Lahvlahn: The "Snow Show Like a Joe Show" Edition - 01/03 two-eighteen so to speak

jetfiremuck

Jesus lads......they all know each other barristers judges etc.they all know the routine etc. it's all staged in the sense that the barrister can be on either side at any time.

pc7

BarryD2 wrote: »

And one that took on a whole energy of it's own, once it was made. Be interesting to see what comes about as regards the quality of the PSNI investigation.

This, with what was reported on, I was very surprised they proceeded with a prosecution.

thecretinhop

jesus chrisr rtes own people skirting the libel line there fk me

jetfiremuck

The big unnoticed important thing is there were other girls at the party which by itself puts the plaintiff in a weaker position....

thecretinhop

pbh is utterly gutted

Dan Jaman

And now, back to the pain...

Nope; just the pain of raking over the coals from parties with vested interests.

constitutionus

Fukin he'll.

Secrets courts so slappers snared riding 3 guys can get a conviction when she spoof a a rape when her female friends walk in.

This is insane.

I haven't heard the media go this nuts sine the job'stown trial.

Justice is in a very perilous state if this is the mentality of our journo set

thecretinhop

this is outrageous behaviour from the rte

Dan Jaman

jetfiremuck wrote: »

The big unnoticed important thing is there were other girls at the party which by itself puts the plaintiff in a weaker position....

Did they all get a shag, too?
See, if they did, and only the odd one out had any complaint, it turned this into a farce.

SEPT 23 1989

no mention of the lads being innocent????????

Roger_007

Maybe you should get her signature on a consent form?

Rock Lesnar

This is unbelievable

Dan Jaman

thecretinhop wrote: »

pbh is utterly gutted

He'll unwind by breaking out the 12-bore and bagging a few peasants after dinner.

BPKS

If somebody drunk went back to a party without their friends, to people they didnt know, tried to kiss a few of the people at the party etc. etc.

Murdoc90

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

no mention of the lads being innocent????????

OJ is innocent too!

thecretinhop

she is a saint lads the biggest legal outrage since OJ i believe her hash job

Yer Da sells Avon

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

no mention of the lads being innocent????????

They were found not guilty in a system which, when the jury believes there is reasonable doubt, demands a not guilty verdict - even if that means that scum like Paddy Jackson and friends walk free.

constitutionus

Fuk sake PHP.
.

Why don't you just call for a #believeher.

Finally someone in to contest this

Skid X

I like how this Lady said hello to the listeners.

All callers should do that.

SEPT 23 1989

This aul one won't last long

BPKS

Coronation Street!

Dan Jaman

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

This aul one won't last long

She's run out of points.
Failed to mention past episodes of East Enders and Emmerdale.

Roger_007

Hapax Legomenon wrote: »

They were found not guilty in a system which, when the jury believes there is reasonable doubt, demands a not guilty verdict - even if that means that scum like Paddy Jackson and friends walk free.

So, your logic is that the accused is always guilty.........except that sometimes they get off because of a reasonable doubt.
Have I got that right?

thecretinhop

pbh trying to get him out of ulster team low life thug pbh your gutter still with your posh voice

jetfiremuck

This eejit....the girl was not dragged upstairs kicking and screaming,was not held down ,was not heard screaming rape...get off me etc. so where's the issue.

Uncharted

PBH just cannot accept the outcome!
There's no room on the national broadcaster for such bias.

He is a bloody disgrace!!!!

BPKS

He should have a Grand Slam medal!

SEPT 23 1989

It's the systems fault the men were found innocent

thecretinhop

great point he should have a grand slam medal

this is unreal biased

Dan Jaman

BPKS wrote: »

He should have a Grand Slam medal!

I doubt if the shag was THAT good!