Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Rail September Timetable Changes

Options
1101113151638

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,506 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    marno21 wrote: »
    The only way the NTA are going to properly encourage long term investment in the DART system is by driving the entire system to breaking point to show just how limited it is

    When we get to the stage that the DART system is overall constantly the focus of bad publicity there will be major investment

    It's a sad system but it's the way things seem to go around here

    That's hardly ideal though. If it's broken today (and recognised) it's a minimum of 5 years broken before any meaningful infrastructure is funded and built built. Long time to be running a broken system.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,524 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Infini wrote: »
    Yeah but instead the FG idiot's butchered everything. They slashed funding because of the recession and forgot that infrastructure is not an expense but an investment that pays back in the long term. Then they idiotically cancelled the DU instead for a bloody metro which involves ripping up part of the LUAS line even though they could just build a spur off the Northern line to the airport for a fraction of the cost and maybe extend it to swords or that.....

    Seriously things like that really irritate me...
    What are they ripping up? The green line was built to metro spec with wider tracks


    Isn’t a dedicated line much bette was then a half arsed attempt with a spur.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,876 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Infini wrote: »
    Yeah but instead the FG idiot's butchered everything. They slashed funding because of the recession and forgot that infrastructure is not an expense but an investment that pays back in the long term. Then they idiotically cancelled the DU instead for a bloody metro which involves ripping up part of the LUAS line even though they could just build a spur off the Northern line to the airport for a fraction of the cost and maybe extend it to swords or that.....

    Seriously things like that really irritate me...

    FG didn’t forget anything.

    They made calculated short term political decisions.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,666 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    marno21 wrote: »
    bk wrote: »
    Well the rumour has it that Irish Rail are currently preparing a tender for a large numbers of both EMU's (DARTs) and hybrid diesel-electric trains for commuter services.

    I would assume that this isn't just replacing old DARTs, but a significant expansion too.

    It does look like this new 10 minute schedule is workable in terms of scheduling and paths, which is great news. But if only they had more DART carriages and thus all 8 carriage trains, then it seems most of the above complaints would be resolved.

    I'd suspect we will hear a lot more about new trains in the next few months. I suspect they are waiting to announce it all as part of a big DART Expansion project launch, similar to the Metrolink launch.

    The only way the NTA are going to properly encourage long term investment in the DART system is by driving the entire system to breaking point to show just how limited it is

    When we get to the stage that the DART system is overall constantly the focus of bad publicity there will be major investment

    It's a sad system but it's the way things seem to go around here

    Indeed and that has been the case for as long as I can remember across many governments.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,769 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    Looks to me like Greystones isn't seeing a frequency improvement, but just a change in times. Which means that the buses no longer link up with the train times...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,769 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    ted1 wrote: »
    What are they ripping up? The green line was built to metro spec with wider tracks


    Isn’t a dedicated line much bette was then a half arsed attempt with a spur.

    Could've sworn I read on journal.ie that they were going to be closing a big stretch of the luas for the Metro upgrade so they could replace the lines.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    That's hardly ideal though. If it's broken today (and recognised) it's a minimum of 5 years broken before any meaningful infrastructure is funded and built built. Long time to be running a broken system.

    We've been running a broken system for 25 years. Both dart and bus


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,798 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    McGaggs wrote: »
    Could've sworn I read on journal.ie that they were going to be closing a big stretch of the luas for the Metro upgrade so they could replace the lines.

    One potential option could involve a closure to build a bridge that was not replaced originally at Dunville Avenue. That is not set in stone


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,798 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And the 0545 Sligo is making use of its padding again today. Already 5 mins late to Maynooth and holding up the stopping service behind it


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    8 carriages back on the southbound howth darts for 8.00 and 8.20 this morning


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,666 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull


    From what I have seen and from what colleagues have told me it was slightly better this morning, but still room for improvement.

    I did notice though that more Howth sets seem to be 2 carriages up on yesterday, when really you'd have thought that they'd have added more to Malahide.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Cloudio9


    People standing from Malahide on the 830 Dart this morning. Then in Portmarnock the previous 829 Dart and 841 commuter services have been replaced by this one Dart so big crowds on platform.


  • Registered Users Posts: 703 ✭✭✭frisbeeface


    Cloudio9 wrote: »
    People standing from Malahide on the 830 Dart this morning. Then in Portmarnock the previous 829 Dart and 841 commuter services have been replaced by this one Dart so big crowds on platform.

    I'm on the same DART and there's still seats free in my carriage at Kilbarrack.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,524 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    McGaggs wrote: »
    Looks to me like Greystones isn't seeing a frequency improvement, but just a change in times. Which means that the buses no longer link up with the train times...

    It’s in Wicklow they should be lucky to have a DART. The single track is a big issue there


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,985 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    devnull wrote: »
    From what I have seen and from what colleagues have told me it was slightly better this morning, but still room for improvement.

    I did notice though that more Howth sets seem to be 2 carriages up on yesterday, when really you'd have thought that they'd have added more to Malahide.
    8.00 howth southbound 100% needs to be 8 carriages, always busiest dart heading into city centre, madness that it was 6 carriages yesterday

    8.20 howth southbound could cope with 6 carriages


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,798 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    L1011 wrote: »
    And the 0545 Sligo is making use of its padding again today. Already 5 mins late to Maynooth and holding up the stopping service behind it

    Reached Ossory Road early and then had to wait so long that it ended up in Connolly late!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭PCros


    As the pressure seems to be mounting now for IR and we cans see they are getting complaints every 30 seconds on Twitter...can they just amend the timetable again now or is there a load of red tape to go and do that?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    devnull wrote: »
    I did notice though that more Howth sets seem to be 2 carriages up on yesterday, when really you'd have thought that they'd have added more to Malahide.

    If you were one of the people using the short darts yesterday morning from Howth you'd be happy to see them increased this morning.

    I got the 8:31 at Kilbarrack and it was thankfully 8 carriages long. Still didn't get a seat.

    The old (proper rush hour) 11 minute gap between two Howth darts at this time of the morning is gone as are my chances of getting a seat, but there you go, first world problems, have to think of the greater good etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,928 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    McGaggs wrote: »
    Looks to me like Greystones isn't seeing a frequency improvement, but just a change in times. Which means that the buses no longer link up with the train times...

    no frequency increase in Greystones but apparently the NTA are looking into option for providing a 20 minute service (a passing loop seem the most likely solution).

    The buses never met with the trains - BusConnects is supposed to fix that, but DublinBus often behave like they're in competition with Irish Rail. Buses often pull out of Greystones station as there are still crowds emerging from an incoming Dart.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Cloudio9


    I'm on the same DART and there's still seats free in my carriage at Kilbarrack.

    Maybe you have BO 😀


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    loyatemu wrote: »
    no frequency increase in Greystones but apparently the NTA are looking into option for providing a 20 minute service (a passing loop seem the most likely solution).

    The buses never met with the trains - BusConnects is supposed to fix that, but DublinBus often behave like they're in competition with Irish Rail. Buses often pull out of Greystones station as there are still crowds emerging from an incoming Dart.

    Honestly if they want a quicker service down there they NEED to double-track that section but to do so would involve the need to employ a significant amount of tunneling and scaling back of the cliff face as well. There really isnt any room for a passing loop.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,928 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Infini wrote: »
    Honestly if they want a quicker service down there they NEED to double-track that section but to do so would involve the need to employ a significant amount of tunneling and scaling back of the cliff face as well. There really isnt any room for a passing loop.

    there's room for a a loop on the Greystones side of the long tunnel. They could also (at greater cost/disruption) double the whole way between the tunnel and Greystones station, there's space but it would be a big job as they'd have to widen cuttings and embankments and replace a few bridges.

    Doubling the whole section between Bray and Greystones - I'd imagine they'd have to dig an entirely new tunnel almost the full length of the hill, so crazy money and not justifiable at current population levels.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    devnull wrote: »
    I generally don't like bench seats but I prefer the 8100 class to the 8500 and 8510 trains with the crazy amounts of padding and low seating position that pretty much encourages slouching. The 8520s are the second best after the 8100 a big improvement over the overly padded ones and more room.

    The 8100s really feel more cut out for the kind of work DART is, which is basically inner suburban work rather than the newer stuff that feels more like an outer suburban train that has had a few things taken out of it.

    The general feeling of quality is better on the 8100s as well, they have a PIS that works, thay have good windows, they feel like a train and the build quality seems better on the interior if you ask me. The refurbishment really was excellent, they look nothing like their age and their older siblings are still in service in Hamburg.



    When the 8100s finally go to be scrapped I hope they preserve at least one full set, as it will be a really sad day for a well built train that has served Dublin exceptionally well and is probably the last of the IE stock that will see anything like 40 years in service. I normally prefer new to old, but I make an exception for the 8100s.

    Agree with you about the original DART carriages being the best but where do you think they should be preserved - Moyasta or in the National Transport Museum/Hay Shed in Howth?


  • Registered Users Posts: 82,587 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Hoefully they refrain from turning the unnecessary heat on them until it actually gets very cold or they will need to setup a temporary morgue at Connolly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭XPS_Zero


    Infini wrote: »
    It was well warned by plenty that increased traffic would have this effect. Drivers issues aside they need to invest significantly in the infrastructure itself including DU and rolling stock to have better reliability.

    I say this through gritted teeth as a politico...if the commuters want this then they have to say "invest in public services esp public transport" when canvassers come to their door and when pollsters call them on the phone NOT:

    "I want to get rid of USC"
    "I want a minor tax cut I'll barely notice on pure principle"
    "I want an extra 5er on my pension"

    Conrary to what you may think, the campaigns that know what they are doing (the ones I run do anyway..) write down what people say on the canvass and when the same issue keeps popping up again and again they notice.
    The problem is people keep thinking short term, or they tell their national representative (instead of their local election candidate) about their local park or bad road or complain they are having trouble getting one of the new medical cards, by all means complain about the stuff bothering you atm but if you want bigger scale changes yell for them.

    I often find it really odd that public transport infrastructure never comes up with Dublin people, the country folk will tell you all day long they want a stop from the Cork line for their town etc but the Dublin people restrict themselves to complaining about the local bus stop and never complain about the bigger stuff.
    Even look at the Portmarnock example, their complaint is NOT "you guys don't know the difference between an investment and an expense, you are frittering money away on short term stuff instead of building things that will get me to work faster like Metro and DU...stop announcing them F
    G BUILD THEM ALREADY! and add more capacity to the rail lines!"...their complaint is, as I keep coming back to "look after my bit of the jigsaw puzzle", stop at MY station again...forget the domino effect it might have on the rest of the line, stop at MY station...so what you end up with there is the TD for that area and the govt and the TD for some other area fighting over what will happen...whereas if the politicos see you all demanding major infrastructure upgrades they will do it, and EVERYONE will benefit it won't be just "my station wins your station loses".


    If we had finished T21 by now none of this would be an issue at all!


    Much as I love blaming Irish Rail and the Irish public sector and their unions for things, although the union did sabotage driver training here, this is the govts fault, the last 3 govts, not IE's. Cowens govt never should have delayed T21 (yes even in a national crises, in depressions is when the govt is supposed to step in as the investor, we got billions to bail out failed companies we could have folded investment in the country into the plans), Leo and his successor never should have canceled it then faffed around for years hemming and hawing over it with absurd plans to run a Luas to the aiport dumping people in a loop around the roundabout. This all comes down to that - T21 was never finished and it needs to be. I realize that even if they pick up the shovels now it will take years so obviously we need some soloution in the mean time, but this can has to be stopped kicking down the road and the only way that will happen is through public demand.

    There is a general election in a year, mention PT investment every time a canvasser calls, any time a polling company calls you, anytime you call into a radio show, any time you are talking to other friends make the case why it's needed esp if they bring up problems like THIS, talk about it so often people roll their eyes and tell you to change the tune.

    It's the only way this will ever get sorted.

    Oh and you have to tell them it's more important to you than your tax cut - sorry, sure we'd be borrowing for this but we need the revenue from tax to pay the interest and pay it back.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,710 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    My only comment is they have drafted the timetable fairly well, things were movming well give or take 2-3 minutes.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,721 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    XPS_Zero wrote: »
    I often find it really odd that public transport infrastructure never comes up with Dublin people, the country folk will tell you all day long they want a stop from the Cork line for their town etc but the Dublin people restrict themselves to complaining about the local bus stop and never complain about the bigger stuff.

    I think the problem is too many people living in Dublin still think of it as a town, rather then a medium sized European capital city of 1.5 million people (metro).

    I think most people don't realise how big Dublin has really gotten and don't realise that similar sized European cities would have 3 or 4 Metro lines and extensive tram networks. So they don't really know to shout for it, even though they are suffering every day during their commute into work. They don't know that it can be better.

    That is why I think it is so important to get Metrolink built. I think it will completely change peoples thinking about infrastructure like this and lead to calls for more. Just like we saw we Luas was first built.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,349 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    bk wrote: »
    I think the problem is too many people living in Dublin still think of it as a town, rather then a medium sized European capital city of 1.5 million people (metro).

    It's a very, very small example of this, but I'm changing how I'm referring to Dublin. I'm no longer saying "I'm heading into town", I'm trying to say "city centre", or even just "city". It's quite hard to change an ingrained thought though, so I have to admit I'm struggling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,769 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    loyatemu wrote: »
    no frequency increase in Greystones but apparently the NTA are looking into option for providing a 20 minute service (a passing loop seem the most likely solution).

    The buses never met with the trains - BusConnects is supposed to fix that, but DublinBus often behave like they're in competition with Irish Rail. Buses often pull out of Greystones station as there are still crowds emerging from an incoming Dart.

    The buses to Greystones would drop you off in time to catch the DART, but not now. You're right about them not meeting passengers off the train. I've seen them turn off the lights on the bus before dropping off passengers so as to sneak past without picking anyone up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    CatInABox wrote: »
    It's a very, very small example of this, but I'm changing how I'm referring to Dublin. I'm no longer saying "I'm heading into town", I'm trying to say "city centre", or even just "city". It's quite hard to change an ingrained thought though, so I have to admit I'm struggling.

    It will always be town to me :D


Advertisement