GW 33 Matchday Thread: 3pm teams in op.

manual_man

Kane(c) went from looking like 16pts to 2pts. Sure what can you do. Massive points swing. Lukaku Lingard and Silva up now need GOALS GOALS GOALS

Mr. Guappa

KevIRL wrote: »

Oh look at Mr having a great week...

Correction: 15 from 8 once Barnes subs in.

Wilberto

21 from 7 after subs. Still have DDG, Otamendi, Auba, and Lingard to go.

gammygils

Bavies no show gets Shaq off my bench with a 5 - my only points
Disaster

CSWS101

Oh piss off Gary
https://twitter.com/GaryLineker/status/982649472915312640

COH

#JusticeForKaneCaptainers

normanoffside

11 from 7

km79

Harry kane as predicted has said it went in off his shoulder
As john Terry did

What now ..........do they now have for prove he didn't touch it...........there have been 4 of these fairly high profile incidents
Terry - goal given to him
Ageuro - goal given to him
Dawson - goals given to him

Kane - not getting goal it seems

Or will he .......

alchemist33

Having finally looked at my league leader's team, but not the actual goal, I've reached the firm conclusion it's an Eriksen goal.

Cantona's Collars

18 with Sane, Otamendi, Lukaku and Captain Rambo to play.

SlickRic

Even though I'm 12 from 7, a Sterling goal and I'm probably hitting the average.

What a GW.

CSF

km79 wrote: »

Harry kane as predicted has said it went in off his shoulder
As john Terry did

What now ..........do they now have for prove he didn't touch it...........there have been 4 of these fairly high profile incidents
Terry - goal given to him
Ageuro - goal given to him
Dawson - goals given to him

Kane - not getting goal it seems

Or will he .......

Ah man, what the player says means absolutely nothing. Still haven't been able to find a video of the call to make my own judgement, but they have to study the video evidence and make a decision on whether they touched it. If they conclude yes, Kane goal. If they conclude, no, Eriksen goal.

I agree that FPL are inconsistent in their approach to many things, but they can't just go throwing out goals where there is nothing to suggest a player to touch it, just because he says he did.

the whole year inn

13 from 3 and no Kane goal is perfect for me.

km79

This would be a good day for ddg to finally save a penalty

km79

CSF wrote: »

Ah man, what the player says means absolutely nothing. Still haven't been able to find a video of the call to make my own judgement, but they have to study the video evidence and make a decision on whether they touched it. If they conclude yes, Kane goal. If they conclude, no, Eriksen goal.

I agree that FPL are inconsistent in their approach to many things, but they can't just go throwing out goals where there is nothing to suggest a player to touch it, just because he says he did.

But that's exactly what they did with John Terry which was my point

km79

km79 wrote: »

You can be sure they will be interviewed by sky after
Kane will say he touched it
Eriksen will accept that and laugh
What then ?

@BenDinnery: Kane: "It was my goal, it flicked off my shoulder and went in."

Eriksen: "He celebrated like it was his goal so I will have to take his word for it."

LOL

shineon23

Interview with Kane and Eriksen on BBC.

Both saying it's Kane goal.

Pity they don't decide the FPL goals/points allocation.

I could really do with those Kane points.

And it's as good as time as any to revive my
#JusticeForDavidSilva
agenda from a dew seasons back.

CSF

km79 wrote: »

But that's exactly what they did with John Terry which was my point

I sincerely hope that is not what they did with John Terry. Is there an obvious way to tell that they did that?

Even if this was the case, I would like to think they will not continue to do crazy things because they did a crazy thing in the past.

SlickRic

Kane is a liar.

wonski

Was that decision based on the interview, though?

I don't think any statistics on the game is decided on interviews tbh.

Video footage and discussion more like.

km79

CSF wrote: »

I sincerely hope that is not what they did with John Terry. Is there an obvious way to tell that they did that?

Even if this was the case, I would like to think they will not continue to do crazy things because they did a crazy thing in the past.

remoteboy

14 (-8) from 9

km79

SlickRic wrote: »

Kane is a liar.

They should have asked aguero if he touched the ball against Newcastle when he clearly didn't but goal was given anyway

CSF

km79 wrote: »

I think there would be fury beyond epic proportions if this was changed back because the lads said Kane scored a goal while hes in the race for the golden boot.

shineon23

SlickRic wrote: »

Kane is a liar.

I don't care if he is.

As far as Im concerned is he passed wind and that wind redirected the ball, id give him the goal :P

km79

CSF wrote: »

I think there would be fury beyond epic proportions if this was changed back because the lads said Kane scored a goal while hes in the race for the golden boot.

But maybe he did touch it and he will be furious if he misses out on golden boot ......

manual_man

remoteboy wrote: »

14 (-8) from 9

Ok you win

CSF

km79 wrote: »

But maybe he did touch it and he will be furious if he misses out on golden boot ......

Not.....sure.......if..........serious :D:D

km79

Shaqiri assist is still there

km79

Bernardo Silva is the false 9