Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2018 NFL Draft

  • 03-10-2017 3:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    gyi0064502599.0_standard_352.0.jpg

    Date: April 26th-28th
    Location: TBC, though Dallas seems to be favoured
    TV: ESPN and NFL Network

    A quarter of the way through the regular season, and with many teams already looking ahead to their selection in the 2018 NFL draft, it's time for a new thread.

    As always, here's a few resources which may be of interest:

    Matt Miller's Early 2018 Rankings
    Sports Illustrated's 2018 Top 10 (updated weekly)
    CBS Sports' 2018 Rankings
    Mel Kiper's Top 25 (updated regularly, ESPN Insider subscription required)

    The early expectation is that this will be a strong year for QB's, and while that is said every year and ultimately it won't seem as good as thought when the evaluations really start at the turn of the year, it does appear to be the strongest in years relatively speaking.

    It should also be another good year for running backs after two went in the top 10 last year, with Penn State's Saquon Barkley the pick of the bunch.


«13456718

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,052 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Order as it stands

    FIRST ROUND

    1. Browns 0-4 (.438)

    2. 49ers 0-4 (.625)

    3. Giants 0-4 (.667)

    4. Chargers 0-4 (.733)

    T5. Colts 1-3 (.438)

    T5. Bengals 1-3 (.438)

    7. Bears 1-3 (.733)

    8. Dolphins 1-2 (.333)

    T9. Ravens 2-2 (.375)

    T9. Cardinals 2-2 (.375)

    T9. Seahawks 2-2 (.375)

    12. Browns via trade with Texans 2-2 (.438)

    T13. Cowboys 2-2 (.500)

    T13. Jaguars 2-2 (.500)

    T13. Titans 2-2 (.500)

    T16. Saints 2-2 (.533)

    T16. Jets 2-2 (.533)

    18. Raiders 2-2 (.563)

    19. Vikings 2-2 (.667)

    20. Patriots 2-2 (.688)

    21. Redskins 2-2 (.750)

    22. Buccaneers 2-1 (.250)

    T23. Steelers 3-1 (.313)

    T23. Rams 3-1 (.313)

    25. Eagles 3-1 (.375)

    T26. Panthers 3-1 (.438)

    T26. Packers 3-1 (.438)

    T26. Lions 3-1 (.438)

    T26. Broncos 3-1 (.438)

    30. Falcons 3-1 (.625)

    31. Bills 3-1 (.688)

    32. Bills via trade with Chiefs 4-0 (.438)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    ...it's October.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,052 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    True but some teams seasons are over bar the shouting at this stage

    You can count out the 1-3 and 0-4 teams from the playoffs

    Sucks for the rest of the season to be meaningless in October


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    No you can't, Christ if not for a last second drive we'd be counting out the Patriots from this years playoffs too then. At 1-3 the Colts are one game off top of their division while every 0-4 team bar the Chargers are just 3 games out with 12 whole games to play. Is it likely they make the playoffs? Not really, but teams always rally later in the year. Even an 0-4 team that doesn't make the playoffs could very easily be picking #15 or lower.

    I don't know, to each their own but early speculation on draft order just makes less than zero sense to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,972 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    Given up for the year and wanting to see the Ravens tank for some elite prospects Paully? :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    So De shon Elliot and Conor Williams have declared for the draft from Texas and are skipping their bowl game. Malik Jefferson and Holton Hill expected to follow suit...

    Should be some more declarations in the next few from various programs i'm sure..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Anyone going to head over this year? I'm considering it.. but will be a post Christmas decision.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    After last weekend the draft order is Cleveland, NY Giants, SF, Indy, Chicago, Denver, NY Jets, Tampa, Arizona, Cleveland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 147 ✭✭spud06


    adrian522 wrote: »
    After last weekend the draft order is Cleveland, NY Giants, SF, Indy, Chicago, Denver, NY Jets, Tampa, Arizona, Cleveland.

    Dolphins have got to trade up in my opinion and try get a QB i.e Lemar Jackson or Mason Rudolph. Tannehill, Moore and Cutler are a total disaster and with Adam Gase history with QBs now is the time for change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    If Luck can come back, Indy with a top 5 pick could actually be poised to put themselves in a position for make a playoff run. They're team hasn't looked that bad to me when I've watched them this year.

    Interesting to see that division next year regardless, with Watson back and Jags and Titans already having solid teams.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    Woo a top 3 pick for the Giants & no Jerry Reese to ruin it. Please god I hope the team doesn't win the last few games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Good sit down with Kiper and McShay here. Lots of talk about the QB's but plenty of other stuff too:

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2018/story/_/id/21665021/2018-nfl-draft-primer-mel-kiper-todd-mcshay-answer-25-questions-prospects-rankings-mock-draft


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Cleveland (0-15) .517
    New York Giants (2-13) .533
    Indianapolis (3-12) .483
    Cleveland - from Houston (4-11) .508
    Tampa Bay (4-11) .558
    Denver (5-10) .483
    New York Jets (5-10) .521
    San Francisco (5-10) .521
    Chicago (5-10) .558
    Cincinnati (6-9) .467

    Oakland (6-9) .508
    Miami (6-9) .542
    Arizona (7-8) .488
    Washington (7-8) .538
    Green Bay (7-8) .538
    Los Angeles Chargers (8-7) .463
    Buffalo (8-7) .492
    Detroit (8-7) .496
    Dallas (8-7) .500
    Seattle (9-6) .488

    Tennessee* (8-7) .438
    Baltimore* (9-6) .438
    Atlanta* (9-6) .550
    Carolina* (11-4) .538
    Buffalo - from Kansas City* (9-6) .479
    Jacksonville* (10-5) .425
    Los Angeles Rams* (11-4) .500
    New Orleans* (11-4) .538
    Pittsburgh* (12-3) .450
    Minnesota* (12-3) .500
    New England* (12-3) .488
    Philadelphia* (13-2) .458

    Cleveland are benefiting massively from the Texans' collapse following injuries to Watson and Watt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 723 ✭✭✭PhilipsR


    Colts surely to chuck their game? A win will drop them to 4 at best, 5 at worst.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Not certain of the tie breakers but a GB loss on Sunday could mean a top 12 pick (and a better chance of staff turnover, esp if it's a blowout). Playoffs are done, so time to be a Lions fan for one day! :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭Alfred Borden


    PhilipsR wrote: »
    Colts surely to chuck their game? A win will drop them to 4 at best, 5 at worst.

    Based on strength of schedule (draft tiebreaker), Colts cant pick lower than 3rd even with a win on Sunday. The problem comes in later rounds where order is reversed between teams on same record. Hoping for a defeat and Giants win for the #2 though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Lionbacker


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Not certain of the tie breakers but a GB loss on Sunday could mean a top 12 pick (and a better chance of staff turnover, esp if it's a blowout). Playoffs are done, so time to be a Lions fan for one day! :o

    Well with the amount of injuries the Packers are dealing with to key players I'd be very disappointed if the Lions can't beat them on Sunday.
    I'm not even sure ye'll have a fully fit 46 man active squad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Well, Sam Darnold was absolutely gash last night. Anyone think he might go back to college next year?

    Though play-wise he'd probably benefit from another year at school, financially he'd be silly to go back IMO.

    I'd be looking at the Matt Barkley situation if I was him. If Barkley had come out in 2012, he'd have been almost guaranteed to go early in the first. Instead he went back, USC had a poor season despite being ranked #1 preseason, went in the 4th round and cost himself a fortune.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Adam Schefter reporting Josh Rosen will be hesitant to declare for the draft if it looks like Cleveland will take him #1.

    However, Peter King says the below:

    https://twitter.com/JoshNorris/status/947829340649254912

    Jesus Christ. Imagine taking him #1 after the season he has just had. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Paully D wrote:
    Jesus Christ. Imagine taking him #1 after the season he has just had.


    The browns will do browns type things...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    I don't follow much college football tbh, but can anyone ELI5 why Lamar Jackson isn't really highly regarded in the draft picks? He's a Heisman winner, has like 90 TD's in his college career, and seems to play like a young Michael Vick.

    What makes him less wanted than Rosen or Darnold for example?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    What makes him less wanted than Rosen or Darnold for example?

    Size
    Wants to run a lot
    Erratic arm
    Takes to much on himself
    Things that'll count against him at NFL level


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    brinty wrote: »
    Size
    Wants to run a lot
    Erratic arm
    Takes to much on himself
    Things that'll count against him at NFL level

    Didn't people say the same things about Watson last year though?

    He's also comparitively small, runs a lot and is a bit of a gunslinger, yet the Houston Offense were on fire with him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Didn't people say the same things about Watson last year though?

    He's also comparitively small, runs a lot and is a bit of a gunslinger, yet the Houston Offense were on fire with him.

    Oh for sure sir but Watson also delivered on the biggest stage too in championship games. Jackson hasn't fully done it at that level every time and that's possibly why he's not at the same level of discussion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    brinty wrote: »
    Oh for sure sir but Watson also delivered on the biggest stage too in championship games. Jackson hasn't fully done it at that level every time and that's possibly why he's not at the same level of discussion

    That's probably the difference I suppose.

    Either way, as long as he doesn't end up at the Browns or Washington (assuming Cousins is gone), he should have a good shot at proving himself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Admittedly I haven't really studied any in detail yet, but from what I have seen of them all (which is sporadic, I admit), Mayfield looks the best to me based purely on his play alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    brinty wrote:
    Size Wants to run a lot Erratic arm Takes to much on himself Things that'll count against him at NFL level

    Whatever about the other points, you can't knock his size. He's 6'3 and 210 pounds before going into an NFL strength program, and has a body that can put in some muscle.

    His arm is the main reason, but a good and creative coach will negate those concerns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    titan18 wrote: »
    Whatever about the other points, you can't knock his size. He's 6'3 and 210 pounds before going into an NFL strength program, and has a body that can put in some muscle.

    His arm is the main reason, but a good and creative coach will negate those concerns.

    I'd love to see what he could do with the Giants. With Beckham and Shepard as his WRs and Engram looking like a really good TE, he could do really well there, but I don't think they'll take him. If I were going into the draft as a QB, I'd probably look to them as the best option tbh.

    Washington could go for him, but the last time they had a 'duel threat QB' he ended up at the Browns and was never seen again (like a lot of others tbf).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    I'd take Jackson at the Giants over Rosen and Darnold tbh.

    Even better if they can trade down and still do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Not a great QB year. I'm not sold on Darnold, those concussions are a big no no so Rosen isn't an attractive option and I just don't think Lamar has what it takes to do it on Sundays.

    The guy I like this year is Ryan Finley, he has a lot of things to like about him. He has a decent arm, he is accurate and has a quick release. He checks down quickly too. The only question mark I have about him is in the pocket. He never really stood too long in the pocket and I never seen him step up. He was almost always backing up and running to he left or right to give himself space. You won't get that space in the NFL so his pocket presence has to be proved. If he can show that then I think he goes a lot higher than people expect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Enjoyed this. Would also make me incredibly wary of Allen.



    My biggest concern on Jackson is that his build looks like he'll find it hard to take NFL punishment without bulking up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    Knex. wrote: »
    I'd take Jackson at the Giants over Rosen and Darnold tbh.

    Even better if they can trade down and still do it.

    I dunno, I have a hard time seeing Jackson having much if any success at the NFL level. Darnold and Rosen as far from finished articles (Rosen in particular needs a good dinner) but I'd fear taking Jackson anywhere other than a mid round project at this point.

    If we have to stay put at 2, I'd rather take Barkley and come back in the 2nd for a QB (maybe Mayfield if he was still around)


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kannon Greasy Self-confidence


    HigginsJ wrote: »
    I dunno, I have a hard time seeing Jackson having much if any success at the NFL level. Darnold and Rosen as far from finished articles (Rosen in particular needs a good dinner) but I'd fear taking Jackson anywhere other than a mid round project at this point.

    If we have to stay put at 2, I'd rather take Barkley and come back in the 2nd for a QB (maybe Mayfield if he was still around)

    I could do without Barkley and zeke 4 times a year thank you very much


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,941 ✭✭✭krustydoyle


    QBs Darnold and Rosen both declare for the Draft


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman


    HigginsJ wrote: »
    I dunno, I have a hard time seeing Jackson having much if any success at the NFL level. Darnold and Rosen as far from finished articles (Rosen in particular needs a good dinner) but I'd fear taking Jackson anywhere other than a mid round project at this point.

    If we have to stay put at 2, I'd rather take Barkley and come back in the 2nd for a QB (maybe Mayfield if he was still around)

    Mayfield will not be there in the second round In my opinion, too many QB needy teams. I expect Arizona or Washington to be his landing spot.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Mayfield will not be there in the second round In my opinion, too many QB needy teams. I expect Arizona or Washington to be his landing spot.

    He won't last the top 10 I'd imagine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman


    adrian522 wrote: »
    He won't last the top 10 I'd imagine.

    Yeah I think that's a fair guess, too many QB needy teams.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    Yeah I think that's a fair guess, too many QB needy teams.

    Yea that is fair, there is alot of very needy QB teams, alot will however depend on what happens in FA.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    HigginsJ wrote: »
    Yea that is fair, there is alot of very needy QB teams, alot will however depend on what happens in FA.

    Outside of what happens with the QBs at the Vikings I think the rest are pretty much zero sum on the demand, if a team loses their QB in FA they'll become the needy one.

    I'd expect 3 QBs to go in the top 10 and another one in top 20.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Outside of what happens with the QBs at the Vikings I think the rest are pretty much zero sum on the demand, if a team loses their QB in FA they'll become the needy one.

    I'd expect 3 QBs to go in the top 10 and another one in top 20.

    I suppose, although Alex Smith and Sam Bradford could possibly stop teams spending a 1st rounder on a QB if they move on from the Vikes and Chiefs. You never know, someone could bring back Kaep!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    For all my pointing out the ridiculousness of teams not hiring him (which ultimately should have cost Mike McCarthy his job as it did nearly all the other staff in GB), there's not a chance a team would or should take Kaep over a 1st or 2nd round guy imo

    Doubt he'll be back, but if he is I reckon it would be a midseason emergency hire, or even if in preseason it would be more to fill the spot for a year or so until a raw, high upside QB was available (he wouldn't have helped that hapless Browns team much, but a season on the bench to sit and learn without pressure I think would have been a lot more productive for Kizer this year in my opinion) so I wouldn't expect him in any setting to impact upon any draft picks.

    Chiefs and Vikings are good examples though of later picking teams... and I'm praying nobody before GB's pick gets their guy so we can have a big giant run on QBs and get a premium defensive guy! :p Doubt there'll be much demand for Keenum who just fit the system really well (and going by all three lads' performances and what they're doing at RB it seems a pretty damn good system!) but Bradford or especially Bridgewater could fetch an awful lot of interest. Doubt Smith leaves, and unless he does I think Cousins might be in the best situation of any FA since Peyton Manning about 5 years ago. No of course he's no Peyton, but he's in an excellent position to be ridiculously valuable to a number of teams at different points in the league.

    It's going to be pretty interesting at that position however, unlike last year when Jay and Tony robbed us of the circus by retiring. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,317 ✭✭✭HigginsJ


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Doubt there'll be much demand for Keenum who just fit the system really well

    You'd have to be mad to take Keenum's season as anything other than an aberation, it reminds me of that run Josh McCown had with the Bears a few years back.

    Keenum has been a below average back up for most of his career to date, chances are he'll revert back to that next season.

    P.S. The Kaepernick thing was said tongue in cheek, I doubt he will come back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The only thing that went against Keenum coming out of college was his size. If he was 6'4" he would have been an early first round pick.

    He has been on bad teams for most of his career and got a chance with a good offensive line this season and made it work. I think he has shown enough to interest teams. I think the Vikings should do whatever it takes to hold onto him. Bridgewater is never going to be as good as he has been this season and Bradford is just always at risk of injury. I think they should cut the pair of them and bring in a project and a veteran backup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    McCarron is another one who could get interest in FA depending on his case. With a likely 2 of Bridgewater, Bradford and Keenum available, and potential of Smith being traded, there's a few QBs to go around that don't need to replaced by the team who loses them. Cutler too I guess, but not sure many would want him as a starter anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Paully D wrote: »

    You guys ever read Dane Brugler re draft. He is outstanding in his coverage of players. Has already reviewed 400 players and will do another 600. Come draft day he’ll have a fact about every player picked. Does a draft show now twice a week on Dallas Cowboys with a few of our media team and then covers all three days of the draft with the cowboys team.

    Does every teams media do a draft show and provide coverage like that??

    I had sky, nfl , Espn and cowboys open for last two years during the draft and I’ll admit the cowboys coverage was streets ahead. But maybe I’m biased


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Fair play to Leaf on that one! Social media can be infamously deceptive in this sense, but it's good that at a glance on his Twitter account he seems to have got his life together after a pretty rough few post NFL years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D




  • Advertisement
Advertisement