Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Woman sues shop over ludicrous defamation claim.

2»

Comments

  • #52
    Samuel T. Cogley
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    Allinall wrote: »
    There was no judge involved.

    More's the pity.

    She should have been told to piss off and had costs awarded against her. Utter scam.


  • #53
    Mutant z
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Mutant z


    Disgraceful but not in the least bit surprising this is sadly all too common in society where people are suing for the most minor trivial things.


  • #54
    listermint
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,111 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Samuel T. Cogley wrote: »
    People misunderstanding settlements and precedent as usual I see.
    Allinall wrote: »
    There was no judge involved.

    More's the pity.
    Samuel T. Cogley wrote: »
    She should have been told to piss off and had costs awarded against her. Utter scam.

    Ah lads,

    no understanding why an insurance company would pay out a settlement then i see..


    Dont understand precedent i see, i suppose the Insurer does. You should ask them why.

    awe bless.


  • #55
    Mutant z
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Mutant z


    skinny90 wrote: »
    Why is the lady in question not named and shamed?

    Indeed she should be splashed on the front pages of every newspaper that way she and others may think twice before they try this sort of con again.


  • #56
    Mint Sauce
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,293 ✭✭✭✭Mint Sauce


    Seve OB wrote: »
    lol, probably :D

    Then sue her for defamation!

    :D


  • #57
    astrofool
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,906 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Samuel T. Cogley wrote: »
    I'm having that too much fun watching all the misunderstandings and rules of precedent informed by three episodes of law and order I'm afraid. But if you like you can give a concise and well thought out explanation of the above if you like...

    I'm sure you'll understand why tomato plants explain why precedent is being misinterpreted here.

    I'd much prefer your version rather than sneering from the side. And what you want to do with the tomato plants, however kinky, is your own business, I'm sure your son doesn't mind.


  • #58
    Skihunta13
    Registered Users Posts: 161 ✭✭Skihunta13


    baylah17 wrote: »
    Case was settled , therfore no Judge involved.

    Why was it settled? Because insurance companies know the judge would award something to the complainant.


Advertisement