Eastenders [News, Spoilers and Discussion - from Jan 2018]

donkeykong5

bubbles o hara wrote: »

iamwhoiam wrote: »

Are we supposed to find Kat sexually assaulting Ted funny ?

We're supposed to find everything Kat does funny. I think the writers are trying to turn EE into a comedy. :mad:

Her false laugh is very very annoying.

JP Liz V1

Andy From Sligo wrote: »

Are Mick and Keegan going out of it then? , I didn't hear anything but maybe they kept it under wraps . I cannot see how mick and Keegan can survive a huge truck plowing into them but there you go this is soap land where anything can happen , like a ex vicar (Billy) falling off a cliff and a few months later walking absolutely perfectly , or an OAP (Ken) having a stroke and within a month can speak so clearly he could play a part in a Shakespeare play (corrie)

I thought last night if EastEnders was by chance watching Fair City by the similarities of the storyline.
Mick finds Keegan stabbed (Wayne finds Karen stabbed) Mick phones for ambulance , decides it would be too long and bundles Keegan into his motor (Wayne decides too long to wait for ambulance and bungs Karen into the back of his car)

I am sure the truck will miss them or the car will start :rolleyes: I think the stabbing storyline does not need Mick involved

Preferred Kat the way she was in Red water

Andy From Sligo

Deleted User wrote: »

Preferred Kat the way she was in Red water

never watched that Red Water thing, didn't even have the urge to watch it and still cant be arsed to watch it

JP Liz V1

I really do not see the point of Kat or Mel's return

Andy From Sligo

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

I really do not see the point of Kat or Mel's return

i sometimes wonder if (in the likes of Mel return) they offer her a storyline such as the one where she is going after Ben for the money and the producers say "How about if we were going to offer you a permanent role? - would you be interested in coming back full time?" - might be wrong , but that's what it feels like sometimes, especially shortly afterwards getting the job of managing the club like that out of the blue - it all seems like it was just thrown altogether quickly

SAMTALK

Deleted User wrote: »

Preferred Kat the way she was in Red water

Far away ?

Galwayguy35

Kat was a likable character in Redwater, it's like she has a personality transplant when she puts on her $5 hooker clothes.

Riddle101

Galwayguy35 wrote: »

Kat was a likable character in Redwater, it's like she has a personality transplant when she puts on her $5 hooker clothes.

Unfortunately characters in Eastenders never really grow or develop as characters so they're always going back to the the same old character traits. I think that's one of Eastender's biggest flaws is the characters never change. I never watched Redwater but from what i've read Kat's character in Redwater was probably the closest thing to character development we've seen in her. Now she's gone back to Eastenders and she's reverted back to her old self.

SAMTALK

SAMTALK wrote: »

Far away ?

No her character she was far more classy then

Meauldsegosha

I had a feeling it was

Alfie

that Hayley was meeting. I wonder if he is the father of her baby?

iamwhoiam

Why did that once again have to be all about Mick ?

iamwhoiam

Meauldsegosha wrote: »

I had a feeling it was

Alfie

that Hayley was meeting. I wonder if he is the father of her baby?

It never struck me !

Lackey

I thought Shirley and Mick were brilliant in those episodes.
Very gritty

JP Liz V1

How did Shakil end up there, behind rubbish, in the bushes?

iamwhoiam

iamwhoiam wrote: »

Why did that once again have to be all about Mick ?

Always shoe horned into every story

Shirley was brilliant though

Andy From Sligo

mick will have to come clean that he saw shaki crawling around at the pub door .. it will eat away at him otherwise - i reckon he will ... but who will he confide in first? - my guessing is his mrs , but you never know

Delta2113

Eastenders at 10.05PM on RTE2 - moved from RTE1 tonight.

jhegarty

Delta2113 wrote: »

Eastenders at 10.05PM on RTE2 - moved from RTE1 tonight.

I presume there is something that might impact on the vote in it.

Delta2113

Yes but BBC1 has it in anyway.

iamwhoiam

Good call by RTE not to show it early

Delta2113

iamwhoiam wrote: »

Good call by RTE not to show it early

Not sympathetic to the yes side then?

iamwhoiam

Delta2113 wrote: »

Not sympathetic to the yes side then?

Actually I was referring to the murder storyline . But if you really must know I voted Yes ?

JP Liz V1

So Hayley is happy to chase Alfie but not Martin who looks better imho

Is Alfie all cured of his tumour too?

Foggy Jew

Obviously missed an episode.... Is Shaki brown bread?

casio4

Carmel is playing a blinder she is very realistic as someone whose child was killed

JP Liz V1

Foggy Jew wrote: »

Obviously missed an episode.... Is Shaki brown bread?

Yes Shaks is dead and Keegan is blaming Mick

Foggy Jew

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Yes Shaks is dead and Keegan is blaming Mick

Thanks Liz...was piecing it together as I went along. RIP Shakil!

iamwhoiam

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Yes Shaks is dead and Keegan is blaming Mick

Keegan blaming anyone but himself . He stole the bike in the first place . I never bought the newly reformed Keegan , he was horrible when he was first introduced

JP Liz V1

Ted made an appearance, cheery in the pub, did Joyce get cremated?

What happened to the money Patrick left that Keegan's dad took?