Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dilemma with the bill

Options
13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14 suirvale


    i been involved in construction for years.
    so often when it comes to the money the s**** hits the fan.
    the customer will want fake receipt for insurance or their parents or tax claim.
    so i i just want the Work but over the years i am tried of it all..too much stress trying to get work and money.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    If the work was grant aided in full then I don't see how you would be allowed claim the VAT back - it would be the payee who could claim back the VAT.

    Part grant aided...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    Graham wrote: »
    Part grant aided...

    Thanks Graham.

    Is it a percentage that's aided or up to a certain amount?

    I have no experience with these grants but I have with many other types and there is no way the contractor will get paid from the public purse without a bona fide invoice. (With the one exception of a carte blanche grant direct to an individual to spend as they choose.)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Lads - just to clear one thing up.

    The OP is not claiming on the Home Renovation Incentive - they are attempting to claim back the VAT under an allowance for disabled people.


    OP:

    If the work was grant aided in full then I don't see how you would be allowed claim the VAT back - it would be the payee who could claim back the VAT.

    If the works were only partially grant aided then you can obviously go about claiming the VAT back on the portion you paid for.

    To try to claim VAT back on works that are grant aided would surely mean you are making a profit on the grant?


    Apologies if I have misunderstood anything here.

    +1 its not the HRI scheme.

    If we accepted the grant to our account and just paid the bill X + vat in total why can we not claim the vat in full?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    A friend of mine used to do a lot of bathroom adaptation work so my knowledge is limited to assisting him with the renewal paperwork and general bar-stool chitchat.

    What I do know;

    He used to be on a panel of companies approved to do grant funded adaptation work. I know every 12/24/36 months he'd have to reapply to remain on the panel, part of that process involved resubmitting insurance, clearance certs etc. He most definitely had to submit an invoice to the LA as he'd often crib about how long it took for the invoices to be settled.

    I do recall specific discussion about homeowners having to reclaim VAT from revenue.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Ginger83, would I be right in assuming your builder submitted a full VAT invoice to the local authority for the grant payment and you got no such invoice for your own contribution?

    Or did you receive the grant and pay the builder directly with your contribution?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    Ginger83 wrote: »
    +1 its not the HRI scheme.

    If we accepted the grant to our account and just paid the bill X + vat in total why can we not claim the vat in full?

    Because it's not you that paid the bill - it's the grant agency.

    You just passed the money from the grant agency to the builder.

    I could be wrong here so feel free to correct me but the system for reclaiming VAT is for when you spend your own money - i.e. it's a form of grant in itself.

    Separately - if you think about it from a purely moralistic point of view - why would 13 odd percent of the grant be given to you as a bonus?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Thanks Graham.

    Is it a percentage that's aided or up to a certain amount?

    I have no experience with these grants but I have with many other types and there is no way the contractor will get paid from the public purse without a bona fide invoice. (With the one exception of a carte blanche grant direct to an individual to spend as they choose.)

    At the time the LA would agree with the homeowner to cover a certain amount. I don't think there was a fixed percentage, more a "here's what we'll contribute" from the LA.

    No fixed %/amount, would vary from job-to-job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Graham wrote: »
    Ginger83, would I be right in assuming your builder submitted a full VAT invoice to the local authority for the grant payment and you got no such invoice for your own contribution?

    Or did you receive the grant and pay the builder directly with your contribution?

    I've no idea what he submitted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Because it's not you that paid the bill - it's the grant agency.

    You just passed the money from the grant agency to the builder.

    I could be wrong here so feel free to correct me but the system for reclaiming VAT is for when you spend your own money - i.e. it's a form of grant in itself.

    Separately - if you think about it from a purely moralistic point of view - why would 13 odd percent of the grant be given to you as a bonus?

    I see your point.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    I could be wrong here so feel free to correct me but the system for reclaiming VAT is for when you spend your own money - i.e. it's a form of grant in itself.

    I very vaguely recall the grant payment was made minus VAT on the basis the homeowner would pay, then reclaim the VAT.

    Vaguely

    In fact, correcting my earlier statement, my friend used to have to wait for the homeowner to receive the grant so that his invoice could be settled by the homeowner.

    There were several jobs where he was concerned the homeowner had spent the grant and he'd be left out of pocket.

    It's also possible/likely that the entire process varies from LA to LA.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Graham wrote: »
    I very vaguely recall the grant payment was made minus VAT on the basis the homeowner would pay, then reclaim the VAT.

    Vaguely

    In fact, correcting my earlier statement, my friend used to have to wait for the homeowner to receive the grant so that his invoice could be settled by the homeowner.

    There were several jobs where he was concerned the homeowner had spent the grant and he'd be left out of pocket.

    It's also possible/likely that the entire process varies from LA to LA.

    If thats the case then i paid vat on the grant.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Ginger83 wrote: »
    If thats the case then i paid vat on the grant.

    My guess would be whatever grant you were offered, you actually received that amount minus VAT. You would pay the VAT element of both the grant and self-funded parts on the basis you would later get refunded all of the VAT.

    Was your builder referred from the panel by the LA?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    Graham wrote: »
    I very vaguely recall the grant payment was made minus VAT on the basis the homeowner would pay, then reclaim the VAT.

    Very possible. I've seen a few different systems for "dealing" with VAT depending on the agency.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Very possible. I've seen a few different systems for "dealing" with VAT depending on the agency.

    It was (probably still is) the most convoluted process. What made it worse was it was often very elderly/infirm recipients left to sort out all the paperwork and running around.

    No fun for the builder either who had little choice but to phone the homeowner every week to see if the grant had arrived yet so their invoice could be settled.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    You should see the way the Dept of Education deal with it!!!

    Convoluted would be an understatement.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Graham wrote: »
    My guess would be whatever grant you were offered, you actually received that amount minus VAT. You would pay the VAT element of both the grant and self-funded parts on the basis you would later get refunded all of the VAT.

    Was your builder referred from the panel by the LA?

    https://monaghan.ie/housing/housing-grants/

    Different LA but clearly says grant EX vat.

    No we picked what we thought was a reputable contractor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 779 ✭✭✭HONKEY TONK


    Ginger83 wrote: »
    If thats the case then i paid vat on the grant.

    Did the grant cover the total cost including vat or did you have to add to the grant to cover the total cost including vat?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Did the grant cover the total cost including vat or did you have to add to the grant to cover the total cost including vat?

    Grant covered about 80%


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    OP.

    Say the builders quote was:

    30000 + 4050 (VAT) = 34050

    Did the granting agency give you 30000 or 34050 into you account?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Messy situation Ginger83, I guess your next step is to get insistent with the builder that this was not a cash job. The original quote included VAT and you want a VAT invoice.

    I can't imagine he will be keen as it will mean he has to pay the VAT element that you'll be reclaiming.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    OP.

    Say the builders quote was:

    30000 + 4050 (VAT) = 34050

    Did the granting agency give you 30000 or 34050 into you account?

    On those figures 30k


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Graham wrote: »
    Messy situation Ginger83, I guess your next step is to get insistent with the builder that this was not a cash job. The original quote included VAT and you want a VAT invoice.

    I can't imagine he will be keen as it will mean he has to pay the VAT element that you'll be reclaiming.

    Yes i can see a row coming but i've got the original quote.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    Ginger83 wrote: »
    On those figures 30k

    In that case I'd say you are totally entitled to claim it back and the grant was specifically paid ex VAT in the assumption that you would.

    My previous comments were on the assumption that you had been given the 34k.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    In that case I'd say you are totally entitled to claim it back and the grant was specifically paid ex VAT in the assumption that you would.

    My previous comments were on the assumption that you had been given the 34k.

    Ideally yes but being entitled to and obtaining a vat receipt could be quite different.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    He has some neck considering what could happen if he continues this line ....

    I don't normally advocate threats of "reporting" people but in this case it's hard to see an alternative.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,091 ✭✭✭✭Sleeper12


    Can I suggest you get in touch with whoever processed the grant & ask for any paperwork he might have provided them. Get all your own paper work together & have a meeting with the builder. Show him a copy of the quote showing vat & ask him to explain. Tell him the only option he is leaving you is to explain it all to revenue. Im sure he'll fold


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    He has some neck considering what could happen if he continues this line ....

    I don't normally advocate threats of "reporting" people but in this case it's hard to see an alternative.

    Maybe a solicitors letter?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭Ginger83


    Sleeper12 wrote: »
    Can I suggest you get in touch with whoever processed the grant & ask for any paperwork he might have provided them. Get all your own paper work together & have a meeting with the builder. Show him a copy of the quote showing vat & ask him to explain. Tell him the only option he is leaving you is to explain it all to revenue. Im sure he'll fold

    I already have the quote.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,656 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    its quite simple.

    if hes given you a quotation with VAT included, and youve paid the full bill, he should give you a receipt with VAT included.

    If youve paid him the full amount including VAT and hes now saying its a cash job, then hes pocketing the cash to the VAT amount.
    report him to revenue.


Advertisement