Ibrahim Halawa acquited(mod warning in op-Heed it)

wes

EMPunk wrote: »

No , no it does not , i suggest keeping you pseudo intellectual understanding of the legal system to a minimum least you further embarrass yourself.

Its up to you to prove guilt, not me. Get back to me, when you can do so. I suggest until you do, you stop making accusation.

atticu

wes wrote: »

Prove that she is being untruthful. Your are making an accusation, now prove it.



You demanded proof from me, now I demand you prove your claims.

I have not made any accusations, so nothing for me to prove.
I have not made any claims, so nothing for me to prove.

You have made claims without backing them up or proving them.

Sorry, but I can't believe your claims.

atticu

wes wrote: »

You have repeatedly. Now proof please.

Please quote my post where I made a claim.
If you can't, then don't say I did.

EMPunk

wes wrote: »

Its up to you to prove guilt, not me. Get back to me, when you can do so. I suggest until you do, you stop making accusation.

What planet do you live on????????????

What was this accusation????

Im not trying to prove anything unlike you and your agenda here!

I was merely pointing out something to someone who seems to think posting utter tripe with little to no knowledge on a subject can pass as accepted fact

And for the third time an acquittal under most circumstance does not prove innocence .

Have a great day .

wes

atticu wrote: »

I have not made any accusations, so nothing for me to prove.
I have not made any claims, so nothing for me to prove.

Demanding I prove someone innocent is an accusation.

You also made claims in regards to Halawa's sister. So proof please of your claims.....

atticu wrote: »

You have made claims without backing them up or proving them.

I did, you rejected them. Stop with the lies.

atticu wrote: »

Sorry, but I can't believe your claims.

It pretty clear, that no level of proof will ever be good for you. I do wonder why that is......

wes

EMPunk wrote: »

And for the third time an acquittal under most circumstance does not prove innocence .

Innocence doesn't have to be proven. You need to prove guilt.

Everything else you said is typical pseudo intellectual tripe, from those who are happy to insinuate guilt, and pretend your not making an accusation.

First Up

Do you intend to answer this question?

First Up

Do you intend to answer this question?

EMPunk

wes wrote: »

Innocence doesn't have to be proven. You need to prove guilt.

Everything else you said is typical pseudo intellectual tripe, from those who are happy to insinuate guilt, and pretend your not making an accusation.

You know you are replying to someone who chimed in about 7 posts ago merely stating acquittals do not prove innocence

An acquittal is usually the reward of the guilty

I have a law degree , i work for a well known solicitors office , the only thing pseudo intellectual here is you and your child like argument

Do not quote me again i do not wish to further engage in your silly panto

First Up

EMPunk wrote: »

An acquittal is usually the reward of the guilty

I have a law degree , i work for a well known solicitors office.

You made a poor career choice. And your employer made an even worse one.

wes

EMPunk wrote: »

You know you are replying to someone who chimed in about 7 posts ago merely stating acquittals do not prove innocence

Yeah, and my point is that I don't have to prove innocence. Up to those making the accusation.

EMPunk wrote: »

An acquittal is usually the reward of the guilty

:a setting free from the charge of an offense by verdict, sentence, or other legal process

EMPunk wrote: »

I have a law degree , i work for a well known solicitors office , the only thing pseudo intellectual here is you and your child like argument

I don't believe you.

EMPunk wrote: »

Do not quote me again i do not wish to further engage in your silly panto

Don't reply to my posts, if you don't want me to reply back. This is a public forum, people can reply to whom they please. Block me, if you don't like my posts.

givyjoe

EMPunk wrote: »

You know you are replying to someone who chimed in about 7 posts ago merely stating acquittals do not prove innocence

An acquittal is usually the reward of the guilty

I have a law degree , i work for a well known solicitors office , the only thing pseudo intellectual here is you and your child like argument

Do not quote me again i do not wish to further engage in your silly panto

Sorry, what? Is that quoting the bible or some other sh1te book? An acquittal means you have been found not guilty of a crime which you have been charged with.

Nothing 'proves' innocence.. but that evidence is there that the lad isn't innocent? Plenty of completely innocent people have gone on trial. This didn't get that far.

atticu

givyjoe wrote: »

but that evidence is there that the lad isn't innocent

Now you claim he isn't innocent.
WOW!

givyjoe

atticu wrote: »

Now you claim he isn't innocent.
WOW!

Dont jizz your pants... it was a typo.. should be what, not that.

atticu

wes wrote: »

Demanding I prove someone innocent is an accusation.

I asked you to back up your claims, you didn't.

EMPunk

First Up wrote: »

You made a poor career choice. And your employer made an even worse one.

Im sorry but the attraction of the social welfare was not as appealing to me as it was to you.

I made a great choice as shown by my lack of mortgage on D18 fully detached 4 bed 3 bath house

oh how i wish i worked in a call center :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

First Up

EMPunk wrote: »

First Up wrote: »

You made a poor career choice. And your employer made an even worse one.

Im sorry but the attraction of the social welfare was not as appealing to me as it was to you.

I made a great choice as shown by my lack of mortgage on D18 fully detached 4 bed 3 bath house

oh how i wish i worked in a call center :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

My cleaner comes from Dublin 18.  I hear there are some nice parts.

EMPunk

First Up wrote: »

My cleaner comes from Dublin 18. I hear there are some nice parts.

You don't have a cleaner I do have a fancy house in posh land :cool:

givyjoe

EMPunk wrote: »

You don't have a cleaner I do have a fancy house in posh land :cool:

And a disgusting condescending attitude in your posts to match.

atticu

[QUOTE=wes;104779653

You also made claims in regards to Halawa's sister. So proof please of your claims.....

[/QUOTE]

I never made any such claim.

wes

atticu wrote: »

I asked you to back up your claims, you didn't.

I do wonder what possible reason, you could have for no accepting the facts?

wes

atticu wrote: »

I never made any such claim.

Prove that your haven't .

atticu

wes wrote: »

I do wonder what possible reason, you could have for no accepting the facts?

Because there aren't any facts.

atticu

wes wrote: »

Prove that your haven't .

Very easy, read back though all my posts.

EMPunk

givyjoe wrote: »

And a disgusting condescending attitude in your posts to match.

Yep , being financially secure really makes you realise how you hate muslims and poor people:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I condescend on psuedo intelectuals that attack people here

givyjoe

EMPunk wrote: »

Yep , being financially secure really makes you realise how you hate muslims and poor people:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I condescend on psuedo intelectuals that attack people here

Thanks for explaining your horrible attitude.. You're right, assuming you are financially secure means you couldn't hate muslims and poor people.. cough trump cough

EMPunk

givyjoe wrote: »

Thanks for explaining your horrible attitude.. You're right, assuming you are financially secure means you couldn't hate muslims and poor people.. cough trump cough

Typical moronic trump reference , you people realise we live in ireland yea????????

wes

atticu wrote: »

Very easy, read back though all my posts.

I see no proof. Proof please.

(I hope you get why I am doing this....)

givyjoe

EMPunk wrote: »

Typical moronic trump reference , you people realise we live in ireland yea????????

It's an obvious and easy popular reference, makes the point quickly an easily, i.e. plenty of wealthy racists out there, do you disagree? What has living in Ireland got to do with it?

Ps. Keep up the classy posts.

First Up

EMPunk wrote: »

First Up wrote: »

My cleaner comes from Dublin 18.  I hear there are some nice parts.

You don't have a cleaner I do have a fancy house in posh land :cool:

Oh yes I do - and a gardener (big garden).