Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

who is responsible for derelict boats?

Options
  • 20-02-2018 6:45am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭


    Hi all,
    genuine curiosity: who is responsible for apparently abandoned boats? Every harbour appears to have a permanent supply of old boats in rag order that seem to have been there forever with no sign of them being cleared away, so who is responsible for them?

    regards
    Stovepipe


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 26,481 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Under the Harbours Act, if a ship is in a harbour and doesn't have authority to be there under the harbour bye-laws, and if its presence in the harbour is causing a problem with harbour operations, the harbourmaster can direct the master of the ship to remove it to "such place or anchorage as the harbour master may direct" (which, presumably, may be outside the harbour). The "master" of a ship is the person having command or charge of a ship and, in default of a sailing master, I imagine the master would be the owner of the ship.

    Note that it makes no difference here whether the vessel is derelict or not.

    Obviously, particular harbour bye-laws might make further provision about this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    I'm thinking more about the plethora of abandoned fishing boats that seem to cluster around small ports and harbours. It appears that some people just abandon craft and walk away and leave the local authorities to clean up the remains.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    If you are curious, look up the fleet register and see if the license is active.
    If it is the boat may be laid up for different reasons.
    They have names and official numbers on them so you can identify the owners.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    nothing serious; i was just looking at some photos of old boats and it struck me that someone owned them yet they were allowed to lie derelict. If I left a car outside my house, the corpo would be on to me in a heartbeat to shift it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    Stovepipe wrote: »
    nothing serious; i was just looking at some photos of old boats and it struck me that someone owned them yet they were allowed to lie derelict. If I left a car outside my house, the corpo would be on to me in a heartbeat to shift it.

    Are you sure they are derelict though? Boats can lie up for long periods and still go back fishing when they need or are able to.
    The East coast razor fleet are a pretty sorry looking bunch of boats though, I wasn't impressed by them when I had a look over a few.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,979 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    I was at a small regional harbour and some of the boats, both pleasure boats and small fishing boats were obviously derelict, ie, missing planks, rotten structure, rusted out cabins and so on..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭5rtytry56


    Stove there's a method to your madness here. I know of a seaside town with such a harbour which has a lot of young families a certain times of the year. This represent s a safety issue. Some young kids like to explore too.


Advertisement