to ensure a serial killer is dead?

Also do you think that any merit to having a confirmed NRV out now?

No, I understand why Jessica is doing what she is doing.

Luke confirming himself makes him easy bait for morning munch , particularly if wolves aren't sure who to eat . . I find the second outing more of a concern, how much can Luke do tonight to help the village ?

Holly WW

Mary WW wrote: »

Yeah, but after you said I Am Luke Cage ...

I think a few others said you might be being controlled. I was firmly in the you're Kilgrave camp.

Ya after Kilgrave was ****ed due to stuff..... If what steve says is true...

My money is on Haley, Mistique or Hulk.

Hope its hulk and the games over then im back to mafia universe

Mary WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

You see my point. I'd prefer not to lynch you as I do believe you as much as I can without confirmation. If only there was a way - we need Luke to confirm you and I'd switch my vote I think.

I'm getting pretty close to switching myself but not there yet. I'm convinced Steve is telling the truth, but I'm not definite Holly is Kilgrave. I'd be pretty confident but not definite.

Steve WW

Holly WW wrote: »

That or and its a big or someone has control of my account

Thats an or i would not believe tbh. It would make a player reduntant and be against the spirit of the game

Holly WW

I'll ask in the backroom if they will munch luke if he come out 2 ticks.

Wendy WW

Doris WW wrote: »

No, I understand why Jessica is doing what she is doing.

Luke confirming himself makes him easy bait for morning munch , particularly if wolves aren't sure who to eat . . I find the second outing more of a concern, how much can Luke do tonight to help the village ?

we shouldnt be talking about luke outtig himself. if steve is being truthful, he is clearly in a backroom now with luke - and luke has decided to remain quiet.

Frank WW

I think we are better going for the confirmed kill on killgrove through a steve lynch rather than risk messing up and losing out but i do see the appeal for holly but it just seems she is trying so hard and it could be a bluff

Liam WW

Let me get this right, can Luke not peek Steve and talk together without the rest of us knowing.

Mary WW

Doris WW wrote: »

No, I understand why Jessica is doing what she is doing.

Luke confirming himself makes him easy bait for morning munch , particularly if wolves aren't sure who to eat . . I find the second outing more of a concern, how much can Luke do tonight to help the village ?

But why include both saying the village is poxy? It's good to challenge the idea but calling the village poxy for trying to come up with something that might help us isn't very constructive.

Gertrude WW

You know what - screw it. I'm a gambler at heart. Let's switch off Steve and lynch Holly.

Steve WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

we shouldnt be talking about luke outtig himself. if steve is being truthful, he is clearly in a backroom now with luke - and luke has decided to remain quiet.

Im not and he hasn't. Or at least hasnt said it in a backroom im not in

Isla WW

Doris WW wrote: »

No, I understand why Jessica is doing what she is doing.

Luke confirming himself makes him easy bait for morning munch , particularly if wolves aren't sure who to eat . . I find the second outing more of a concern, how much can Luke do tonight to help the village ?

Hang on, we do have a bodyguard don't we? Couldn't Luke come out and then let Capn America protect him overnight? That way he's safe for 2 nights? The wolves would be nuts to go for him if he was being protected.

Mary WW

Holly WW wrote: »

Actually I take it back lynch me for the craic

Trying to double bluff maybe? I'm probably going to stick with Steve to lynch anyway.

Steve WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

You know what - screw it. I'm a gambler at heart. Let's switch off Steve and lynch Holly.

Its exactly what i said to myself when i said **** it ill vote

Nigel WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Well I wouldn't say I'm strongly opposed, I'm just not so sure the pros outweigh the cons like Frank has described. If Luke wants to reveal on thread than that's obviously his call.

It his call, like steve. If he feels its worth it, then he should go for it

Eva WW

Liam WW wrote: »

Let me get this right, can Luke not peek Steve and talk together without the rest of us knowing.

Nope. Luke can peek Steve.

Steve WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Hang on, we do have a bodyguard don't we? Couldn't Luke come out and then let Capn America protect him overnight? That way he's safe for 2 nights? The wolves would be nuts to go for him if he was being protected.

And have a body guard protect an nrv the wolves wont kill because hes no danger to them? Hmmm, suspicious

Gertrude WW

Mary WW wrote: »

Trying to double bluff maybe? I'm probably going to stick with Steve to lynch anyway.

If we can get enough agreement I'm on for taking the punt on Holly.

Mary WW

Steve WW wrote: »

And have a body guard protect an nrv the wolves wont kill because hes no danger to them? Hmmm, suspicious

Well it gives the option of Captain protecting him. Wolves own't know if he's under protection or not. Another point for Luke coming out if you ask me.

Mary WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

If we can get enough agreement I'm on for taking the punt on Holly.

I'm usually not a gambler Gertrude but I could be persuaded.

Steve WW

I f u think its worth taking the punt do. You dont need a mass siwtch cause if i die kilgrave will anyway so its no matter if i do. The votes will be split between the 2

Doris WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I'm getting pretty close to switching myself but not there yet. I'm convinced Steve is telling the truth, but I'm not definite Holly is Kilgrave. I'd be pretty confident but not definite.

If we don't lynch Steve, how do we know he is Jessica ?

Not to be making conspiracys, but wouldn't it be a savagely bold, but wonderful con, for the wolves to pretend to be Jessica prepared to sacrifice themselves to kill a baddy . .Then for them to spend a day building up the Lynch and the credibility of "their Jessica" .. Everybody is convinced Steve is Jessica . .

Then for at the late hour, start a strategy to focus on a different target. . The hope would be that Steve gets off and is trusted as a villager so his word would be strong. . Meanwhile, Jessica and/or Luke out themselves to protect the village or the village trusts Steve.

If Steve isn't lynched he has to be viewed by the seer. Is there any bad character that can hide themselves from the Seer ?

Wendy WW

i would take the punt on holly also