WW XXI: Christmas Chaos!

Gabriel WW

Isla WW wrote: »

I've been interacting with Gabby for the past while hence me referencing having used that gif to refer to the weird post about soul reading Gabby wrote. I made an error and wrote Babs name instead of Gabbys with all these anon accounts not standing out too much.

I appreciate if your poking me to see what I do but id focus on people posting on stuff like Tegan pretting she was new then saying nah im not or this weirdness going on between Gabby and Frank. I might post a lot but that stuff stands out a lot more to me

Ya your right I wonder what frank and gabby are up to?

Doris WW

The general consensus was not to do an FFA... and now we're doing an FFA...

I have one person in mind who I'm going to vote for. Do you want me to make up another two based on nothing?

Barbara WW

Anyone got the lynch form handy?

Ewan WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

I was having a bit of trouble not having much to go off myself but you manage to get 3 names with no reasons what so ever, welcome to the list population you

Conor WW wrote: »

Ewan, this was over an hour ago... and then...






Bandwagon obvious bandwagon is obvious.

Weak sauce.

Isla, any reason your FFA is almost an exact carbon copy of mine also?

It is not a bandwagon but just a list going on what others have said as I think this is what most people will do. FFA on day 0 is as useless as an ashtray on a motorbike at this stage and my list with no reason is exactly that.
IF I have a proper FFA by today I will put something together, but the above one was just random names of folks

Jake WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Anyone got the lynch form handy?

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1J0x...Hk0ko/viewform

Steve WW

Only two so far for my FFA.

#FFA1
tegan The I'm new, whats going on act was so clumsy, they wanted to be caught, for exactly the reason liam said, no wolf would be that shít. Convienient.
conor Steering, then giving people problems for having same people as his ffa, but these people who came after have reasons which conor didn’t even bother with

Nigel WW

Doris WW wrote: »

The general consensus was not to do an FFA... and now we're doing an FFA...

I have one person in mind who I'm going to vote for. Do you want me to make up another two based on nothing?

If you've got nothing else other than then just post one tbh, no point adding someone without a valid reason. It dilutes genuine suspicions and while doubtful at this stsge may lead to someone being run off who may not have been without your vote.

Conor WW

Jake WW wrote: »

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1J0x...Hk0ko/viewform

Foolish Jake, that url doesn't exist!

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1J0xkxbnSlwo1HuxcAVOGyEXHM5N2HJDAXXUTmlHk0ko/viewform

Conor WW

Looks like I'll be up tonight. That's fine. I'm not significant so happy to take one for the team. Watch those putting me on FFAs though, especially those with limited to no reason for the other names on their FFAs.

Liam WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

It is not a bandwagon but just a list going on what others have said as I think this is what most people will do. FFA on day 0 is as useless as an ashtray on a motorbike at this stage and my list with no reason is exactly that.
IF I have a proper FFA by today I will put something together, but the above one was just random names of folks

Isn't that what Conor did?

Seriously, why bother post a fake one of random names?

Weird.

Conor WW

Liam WW wrote: »

Isn't that what Conor did?

Seriously, why bother post a fake one of random names?

Weird.

Yup. On the watchlist, that one is.

Mary WW

I don't like ffas until I actually have a sense for what is going on so will be abstaining from on

Angus WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Hey I thought you were trying to pocket me earlier so this comes as quite a surprise

Tbh, I thought YOU were trying to pocket ME, hence why I put you on my list. I've agreed with 90% of what you've said, in terms of general strategy, and I don't like being so trusting of someone so quickly so, to be safe, I'm putting you on my "don't trust" list for now.

If that makes any sense...

Liam WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Looks like I'll be up tonight. That's fine. I'm not significant so happy to take one for the team. Watch those putting me on FFAs though, especially those with limited to no reason for the other names on their FFAs.

You're on one or two ya gimp will ya slow down

Cheesus, the self pity is real today folks "someone accused me boohoo looks like I'm for the chop"

You're still contradiciting yourslef by the way, let's look at the people who put you on the FFA, sure we don't know that that's their actual FFA or just a tester to see how people react.

Morons trying to overcomplicate everything is what's the most confusing thing about this game, same with Steve and his bloody MD5s.

Conor WW

And to add Liam, my list were of three people I thought likely to be jumped on in FFAs. I wanted to gauge reactions. I was deliberately being contradictory to my previous posts to see who if anyone would pick up on it.

Steering, btw Steve? Steering what? Team village is a rudderless vessel with no captain.

Still stand by the peeking low and lynching mid/high plan earlier. That's a great idea.

Gabriel WW

Liam WW wrote: »

You're on one or two ya gimp will ya slow down

Cheesus, the self pity is real today folks "someone accused me boohoo looks like I'm for the chop"

You're still contradiciting yourslef by the way, let's look at the people who put you on the FFA, sure we don't know that that's their actual FFA or just a tester to see how people react.

Morons trying to overcomplicate everything is what's the most confusing thing about this game, same with Steve and his bloody MD5s.

You ****ing tell em tom

Steve WW

Liam WW wrote: »

You're on one or two ya gimp will ya slow down

Cheesus, the self pity is real today folks "someone accused me boohoo looks like I'm for the chop"

You're still contradiciting yourslef by the way, let's look at the people who put you on the FFA, sure we don't know that that's their actual FFA or just a tester to see how people react.

Morons trying to overcomplicate everything is what's the most confusing thing about this game, same with Steve and his bloody MD5s.

I thought it was a great idea!

Conor WW

Liam WW wrote: »

You're on one or two ya gimp will ya slow down

Cheesus, the self pity is real today folks "someone accused me boohoo looks like I'm for the chop"

You're still contradiciting yourslef by the way, let's look at the people who put you on the FFA, sure we don't know that that's their actual FFA or just a tester to see how people react.

Morons trying to overcomplicate everything is what's the most confusing thing about this game, same with Steve and his bloody MD5s.

Where was the self pity? I couldn't give a sh1te if I'm up!

Liam WW

Mary WW wrote: »

I don't like ffas until I actually have a sense for what is going on so will be abstaining from on

If you're suss of one or two people at any stage, letting us know is a big help, or might be in future.

I'm not asking you to share now or give names based on minor **** all the time but if minor **** is all you have we'll take it, at least it's coming from a suspicion as opposed to pulling random names out for the sake of it.

Not just at you

Liam WW

Steve WW wrote: »

I thought it was a great idea!

In theory its a 100% solid idea but there's no way in hell that even half the players would manage to do it correctly, which is why I think it's needless overcomplication.

Steve WW

Conor WW wrote: »

And to add Liam, my list were of three people I thought likely to be jumped on in FFAs. I wanted to gauge reactions. I was deliberately being contradictory to my previous posts to see who if anyone would pick up on it.

Steering, btw Steve? Steering what? Team village is a rudderless vessel with no captain.

Still stand by the peeking low and lynching mid/high plan earlier. That's a great idea.

By getting your ffa in first, you are steering, you may have thought you weren't, but you did, sure you even said that isla copied your ffa exactly, so you must be aware of that.

Barbara WW

Steves idea was decent but was never gonna work. Imagine getting players to do it when we cant even get them to do a standard ffa

Gabriel WW

Also how are ye compiling these random names? Are they really random? Are ye using rings as that's against the rules :P

Santa bring the ban hammer down

Frank WW

Ive a stupid song suck in my head :(:(:(

Conor WW

Steve WW wrote: »

By getting your ffa in first, you are steering, you may have thought you weren't, but you did, sure you even said that isla copied your ffa exactly, so you must be aware of that.

So what? People are capable of independent thought? Fine if you want to have at me for my plan regarding the FFAs but this steering bullsh1t is exactly that, bullsh1t. I'll post what I want, when I want, don't expect anyone to follow me, but if they do I'll damn sure pull them up on it when it's the exact same.

Nigel WW

#FFA1

Based on my interations over the last day this shouldnt really come as a surprise

1. Conor, seriously contradicting himself and ive called him out on a few things. He seems to be happy enough to chalk down the discrepancies to trying to flush wolves out but as we are im not buying it. The switch from no FFA to Putting an FFA out to gauge reactions was clumsy along with what i highlighted him in.

2. Gabriel, really unsure on him last night and his kill Frank mantra has been a bit odd today. Actually all of those interactions with Frank and the reference to the xmas song just stick in my mind.

3. Doris, highlighted in a post yesterday that she posted about water and one of those furry lads. Potential task, have had very little to go on since but sticks in my mind. There may be no tasks in which case I'm barking up the wrong tree, but i feel there has to be some tasks in game.

At this point ive not decided on who im voting for be these are the ones who stick in mind so far. Might revisit this later but this is where my head is at as of now.

Liam WW

Conor WW wrote: »

And to add Liam, my list were of three people I thought likely to be jumped on in FFAs. I wanted to gauge reactions. I was deliberately being contradictory to my previous posts to see who if anyone would pick up on it.

Which is fair enough, but after a day of contradicting and doubling back on yourself after the fact you can see how that would start to get confusing? We have no idea where you stand now, all you've done is **** out plans and grass yourself when you are pulled up on their inconsistency.

I picked up on your contradictions, does that tell you anything about me or this more pseudo -psychology to try hunt solo?

Anyways, I've had enough of a go at you already and I don't want to overdo it, I'm going to move on.

Steve WW

Conor WW wrote: »

So what? People are capable of independent thought? Fine if you want to have at me for my plan regarding the FFAs but this steering bullsh1t is exactly that, bullsh1t. I'll post what I want, when I want, don't expect anyone to follow me, but if they do I'll damn sure pull them up on it when it's the exact same.

That's perfectly fine.

I have my suspicion of steering, which you refute. fine.

You have you suspicions of following, Also fine.

We are both entitled to have our own suspicion and reasoning. I accept and respect yours, I hope you will provide me the same courtesy.

Conor WW

Oooh the bandwagon is picking up steam now.

*Rubs palms in glee*

Maybe I should have stayed as a lower poster, all of whom are totally skating past still by the way.

Nigel WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Still stand by the peeking low and lynching mid/high plan earlier. That's a great idea.

Its the best thing you've posted all day and a strategy i can go with.

Angus WW

see, I feel there's two people working together at the moment and can't shake that feeling now.

But then I've been known to see ghosts in shadows...

Nigel WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Oooh the bandwagon is picking up steam now.

*Rubs palms in glee*

Maybe I should have stayed as a lower poster, all of whom are totally skating past still by the way.

Your plan was to let them skate by initially and peek them, are you doubling back on that one aswell?

Frank WW

Ill be back in about 45mins to an hour. Duty calls.

Liam WW

Angus WW wrote: »

see, I feel there's two people working together at the moment and can't shake that feeling now.

But then I've been known to see ghosts in shadows...

Care to share?

Conor WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Your plan was to let them skate by initially and peek them, are you doubling back on that one aswell?

Nope. That's still a good plan. No harm in highlighting 4 or 5 of us are dominating the posting however and further investigation should be warranted of the lower echelons. Imagine that, look into others and come back and lynch me at 9 if ye like, we have 3 hours yet!

Nigel WW

Angus WW wrote: »

see, I feel there's two people working together at the moment and can't shake that feeling now.

Weird but i thought that this morning but about you and Gab, then you both thought the other was trying to pocket each other so i let it go especially now you hate each other now

Ive not noticed any other obvious buddies so far.

Nigel WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Nope. That's still a good plan. No harm in highlighting 4 or 5 of us are dominating the posting however and further investigation should be warranted of the lower echelons. Imagine that, look into others and come back and lynch me at 9 if ye like, we have 3 hours yet!

Id agree people need to start looking at lower posters, once you can actually extrapolate something from. The focus has been on the 5 or 6 higher posters which is unfortunately usually the case in the early days.

Conor WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Id agree people need to start looking at lower posters, once you can actually extrapolate something from. The focus has been on the 5 or 6 higher posters which is unfortunately usually the case in the early days.

We could always break the mold and pile on a lower poster for the laugh

Winnie's one of the SKs imo.

Holly's probably a gremlin.

Liam WW

Anyone to post a post list for us suckers on mobile?

Conor WW

Liam WW wrote: »

Anyone to post a post list for us suckers on mobile?

I'll do it.

User Name Posts
Conor WW 62
Tegan WW 60
Gabriel WW 59
Isla WW 52
Wendy WW 48
Nigel WW 37
Steve WW 30
Frank WW 28
Liam WW 26
Barbara WW 25
Jake WW 21
Angus WW 20
Doris WW 15
Derry WW 8
Riona WW 7
Gertrude WW 5
Orla WW 5
Desmond WW 5
Ewan WW 4
Mary WW 4
Winifred WW 4
Pter 3
Holly WW 3
Phil WW 2

Steve WW

Liam WW wrote: »

Anyone to post a post list for us suckers on mobile?

User Name Posts
Conor WW 62
Tegan WW 60
Gabriel WW 59
Isla WW 52
Wendy WW 48
Nigel WW 37
Steve WW 30
Frank WW 28
Barbara WW 25
Liam WW 25
Jake WW 21
Angus WW 20
Doris WW 15
Derry WW 8
Riona WW 7
Gertrude WW 5
Orla WW 5
Desmond WW 5
Ewan WW 4
Mary WW 4
Winifred WW 4
Holly WW 3
Phil WW 2


removed pter barney and trit

Angus WW

Liam WW wrote: »

Care to share?

Funny you should ask, actually. Was curious to see if you would.

You're one. ill keep number two to myself for a bit longer, cause I'm studying your interactions, and lack thereof sometimes, with someone

Angus WW

*tumbleweed*

Conor WW

I'm here, just waiting for a response from Liam tbh

Tegan WW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0MK7qz13bU

Gabriel WW

Frank Tegan are the safe plays come on like

Conor WW

Winifred WW wrote: »

FFS that was an effort! After some trial and error folks Wini has arrived to join the festive celebrations. Sorry I'm late. I have been watching the thread so I'm not behind (well I am a little bit) I just couldn't get logged in.

Watching said thread, yet offers nothing of opinions.

Winifred WW wrote: »

Winnie is here!!!!

Also just for my 2c on the issue, Mogwai reads as team village, he'll win the game if he stays alive till the end game. There's a very slim chance of that happening IMO. So therefore I see him as team village and am happy to leave him be for now on.

Happy to let Mogwai be. Don't have an issue really.... except the Mogwai if killed by gremlins creates another wolf. Or gives an extra kill to SKs. But yeah, happy to leave it be from (I assume they mean from not for) now on....

Winifred WW wrote: »

Not really seeing the reason for the suspicion on Nigel btw.

Thanks for that pearl of wisdom, Winnie, care to explain why?

Winifred WW wrote: »

Just saying there's absolutely zero chance of most people getting their FFA in before 4.30. I've only popped on to try keep up with the thread but wouldn't have a concrete list till way later.



I do despise this sort of play. Oooh trust me for now and I'll explain everything later. (when I've had some time to think of a reason) Not liking Conor's recent posts at all.

So you've followed the thread, you don't like my posts yet you don't elaborate.

Coasting to the point of abandonment. Super suss Winnie. How about you put all that following the thread to use and give us an FFA?

Liam WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Funny you should ask, actually. Was curious to see if you would.

You're one. ill keep number two to myself for a bit longer, cause I'm studying your interactions, and lack thereof sometimes, with someone

I normally do ask for things like that, I'll try to let the pressure of knowing I'm being watched from affecting my posting though

Conor WW

Holly WW wrote: »

Holly reporting for village jury duty

Hi Holly, why jury duty?

Holly WW wrote: »

Tasks..... could telling jokes on.thread be a task?

There is no mention of tasks in the OP Holly....

Holly WW wrote: »

Plus one, the more a wolf talks, the chances of them slipping up increases.

Wow, totally agree Holly, maybe you could speak up a bit more yourself?

Tegan WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Frank Tegan are the safe plays come on like

Yeah guys, kill the non roled villager cos, well, they’re not a roled villager. Great strategy there Gabriel.