Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Wind Warning for Dublin, Wexford, Wicklow, Galway, Clare, Cork, Kerry, Limerick and W

Options
124

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    Liverpool TAF:
    TAF AMD EGGP 122142Z 1221/1318 16018G30KT 9999 SCT025
    TEMPO 1221/1318 4000 SHRA BKN012
    BECMG 1222/1301 27030G45KT
    PROB40 TEMPO 1222/1303 24040G60KT
    BECMG 1303/1306 27025G35KT
    BECMG 1308/1311 27015G25KT
    BECMG 1315/1318 27010KT


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭mickger844posts


    63km/h now the Max gust here in Waterford City
    Pressure min was 989mb but is rising now to a current 993mb
    www.waterfordweather.com
    www.waterfordcityweather.com


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭George Sunsnow


    It's only got noticeably windy here in the Arklow area in the last half hour or so


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 240 ✭✭fraxinus1


    Met Eireann forecast downgraded significantly. The whole thing has been a farce. Forget about the UK, before the name Aileen was used, the met eireann forecast was mentioning severe winds. Barely a gale. This kind of hype is what allows the media to exaggerate and run incorrect stories about weather events.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,177 ✭✭✭pad199207


    Bottomed out at 987mb here


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    fraxinus1 wrote: »
    Met Eireann forecast downgraded significantly. The whole thing has been a farce. Forget about the UK, before the name Aileen was used, the met eireann forecast was mentioning severe winds. Barely a gale. This kind of hype is what allows the media to exaggerate and run incorrect stories about weather events.

    Didn't take long for this kind of post to pop up! Where was your meteorological expertise reading the charts yesterday when the wind warning was issued?

    It's so easy for posters to come on here when a marginal forecast ends up being incorrect and give it all the "hype" nonsense, but they rarely want to stick their necks out and actually make some predictions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,907 ✭✭✭✭Kristopherus


    fraxinus1 wrote: »
    Met Eireann forecast downgraded significantly. The whole thing has been a farce. Forget about the UK, before the name Aileen was used, the met eireann forecast was mentioning severe winds. Barely a gale. This kind of hype is what allows the media to exaggerate and run incorrect stories about weather events.

    Well, all day the Beeb forecasts were mentioning windy condtions hitting North Wales and NW England. Those winds could only come from here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Didn't take long for this kind of post to pop up! Where was your meteorological expertise reading the charts yesterday when the wind warning was issued?

    It's so easy for posters to come on here when a marginal forecast ends up being incorrect and give it all the "hype" nonsense, but they rarely want to stick their necks out and actually make some predictions.

    They could be accused of egotism if they did...


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    They could be accused of egotism if they did...

    That weren't me!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,505 ✭✭✭✭Xenji


    It will be interesting to see the max gust here today, Mace Head recorded 103 km/hr on Sunday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭Oscar Bravo


    hilarious intro to the late night forecast on Radio1, over to pat clarke in met eireann (silence, followed by the sound of a door opening and someone running into a room) "im here", pat your on air lol


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,915 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Well, all day the Beeb forecasts were mentioning windy condtions hitting North Wales and NW England. Those winds could only come from here.

    The winds might have passed Ireland but just now according to ME the depression is heading into the Irish Sea and depeening rapidly which is where the UK will get this storm


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,944 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    The storm was named due to the impact on the U.K., a yellow warning here isn't enough to cause it to be a warning but ya nothing at all in Carlow really.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,944 ✭✭✭✭Villain




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,169 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Forecast gusts didn't occur in Liverpool or Manchester either.

    Did the system shift alot?


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 17,917 Mod ✭✭✭✭DOCARCH


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    Forecast gusts didn't occur in Liverpool or Manchester either.

    Did the system shift alot?

    Looks like it was a little further south than expected.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Top gust of just 34mph from "Storm" Aileen.
    Sunday's top gust was 48mph and Monday's was 38mph.
    Recorded at standard 10 metre height.

    I know we're pretty sheltered here in South Laois right on the Kilkenny border, but these "warnings" are going to be ignored if they are being used to warn about ~20mph winds with ~40mph gusts.

    There seems to be a growing culture of exaggerating these standard wind events... I could give my thinking on this, but I'll spare it for the CT forum.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Danno wrote: »
    Top gust of just 34mph from "Storm" Aileen.
    Sunday's top gust was 48mph and Monday's was 38mph.
    Recorded at standard 10 metre height.

    I know we're pretty sheltered here in South Laois right on the Kilkenny border, but these "warnings" are going to be ignored if they are being used to warn about ~20mph winds with ~40mph gusts.

    There seems to be a growing culture of exaggerating these standard wind events... I could give my thinking on this, but I'll spare it for the CT forum.

    Another one! Where were your predictions before the event?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    Some fairly strong winds being reported by the platforms in the North Sea (but at much higher than the 10-metre standard heights so not that relevant).

    K14-fa-1c Sea (28 m amsl)
    METAR EHKV 130725Z AUTO 26062G73KT 4100 -RADZ FEW011 SCT020 BKN025 12/11 Q0988 RERA REDZ

    D15-fa-1 Sea (36 m amsl)
    METAR EHDV 130925Z AUTO 28062G72KT 3000 -RA FEW004/// SCT009/// BKN014/// 13/10 Q0982 RERA REDZ

    L9-ff-1 Sea (30 m amsl)
    METAR EHMG 131055Z AUTO 25054G64KT 9000 FEW015 SCT022 BKN035 14/09 Q0986


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,915 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    Got a friend who is stuck in Schiphol Airport with flights in and out delayed due to strong winds, probably ok by now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,851 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    My wife flew back into Dublin last night around 11pm, plane had to take two attempts to land because of the wind!


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars


    JCX BXC wrote: »
    Forecast gusts didn't occur in Liverpool or Manchester either.

    Did the system shift alot?

    4438C16600000578-4878554-image-a-59_1505293814473.jpg

    A lot of disruption across the UK with roads blocked by fallen trees and overturned lorries,flooding in parts too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Another one! Where were your predictions before the event?

    It's not my remit to give compulsory predictions, however - I am entitled to question those of others especially when my taxes are being used to fund such predictions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭Oneiric 3


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Another one! Where were your predictions before the event?

    I really don't understand the logic of this line you are taking lately. Are comments on an official forecast not valid until one has made a forecast themselves? :confused:

    New Moon



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Danno wrote: »
    It's not my remit to give compulsory predictions, however - I am entitled to question those of others especially when my taxes are being used to fund such predictions.

    If you had stretched yourself to make some predictions, you might have noticed that most of our weather systems operate on very fine margins, and the very slight shift of Aileen to the south spared Ireland from much of the forecast yellow wind warnings (which is not a particularly high warning level it must be said) coming to pass.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Oneiric 3 wrote: »
    I really don't understand the logic of this line you are taking lately. Are comments on an official forecast not valid until one has made a forecast themselves? :confused:

    Of course not, but it's very easy to weigh in after the fact and point out how the forecasts were incorrect without actually understanding the context in which a forecast was made.

    People who post after the fact that the yellow wind warning was exaggerating simply seem to be ignoring that context, in favour of the idea that Met Eireann are for some reason indulging in hype.

    In this case, the context is extremely clear when you scroll back to the start of this thread and look at the model charts that Meteorite posted - Aileen was a system that shifted marginally southwards and went from affecting the counties mentioned in the post title to only affecting the south coast. Such a marginal southwards shift, when plenty of models were predicting otherwise, doesn't lend itself (in my opinion) to the idea that ME are exaggerating or hyping anything.

    Additionally, we've had a few complaints that the storm was named, which belies a misunderstanding of how they become named, and a rather 'me' attitude to the effects of said storms.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    Aileen was not, and was never going to be, anything of note in Ireland, which is why Met Éireann didn't name it and only issued a standard yellow warning, something that is common enough. The UKMO named the storm based on the much higher potential impact on them. It's not that hard to grasp.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,649 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Aileen was, and was never going to be, anything of note in Ireland, which is why Met Éireann didn't name it and only issued a standard yellow warning, something that is common enough. The UKMO named the storm based on the much higher potential impact on them. It's not that hard to grasp.

    Exactly, I don't get all the people saying this was exaggerated or overhyped!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭Oneiric 3


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Of course not, but it's very easy to weigh in after the fact and point out how the forecasts were incorrect without actually understanding the context in which a forecast was made.

    People who post after the fact that the yellow wind warning was exaggerating simply seem to be ignoring that context, in favour of the idea that Met Eireann are for some reason indulging in hype.

    In this case, the context is extremely clear when you scroll back to the start of this thread and look at the model charts that Meteorite posted - Aileen was a system that shifted marginally southwards and went from affecting the counties mentioned in the post title to only affecting the south coast. Such a marginal southwards shift, when plenty of models were predicting otherwise, doesn't lend itself (in my opinion) to the idea that ME are exaggerating or hyping anything.

    Additionally, we've had a few complaints that the storm was named, which belies a misunderstanding of how they become named, and a rather 'me' attitude to the effects of said storms.

    What 'context' are you on about though? There was a yellow warning given. The question is, did this 'storm' warrant such a warning? I am genuinely not sure as haven't had time to look at yesterday's wind states. I do recall, however, that there was mention on the Met site of 'severe winds' along the east coast for yesterday. Did this come to pass?

    Whether you accept it or not, most people are going to take what a Met service is going to tell them at face value (as is the press) Most people are too busy with other things in the lives to have the time put such forecasts into some sort of illusionary 'context'.

    New Moon



Advertisement