Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Manned Chinese moon landing

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,806 ✭✭✭corny


    S03E01-WcOR7BZD-subtitled.jpg


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,400 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Because it's upsetting in the first place that the US pisses more than 50% of their money down the drain for the military and now to know that NASA gets raided as well for more instruments of warfare.
    Back in 1967 when the Russians were showing Vostok at the Paris Air Show there was shock when they just picked them up with a crane and had lads walking on them to attach the chains. At the time the original Atlas and UK's Blue Streak would collapse under their own weight unless the tanks were kept pressurised.

    Vostok at the Paris Air Show 1967
    https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/si-2154-bhjpg


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,400 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Delayed for a year or two. :(

    So no sample return for a while, and it will be from a newer area than than the Apollo ones.

    http://spacenews.com/long-march-5-failure-to-postpone-chinas-lunar-exploration-program/
    A leading official of China’s space program confirmed Sept. 25 that the July failure of the country’s largest launch vehicle will lead to delays to upcoming lunar missions, including one to return samples.

    Ah well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,875 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    irishgeo wrote: »
    the yanks arent keen on anyone landing near where they landed.

    Yeah they even have a rule where something/ someone can't get within a certain distance of where the Apollo descent stages and rovers and the other stuff up there are.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,400 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Yeah they even have a rule where something/ someone can't get within a certain distance of where the Apollo descent stages and rovers and the other stuff up there are.
    Who has that rule ?

    And who enforces it ?


    Apollo 12 landed near and took parts from Surveyor 3 so there's precedent.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭mickmackey1


    Who has that rule ?

    And who enforces it ?


    Apollo 12 landed near and took parts from Surveyor 3 so there's precedent.
    Yep the Nasa guidelines can be downloaded -

    https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/may/HQ_12-168_Lunar_Protection_Guidelines.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,875 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Who has that rule ?

    And who enforces it ?


    Apollo 12 landed near and took parts from Surveyor 3 so there's precedent.

    Surveyor 3 was NASA hardware though. I should have said non NASA craft can't land within a certain distance of a NASA one.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,400 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Guidelines. It's not like NASA can send someone up into space to enforce them either.
    The guidelines do not represent mandatory U.S. or international requirements. NASA provided them to help lunar mission planners preserve and protect historic lunar artifacts and potential science opportunities for future missions.


Advertisement