Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

6N Tournament 2018 (non-Irish TT)

179111213

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Yeah to be fair I'd give Jones the benefit. They've been a mile the most consistent NH team since he took over. They could well still finish the campaign with 2 wins, which would likely mean in 3 attempts they've won a slam, a championship and then at worst lost on PD/BP - not bad going

    I seem to recall Hughes playing a blinder vs Scotland last year to be fair

    Vunipola's loss just can't be understated enough overall though


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,967 ✭✭✭Synode


    Jones has this notion of who is a test match player and who isn't. He thinks Hughes is and Simmonds is less so/not really at all

    Where are you getting this from at all? Simmonds started against Italy and Wales but got injured.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Aldo Jolly Lemon


    Synode wrote: »
    Where are you getting this from at all? Simmonds started against Italy and Wales but got injured.

    Because Hughes was unavailable as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,967 ✭✭✭Synode


    Because Hughes was unavailable as well.

    Where are you getting that Jones thinks Simmonds isn't really a test player when he's played multiple tests for England in the last 6 months


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Aldo Jolly Lemon


    Synode wrote: »
    Where are you getting that Jones thinks Simmonds isn't really a test player when he's played multiple tests for England in the last 6 months

    Just based on selections. He often doesn't seem that bothered by how guys are playing for their club (see Don Armand for example), and Simmonds seems to be behind Hughes who isn't all that good. Maybe he has made himself a fixture in the squad from now on but if Billy V and Hughes were both available I'd be surprised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    Elliot Daly back in the England training squad for France


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Any word on the suspended French players returning for England?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Just based on selections. He often doesn't seem that bothered by how guys are playing for their club (see Don Armand for example), and Simmonds seems to be behind Hughes who isn't all that good. Maybe he has made himself a fixture in the squad from now on but if Billy V and Hughes were both available I'd be surprised.

    It might just be the fact that Jones also recognises that AP form doesn't translate to International form, if anything its drifted further away.
    I think Armand falls into this category.
    As Harris has done for Scotland already this season.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Any word on the suspended French players returning for England?

    I'd be 95% confident they'll all be back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    Bizarre.

    Is it tho, you step out of line, show lack of respect you get dropped. Maybe Brunel is trying to restore discipline and order to the French camp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    c.p.w.g.w wrote: »
    Is it tho, you step out of line, show lack of respect you get dropped. Maybe Brunel is trying to restore discipline and order to the French camp.
    There are always two sides to every story. And Eddie Jones would probably be more sympathetic. But I'm just guessing obvs.

    A three match ban effectively and possibly more because of a bit of a dust up with some Scottish 'fans' seems a bit excessive.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jesus that's a pain in the face. Advantage England to be honest, might even snag the BP.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    To bring them back in now would undermine whatever fragile team camaraderie that has been built up over the last couple of weeks. It's not like they were actually winning games with those guys in place (and they made several other changes aside from them too). Thomas was the only one that was really stepping up and France have options out wide to replace him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Lets not kid ourselves was there ever actually a hope England would lose this even if France had everyone available?

    Come on, it's the world number 2 against the world number 10.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    jr86 wrote: »
    Lets not kid ourselves was there ever actually a hope England would lose this even if France had everyone available?

    Come on, it's the world number 2 against the world number 10.

    It's not necessarily about France winning but this tournament is very likely to come down to a single point or two so denying England a BP is critical and limiting any benefit to their points difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Buer wrote: »
    It's not necessarily about France winning but this tournament is very likely to come down to a single point or two so denying England a BP is critical and limiting any benefit to their points difference.

    Only way England can really put pressure on us.

    We definitely should be beating Scotland and if we have any ambition at all we really should be going after our own BP to "win" the competition.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Only way England can really put pressure on us.

    We definitely should be beating Scotland and if we have any ambition at all we really should be going after our own BP to "win" the competition.

    This would by my thinking

    Wouldn't worry at all about Paris, where I'm fairly sure England would have gotten a TBP regardless.

    All in Ireland's own hands now, if they can't beat England or Scotland fair enough, you don't deserve to win it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    jr86 wrote: »
    This would by my thinking

    Wouldn't worry at all about Paris, where I'm fairly sure England would have gotten a TBP regardless.

    I'd be surprised still if England got a TBP. It's certainly a possibility given how happy a venue Paris has been for them over the years but, Italy aside, they haven't looked very dangerous in the try scoring stakes.

    Scoring 4 tries on the road in the 6N (Italy aside) is a very rare occurrence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    The one thing France have been doing is making tackles well. They fell asleep in Scotland and Italy at the end so if they fix that it'll be tough for England


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    The forecast for Paris is pretty bad on the weekend so could turn into a slugfest so a BP is unlikely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Bridge93 wrote: »
    The one thing France have been doing is making tackles well. They fell asleep in Scotland and Italy at the end so if they fix that it'll be tough for England
    They're also at home. That's always a big thing for French players and having lost one at home already, they will be determined not to lose another one.

    Of course that ultimately depends on whether they're able to. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    On the other side of the coin, Nowell and Underhill are both out of the France match and Hartley is struggling to make it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    On the other side of the coin, Nowell and Underhill are both out of the France match and Hartley is struggling to make it.

    Hartley is barely a loss these days. Though the loss of him, Underhill and Nowell severely weakens England's bench. I couldn't even hazard a guess as to who is England's third choice hooker.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Hartley is barely a loss these days. Though the loss of him, Underhill and Nowell severely weakens England's bench. I couldn't even hazard a guess as to who is England's third choice hooker.

    Cowan dickie no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    Luke Cowan Dickie probably who's a good player. Elliot Daly back softens the Nowell loss


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭Glass Prison 1214


    What ever happened to Tom Youngs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    What ever happened to Tom Youngs?
    Don't think Eddie Jones ever played him. Or even selected him for a squad afaik.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    Cowan dickie no?

    Is he the lad with the rotten mullet?


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Is he the lad with the rotten mullet?

    That's him :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,225 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Exeter are curiously underrepresented in the ENgland squad. I thought Cowan Dickie was very good against Leinster. I was surprised when I learned he was far down the pecking order for England. Of course Don Armand was their best player in those games and has been pulling up trees in the Premiership but Jones doesn't fancy him at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    I'd have thought Slade would be involved but for injury. Both their props and now Cowan Dickie involved as is Simmonds. Are there any other English qualified players other than Armand who are hard done by?

    Matt Kvesic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Bridge93 wrote: »
    I'd have thought Slade would be involved but for injury. Both their props and now Cowan Dickie involved as is Simmonds. Are there any other English qualified players other than Armand who are hard done by?

    Matt Kvesic?

    I think Nowell should always be an automatic starter myself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    jr86 wrote: »
    I think Nowell should always be an automatic starter myself

    So would I. Don't think I'll ever rate Jonny May as highly as the England coaches


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Scotland team announced. Kinghorn on the wing as the only change to the starting XV.
    Brown and Jones on the bench.

    Kinghorn is a FB first and foremost, bold move from Townsend.
    15. Stuart Hogg (Glasgow Warriors) – 58 caps

    14. Blair Kinghorn (Edinburgh Rugby) – 1 cap
    13. Huw Jones (Glasgow Warriors) – 14 caps
    12. Pete Horne (Glasgow Warriors) – 31 caps
    11. Sean Maitland (Saracens) – 32 caps

    10. Finn Russell (Glasgow Warriors) – 35 caps
    9. Greig Laidlaw VICE CAPTAIN (Clermont Auvergne) – 61 caps

    1. Gordon Reid (London Irish) – 30 caps
    2. Stuart McInally (Edinburgh Rugby) – 15 caps
    3. Simon Berghan (Edinburgh Rugby) – 7 caps
    4. Grant Gilchrist (Edinburgh Rugby) – 21 caps
    5. Jonny Gray (Glasgow Warriors) – 41 caps
    6. John Barclay CAPTAIN (Scarlets) – 69 caps
    7. Hamish Watson (Edinburgh Rugby) – 18 caps
    8. Ryan Wilson VICE CAPTAIN (Glasgow Warriors) – 35 caps

    Substitutes

    16. Fraser Brown (Glasgow Warriors) – 29 caps
    17. Jamie Bhatti (Glasgow Warriors) – 6 caps
    18. Willem Nel (Edinburgh Rugby) – 20 caps
    19. Tim Swinson (Glasgow Warriors) – 34 caps
    20. David Denton (Worcester Warriors) – 37 caps
    21. Ali Price (Glasgow Warriors) – 14 caps
    22. Nick Grigg (Glasgow Warriors) – 2 caps
    23. Lee Jones (Glasgow Warriors) – 7 caps


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    All change for Wales, will be good to see lots of different combinations starting. Lot of new guys getting some experience either starting or off the bench
    Expect to see North at center at some point in the match??

    Wales starting XV:
    15. Liam Williams,
    14. Steff Evans,
    13. Owen Watkin,
    12. Hadleigh Parkes,
    11. George North,

    10. Gareth Anscombe,
    9. Gareth Davies,

    1. Nicky Smith,
    2. Elliot Dee,
    3. Tomas Francis,
    4. Bradley Davies,
    5. Cory Hill,
    6. Justin Tipuric,
    7. James Davies,
    8. Taulupe Faletau (capt)

    Replacements: Ken Owens, Rob Evans, Samson Lee, Seb Davies, Ellis Jenkins, Aled Davies, Rhys Patchell, Leigh Halfpenny


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,225 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That's an interesting Welsh front 5.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    good to see scotland sticking with that 23 (- seymour) and didnt bring in Worser Gray and Charlie Hardie.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Thats some "mobile" back row for wales !!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    To an Irish fan, that Welsh selection is incredible. Ireland would never look to throw so many changes into a team and drop/rotate players that are performing just to see new combinations in the 6N.

    Is that 7 changes in the pack I'm counting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Buer wrote: »
    To an Irish fan, that Welsh selection is incredible. Ireland would never look to throw so many changes into a team and drop/rotate players that are performing just to see new combinations in the 6N.

    Is that 7 changes in the pack I'm counting?
    It's game over for Wales in this championship, so Gatland is obviously using the rest of the matches to test some new combinations. Not the worst idea ever.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    It's game over for Wales in this championship, so Gatland is obviously using the rest of the matches to test some new combinations. Not the worst idea ever.

    I think it's a great idea. It's just that an Irish selection would never be so aggressive. Admittedly, some of those coming in are long established test players like Faletau, North, Tipuric and Bradley Davies but it's still a huge amount of change.

    I'd have thought Biggar would have featured to develop some fitness and get some game time before the French game but has been cut completely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Birdie Num Num


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    It's game over for Wales in this championship, so Gatland is obviously using the rest of the matches to test some new combinations. Not the worst idea ever.

    Looking to Japan possibly.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,508 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    What's up with Sam Davies these days?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Be very interesting to see if James Davies can bring his club form to the international stage.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    It's game over for Wales in this championship, so Gatland is obviously using the rest of the matches to test some new combinations. Not the worst idea ever.

    They also don't have to worry about world rankings for a good while. Optimal time to build depth but I've no doubt had they beaten Ireland or England they'd have selected a much more recognisable team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    They also don't have to worry about world rankings for a good while. Optimal time to build depth but I've no doubt had they beaten Ireland or England they'd have selected a much more recognisable team.

    That goes without saying, but its still adventurous (or reckless?) to go for the changes he has made. Not sure if some other nameless coaches would have done the same.

    If that backrow clicks it could be a helter skelter match with both teams looking for continuity and width. Expect a hell of a lot of offloads

    Mind you Wales record in the autumn internationals when they make wholesale changes is not a good one so I would imagine Italy will really target this match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    What’s the craic with the flanker, Young at Wasps, seems to be going well but can’t get a look in.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Webbs


    England:
    Watson;
    May,
    Te'o,
    Farrell (capt),
    Daly;
    Ford,
    Care;

    M Vunipola,
    George,
    Cole,
    Launchbury,
    Itoje,
    Lawes,
    Robshaw,
    Hughes.

    Replacements: Cowan-Dickie, Marler, Sinckler, Haskell, Simmonds, Wigglesworth, Joseph, Brown.


    Bit surprised that Brown is dropped to bench, mind you that is a dangerous looking back 3 now. England still look so unbalanced in the back row, Lawes is not a No6. Is Simmons was at 7 and robshaw at 6 then it would look far more competitive in the loose. Mind you its France and it will be a bit of a bosh fest in the forwards.
    If George shows up well again could be an interesting selection for Jones come Ireland match


Advertisement