Werewolf XX - WWE: The Monday Night Wars

Mary WW

Given we talked about holding off on FFA and voting until later in the day to avoid wolves piling on a name, does everyone want to stand by their early vote for Vernon? Cause it looks a little vulpicious.

I'm assuming the tasks asymmetrical so as to avoid the wolf teams IDing eachother, so presume we're looking for two sets of suspicious behavior. And there's no getting around Vernon's...

So that's Vernon, Desmond, Me unless you've all rethought your FFA from yesterday. Anyone else we need to interrogate?

Vernon WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

See if you're Team ECW that could have been a task by Team WCW by calling it out you're looking like you're helping yet you are literally a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Honestly if you hadn't come out with the whole... ah I was just testing ye excuse I would have been more inclined to believe you.

Well thats all it was, take a step back and check my previous posts. You'll find nothing wolfy about them.

Isla WW

Doris WW wrote: »

Isla, you accused Mary yesterday, right? Was that just for the task or had you a hunch she was wolf? I think you might have answered this earlier but I can't find the post now.

Little bit from A, little bit from B to be honest. Still can't quite get the inkling out of my mind it was a task tbh. But I needed a target and so I went with it.

Isla WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

I'm interested in what Des has to say, I called him out earlier

Agreed. But again we seem to be somehow deflected off Desmond and onto you now.

Isla WW

Mary WW wrote: »

Given we talked about holding off on FFA and voting until later in the day to avoid wolves piling on a name, does everyone want to stand by their early vote for Vernon? Cause it looks a little vulpicious.

I'm assuming the tasks asymmetrical so as to avoid the wolf teams IDing eachother, so presume we're looking for two sets of suspicious behavior. And there's no getting around Vernon's...

So that's Vernon, Desmond, Me unless you've all rethought your FFA from yesterday. Anyone else we need to interrogate?

Still not giving in on the Riona thing. I want to hear more from Liam who we have had nothing from thus far as well. Vernon has come out to play which is good.

Holly we need more from. I was about to say Phil has gone mysteriously quiet but he's back on thread now so I'll let it slide... for now.;)

We have an idea of who we want the seer to check but will leave that for later.

Orla WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

Well thats all it was, take a step back and check my previous posts. You'll find nothing wolfy about them.

Who did you vote for? Youve been asked numerous times and have actually ignored every single one. Flat out refusing to answer another poster!

Phil WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

Isla's story is bull in my opinion fwiw.

Why do you think this?

Isla WW wrote: »

Agreed. But again we seem to be somehow deflected off Desmond and onto you now.

He's definitely going in my FFA today, like he was yesterday when I actually voted for him. The only question is who the other two candidates will be

Gertrude WW

Mary WW wrote: »

Given we talked about holding off on FFA and voting until later in the day to avoid wolves piling on a name, does everyone want to stand by their early vote for Vernon? Cause it looks a little vulpicious.

I'm assuming the tasks asymmetrical so as to avoid the wolf teams IDing eachother, so presume we're looking for two sets of suspicious behavior. And there's no getting around Vernon's...

So that's Vernon, Desmond, Me unless you've all rethought your FFA from yesterday. Anyone else we need to interrogate?

Please excuse my ignorance, what does 'vulpicious' mean?

Orla WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Why do you think this?



He's definitely going in my FFA today, like he was yesterday when I actually voted for him. The only question is who the other two candidates will be

At this point ( in no particular order of preference) id be looking at Vernon, Des and Mary. Fairly obvious but all three have made wrestling references, but extremely difficult to know which was a task, im more sold on Des than Vernon at the moment even though Vernon wont answer simple questions, at least he's here as opposed to Des who is lying low IMO

Phil WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Please excuse my ignorance, what does 'vulpicious' mean?

Wolfy

Vernon WW

Orla WW wrote: »

Who did you vote for? Youve been asked numerous times and have actually ignored every single one. Flat out refusing to answer another poster!

I only remember beeing asked once by Mary I think, but if ya must know, I voted Des

Vernon WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Please excuse my ignorance, what does 'vulpicious' mean?

Phil WW wrote: »

Wolfy

Mixture of sexy and wolfy, could be a reference to Kevin Nash?

Isla WW

I simply won't be around to follow the plan put forward last night. Will be casting my vote early and won't be on to change it.

#FFA2

Desmond - Four posts. Four. Three containing wrestling references.

Riona - Not letting this slide yet. Still super suss of Riona and her initial post. Her posting since has improved but not enough to assuade my suspicions.

Derry - Little left of field this but I get the feeling Derry is trying to blend with the crowd a lot. A wolf in sheep's clothing? Not sure yet but I have suspicions enough to name them in my FFA.

Phil WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

I only remember beeing asked once by Mary I think, but if ya must know, I voted Des

That's funny, since you and Holly actively discussed it this morning, when you knew we were looking for it...

Mary WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Please excuse my ignorance, what does 'vulpicious' mean?

Sorry : vulpine (of the wolf) + suspicious
It is not a wrestling term.

I keep forgetting to not do anything remotely hackle-raising.

Gertrude WW

Mary WW wrote: »

Given we talked about holding off on FFA and voting until later in the day to avoid wolves piling on a name, does everyone want to stand by their early vote for Vernon? Cause it looks a little vulpicious.(wolfy)

I suggested we do an FFA and stick to the result, as in, vote for the singular outcome of the FFAs. Frank said he wouldn't follow such a plan.

So, for now, I've gone with transparency instead, until some plan is actually formulated.
Anything that requires 21 people to post in a 5 minute window is out. Sure, getting them to vote in a 10 hour window seems hard enough.

Mary WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

Mixture of sexy and wolfy, could be a reference to Kevin Nash?

How did you get sexy out of that?
Just an excuse to drop a wrestler name?

Isla WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

I suggested we do an FFA and stick to the result, as in, vote for the singular outcome of the FFAs. Frank said he wouldn't follow such a plan.

So, for now, I've gone with transparency instead, until some plan is actually formulated.
Anything that requires 21 people to post in a 5 minute window is out. Sure, getting them to vote in a 10 hour window seems hard enough.

Well, the whole point of the FFA is that the top three then get voted for. We don't say on thread who we're voting for obviously.

It can be a good method of finding a wolf.

Orla WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

I only remember beeing asked once by Mary I think, but if ya must know, I voted Des

Seriously, these are just my posts, you were asked by others aswell

Orla WW wrote: »

Any chance of you voted for and why?

Orla WW wrote: »

Any reason for no FFA or no vote on thread?

Orla WW wrote: »

Ive asked a few times Vernon but who did you vote for last night? Curious to see what your initial thoughts were yesterday

Isla WW

We would like the seer to peek Derry tonight please.

Gertrude WW

Isla WW wrote: »

I simply won't be around to follow the plan put forward last night. Will be casting my vote early and won't be on to change it.

#FFA2

Desmond - Four posts. Four. Three containing wrestling references.

Riona - Not letting this slide yet. Still super suss of Riona and her initial post. Her posting since has improved but not enough to assuade my suspicions.

Derry - Little left of field this but I get the feeling Derry is trying to blend with the crowd a lot. A wolf in sheep's clothing? Not sure yet but I have suspicions enough to name them in my FFA.

If my suspicions are correct, we should probably do the exact opposite of what Isla says.
And I am not saying Isla is bad, just that, if good, she could get lots innocents killed.

Angus WW

Isla WW wrote: »

We would like the seer to peek Derry tonight please.

are you we? First you called Bret out on thread and now the Seer.

Isla WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

If my suspicions are correct, we should probably do the exact opposite of what Isla says.
And I am not saying Isla is bad, just that, if good, she could get lots innocents killed.

:mad::mad::mad:

Gertrude WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Well, the whole point of the FFA is that the top three then get voted for. We don't say on thread who we're voting for obviously.

It can be a good method of finding a wolf.

That may work when we get the results of the vote. We might get into trouble if we dilute the votes.

Isla WW

Angus WW wrote: »

are you we? First you called Bret out on thread and now the Seer.

We is a collective term for an unnamed number of villagers who are in communication. I unfortunately have the job of communicating our wishes to the village.

Angus WW

Orla WW

Isla WW wrote: »

We is a collective term for an unnamed number of villagers who are in communication. I unfortunately have the job of communicating our wishes to the village.

This is a good development if true, strength in numbers behind the scenes anyway

Tegan WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

If my suspicions are correct, we should probably do the exact opposite of what Isla says.
And I am not saying Isla is bad, just that, if good, she could get lots innocents killed.

Lol, but I think she's playing well and you know what that means....

Doris WW

Should we have a vote on who to peak? i know it takes time but maybe we could learn something from who votes who?

Isla WW

Doris WW wrote: »

Should we have a vote on who to peak? i know it takes time but maybe we could learn something from who votes who?

No problem at all with this strategy.

Steve WW

Feck me. Manic day at work and first chance I get to catch up here and it’s all going on.

Nice one with the munch, thank you muches, Nigel
Isla has a role which had her doomed if she found Brett. Brett found her instead so she’s not gonna fall on her own sword. That correct?
Des is still awol.
Vernon is telling us to watch for stuff whilst posting said stuff.
We’re back to FFAs?

Have I missed anything else of real importance?

Tegan WW

Doris WW wrote: »

Should we have a vote on who to peak? i know it takes time but maybe we could learn something from who votes who?

I vote Isla for peek and Vernon for lynch.

Doris WW

Isla WW wrote: »

No problem at all with this strategy.

Ok

#PEAKVOTE1 Mary

I pick Mary as there is still doubt about her from day 0

Angus WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

I vote Isla for peek and Vernon for lynch.

I'd agree with that at the moment but don't like Des' inactivity meaning he gets left out.

Isla WW

#Peekvote1 Derry.

Also the group's collective choice.

Wendy WW

#ffa

I'm going to go with Vernon - Seemed like he performed an ECW Task
Des - Silence and post history very dodgy.
Isla - I was buying her story up until the seer peek call out. Feels like she's trying to divert from something.

Vernon WW

I will vote to peek Des

Phil WW

I'd also be down for a peak on Isla or Vernon. Isla wold probably be the smarter choice

Derry WW

Angus WW wrote: »

I'd agree with that at the moment but don't like Des' inactivity meaning he gets left out.

If hes inactive for the dayi think we should see if he votes or not?

I just cant buy isla's story. Im sorry. But im going to go with vernon tonight but Its very conveniant. I dont mind if that puts on your ffa isla, I'm irrelivant.

Jake WW

Mary WW wrote: »

Given we talked about holding off on FFA and voting until later in the day to avoid wolves piling on a name, does everyone want to stand by their early vote for Vernon? Cause it looks a little vulpicious.

I'm assuming the tasks asymmetrical so as to avoid the wolf teams IDing eachother, so presume we're looking for two sets of suspicious behavior. And there's no getting around Vernon's...

So that's Vernon, Desmond, Me unless you've all rethought your FFA from yesterday. Anyone else we need to interrogate?

At the moment its looking like Des vs Vernon with a few others getting a passing mention. If we're going with the locked in ffa vote we need to keep track of who's steering these two wagons. Unless the wolves can work together theres likely to be wolves looking to push both.

Derry WW

Dont mind with helping the seer choos his peaks, but ye do know we wont get the info for another couple of days right? Why are ye waisting them on people who's future needs to be decided sooner?

Phil WW

Of course the seer could choose not to use it yet, if he thought it could be better suited for a later date

Isla WW

Derry WW wrote: »

If hes inactive for the dayi think we should see if he votes or not?

I just cant buy isla's story. Im sorry. But im going to go with vernon tonight but Its very conveniant. I dont mind if that puts on your ffa isla, I'm irrelivant.

Again, low posters get to skate by for so long in these games, is it any wonder the village loses.

Liam also needs to go. Only serving as a distraction if they're not a wolf by not contributing.

One person dies tonight. The teams have to complete a task to earn the kill. Vernon's 'task' just seems too obvious to me. Misguided, sure. Is he a wolf based on anything previous? Not for me tbh.

Mary WW

Doris WW wrote: »

Ok

#PEAKVOTE1 Mary

I pick Mary as there is still doubt about her from day 0

I'm flattered but that's a waste. Well, I think so, but I don't think I can convince you guys. Isla did indicate that she trumped up those doubts though.
Presumably if Brett talked to Isla he has some way of confirming her story, which would make peeking her a waste.

Peek Des, lynch Vernon or Barbara

Doris WW

Derry WW wrote: »

If hes inactive for the dayi think we should see if he votes or not?

I just cant buy isla's story. Im sorry. But im going to go with vernon tonight but Its very conveniant. I dont mind if that puts on your ffa isla, I'm irrelivant.

We don't get to see who votes unfortunately.

Derry WW

Doris WW wrote: »

We don't get to see who votes unfortunately.

Ah yes. I knew this. Its possible we could loose quiet ones over the next 2 days?

Frank WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

I suggested we do an FFA and stick to the result, as in, vote for the singular outcome of the FFAs. Frank said he wouldn't follow such a plan.

So, for now, I've gone with transparency instead, until some plan is actually formulated.
Anything that requires 21 people to post in a 5 minute window is out. Sure, getting them to vote in a 10 hour window seems hard enough.

There is no point in villagers all piling their votes on a single person. The chances of getting a wolf in this method are slim and it allows the wolves to hide (even though we're not getting lynch votes). You do an FFA then each person votes for one of the top three. That's how it works.

Phil WW wrote: »

I'd also be down for a peak on Isla or Vernon. Isla wold probably be the smarter choice

There's no point in peeking Isla if she's in a room with Bret as Bret can probably confirm her. Or am I taking that up wrong?

Jake WW

Doris WW wrote: »

We don't get to see who votes unfortunately.

Didn't the mods give us the number of votes last night? If we have that and the votes of active voters we should be able to work it out

Isla WW

Others can verify me but won't be doing so for obvious reasons. No need to waste a peek, that's all I can say.

Mary WW

Jake WW wrote: »

Didn't the mods give us the number of votes last night? If we have that and the votes of active voters we should be able to work it out

Yeah but it was more than the number of players due to mind changes. So that info is meaningless.