Ibrahim Halawa radio interview.

JP Liz V1

dreamliner wrote: »

Really and truly all that needs to be said has been said.

The whole nation have forgotten him except for a few people here with a major axe to grind. I really see no point in this discussion, but carry on, it's just not gonna achieve anything. It's actually old news at this stage and he has moved on and is focussing on his new leaf of life. The only ones getting wound up are to be found on here. No one else cares anymore ... it is yesterday's news.

He is media whoring himself but then getting angry and defensive when tough questions are asked

He'd have been better coming home, maybe apologising for his stupidity and staying quite instead of getting himself into a bigger hole with more lies i.e. especially not being political and just going on holiday and venturing out from the cinema to the main stage of a violent protest and addressing the crowd

Omackeral

dreamliner wrote: »

The whole nation have forgotten him except for a few people here with a major axe to grind. I really see no point in this discussion, but carry on, it's just not gonna achieve anything

You have 50+ plus posts on boards. All but 5 of them relate to Ibrahim Halawa or Clonskeagh Mosque. Are you sure it's not your good self with the axe to grind and/or an agenda.

gozunda

dreamliner wrote: »

Really and truly all that needs to be said has been said.

The whole nation have forgotten him except for a few people here with a major axe to grind. I really see no point in this discussion, but carry on, it's just not gonna achieve anything. It's actually old news at this stage and he has moved on and is focussing on his new lease of life. The only ones getting wound up are to be found on here. No one else cares anymore ... it is yesterday's news.

In contradiction to your claim - there is no evident axe to grind in this instance - it is simply a matter of logic.

What is evident from his account is that it is at odds with that which was demonstrated on the LLS.

A similar performance at a compensation hearing would have the claim thrown out the window. And yet for you thats not enough ...

IH et al continue to peddle these stories despite evidence otherwise.

You scream that others should desist in pointing out the obvious. Why is that?

gozunda

Omackeral wrote: »

You have 50+ plus posts on boards. All but 5 of them relate to Ibrahim Halawa or Clonskeagh Mosque. Are you sure it's not your good self with the axe to grind and/or an agenda.

The remainder are in relation to how bad Christianity is - and yet no other criticicism is entertained . Quite amazing...

end of the road

deco nate wrote: »

Don't start.

don't start what?

Omackeral

Expert Plumber wrote: »

Are you Horacio Caine?

Are you Super Mario?

gozunda

dreamliner wrote: »

Ok send me your address and I'll post you the bullet ...

What on earth do people want

You do realise that such an action constitutes an actual threat to a person's life. Or are you seriousley that naive?

For example:
http://www.thejournal.ie/bullet-post-conall-mcdevitt-sdlp-822025-Mar2013/

end of the road

gozunda wrote: »

You do realise that such an action constitutes an actual threat to a person's life. Or are you seriousley that naive?

For example:
http://www.thejournal.ie/bullet-post-conall-mcdevitt-sdlp-822025-Mar2013/

there is no need to be hysterical. given the context of the posts it's obvious he isn't threatening anything or anyone. he's just asking what your standard of proof for ibriham being shot 4 years ago would be

Hitman3000

end of the road wrote:

there is no need to be hysterical. given the context of the posts it's obvious he isn't threatening anything or anyone. he's just asking what your standard of proof for ibriham being shot 4 years ago would be

A scar would be a start. Most bullet wounds end up leaving a scar. I also assume the surgery required to properly attach his finger that was hanging off would also leave a scar.

gozunda

end of the road wrote: »

there is no need to be hysterical. given the context of the posts it's obvious he isn't threatening anything or anyone. he's just asking what your standard of proof for ibriham being shot 4 years ago would be

I'm pointing out the obvious. That is a serious ott post given what was said. There is no 'standard of proof' which would ever involve sending anyone 'a bullet' ...

PeterParker957

end of the road wrote: »

gozunda wrote: »

You do realise that such an action constitutes an actual threat to a person's life. Or are you seriousley that naive?

For example:
http://www.thejournal.ie/bullet-post-conall-mcdevitt-sdlp-822025-Mar2013/

there is no need to be hysterical. given the context of the posts it's obvious he isn't threatening anything or anyone. he's just asking what your standard of proof for ibriham being shot 4 years ago would be

I spotted no hysteria there.

However i still wait on answers to my two simple questions from earlier this evening if you have a moment ?

uptherebels

dreamliner wrote: »

Yeh that's your man, pleasant piece of work

deflect deflect deflect

Buford T. Justice XIX

Mod note:And on that note, we'll finish up. Thanks to all for contributing but it's now time to move on.

Regards,

Buford T. Justice.