Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Discovery - Timeline, continuity and other canonical issues [** SPOILERS **]

12346»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    The biggest problem with the small tech issues has always been the march of real technology.

    It's always really difficult to predict how technology will develop and further to that, there have at times been physical limitations on what could be produced on screen.

    At a certain point you have to either break canon or end up with an absolute farce of a TV show that looks like this:

    7ea9c18e57e0d89b60a24da525a852a5.jpg

    When we're already at a stage where the communicators, computers, holograms, view screens and whatever else are at best decades rather than centuries in the future, and many elements have already been surpassed, it becomes sillier to omit them than stick to canon.
    It'd be like having a future series made in 1920 with mysterious wireless transmissions, and then making a sequel in 1950 where you try to pretend there's no such thing as radio.
    "This Star Trek universe is the same universe as ours, except it's in the future, although they haven't discovered forks, dual-ply toilet paper or creme bruleés."

    Consistency over time in something like Star Wars works a lot better in that regard because there's a level of technological stagnation and sort of techno-western junkyard engineering aesthetic that lends itself to fantastically advanced tech rubbing shoulders with incongruously analog and mechanical designs.

    Star Trek has always been a harder sci-fi with a setting in a utopian future of our universe.

    Sometimes canonicity is important but for other things you just have to ignore it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,807 ✭✭✭Evade


    Gbear wrote: »
    At a certain point you have to either break canon or end up with an absolute farce of a TV show that looks like this:

    7ea9c18e57e0d89b60a24da525a852a5.jpg
    The worst thing about this is this problem was solved until TNG's Relics had this bridge on the holodeck instead of one of the movie ones which they had easier access to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭jmcc


    This wasn't Star Trek. It was more like Snowflakes in Space who were more interested in exploring their feelings than exploring Space. Season 2 needs to have better writers if it is to recover ST fans and gain new ones.

    Regards...jmcc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 870 ✭✭✭Kuva


    It was ok, they should never have went near alternate universe stuff, all of that was crap, very nearly dropped it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,807 ✭✭✭Evade


    Just watching DS9's the Way of the Warrior and it really goes to show how lackluster the battle scenes in STD are.


Advertisement