Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Werewolf XVI - Star Trek
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Sorry about this. It's the only way for me to collate one persons post when I'm on the phone. Haven't analysed these yet.grumpylumpy wrote: »In true grumpy fashion I'm arriving a day late. And refusing to read back through 700 posts. I'll keep up from here on though. I see we already lost a goody
Anyone want to catch me up? Are we all just voting where we see fit or is there any organisation ffa/racing?grumpylumpy wrote: »Morning fellers. Modulators spanked me something rotten for not voting. I've no good reason. I'm disorganised and I fell asleep. Pter does not hold back.
Who's targetting the low poster? Come at me bros
Also I think it needs saying the I love Uriel; everything about him from his flowing armpit hair to his very reasonable johnson just rubs me up the right way. Ladies, amirite?grumpylumpy wrote: »Flushy, for use of the term "m8"grumpylumpy wrote: »I'm not caught up, just had a scan, not gonna have a chance to catch up before 6 with work so looking with fresh eyes lets say.
In all seriousness though, I think MrsFD doth protest too much
And i CANT BELIEVE there was support for no lynch. Really not sure how I feel about it. I'd say there's at least one wolf in there. If they were smart they'd make sure not to bandwagon on it. Wouldn't be surprised at all if one or two committed to it cos it seemed like a good idea at the time, and then couldn't back downgrumpylumpy wrote: »And yet addressed nothing in her last post.
Curiouser and curiouser.
What about you Patrick, who you been accusing?grumpylumpy wrote: »Lads I'm just not going to read back, I'm too lazy and I'm in work trying to look busy. Anyone want to tell me why everyone jumped on Mick?
I think whoever said we've a 1 in 3 chance racing the no lynch vote peeps make a good point. I don't think 3 wolves would be dumb enough to bandwagon on that but I'm willing to bet at least one of them jumped on it and then couldn't back down when it started looking suss.
I do not understand drumpot's vote for no lynch at all. Not to say its condemning but I just can't see the reasoning.grumpylumpy wrote: »Personally I was thinking that at least one wolf jumped on the no vote and couldn't backtract so we've got the 1 in 3 chance
However laid out like this it seems incredibly stupid. They know who they are. They could easily cleverly split the vote on a villager to appear not to be suspicious, but guarantee one less goodiegrumpylumpy wrote: »Someone asked who I suspect so far
tbh I have very few opinions atm but what's stood out:
If Vale was Q I think he'd be more likely in here throwing around accusations than just being odd
MrsFD has been posting fluff and of the no lynch voters i'd have her as most likely to be bad
I didn't care for Sully's "I have my reasons" comment. Sounds like she's hinting at being a roled villager which reads wolfy to megrumpylumpy wrote: »Also necro seems to be flailing a bit... crossed my mind he might be an over enthusiastic wolf who backed himself into a corner and is now trying to get out without being too obvious. But I'm happy to let him and P* have their own p*ssing contest over thisgrumpylumpy wrote: »That would be pretty smart. Maybe we're giving them too much credit though
grumpylumpy wrote: »Ahh here, I'm posting away, much to the disgrace of my team at work!grumpylumpy wrote: »To be fair, she's odd by defaultgrumpylumpy wrote: »Oooooooh snapgrumpylumpy wrote: »Did he ever say on thread he was in bits though?grumpylumpy wrote: »Yep, and it was said with certainty.
Oops!
That's going on the FFAgrumpylumpy wrote: »There's assuming and there's stating fact though. There was no "I can only assume jay's still in bits having been to EP myself before"grumpylumpy wrote: »All this confusion about Sully, and she said herself she was pushing to shoot PJ thinking he was Q. Could Sully not be Q? Is this not a pretty good way to get lynched? Push the accusation on someone else and strongly oppose a role claim that we can't refute with "i have my reasons" and general wolfy behaviour?grumpylumpy wrote: »Oh Jay had this theory already? I thought I was so clevergrumpylumpy wrote: »I think Sully's behaviour has her as the front runner for Q. I'd be inclined to leave her be, but if she's in to be lynched, I'd go ahead and shoot her so we a) don't lose the game to her and b) stand a chance of lynching a wolf.
I had a vote in for her earlier based on her being evasive. Gonna read back and do an FFA for my vote switchgrumpylumpy wrote: »I would like to say at this point that as in my previous post, LETS NEITHER LYNCH NOR SHOOT HER but at the very least not lynch the best Q candidate for now.
I'd be almost certain she's not a wolf. No wolf would act that shadygrumpylumpy wrote: »I'm saying stuff Necro! Let's talk. Or maybe let's have you look at my posts and then let's talk.
I do talk some serious ****e thoughgrumpylumpy wrote: »Okay Necro, did some quoting but by all means don't trust my word alone.
I can go through it, MrsFD was active when I got on this morning and i did think she was being shady. Posted a bunch of fluff in quick succession and then quietened down. I then had to leave the bridge or somesuch star trek reference that indicates i wasn't online.
When I came back the BJ thing was going down. And I'm still totally on that and my suspicions are extremely high there but i haven't mentioned it since cos I'm not sure if its against the rules. This will be informing my FFA if not against the rules.
This was me saying I *didn't* think Vale was Q, to clarify
Also pre-MrsFD's reveal. Which I'm inclined to believe due to a) it being a weird thing for a NRV to do, b) it being a weird thing for a wolf to do and c) no counter claims
Yeah I wasn't committed to this. Still not
Where I stand right now:
- Let's not munch Sully, let's not waste our bullet on her either
- If we're allowed to use it in our reasoning my ffa is not an ffa, lynch beakerjoe for the slip up earlier. Failing that Jay. I have no other evidence against them but i think that was a monumental wolfy F*** upgrumpylumpy wrote: »Right, now, beliving you are who you say you are, I have to back down from my BJ/Jayop theory, or assume Jayop is queen. I'm thinking the lattergrumpylumpy wrote: »I don't think sully knew the vig would come out. But If she's Q, throwing herself at accusing a role claim that we're all able to accept or at least entertain is a good way to go about being lynched
Reasons, sully? Let's have emgrumpylumpy wrote: »I actually don't understand this. But I reappeared on the bridge after ending my other duties at 16:30 +1 star-hour + reading thread.... I'm really trying with the star trek stuffgrumpylumpy wrote: »Unless you're both wolves and Jayop is your queen showing goodgrumpylumpy wrote: »Necro what exactly is it about me? That I've not been consistent?grumpylumpy wrote: »I wasn't called out during any of my other posting bursts (although brief) today. And it's downtime on the starship thingy, I have lots of time for lots of postinggrumpylumpy wrote: »I may be going for some space grogg also. So in line with what I said earlier i'm putting in my vote for BJ now. Gonna try to keep on mobile...space-cell...grumpylumpy wrote: »#FFA2
1. BJ - slip up
2.Jayop - involvement in slip up and I'm ready to think of him as the queen
3. Got nothing, fully invested in the above theorygrumpylumpy wrote: »Absolutely no good reason. Forgot about the game and went to sleep. Didn't post either except to say higrumpylumpy wrote: »Sorry if this is out of character, no idea how to trekky it upgrumpylumpy wrote: »Fine with me Jay, you and your wolf buddies can munch me for it in the morninggrumpylumpy wrote: »Me too buddy!grumpylumpy wrote: »That was earlier on today
I only posted once yesterday and then got modu-spankedgrumpylumpy wrote: »You could read it that way, or that I didn't read the entire first day and a half. Not the best team player with that I realise. I stated twice that I didn't and wouldn't. I didn't and won't. I think my thought process over the course of the day today was spelled out pretty nicely during my conversation with necro. After Flushies reveal about the seer peeks I decided to stick with my guns cos its the best I've got. I could throw somone else in but I don't have anyone really setting off alarms that I can stand behind. Soz bbzgrumpylumpy wrote: »Never underestimate my ability to be a dumbassgrumpylumpy wrote: »SEE?!grumpylumpy wrote: »I'm not especially suss of you Digi, but seeing as we've the whole genie in a bottle thing being pinned on me, are you not just kind of lurking and popping out of the woodwork when you're mentioned?
Food for thought, I've nothing else on yougrumpylumpy wrote: »Can y'all shut up while I read 600 posts. Please and thank you0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
Digital Solitude wrote: »Are they?
Hmmmm... on the face of it maybe not. I missed the latter part at first glance.
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
Advertisement