what would happen if suddenly there was no males ,only females

The Fake Sheikh

The Fake Sheikh wrote: »

Why do so many think there would be no wars?

Wars are usually fought over resources, so in theory, there would still be wars.
But far fewer and more prolonged due to the fact that women generally don't admit defeat.

fatknacker

fatknacker wrote: »

Yet, a lot of women took up 'male' jobs during wartime and proved be quite capable.

Yeah....those brave souls who took up manufacturing while those damn men swanned off on their jollies abroad.

Avatar MIA

Deleted User wrote: »

Yeah....those brave souls who took up manufacturing while those damn men swanned off on their jollies abroad.

You REALLY need to spend less time on Boards and more time reading a history book or two.

Avatar MIA

Avatar MIA wrote: »

You REALLY need to spend less time on Boards and more time reading a history book or two.

You can tell that from a glib post? I'll keep it in mind. Your opinion is important to me, please hold the line for my next available operator.

Avatar MIA

Deleted User wrote: »

You can tell that from a glib post? I'll keep it in mind. Your opinion is important to me, please hold the line for my next available operator.

My opinion was important enough to warrant your reply.

If your statement was a genuinely held view then it was enough to warrant the response it got.

But, if it was meant as a joke, apologies.

Avatar MIA

Avatar MIA wrote: »

My opinion was important enough to warrant your reply.

If your statement was a genuinely held view then it was enough to warrant the response it got.

But, if it was meant as a joke, apologies.

You always need to remember that this AH on Boards, so the answers are either;
A, serious (a rare occurrence)
B, sarcastic (less common)
C, not serious (most likely)

This forum is full of C's, for some of the answers the C has different meanings! :P

bmwguy

Nothing would get done in the world of work. They wouldn't have the balls to make a big decision. I have worked with loads of males and females and i have yet to meet a female with as much drive and the guts to make the decisions men do every day.
That's why they aren't in as many management positions as men. No other reason.
That's why there is a pay discrepancy that is so topical now, not some made up discrimination they like to throw about.

silverharp

they should do one of those survival shows and put the men on one island and the women on another and see who does better

corner of hells

The Fake Sheikh wrote: »

Why do so many think there would be no wars?

Reasons for no wars.

"I'm not wearing that uniform, I don't like it"

"That coporal was mean to me "

"I can't be seen in a tank"

"That hat will mess my hair "

Rinse , repeat and vary the programs.

fatknacker

Deleted User wrote: »

Yeah....those brave souls who took up manufacturing while those damn men swanned off on their jollies abroad.

That's deadly but nothing to do with this thread or what I said.

Burial.

fatknacker wrote: »

Yet, a lot of women took up 'male' jobs during wartime and proved be quite capable.

And let's not forget:
"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." - Hillary Clinton.

fatknacker

Burial. wrote: »

And let's not forget:
"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." - Hillary Clinton.

Again, replying to something I didn't say. This was about women being able to do manual labour when the men left. It's not a "whose a bigger victim" thread.

It's as irrelevant as me posting:

"Grab them by the pussy" -Donald J Trump

Cubik

Burial. wrote: »

And let's not forget:
"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." - Hillary Clinton.

Strange thing for her to say. The primary victims of war are those killed surely.

Tell me how

fatknacker wrote:

Again, replying to something I didn't say. This was about women being able to do manual labour when the men left. It's not a "whose a bigger victim" thread.

I think people read your post as implying women stepped up to the plate but discounted the fact the reason they had to so was because men were away fighting.

Tell me how

Cubik wrote:

Strange thing for her to say. The primary victims of war are those killed surely.

That's the irony of her comment and why it was posted here.

Burial.

Cubik wrote: »

Strange thing for her to say. The primary victims of war are those killed surely.

Yeah tis like saying men are the primary victims of rape, it happens to their wives, mothers and daughters.

America dodged a bullet better than Neo.

Ken.

Mod-Ladies and gents, come on ta fück. This is a light hearted thread that I am enjoying. Don't make me mod it.

Ken.

corner of hells wrote: »

Reasons for no wars.

"I'm not wearing that uniform, I don't like it"

"That coporal was mean to me "

"I can't be seen in a tank"

"That hat will mess my hair "

Rinse , repeat and vary the programs.

You forgot

"I'm not going out there she's wearing the same thing as me"

fatknacker

Tell me how wrote: »

I think people read your post as implying women stepped up to the plate but discounted the fact the reason they had to so was because men were away fighting.

No it's a thread about women being able to survive without men, many preceding posts stated none would be capable of doing certain jobs. My post was reminding that many were deemed capable during wartimes. If that was interpreted as a victims competition on who had if worse during war, then...meh. Can't be arsed.

jamesthepeach

RayM wrote: »

There would be fewer road deaths. Also, you'd be able to make minor factual inaccuracies on the internet without anyone immediately jumping in and saying "well, actually..."

The amount of dents in cars and car park prangs would skyrocket though.

corner of hells

corner of hells wrote: »

Reasons for no wars.

"I'm not wearing that uniform, I don't like it"

"That coporal was mean to me "

"I can't be seen in a tank"

"That hat will mess my hair "

Rinse , repeat and vary the programs.

What if woman A insults the hat of woman B? War is a definite certainty IMO....

Yamanoto

It'd debunk the oft-expressed guff that if women ran the world, it'd be a utopia of flower meadows & kittens

fergiesfolly

Garden sheds would stand as monuments to a lost civilization.
Empty, unused and no one knowing what they were for...." Some say the ancients would just stand alone in there for hours, practicing some mystical art known as DIY"

Mutant z

we would die off as a species through a lack of reproduction rates.

jimmycrackcorm

kbannon wrote:

There would be chaos in every car park!

Reversing into a parking spot would be banned.

Facebook would introduce a big button to automatically post a reply "aw are you alright hun"

Tesla would be famous for long lasting vibrators instead of cars.

Cubik

bmwguy wrote: »

Nothing would get done in the world of work. They wouldn't have the balls to make a big decision. I have worked with loads of males and females and i have yet to meet a female with as much drive and the guts to make the decisions men do every day.
That's why they aren't in as many management positions as men. No other reason.
That's why there is a pay discrepancy that is so topical now, not some made up discrimination they like to throw about.

That's not my own experience at all. The capability in that regard between men and women has always been 50/50 from what I've observed. Currently I work in an operation led by two women and they are constantly having to make very risky decisions but don't need any hand-holding.

I do think confirmation bias and over-focus on gender can come into play in these discussions. Whereas a lot of people just don't think about the sex of the person and they just see a professional.

Then again, it could be different for different industries. I do agree the gender pay gap is a myth.

As for engineering etc being doomed, how do people know this? If women were left to their own devices, they'd just have to do it.

It's like saying there would be nobody nursed to health or hardly any teachers if there were just men and no women. Men would just have to do those jobs though.

corner of hells

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

kbannon wrote:

There would be chaos in every car park!

Reversing into a parking spot would be banned.

Facebook would introduce a big button to automatically post a reply "aw are you alright hun"

Tesla would be famous for long lasting vibrators instead of cars.

Parallel parking would be a mythical concept similar to an invitation to the Mods Christmas party.

Brett Purple Cheesecake

Brett Purple Cheesecake wrote: »

What???

:rolleyes:

Perfectly legitimate thread, especially considering your disdain for people posting threads on topics that have been done before.

Neames

Everything would be "fabulous" most of the time.

And when things aren't "fabulous", other women would ask "you alright hun?"

fergiesfolly

You'd wonder how different the world would be without men.
People keep going on about the war aspect, but what about space exploration, the internet, television and all the other areas that males would have more interest in.
I could see us being more advanced medically in a female dominant world, because women would have a more empathetic, caring outlook and would push for more advances in those fields.

Anyway just a thought...

fergiesfolly

fergiesfolly wrote: »

Garden sheds would stand as monuments to a lost civilization.
Empty, unused and no one knowing what they were for...." Some say the ancients would just stand alone in there for hours, practicing some mystical art known as DIY"

Museum exhibits would include such curiosities as the '21st Century Paint-Stirring Stick', and 'Boot-Cut, High-Waisted, Middle-Aged-Man Jeans'.

cold hands

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexmission
This is an approximation of what it would look like. Old, but classis. Cannot paste liks yet

Smurfette principle

There would be no wars anymore but intense negotiations every 28 days

Cody montana

Lez fest!

fergiesfolly

Candie wrote: »

Museum exhibits would include such curiosities as the '21st Century Paint-Stirring Stick', and 'Boot-Cut, High-Waisted, Middle-Aged-Man Jeans'.

I have both of those.
Fúck. My daughter was right. I am a museum piece.

troyzer

badabing106 wrote: »

and society had to be reorganized.  Making new babies ( only female ) is not a problem due to medical advancements.  what would the world look a generation from now? would it be much different?  Would there be less wars?

Nope:

https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21722877-european-history-answer-queens-especially-married-ones-who-gets-more-wars-kings

Badly Drunk Boy

silverharp wrote: »

they should do one of those survival shows and put the men on one island and the women on another and see who does better

Have you watched the YouTube clip on Post #89? (Turn on the subtitles.)

SuperS54

Carbon omissions would plummet during the summer months as office women everywhere finally got to completely turn off the air conditioning, followed by a winter disaster of carbonic proportions as overworkered boilers strain to maintain at least 40°C.

silverharp

Badly Drunk Boy wrote: »

Have you watched the YouTube clip on Post #89? (Turn on the subtitles.)

very good thanks! , what I expected :pac:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw

corner of hells

Farts would not be seen as hilarious.

corner of hells

corner of hells wrote: »

Farts would not be seen as hilarious.

lots of cats being blamed instead!

Alcoheda

munster87 wrote: »

Everything in the world would be washed and ironed and there would be a fine supply of sandwiches

If a woman makes a sandwich in the forest and no man is there to eat it, does it make a taste?

Cubik

silverharp wrote: »

very good thanks! , what I expected :pac:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw

You're delighted.

Pictures Of Lilly

badabing106 wrote: »

and society had to be reorganized. Making new babies ( only female ) is not a problem due to medical advancements. what would the world look a generation from now? would it be much different? Would there be less wars?

Well all of the inventions and discoveries have kind of been made at this stage, so there's no real need for men.

About half of women would become teachers and divide up the time to get yet more holidays. The other half would go into HR, but there'd be nothing to hire for!! They'd also have to start wolf whistling at each other for the need of something to complain about.

Just goes to show, this is a women's World, but it would be nothing, nothing without a man or a boy!

johnayo

huge increase in natural yogurt sales to cope with all those yeast infections......
I'll get my coat.....:pac:

silverharp

Cubik wrote: »

You're delighted.

no, surprised it got aired though, would have thought the fem collective would have had the show canned. as it goes against the whole women fish bicycle thing

stateofflux

there would be world war 3. started by the line 'the state of her in that dress'

Giving people the stink-eye would be a crime.

thedebatelad

What sort of evil dictator would create a world like that in all honesty? Lets be practical

Roadtoad

A whole new lexicon will be needed , starting with the drivers seat of an aeroplane, then tackling all those male and female threads in the plumbing trade.