Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Insurance and Non-Club Spins

Options
  • 30-12-2017 8:01pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭


    I read in another thread that there might be a problem for non-club spins in relation to insurance. Not wanting to derail that thread, I am starting this one.
    I cycle with a group of cyclists every Sunday. Some of the group are members of clubs, in fact at least 4 cycling clubs and two Triathlon clubs(God help us) are represented in our number. Most of the rest have C.I. unattached licences, however some have no licence.
    Our group has a leader, he decides the time, route and distance of the spin. He also organises our Christmas outing(God help him)
    Now, supposing one of our group fell and injured himself, is there any circumstance where he would have a claim against our leader?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭velo.2010


    One of the un-insured fell you mean? I suppose if they were litigious and it could be found they were asked to cycle in a manner or along a route that was beyond their expected ability as a casual cyclist - though they may actually be quite proficient.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    From the cycling Ireland website:
    "All Cycling Ireland members have personal accident and public liability insurance by virtue of their membership of Cycling Ireland. This insurance will cover you when you are out training or taking part in approved Cycling Ireland events. If you would like to be insured for training and events, you will need to join Cycling Ireland."

    IMO. Your spins are not CI events, nor are they "Club training spins" so no one is covered by CI insurance on your "Group" spins. i hope I'm wrong as the current "Compo Culture" really irritates me!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    For the sake of argument, yes, a non licence holder.
    To further elaborate. The group meets at the same time and place every Sunday morning. People join and leave. Perhaps someone is told by a friend about the group. Maybe someone training for a specific event might join for the duration of his training. There is a core group of about 15, now and again there are 20-25.
    The leader gets phone numbers from interested people and texts everybody the night before a spin, informing of time and duration of spin.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    07Lapierre wrote: »
    From the cycling Ireland website:
    "All Cycling Ireland members have personal accident and public liability insurance by virtue of their membership of Cycling Ireland. This insurance will cover you when you are out training or taking part in approved Cycling Ireland events. If you would like to be insured for training and events, you will need to join Cycling Ireland."

    IMO. Your spins are not CI events, nor are they "Club training spins" so no one is covered by CI insurance on your "Group" spins. i hope I'm wrong as the current "Compo Culture" really irritates me!

    Good point.
    But can the leader, in any circumstance, be held responsible?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Eamonnator wrote: »
    Good point.
    But can the leader, in any circumstance, be held responsible?

    AFAIK anyone can sue anyone for anything, so technically, yes, the leader can be sued, but IMO, it'll be a sad day for all of us if that happened and negligence on the leaders behalf would have to be significant.

    I would recommend though that you advise the leader to ensure all riders are over 18 and therefore, responsible adults.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    At the moment, the age range is 16-67 years.
    I hadn't even thought of the under age element.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    Eamonnator wrote: »
    At the moment, the age range is 16-67 years.
    I hadn't even thought of the under age element.

    I should point out that if any of the u18's are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, it's not a problem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    07Lapierre wrote: »
    I should point out that if any of the u18's are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, it's not a problem.

    Two friends, usually, but not always. accompanied by the parent of one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 509 ✭✭✭531


    I understand that my CI licence covers ME when I am out training. Does it matter who I train with or whether it is a Ci event?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    531 wrote: »
    I understand that my CI licence covers ME when I am out training. Does it matter who I train with or whether it is a Ci event?

    That was my understanding, however I am now a little concerned about our Beloved Leader.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭jamesd


    We have something along the same líne, about 8 of us cycle Sundays and we are club members and all CI insured and one of the guys invited a friend along and he's been coming for the last few Sundays - the cycle leader said he wouldn't allow the friend along from this weekend due to him not bring insured incase anything happened and he sued him or the club.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭C3PO


    jamesd wrote: »
    We have something along the same líne, about 8 of us cycle Sundays and we are club members and all CI insured and one of the guys invited a friend along and he's been coming for the last few Sundays - the cycle leader said he wouldn't allow the friend along from this weekend due to him not bring insured incase anything happened and he sued him or the club.

    I think that is probably a reasonable (if unfortunate!) position to take!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    Leaving aside the juniors, could a case be made that each cyclist is responsible for his own actions?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,438 ✭✭✭jamesd


    C3PO wrote: »
    I think that is probably a reasonable (if unfortunate!) position to take!

    Ya we all agreed with him as better to be safe than sorry, i think once the cyclists are invited to the cycle then you take responsibility for them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Eamonnator wrote: »
    Leaving aside the juniors, could a case be made that each cyclist is responsible for his own actions?

    Not in this country. No matter what happens its always someone else's fault and our judiciary like to award large compensation. Look at what happen when the hill walker cut her knee, luckily it was appealed and she lost. But insurance companies don't appeal, as they just increase premiums instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭velo.2010


    Anybody can cycle with anybody (club policy aside, as we're talking non club members here)) so far as the cyclists agree to cycle together. If one is insured and the other is not, it may prompt the non-insured to claim if they feel the fall was unnecessary or are normally litigious and knowing their companion is licensed/insured.

    If all cyclists in a group are insured then they can be considered to be out on a training spin - your insured and out on a bike ride with other insured cyclists. In that case, it's beside the point if your riding solo or in a group.

    Personally, I wouldn't cycle with folk I knew were unlicensed and not as strong/competent as me. There's a danger you could take them out of their comfort zone while out on a spin. That's why we have cycling clubs... to teach folk the skills in a safe, moderated and insured environment.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,418 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    You need to differentiate personal injury from public liability here. The CI members have personal injury cover, based on comments made at the AGM (not sure if they have put this up on the site though).

    Anyone who causes an accident could be sued by the injured party. If it's not a club spin I would question whether a CI member would have third party cover in this situation (in fact in my personal view they do not). Non-CI members certainly would not (even if, for example, IVCA members - they provide personal injury cover to members and public liability in their own events only)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Eamonnator


    jamesd wrote: »
    Ya we all agreed with him as better to be safe than sorry, i think once the cyclists are invited to the cycle then you take responsibility for them.

    I think this goes to the heart of the matter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 649 ✭✭✭TGD


    07Lapierre wrote: »
    I should point out that if any of the u18's are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, it's not a problem.

    Is that an expert opinion? I’m not an expert but I wouldn’t assume this. It’s reasonable that the parent or guardian (which is an ambiguous term unless under a legal definition) might assume that the ‘leader’ has some expertise etc, and, if the child has a serious accident, and it was perceived that the leader’s decisions/advice/lack of due care etc etc contributed to that accident ....???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    07Lapierre wrote: »
    From the cycling Ireland website:
    "All Cycling Ireland members have personal accident and public liability insurance by virtue of their membership of Cycling Ireland. This insurance will cover you when you are out training or taking part in approved Cycling Ireland events. If you would like to be insured for training and events, you will need to join Cycling Ireland."

    IMO. Your spins are not CI events, nor are they "Club training spins" so no one is covered by CI insurance on your "Group" spins. i hope I'm wrong as the current "Compo Culture" really irritates me!
    I quoted an email I got from CI on the other thread that leisure cyclists were covered commuting.
    Didn't need to be part of a club.


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,418 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    TGD wrote: »
    Is that an expert opinion? I’m not an expert but I wouldn’t assume this. It’s reasonable that the parent or guardian (which is an ambiguous term unless under a legal definition) might assume that the ‘leader’ has some expertise etc, and, if the child has a serious accident, and it was perceived that the leader’s decisions/advice/lack of due care etc etc contributed to that accident ....???
    If it's a club spin it's a requirement under CI's safeguarding rules.

    If it's not a club spin, and unaccompanied minors or vulnerable people are included without a parent/guardian, I would suggest getting legal advice, as clubs can only do this with people who have undergone Garda vetting through CI accompanying said minors/vulnerable persons


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    I quoted an email I got from CI on the other thread that leisure cyclists were covered commuting.
    Didn't need to be part of a club.

    Covered for personal injury, but if you cause an accident, you can be sued...that's my understanding.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,248 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    TGD wrote: »
    Is that an expert opinion? I’m not an expert but I wouldn’t assume this. It’s reasonable that the parent or guardian (which is an ambiguous term unless under a legal definition) might assume that the ‘leader’ has some expertise etc, and, if the child has a serious accident, and it was perceived that the leader’s decisions/advice/lack of due care etc etc contributed to that accident ....???

    No, just a personal opinion


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭morana


    a number of people come to me and ask about cycling and buying bikes and getting into leisure cycling. the first thing i tell them is to join CI and avail of the insurance they offer. It's in their interest to be covered.

    As to the complex legal situations being discussed here it would be best to document and email them to CI for their opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭koutoubia


    My understanding of iVCA insurance is that once you are a paid up member once you have a helmet on you are covered.
    Vets insurance will not be recognised at CI sanctioned events so hence CI insurance is also needed for these events.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,418 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    koutoubia wrote: »
    My understanding of iVCA insurance is that once you are a paid up member once you have a helmet on you are covered.
    Vets insurance will not be recognised at CI sanctioned events so hence CI insurance is also needed for these events.
    You are covered for personal injury by the IVCA insurance whenever on a bike. You are not covered for 3rd party risk though except in the IVCA's own events, and even then it's the organisation and it's officials that are technically covered, along with the event itself

    CI require additional cover through either their own membership cover or one day licences for and 3rd party risk in CI events. In the same way IVCA insurance does not provide 3rd party cover for non-IVCA events

    From a members perspective the 2 sets of cover are generally in line, although the personal injury cover with the IVCA when I last checked was €2,000. CI provides cover up to €2,500 but there is now a €500 excess


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,995 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    koutoubia wrote: »
    ...Vets insurance will not be recognised at CI sanctioned events so hence CI insurance is also needed for these events.
    What about the other way around - does CI insurance cover vets events (e.g. WW200)?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭koutoubia


    What about the other way around - does CI insurance cover vets events (e.g. WW200)?
    I think the Wicklow is a CI sanctioned event so CI insurance applies as does Vets insurance...I think!


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 76,418 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    koutoubia wrote: »
    I think the Wicklow is a CI sanctioned event so CI insurance applies as does Vets insurance...I think!
    It's an IVCA event. Its not "sanctioned" by CI at all. You get insurance cover via your entry fee. No idea if that extends to personal injury. Equally I'm sure if it would qualify as "training" under the CI policy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,458 ✭✭✭lennymc


    as i understand it (from previous experience) the group would be considered an unicorporated club, and liability would be with the members of the group, but again, that is not a legal opinion, but based on another similarish scenario with a group of people who met up to do stuff regularly


Advertisement