United People, It's Time For Ruddy Change!

eldamo

L1011 wrote: »

There is meant to be. It also expires and I don't think you can go straight back to JS because you were self employed.

His next enquiry in the making.

washiskin

He must be beside himself this morning. The Journal has an article about Jobpath and he has posted 3 lengthy replies in 20 minutes. He must have the whole day mapped out on the back of this opportunity of not being media ignored. :rolleyes:

whippet

He in full election mode .. getting lovely and fluffy about Sinn Fein ... must be a few transfers there ?

Seth Brundle

whippet wrote: »

He in full election mode .. getting lovely and fluffy about Sinn Fein ... must be a few transfers there ?

Anyone want to guess the excuse he will use for pulling out of this election?

JohnnyFlash

Seth Brundle wrote: »

Anyone want to guess the excuse he will use for pulling out of this election?

Media ignored.

whippet

Seth Brundle wrote: »

Anyone want to guess the excuse he will use for pulling out of this election?

Everyone else has loads of money for posters ... ninja attacks to his house ... Regina Doherty breaking in to the gaf and switching cables on the computer... sudden illness which clears up just in time to abuse the eventual winners ... take your pick

whippet

His first day on the canvas was a huge success ... himself and Alistar spent the day talking to the electorate in south Louth ... interstingly everyone he spoke to brought up all this issue that Jeff has been talking about ... he really is on point with this campaign.

The addition of a Bluetooth headset was a master stroke .. it’s multitaking .. keeping his hands free to distribute leaflets while keeping the wheels of commerce turning

padd b1975

That lad could be mass contacted (sic) at all hours of the day or night remember!

whippet

padd b1975 wrote: »

That lad could be mass contacted (sic) at all hours of the day or night remember!

It’s not as if he is busy with work

humberklog

Jeff's on message...




I'm stubborn however, when it comes to these things. One or two steps forward out of ten tried and eight failed, is still forward progress. Next attempt again, another few steps forward. Chip, chip, away at the problem with possible solution attempts.



(That's from a recent FB post.)

furiousox

No response from Jeff yet to my earlier question regarding him claiming jobseekers allowance.

I must say I'm...surprised and disappointed. :rolleyes:

After all, this is someone who constantly demands greater transparency and accountability from our election candidates.

whippet

humberklog wrote: »

Jeff's on message...




I'm stubborn however, when it comes to these things. One or two steps forward out of ten tried and eight failed, is still forward progress. Next attempt again, another few steps forward. Chip, chip, away at the problem with possible solution attempts.



(That's from a recent FB post.)

The problem with that mentality Jeff is that everyone else passes you by.

10 years ago you went for local election first .. in the intervening years you have spent most of the time doing nothing for your constituents.. only in the last couple of years did you actually follow through on something - a crusade against jobpath. Yes you might think this has been a success but in reality this just resonates with a small cohort of people who are quite happy to stay away from legitimate work.

Some of your local supporters I know through various sources and I know for a fact that there problem with Jobpath is that meetings are usually scheduled for a weekday during working hours when they are working cash in hand and they can’t take time off work.

These people tend not to vote

Topgear on Dave

Just watching fertility shock on rte1, lots of talk of the cost of kids and childcare. Heavy stuff.

What are Jeff's policies on this?

eldamo

Topgear on Dave wrote: »

Just watching fertility shock on rte1, lots of talk of the cost of kids and childcare. Heavy stuff.

What are Jeff's policies on this?

As with his own multitude of offspring, hope someone else foots the bill.

Seems to be working spiffingly thus far.

padd b1975

Just noticed I've been blocked for "legal defamation".

For the record, all I asked was how many degrees he had and pointed out (not unreasonably I thought) that it was odd that someone so well qualified had been unemployed for so long.

derfderf

padd b1975 wrote: »

Just noticed I've been blocked for "legal defamation".

For the record, all I asked was how many degrees he had and pointed out (not unreasonably I thought) that it was odd that someone so well qualified had been unemployed for so long.

Poetic justice :pac. He was banned from boards for claiming legal defamation (or something similar).

Seth Brundle

Is legal defamation allowed under legal law?

humberklog

I see that someone has let him know that he was getting criticised on a Drogheda news FB page. I've glanced over the papers' pages I know but can't find anything.

Anyone see it? Maybe they're referring to the article from a few months ago.

washiskin

humberklog wrote: »

I see that someone has let him know that he was getting criticised on a Drogheda news FB page. I've glanced over the papers' pages I know but can't find anything.

Anyone see it? Maybe they're referring to the article from a few months ago.

But did someone really call him? It's not beneath his nibs to invent some fictional phone call or concerned citizen......kind of like the man with two pints Enda referred to, ironically.
:rolleyes:

whippet

I’ve been blocked from all channels of asking he simple questions ... if he’s knocking around west street this weekend with his election gear I can probably ask some questions .. if I actually feel arsed

padd b1975

All the usual conspiracy theory headbangers have weighed in now.

I think I've managed to make them even more paranoid.

padd b1975

Seth Brundle wrote: »

Is legal defamation allowed under legal law?

Ironically enough my taxes will be paying for that barely literate charlatan's legal aid, that's if he can find a crackpot ambulance chaser as dumb as himself to take on the case.



Hi Jeff xx.

I know you're reading this.

padd b1975

derfderf wrote: »

Poetic justice :pac. He was banned from boards for claiming legal defamation (or something similar).

It was only my second ever post!

TheAnalyst_

Where is this now. I do love to see him having to directly confront his nonsense.

padd b1975

TheAnalyst_ wrote: »

Where is this now. I do love to see him having to directly confront his nonsense.

He's deleted it now.
It was a comment on a boastful post about all his degrees and various other qualifications.
I'm pretty certain I was the only one to veer off message.

washiskin

Yeah, but it has been noted. :rolleyes:

TheAnalyst_

I'd dearly like to be actual friends with him but I know it would last days. His group page was great as anyone could comment so it was promptly abandoned after a week.

derfderf

padd b1975 wrote: »

It was only my second ever post!

Jeff doesn't like the hard questions like "is that actually true?"

whippet

he seems to be sharing none of Gemma O'Doherty's stuff these days - she had a big meeting in Ashbourne last night (only up the road from Jeff) but he didn't seem to mention anything about this.

It wasn't long ago that he was trying to get a room organised in drogheda for Gemma's presidential campaign and was running around with the other anti-corruption groups that operate out of facebook.

Ashbourne may only be up the road objectively speaking, but to Jeff it's a million miles away from his shed and the warmth of his computer monitors.