Ray Darcy. Live on de telly. 3/2/ 18

horseburger

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

30.

Now can we move on and discuss the show rather than your inane preoccupation.

What would you like to discuss that hasn't been mentioned already?

Alf Veedersane

horseburger wrote: »

The poster said she is "still beautiful" despite looking "well over 30".

The poster said she was "still beautiful".

Still beautiful.

Still.

Beautiful.

horseburger

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

The poster said she was "still beautiful".

Still beautiful.

Still.

Beautiful.

Indeed. There was no need to use the word "still".

The poster could have just stated "she is beautiful".

Alf Veedersane

horseburger wrote: »

Indeed. There was no need to use the word "still".

The poster could have just stated "she is beautiful".

And it would have been the same: the poster saying she is beautiful.

horseburger

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

And it would have been the same: the poster saying she is beautiful.

The poster stated "still beautiful" "but looks well older than 30".

There is nothing wrong with looking older than 30.

Franz Von Peppercorn

horseburger wrote: »

The poster stated "still beautiful" "but looks well older than 30".

There is nothing wrong with looking older than 30.

Except people older than 30 are generally less attractive. Luckily Amanda is still attractive.

retro:electro

horseburger wrote: »

The poster stated "still beautiful" "but looks well older than 30".

There is nothing wrong with looking older than 30.

It's 24 hours later. I think you need to get over it tbh.

horseburger

anna080 wrote: »

It's 24 hours later. I think you need to get over it tbh.

The programme was on around 10pm and the interview was on around 11pm.

That's 22 hours ago.

horseburger

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Except people older than 30 are generally less attractive. Luckily Amanda is still attractive.

In your opinion.

Alf Veedersane

horseburger wrote: »

The poster stated "still beautiful" "but looks well older than 30".

There is nothing wrong with looking older than 30.

The poster obviously agrees since they said she is beautiful.

horseburger

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

The poster obviously agrees since they said she is beautiful.

Why did the poster feel the need to comment that she looks well over 30?

If she is beautiful it doesn't matter what age she is.

Alf Veedersane

horseburger wrote: »

Why did the poster feel the need to comment that she looks well over 30?

If she is beautiful it doesn't matter what age she is.

Because the poster thought that she was beautiful and that she looked well over 30.

The latter doesn't have any impact on the former. Except to you.

Dtp1979

horseburger wrote: »

Why did the poster feel the need to comment that she looks well over 30?

If she is beautiful it doesn't matter what age she is.

Probably because most people remember her as the good looking early 20 year old girl. She’s back in the public eye, has obviously aged as people do. She’s had a hard 10 years and probably does look over 30 and still very attractive.

horseburger

Dtp1979 wrote: »

Probably because most people remember her as the good looking early 20 year old girl. She’s back in the public eye, has obviously aged as people do. She’s had a hard 10 years and probably does look over 30 and still very attractive.

The point is, if the poster thinks she is beautiful, then her age doesn't matter, therefore the comment about her looking over 30 is unnecessary.

The Talking Bread

horseburger wrote: »

The point is, if the poster thinks she is beautiful, then her age doesn't matter, therefore the comment about her looking over 30 is unnecessary.

:D:D:D

You are a gift!

horseburger

The Talking Bread wrote: »

:D:D:D

You are a gift!

You obviously have high enough opinions on yourself, to feel that you can pontificate on other people's attractiveness, on a message board.

BorneTobyWilde

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Christ you are a snowflake. People do get less attractive as they age.

Except 80 year old Chuck Norris

horseburger

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

Except 80 year old Chuck Norris

"still beautiful" "but looks well over" 80.:)

The Talking Bread

horseburger wrote: »

You obviously have high enough opinions on yourself, to feel that you can pontificate on other people's attractiveness, on a message board.

Super opinions of myself, darling x

monkey9

Jesus Horseburger, i don't know if you really are how you seem or if you're taking the proverbial, but i will explain this to you anyway for the craic

You literally asked for an explanation, so this is it.

Amanda Knox used to be about 20. Now she's 30. That's because ten years have passed. Now, to look at Amanda in observational purposes, she looks closer to 40

If Amanda Knox had not been caught up in the murder of Meredith Kercher, she may well have looked younger. Never underestimate how stress can have on physical features.

What TTB has observed there is that Amanda now looks older than 30, her actual age and it surprised him. IT'S NOT TO SAY HE'S MAKING FUN OF HER LOOKS OR THAT SHE LOOKS IN AN AWFUL STATE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BECAUSE SHE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL LOOKING AND ANYWAY IT DOESN'T MATTER ABOUT HER LOOKS but you can really see how much she's aged throughout this process.

Does that explain things now, Horseburger?

horseburger

monkey9 wrote: »

Jesus Horseburger, i don't know if you really are how you seem or if you're taking the proverbial, but i will explain this to you anyway for the craic

You literally asked for an explanation, so this is it.

Amanda Knox used to be about 20. Now she's 30. That's because ten years have passed. Now, to look at Amanda in observational purposes, she looks closer to 40

If Amanda Knox had not been caught up in the murder of Meredith Kercher, she may well have looked younger. Never underestimate how stress can have on physical features.

What TTB has observed there is that Amanda now looks older than 30, her actual age and it surprised him. IT'S NOT TO SAY HE'S MAKING FUN OF HER LOOKS OR THAT SHE LOOKS IN AN AWFUL STATE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BECAUSE SHE IS STILL BEAUTIFUL LOOKING AND ANYWAY IT DOESN'T MATTER ABOUT HER LOOKS but you can really see how much she's aged throughout this process.

Does that explain things now, Horseburger?

Thanks monkey9 for that civil and courteous intervention.

Wouldn't it have been more constructive and helpful, if the poster had shown more concern for her health and mental well being, than her physical attractiveness?

Here's another really useful, and delightful remark, from The Talking Bread:

"Christ she really is taking the f*cking pi$$ with that dress."

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=106047160&postcount=214

The Talking Bread wrote: »

Christ she really is taking the f*cking pi$$ with that dress.

Might you respond, with another diplomatic interpretation, of what the poster was saying?

The Talking Bread

Go out and get some fresh air mate. I've more concerned for your mental well being at the minute than a murderer. (Yes I did say that....... ......I'm sure that comment will really get you going and I look forward to more nonsense! Derailing the thread with purpose with your paranoia and obsession

The Talking Bread

You are awake at Almost 3 in the morning and this sh*t is still being obsessed about

horseburger

The Talking Bread wrote: »

You are awake at Almost 3 in the morning and this sh*t is still being obsessed about

I rather suspect you are the one obsessing.

I just thanked the earlier poster for a civil and courteous response, and asked if this poster was going to provide another detailed interpretation of whatever it is you were really trying to say, when you made another really constructive observation, regarding Amanda Knox's appearance, on the show.

What should she have worn, that would not have merited your response: "Christ she really is taking the f*cking pi$$ with that dress."?

What items of clothing would have met with your approval?

What relevance, had what she was wearing, on the show, to the issue she was discussing?

Why did you feel the need to comment on her appearance?

Her appearance, and what she was wearing, had no relevance, to the issue she was discussing.

The poster, who was defending you, also posted at a similar time. Why haven't you accused them of being "awake at Almost 3 in the morning" and of engaging in a discussion where "this sh*t is still being obsessed about".

You described a discussion about your comments, as "this sh*t is still being obsessed about".

You stated this, in reference to a discussion, between me and another person, about what you had written. It sounds like you are conceding that you were talking "sh*t", and that your posts were, and are, "sh*t".

You described, what we were talking about, as "this sh*t".

We were talking about your comments. Therefore, it sounds like, you are describing, what you wrote, as "sh*t"

The Black Oil

Mod note. Enough with crap in the last few posts.

Patty O Furniture

horseburger wrote: »

No, I do not think it's a negative to look over 30.

What I am suggesting is that if someone writes "but she looks well over 30", that they might very well think that looking over 30, is a negative.

The word "but" is important, because when that word is used, it is used to emphasise a negative.

For example 'Liverpool had most of the possession of the ball during the match, but they didn't capitalize on that, by scoring any goals'.

'The concert was good. You could see the band were enthusiastic, but the sound in the venue was poor".

Ah c'mon say anything you want on this thread, but leave Liverpool outta this!
But, more like 'Spurs capitalized on the diving, by not scoring any goals'

What has happened to the Beautiful Game, Still it could be worse :rolleyes:

Anyway this thread has taken it's toll, as i'm not gonna roll with the troll

Peace out!

horseburger

Patty O Furniture wrote: »

[/I]Ah c'mon say anything you want on this thread, but leave Liverpool outta this!
But, more like 'Spurs capitalized on the diving, by not scoring any goals'

What has happened to the Beautiful Game, Still it could be worse :rolleyes:

Anyway this thread has taken it's toll, as i'm not gonna roll with the troll

Peace out!

Much better for you to read the fabulous contributions from other posters, like Sligojoek, who made a comment about Ray D'Arcy having a "creepy head".

Sligojoek commented during the show on Saturday night:

"The creepy head on Ray"

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=106047094&postcount=196

sligojoek wrote: »

The creepy head on Ray

paleoperson

That's all for this week... *end credits*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jouS-a9pq2M

LoughNeagh2017

https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/amanda-knox-sings-proira-song-in-irish-tv-36566961.html

I dont know why British unionists think that this is something shameful, the actions of the IRA helped create the country. This is what happens when you give British unionists jobs as journalists.

RTE have every right to have republican songs played on tv.

sligojoek

Ray D'Arcy's popular Thursday night chat show

Research is up on a par with Darcy

Patty O Furniture

horseburger wrote: »

"The creepy head on..."

horseburger

Patty O Furniture wrote: »

I think this fella is a lot less bald than Ray D'Arcy.

donkeykong5

Dave mcsavage should be interesting

ouxbbkqtswdfaw

donkeykong5 wrote:

Dave mcsavage should be interesting

He should be, but Ray will soon sort that out.

sightband

9i4ecnwb51uy3z wrote: »

He should be, but Ray will soon sort that out.

“so dave, tell me, what are your thoughts on jumbo porridge oats versus the normal ones?”

ouxbbkqtswdfaw

lol

sligojoek

There's a live thread going here lads.

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057840013