Werewolf XX - WWE: The Monday Night Wars

Derry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Have to name my target each morning. Then I have up until 2 hours before the lynch to accuse said target. Or I die.

Can you say who you named today, within the phrase "i dont think x is a wolf"

Isla WW

That's all the information pertaining my role that I have available to me. There is a chance accusing others could lead to same devastating consequences, which is why I'm wary of who I accuse. I picked Mary as they got so defensive early on and figured it was a safe bet. Could be wrong though.

Angus WW

Do we need to know who Abigail was? will it affect much?

Derry WW

Ara ****it you already did des

Isla WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Can you say who you named today, within the phrase "i dont think x is a wolf"

My accusation is already made. I don't want to use that phrase as I'm not sure if it's akin to a 'take backsies' so I'll be continuing to accuse them throughout the day.

Derry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

My accusation is already made. I don't want to use that phrase as I'm not sure if it's akin to a 'take backsies' so I'll be continuing to accuse them throughout the day.

It smells like grandpa s to me. Tbh there is only a negative result to your role. I'd personally bite the bullet but thats just me.

Angus WW

Isla WW wrote: »

That's all the information pertaining my role that I have available to me. There is a chance accusing others could lead to same devastating consequences, which is why I'm wary of who I accuse. I picked Mary as they got so defensive early on and figured it was a safe bet. Could be wrong though.

So you don't even find out if you were right?

Sounds like an odd role for such a big star. I mean most villagers accuse people anyway if those people posted odd things on the thread. Not that hard to conceal but you don't get any possible benefits only the potential Bret disadvantage.

You would imagine HBK would have something positive about him for team WWE but it does not seem so unless your holding back despite making an unwarranteed divulging of persona

Derry WW

Or accuse mary over and over again

Mary WW

Frank WW wrote: »

Excuse me so you want to lynch a villager? Explain to me how that's ever a good idea? We need to keep our villagers alive.

RIP Gillberg. You did us good. That's amazing for the village.

I did. Read it again.
If she has to change target every day, she'll hit Brett eventually and then it's 6 wolves. Surely that's worse than removing her from play knowing she's Village if we don't have a valid alternative?

However, if she can accuse the same person repeatedly it's not an issue.

Angus WW

Isla, just to clarify that your saying that, Your HBK role has no positives for the Village you can only accuse people and potentially turn Bret, right?


atm Des is top of any list for me, but Isla def has everyones attention

Isla WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I did. Read it again.
If she has to change target every day, she'll hit Brett eventually and then it's 6 wolves. Surely that's worse than removing her from play knowing she's Village if we don't have a valid alternative?

However, if she can accuse the same person repeatedly it's not an issue.

Don't waste a lynch on me. I can remove myself from the equation if it's necessary. Not today, unfortunately. But when we get down to the bare bones it would be in the interest of the village for me to not accuse someone.

Isla WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Isla, just to clarify that your saying that, Your HBK role has no positives for the Village you can only accuse people and potentially turn Bret, right?


atm Des is top of any list for me, but Isla def has everyones attention

:(:(

Yep. I debated coming straight out yesterday but held off for a little while. No upsides to my role for the village unfortunately... Soz.

Mary WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Or accuse mary over and over again

I'm game for that. As long as she's the only one doing it

Isla WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I'm game for that. As long as she's the only one doing it

Personally I'd be looking at those that hopped on the Mary bandwagon for the spin last night.

Derry WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I'm game for that. As long as she's the only one doing it

All it proves is your not brett.

Mary WW

Derry WW wrote: »

All it proves is your not brett.

Unless I am. I mean, they're not telling us the lynch votes, why tell us if there's a face heel turn?

(I'm not, but after yesterday I don't trust me so why should you?)

Isla WW

I'll be at a house show from about 5.30pm this evening, so if we're doing FFAs might be best for someone else to compile

Derry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Don't waste a lynch on me. I can remove myself from the equation if it's necessary. Not today, unfortunately. But when we get down to the bare bones it would be in the interest of the village for me to not accuse someone.

Hmm so do not lynch you until its really late and we begin to accept you are who you say you are. I've smelled this dish before.

I think you should do it tomorrow if not then you are a wolf in my eyes and i will vote lynch you then.


There are

Isla WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Hmm so do not lynch you until its really late and we begin to accept you are who you say you are. I've smelled this dish before.

I think you should do it tomorrow if not then you are a wolf in my eyes and i will vote lynch you then.


There are

Well if the village wills it I won't accuse anyone tomorrow if I'm still about. This will mean my death and another village member down though, them's the breaks.

Lord TSC

beakerjoe wrote: »

MOD HAT ON

Abigail WW has been modkilled due to reasons outside our control.

RIP ABIGAIL

Lynch forum now open

Angus WW

Isla WW wrote: »

I'll be at a house show from about 5.30pm this evening, so if we're doing FFAs might be best for someone else to compile

Would you mind clarifying what you mean by House Show? this is also a wrestling term to refer to their non televised shows and it is the second time you said you would be at a house show.

Doris WW

Isla WW wrote: »

I'll be at a house show from about 5.30pm this evening, so if we're doing FFAs might be best for someone else to compile

As in wrestling or looking at houses?

Isla WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Would you mind clarifying what you mean by House Show? this is also a wrestling term to refer to their non televised shows and it is the second time you said you would be at a house show.

It means I'll be away for the evening. I was trying to stay in the WWErewolf Universe. :o:o

Soz for confusion.

Derry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Well if the village wills it I won't accuse anyone tomorrow if I'm still about. This will mean my death and another village member down though, them's the breaks.

But guarantees another wolf isnt created. Put it this way, you decide to accuse mary every night the wolves win their comp and kill mary. Now you have ro pick someone new that new person is a wolf. The safest thing is for the role to die.

Gertrude WW

Voted: Barbara WW

Vernon WW

Voting isla today she legitimately has no benefit to the village, she can remove herself? that's also a negative for the village as we will stil have to lynch someone that is unknown, or we can lynch her, gives us a safe kill, prevents the possible turn of a villager to wolf.

Killing isla is the safe play, be smart lynch isla

Isla WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

Voting isla today she legitimately has no benefit to the village, she can remove herself? that's also a negative for the village as we will stil have to lynch someone that is unknown, or we can lynch her, gives us a safe kill, prevents the possible turn of a villager to wolf.

Killing isla is the safe play, be smart lynch isla

:mad::mad::mad:

This is very upsetting.

Vernon WW

Doris WW wrote: »

As in wrestling or looking at houses?

a house show is an arena show that generally doesn't make it onto tv, Wrestlers are on the road for 200+ shows a year, most aren't televised, aka house shows

Vernon WW

Isla WW wrote: »

:mad::mad::mad:

This is very upsetting.

The village being smart about not lynching an unknown tonight and tomorrow and still losing you so possible negative 3 is upsetting?

Angus WW

Isla WW wrote: »

It means I'll be away for the evening. I was trying to stay in the WWErewolf Universe. :o:o

Soz for confusion.

Probably not the best idea for anyone, I'm tempted to throw out wrestling terms given the theme but all such things will be considered task potential by myself anyway.

(If your HBK) Accuse whoever you want every night you can Isla but don't assume some people will not also consider you wolf material. Only your word makes you HBK and I don't actually think Wolves would target you now as instead of just being a villager you have called yourself out as a potential ticking timebomb in the village. Des is still something I would deal with first however, that is if nobody else looks like they are doing a task

Derry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

:mad::mad::mad:

This is very upsetting.

That'll learn ya for revealing a role that only benefits the wolves 😂

Gertrude WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

Voting isla today she legitimately has no benefit to the village, she can remove herself? that's also a negative for the village as we will stil have to lynch someone that is unknown, or we can lynch her, gives us a safe kill, prevents the possible turn of a villager to wolf.

Killing isla is the safe play, be smart lynch isla

Not today, tomorrow. If Isla does not die 2 hours before the lynch, everybody vote for her in force.

Angus WW

Even if Nigel/Gillberg stopped them with his sacrafice should we assume that 2 tasks were attempted on thread? an ECW and a WCW one? therefore there are at least 2 things be they thngs we highlighted or not that we could go back and spot now?

I'm thinking one was Des (don't want to push that too much but him not being around means people forget him)

Isla WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Even if Nigel/Gillberg stopped them with his sacrafice should we assume that 2 tasks were attempted on thread? an ECW and a WCW one? therefore there are at least 2 things be they thngs we highlighted or not that we could go back and spot now?

I'm thinking one was Des (don't want to push that too much but him not being around means people forget him)

No there were no tasks yesterday they got kills as normal.

Today there will be tasks and we should look out for them.

Gertrude WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Even if Nigel/Gillberg stopped them with his sacrafice should we assume that 2 tasks were attempted on thread? an ECW and a WCW one? therefore there are at least 2 things be they thngs we highlighted or not that we could go back and spot now?

I'm thinking one was Des (don't want to push that too much but him not being around means people forget him)

I don't think so. Today from 11am is task day, not yesterday.

Vernon WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Not today, tomorrow. If Isla does not die 2 hours before the lynch, everybody vote for her in force.

see I don't like this. Here is why, we kill her today we are 0 as we lose a villager but cant randomly lose one villager and add a wolf. We can lynch des tomorrow if we all want, therefore we have two safe lynches, otherwise we lynch des, isla removes herself and we lose another to lynch possibly a wwe superstar, the numbers and logic say lynch isla first.

Derry WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

see I don't like this. Here is why, we kill her today we are 0 as we lose a villager but cant randomly lose one villager and add a wolf. We can lynch des tomorrow if we all want, therefore we have two safe lynches, otherwise we lynch des, isla removes herself and we lose another to lynch possibly a wwe superstar, the numbers and logic say lynch isla first.

Have to say i agree with this.

Isla WW

Ah jesus, why are we lynching villagers instead of looking for wolves.

Derry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Ah jesus, why are we lynching villagers instead of looking for wolves.

Because "villagers" can create wolves so its as good as killing a wolf

Gertrude WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

see I don't like this. Here is why, we kill her today we are 0 as we lose a villager but cant randomly lose one villager and add a wolf. We can lynch des tomorrow if we all want, therefore we have two safe lynches, otherwise we lynch des, isla removes herself and we lose another to lynch possibly a wwe superstar, the numbers and logic say lynch isla first.

We need to lynch wolves.
If Isla is a wolf, she will be lynched tomorrow.
If Isla is village, she sacrifices herself for villages good tomorrow.

The villages only method of ridding itself of wolves is by lynching.
If we lynch isla today, and she is a villager, we are robbing the village of a lynch attempt that could be used on a wolf. Either today, or tomorrow.

Isla WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

We need to lynch wolves.
If Isla is a wolf, she will be lynched tomorrow.
If Isla is village, she sacrifices herself for villages good tomorrow.

The villages only method of ridding itself of wolves is by lynching.
If we lynch isla today, and she is a villager, we are robbing the village of a lynch attempt that could be used on a wolf. Either today, or tomorrow.

No need to even lynch me. If I don't die 2 hours before the lynch,vig kill me.

Wendy WW

Yea I don't like the idea of lynching Isla, even if the role isn't a great one it's still a villager and one lynch wasted not looking for a wolf.

If we focus and nab a wolf tonight after their blocked kills this morning we'll have a great advantage going into Day 3.

Frank WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I did. Read it again.
If she has to change target every day, she'll hit Brett eventually and then it's 6 wolves. Surely that's worse than removing her from play knowing she's Village if we don't have a valid alternative?

However, if she can accuse the same person repeatedly it's not an issue.

At the moment I'm believing Isla. I see no reason or need for her (as a wolf) to claim a role this early with no way of backing her claim up. Therefore I would rather not kill an almost confirmed villager for now and focus on trying to find out other wolves.

Vernon WW wrote: »

see I don't like this. Here is why, we kill her today we are 0 as we lose a villager but cant randomly lose one villager and add a wolf. We can lynch des tomorrow if we all want, therefore we have two safe lynches, otherwise we lynch des, isla removes herself and we lose another to lynch possibly a wwe superstar, the numbers and logic say lynch isla first.

Fair enough some villagers will have to go but again, I don't think we need to kill Isla today. I would much rather hear from Desmond and look at other potential suspicions.
Is the devil you know better than the devil you don't? Is it better to kill an almost confirmed villager instead of a potential wolf?

Wendy WW

Frank WW wrote: »

Fair enough some villagers will have to go but again, I don't think we need to kill Isla today. I would much rather hear from Desmond and look at other potential suspicions.
Is the devil you know better than the devil you don't? Is it better to kill an almost confirmed villager instead of a potential wolf?

Yep second, we need another option other than Isla. Desmond has been very very quiet.

What say you Desmond?

Orla WW

If we know Isla is known goody, ie no dispute of the role claim then id be inclined to focus my day on catching an actual wolf. If no closer at 8pm then revisit

Orla WW

Ive asked a few times Vernon but who did you vote for last night? Curious to see what your initial thoughts were yesterday

Derry WW

Thats fair... she's only a danger if she accuses another person. Ok so work on others for today.

Des seems to be the hot topic so lets put him on the shelf for now. Until he shows up at least.

Is there anywhere else worth looking? Angus and wendy riding isla this morn setting up the scenario i suggested earlier was suspicous enough to me.

Isla WW

Problem has been averted anyways, folks. I know who Bret is.

Tegan WW

Isla, whatvtime did you start naming someone yesterday?

Orla WW

At this point we are still probably working off yesterdays FFAs, watching the thread for tasks should hopefully be more rewarding than day 0. It'd be nice if a few people who didnt do FFAs or put their vote on thread did so now, it would at least give some points for discussion