Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

High End Frame? Creaky BB? Have a look....

Options

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    CaoimH_in
    Registered Users Posts: 945 ✭✭✭CaoimH_in


    So we're to believe HongFu/DengFu is a better bicycle manufacturer than Cervelo, Boardman, or Cannondale? What was the sample size? As a fan of Look bikes I should feel delighted, but I'm really just confused...


  • Options
    #3
    Lumen
    Registered Users Posts: 31,084 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    CaoimH_in wrote: »
    So we're to believe HongFu/DengFu is a better bicycle manufacturer than Cervelo, Boardman, or Cannondale?
    Why would you hold an opinion one way or another, without evidence?


  • Options
    #4
    CaoimH_in
    Registered Users Posts: 945 ✭✭✭CaoimH_in


    Lumen wrote: »
    Why would you hold an opinion one way or another, without evidence?

    I don't have an opinion, I asked a question. I'm not quite sure what you're driving at.


  • Options
    #5
    koutoubia
    Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭koutoubia


    CaoimH_in wrote: »
    What was the sample size?.
    SAmple size as in the amount of frames used? He says in the comments it was 200.


  • Options
    #6
    CaoimH_in
    Registered Users Posts: 945 ✭✭✭CaoimH_in


    Guy in that video wrote: »
    minimum 12 of each, On Cannondale it was 34, on Boardman it was 48. Unfortunately my local bike shop is not a trek supplier otherwise I would have added them

    Ah, well to be fair that could account for some level of deviation between bike manufacturers. I doubt many LBS have that many Time or Look bikes around.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    Lumen
    Registered Users Posts: 31,084 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    CaoimH_in wrote: »
    I don't have an opinion, I asked a question. I'm not quite sure what you're driving at.
    Ah right, OK. Well I guess the assertion is only that they tend to have better fitting bottom brackets.

    It's a very bold claim though. I'd like to know how the samples were selected.


Advertisement