Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Tips on topping coniferous trees...

Options
  • 16-09-2017 8:23pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭



    I have several mature coniferous trees, about 50 ft tall and 40 years old. They have become quite bare and I would like them to thicken up. I understand I will need to cut the top off them. How much should I cut off the top to encourage them to thicken up?


    I have several mature coniferous trees, about 50 ft tall and 40 years old. They have become quite bare and I would like them to thicken up. I understand I will need to cut the top off them. How much should I cut off the top to encourage them to thicken up?

    Thanks for reading



Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,526 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    if memory serves, topping a conifer is not something you'd want to do without good reason and approaching it properly - conifers don't react the same way to pruning as deciduous trees do.

    given the complications and size, i suspect this is not something i think you should do without engaging professional help.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,437 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I agree with magicbastarder; and topping them will be unlikely to cause them to become more bushy - conifers do not usually regrow in that way, and in fact some trees specifically grow in the manner you are suggesting, losing cover as they get older.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Agreed. Topping 50ft conifers will definitely not cause them to bush up. Confers just don't grow that way. The secret with a conifer hedge is to keep it low and regularly trimmed from the beginning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31,072 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Conifers grow in dense forests where light doesn't reach the bottoms. They've evolved to save energy by dropping foliage from the lower branches as they get taller.

    But depends on species. What exactly are they?


  • Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭Bernice101


    Hi there op here
    They are what we would call 'regular' palm trees.

    They are planted in a line in front of a house. I'm half debating with myself if I should just cut them down and plant a hedge..


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,526 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    google leylandii - would that match what you have in the garden?
    or more like a cordyline?


  • Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭Bernice101


    Op here again,
    Thanks everyone for your advice.
    I've decided to cut down the trees and start from scratch. Something like the leylandi would work if it grows up to 1 meter per year. Are there any more ornate options than the laylandii? Something that would also provide cover all year round. Perhaps in a nicer colour? I also seen somewhere a beautiful drooping palm tree (Germany if I recall correctly) would something like that work in limestone soil? But perhaps something like that would loose its effect if kept trimmed into a hedge?
    Thanks in advance for your recommendations


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,526 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    leylandii will need annual maintenance or it will turn into a potentially expensive, potentially ugly issue for you.

    it depends what you need the trees for - a windbreak, a barrier, to block a view, or simply to look good?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Bernice101 wrote: »
    Op here again,
    Thanks everyone for your advice.
    I've decided to cut down the trees and start from scratch. Something like the leylandi would work if it grows up to 1 meter per year. Are there any more ornate options than the laylandii? Something that would also provide cover all year round. Perhaps in a nicer colour? I also seen somewhere a beautiful drooping palm tree (Germany if I recall correctly) would something like that work in limestone soil? But perhaps something like that would loose its effect if kept trimmed into a hedge?
    Thanks in advance for your recommendations

    Planting more leylandii is a big mistake. How high do you want this? Is it a hedge or a screen that you ****? There are many options depending on what you want the planting for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Bernice101 wrote: »
    Op here again,
    Thanks everyone for your advice.
    I've decided to cut down the trees and start from scratch. Something like the leylandi would work if it grows up to 1 meter per year. Are there any more ornate options than the laylandii? Something that would also provide cover all year round. Perhaps in a nicer colour? I also seen somewhere a beautiful drooping palm tree (Germany if I recall correctly) would something like that work in limestone soil? But perhaps something like that would loose its effect if kept trimmed into a hedge?
    Thanks in advance for your recommendations


    Privet, photinia red robin, laurel, olearia and vibunum tinus can make a nice hedge, but not sure how fast they would grow each year. I reckon the laurel would be the fastest growing. The privet is also fairly fast and has nice white flowers in the summer. The viburneum is good for flowers in the winter months and red robin has interesting red colour to new leaves all year round. I think the conifer hedges are a bit too vigorous and labour intensive and for a decent length of hedge you probably should have some mechanical trimmer available.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 31,072 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Planting more leylandii is a big mistake. How high do you want this? Is it a hedge or a screen that you ****? There are many options depending on what you want the planting for.

    :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Lumen wrote: »
    :eek:

    What's that supposed to signify?


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,437 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    :D read what you typed a little more closely S.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    looksee wrote: »
    :D read what you typed a little more closely S.

    I see! Not having a dirty mind, I had to look word by word twice. Not a word I'd normally read as anything other than a typographic error, not one I've ever uttered nor written intentionally.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31,072 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    I see! Not having a dirty mind, I had to look word by word twice. Not a word I'd normally read as anything other than a typographic error, not one I've ever uttered nor written intentionally.
    Well, at least your sense of humour is fully intact :pac:


Advertisement