Ibrahim Halawa acquited(mod warning in op-Heed it)

Hitman3000

weldoninhio wrote:

More pertinent, how he got them from his cell in Egypt to Ireland, and published in less than 24 hours.

Tom reckons he took a photo with his phone of the letter and then sent the photo via the internet to someone in Ireland. Totally believable...... I asked Tom what the point of a letter was if he had a phone, no answer.

Hector Savage

deco nate wrote: »

Ah now, no need for that kind of post!
Sure he has already said after 4 years of being locked up that he is going to help the homeless of Ireland(.maybe put them up somewhere? Maybe Clonskeagh) . and stand up an fight for anyone found guilty of crimes to set them free.
Stop belittling this brave child.
Thank you

If he puts homeless people up, there will be a price no doubt.
They will be exposed to Islam maybe ???

And of course, these people will probably feel such gratitude they may feel obliged to convert.

Dangerous times.
Just as we leave the horrible RCC behind, the seeds of a worse regime are slowly being sown.

weldoninhio

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Tom reckons he took a photo with his phone of the letter and then sent the photo via the internet to someone in Ireland. Totally believable...... I asked Tom what the point of a letter was if he had a phone, no answer.

Maybe he prayed really hard and Allah personally delivered them to Ireland.

gozunda

First Up wrote: »

Thanks for providing such an exquisite piece of irony on which to wrap up.

Off to Egypt on a Holiday perhaps?

But still not going to provide an answer to the accusations you made? I expected as much :pac:

And yet you relentlessly hound others just so your you can harp on with groundless opinions .

I expected no less. Pathetic ...

givyjoe

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Tom reckons he took a photo with his phone of the letter and then sent the photo via the internet to someone in Ireland. Totally believable...... I asked Tom what the point of a letter was if he had a phone, no answer.

Perhaps it was to 'prove' that it was from him, written in his own handwriting. A message from a phone, an email etc even if you know the phone number, might not actually be from that person.

Just a possible reason.

Hitman3000

weldoninhio wrote:

Maybe he prayed really hard and Allah personally delivered them to Ireland.

Like a letter a letter to Santa. ; )

Hitman3000

givyjoe wrote:

Perhaps it was to 'prove' that it was from him, written in his own handwriting. A message from a phone, an email etc even if you know the phone number, might not actually be from that person.

That's the thing several letters clearly had different authors but yet the sisters all claimed they came from the Egyptian lad. Doesn't make sense and laughable that people in Ireland believed the sh*t the sisters were peddling.

elperello

Hitman3000 wrote: »

An but this isn't about me, however it's telling how you repeatedly deflected from my question. Uncomfortable for you? Just say so. You have shown yourself up for what you are, as another poster said. Laters, ; )

I don't accept your bona fides as a concerned citizen worried about other citizens travel arrangements.

What are you doing hiding behind another posters opinion. If you have something to say about me spit it out.

jmayo

K.Flyer wrote: »

The term "smuggled out" is at best laughable.
Some of the "smuggled" letters are virtually crease free, one in particular has no folds in it at all, yet was written, signed and dated, smuggled out of prison, and made it into the press pages for the same day without a blemish on the page.
Oddly enough, after this was highlighted in previous threads, subsequent letters would appear very crumpled! :rolleyes:

Irish student Ibrahim Halawa writes heartbreaking letter home to mark three years in Egyptian prison

Why didn't he write it in Arabic so that the auld fella could read it ?

There are more holes in this lads story than at St Andrews.

And the real laugh is how hard his supporters try to spin that there is nothing to them.

Talk about fooking gullible, no wonder so many people get stung in internet scams.
Or are they all gullible or just would rather engage in some cognitive dissonance rather than be seen as a non liberal right on type.

He accidently found himself on a podium at a muslim brotherhood protest rally whilst he was on holidays.
He wrote perfectly formatted and presentable letters home whilst he was
in a prison where the guards were torturing him.
He was on continous hunger strikes, but miraculously he looks very healthy on his release.
He was tortured and shot in the hand, but rather than looking like Padre Pio he miraculously has the hands of a Neutrogena hand model.

He was Egyptian, lived in Ireland, Egypt was his home, but then he was Irish and Ireland was his home.
Quite a mixed up young fellow, but so are a lot of his age group.

Then again a lot of his age group just go on holiday to go on the lash and get laid, rather than climb on board a platform with ultra bigots at a Day of Rage.

Questions, questions.

elperello

Hitman3000 wrote: »

You refusing to answer a question is very telling.

I'm not interested in adding fuel to your little bonfire.

topper75

gitzy16v wrote: »

Welcome home brother Ibrahim.

Ireland is as much his home as you are his brother.

Hitman3000

elperello wrote:

I don't accept your bona fides as a concerned citizen worried about other citizens travel arrangements.

Any chance you would pay the ball instead of the man?

elperello wrote:

What are you doing hiding behind another posters opinion. If you have something to say about me spit it out.

See my above comment it seems you're unable to answer a question you get personal. If you can't or don't want to answer a question have the decency to say so.

Hitman3000

elperello wrote:

I'm not interested in adding fuel to your little bonfire.

Running away so? Very telling that your afraid to address genuine questions.

Ash.J.Williams

topper75 wrote: »

Ireland is as much his home as you are his brother.

You're clearly very intelligent

Hitman3000

topper75 wrote:

Ireland is as much his home as you are his brother.

Have you ever heard of sarcasm?

givyjoe

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Any chance you would pay the ball instead of the man?


See my above comment it seems you're unable to answer a question you get personal. If you can't or don't want to answer a question have the decency to say so.

Do you really think commenting on the obvious sarcasm in your post, with relation to your 'concern', is playing the man?

elperello

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Any chance you would pay the ball instead of the man?


See my above comment it seems you're unable to answer a question you get personal. If you can't or don't want to answer a question have the decency to say so.

I will if you will but remember you don't own the ball.

Read back your posts directed at me. You got a bit personal yourself.

elperello

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Running away so? Very telling that your afraid to address genuine questions.

Running away? Not my form.

Not indulging you by commenting on your conspiracy theories which can't be proved one way or the other.

Hitman3000

givyjoe wrote:

Do you really think commenting on the obvious sarcasm in your post, with relation to your 'concern', is playing the man?

I asked a question the poster as is his right refused to answer the question but instead has sought to make a personal attack on me. So yes he was and is playing the man not the ball.
As for sarcasm that's a matter of opinion.

givyjoe

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Have you ever heard of sarcasm?

Hitman3000 wrote: »

I asked a question the poster as is his right refused to answer the question but instead has sought to make a personal attack on me. So yes he was and is playing the man not the ball.
As for sarcasm that's a matter of opinion.

You seemed well able to spot it in other posts, shouldn't be such a surprise for others to do the same :rolleyes:

Hitman3000

elperello wrote:

I will if you will but remember you don't own the ball.

So that's a yes you will answer?
Btw the ball comment I think is in the charter could be wrong.

elperello wrote:

Read back your posts directed at me. You got a bit personal yourself.

Enlighten me please, genuinely don't know what you are talking about similar to your slur allegation you didn't back that up either.

Hitman3000

elperello wrote:

Not indulging you by commenting on your conspiracy theories which can't be proved one way or the other.

The question related to Daddy Halawa allowing his 17 year old son trouble to an area that was under a DOFA travel advisory. No conspiracy there. It was a question based on fact. : )

Hitman3000

givyjoe wrote:

You seemed well able to spot it in other posts, shouldn't be such a surprise for others to do the same

But he questioned motive how is that relevant to asking a fact based question?

Hitman3000

givyjoe wrote:

You seemed well able to spot it in other posts, shouldn't be such a surprise for others to do the same

One post. Not posts. ; )

Hitman3000

*travel not trouble

givyjoe

Hitman3000 wrote: »

One post. Not posts. ; )

Sure, one post;):pac::D:P:cool::eek::o:mad::(:rolleyes::):p

Hitman3000

elperello wrote:

Running away? Not my form.

It very much is as you have clearly demostrated in the last several posts. It's ok you swallowed the lies and are now unwilling to admit it.

elperello

Hitman3000 wrote: »

So that's a yes you will answer?
Btw the ball comment I think is in the charter could be wrong.


Enlighten me please, genuinely don't know what you are talking about similar to your slur allegation you didn't back that up either.

That's a yes to playing the ball.
I will debate based on facts.

So you have forgotten what you wrote and you want me to go back and trawl through you posts to remind you?

Hitman3000

elperello wrote:

That's a yes to playing the ball. I will debate based on facts.

My question about his father allowing his son travel to an area that the DOFA advised against is fact based but you refused to answer. So puts the last part of you comment into doubt.
You instead questioned my motives, irrelevant other than playing the man.

elperello

Hitman3000 wrote: »

The question related to Daddy Halawa allowing his 17 year old son trouble to an area that was under a DOFA travel advisory. No conspiracy there. It was a question based on fact. : )

An old student debating trick.
Take a little dash of truth and embellish it with your slant to gain an advantage.