Chemical weapon used on civilians in Syria + Airstrikes

ohnonotgmail

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

Discreetly tucked away by their British friends, see if you can find it on BBC News folks.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world/middle_east

it is on the BBC News front page

sparksfly

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

Discreetly tucked away by their British friends, see if you can find it on BBC News folks.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world/middle_east

Can you imagine the coverage this would get if it was a suspected Russian strike in Syria? British licence payers are being severely short changed by the BBC when it comes to impartiality.

Elmer Blooker

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

it is on the BBC News front page

I better go to Specsavers! http://www.bbc.com/news

mcmoustache

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

Discreetly tucked away by their British friends, see if you can find it on BBC News folks.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world/middle_east

Is this some story that shows that the chemical attack was fabricated or a story about something else for you to whatabout?

ohnonotgmail

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

I better go to Specsavers! http://www.bbc.com/news

the link you posted was just to the middle east section of the BBC. the top story there was about the rebuilding of the mosque in mosul. i thought that was what you are referring to. I hadn't noticed the link in the previous story. However that is also on the BBC middle east page it hasnt been buried.

zom

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

Discreetly tucked away by their British friends, see if you can find it on BBC News folks.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world/middle_east

But they explained in some other article that this is all Russians and poor people fault (war in Yemen).

cnocbui

Elmer Blooker wrote: »

I better go to Specsavers!

I have no idea what you you are on about.

BalcombeSt4

Gatling wrote: »

Remind us how that happened

How people died in the Central America wars of the 60's, 70's & 80's? Well they were either bombed or shot to death.

mcmoustache

Gatling wrote: »

It's a sputnik exposé

Safe to say it's fake

Funny you should say that.

It turns out that the "exposé" was filmed at a military building in Damascus.

mcmoustache

BalcombeSt4 wrote: »

How people died in the Central America wars of the 60's, 70's & 80's? Well they were either bombed or shot to death.

Yeah. And how many died in the trenches in Belgium? And what about the crusades? And what about that meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs?

Shurimgreat

mcmoustache wrote: »

Yeah. And how many died in the trenches in Belgium? And what about the crusades? And what about that meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs?

America is definitely to blame for that. The crater is on the American continent.

Cheerful Spring

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman was harassed by certain people online of being a Russian bot on Twitter and Sky News made the mistake of bringing him on to attack him. They got annilated with truth bombs, amazing watch, and futher proof how stupid these puppets are.

Gatling

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman

Claimed to be voting in the US elections and gets caught in the lie.

Happens on threads on a regular basis


Typical low level trolls stuff

Call Me Jimmy

double post

Call Me Jimmy

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman was harassed by certain people online of being a Russian bot on Twitter and Sky News made the mistake of bringing him on to attack him. They got annilated with truth bombs, amazing watch, and futher proof how stupid these puppets are.

Frightening, they almost lament that they can't shut his twitter down just for daring to question the british government. Especially sinister is the government scrolling through his twitter trying to discredit him over unrelated ****... unbelievable

mcmoustache

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman was harassed by certain people online of being a Russian bot on Twitter and Sky News made the mistake of bringing him on to attack him. They got annilated with truth bombs, amazing watch, and futher proof how stupid these puppets are.

There's very little to differentiate between an IRA shill who retweets Russian propaganda and a useful idiot who retweets Russian propaganda. He came up as a false positive and if you look at his timeline, you'll see why.

In any case, one false positive doesn't prove whatever point it was that you were making.

mulbot

Gatling wrote: »

Claimed to be voting in the US elections and gets caught in the lie.

Happens on threads on a regular basis


Typical low level trolls stuff

He explained this as nothing more than a turn of phrase-as in,"he gets my vote" or "he gets the nod from me".

BoJack Horseman

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman was harassed by certain people online of being a Russian bot on Twitter and Sky News made the mistake of bringing him on to attack him. They got annilated with truth bombs, amazing watch, and futher proof how stupid these puppets are.

When dissent becomes a subversive act & has one labelled an enemy.

Orwellian stuff
Dark times for Britain.

Gatling

Actually going back to the Airstrikes inside Syria lavrov made big claims about shooting down the majority of the missles fired as did the assad regime .but neither offered any evidence to back up the claims no photos or videos,debris

The Americans came out and said yes the regime fired 2 missles after all 105 cruise and air to ground missles had all hit their designated targets .

Looks like lavrov got caught again and the Syrians shot into the night sky to make it look like they did something.

Gringo180

Very interesting that Theresa Mays husband has links to the arms industry.

mcmoustache

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

Frightening, they almost lament that they can't shut his twitter down just for daring to question the british government. Especially sinister is the government scrolling through his twitter trying to discredit him over unrelated ****... unbelievable

BoJack Horseman wrote: »

When dissent becomes a subversive act & has one labelled an enemy.

Orwellian stuff
Dark times for Britain.

Wow, that's some hyperbole over the TV equivalent of the daily mail having a crank on a show. You'd swear Sky news was a government controlled broadcaster like Sputnik or RT.

mulbot

Gatling wrote: »

Actually going back to the Airstrikes inside Syria lavrov made big claims about shooting down the majority of the missles fired as did the assad regime .but neither offered any evidence to back up the claims no photos or videos,debris

The Americans came out and said yes the regime fired 2 missles after all 105 cruise and air to ground missles had all hit their designated targets .

Looks like lavrov got caught again and the Syrians shot into the night sky to make it look like they did something.

In fairness,we really haven't seen much evidence from the American regime of the damage done by 100+ missiles

donegaLroad

Gringo180 wrote: »

Very interesting that Theresa Mays husband has links to the arms industry.

Very interesting that she is also a supporter of Zionism.

Gatling

mulbot wrote: »

In fairness,we really haven't seen much evidence from the American regime of the damage done by 100+ missiles

We've seen plenty actually.

Rubble mostly ,
Along with plenty of before and after satellite images,

But nothing showing one missle interception never mind the 70+ quoted as shotdown

Gringo180

Gringo180 wrote: »

Very interesting that Theresa Mays husband has links to the arms industry.

So does the person that cleans the toilets at Intel

nacho libre

Aegir wrote: »

So does the person that cleans the toilets at Intel

Does Leo's partner clean toilets in intel? Has he also done well out of BAE shares, courtesy of deals his partner has done with the Saudi Government?

nacho libre

nacho libre wrote: »

Does Leo's partner clean toilets in intel? Has he also done well out of BAE shares, courtesy of deals his partner has done with the Saudi Government?

no idea, maybe.

What does this have to do with the discussion? Has Philip May done well out of BAE shares? He is a small cog in a huge wheel that owns a massive 8% of BAE shares.

maybe they should invest in a company making tin foil hats?

mulbot

Aegir wrote: »

no idea, maybe.

What does this have to do with the discussion? Has Philip May done well out of BAE shares? He is a small cog in a huge wheel that owns a massive 8% of BAE shares.

maybe they should invest in a company making tin foil hats?

The large wheel won't turn without the small cog! Would it not be a conflict of interest,especially where international politics are concerned?

mulbot

mulbot wrote: »

The large wheel won't turn without the small cog! Would it not be a conflict of interest,especially where international politics are concerned?

If every Prime minister/President or whatever couldn't make decisions because of some very very tenuous links their spouse had to a company that is very tenuously connected to that decision, we would either have a complete breakdown of a governments ability to do anything, or a complete ban on premier's spouses being able to lead normal lives.

This really is tin foil stuff

Elmer Blooker

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman was harassed by certain people online of being a Russian bot on Twitter and Sky News made the mistake of bringing him on to attack him. They got annilated with truth bombs, amazing watch, and futher proof how stupid these puppets are.

Fair play to the SKY reporter Alistair Bunkall who somehow managed to keep a straight face when he asked: " ... might you be part of a propaganda machine? .. "

There's very little to differentiate between an IRA shill

The IRA? Don't you mean "rebels" or "opposition"?

So does the person that cleans the toilets at Intel

Someone on a minimum wage is part of the arms industry? Do explain or maybe some the 6 posters who thanked this might?

mulbot

Aegir wrote: »

If every Prime minister/President or whatever couldn't make decisions because of some very very tenuous links their spouse had to a company that is very tenuously connected to that decision, we would either have a complete breakdown of a governments ability to do anything, or a complete ban on premier's spouses being able to lead normal lives.

This really is tin foil stuff

Wasn't Prime Minister supposed to get approval from Parliament before acting?

Gatling

mulbot wrote: »

Wasn't Prime Minister supposed to get approval from Parliament before acting?

No she was legally able and entitled to bypass parliament

mulbot

Gatling wrote: »

No she was legally able and entitled to bypass parliament

Convenient

Gatling

mulbot wrote: »

Convenient

Not really action was taken first and foremost not a debate that would roll on for weeks .
Assad and putin are solely responsible for the attacks ,
Bar the nonsense about shooting down most of the missles ,they have gone very quite this week must be trying to figure which story they put out is the latest truth

Gringo180

Aegir wrote: »

maybe they should invest in a company making tin foil hats?

They should sell well on here, what with all the crazies actually believing Assad gassed his own people just as hes cleared out all the western backed head choppers and heart eaters from his country :pac:

sparksfly

Aegir wrote: »

Gringo180 wrote: »

Very interesting that Theresa Mays husband has links to the arms industry.

So does the person that cleans the toilets at Intel

[justify][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Stupid comparison.[/font]
[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The company that Peter May is involved in, Capital Group, is the largest shareholder in BAE Defense Systems and is also the second-largest shareholder in Lockheed Martin. Both company's shares have rocketed since the missile strikes last week.[/font]
[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Theresa May has a clear conflict of interest.[/font][/font][/justify]

bilston

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

Cheerful Spring wrote: »

Just had to post this and out after this. Englishman was harassed by certain people online of being a Russian bot on Twitter and Sky News made the mistake of bringing him on to attack him. They got annilated with truth bombs, amazing watch, and futher proof how stupid these puppets are.

Frightening, they almost lament that they can't shut his twitter down just for daring to question the british government. Especially sinister is the government scrolling through his twitter trying to discredit him over unrelated ****... unbelievable

Yeah the UK is real totalitarian state...

Gatling

Gringo180 wrote: »

what with all the crazies actually believing Assad gassed his own people

It's been repeatedly proven he has .


Not once ,not twice but multiple chemical weapons attacks ,and yes two groups used chlorine against Assad regime forces

Unfortunately with boards were stuck with people will deny white is white and black is black

mulbot

Gatling wrote: »

It's been repeatedly proven he has .


Not once ,not twice but multiple chemical weapons attacks ,and yes two groups used chlorine against Assad regime forces

Unfortunately with boards were stuck with people will deny white is white and black is black

Proven? When?

cnocbui

mulbot wrote: »

Proven? When?

OPCW reports: http://news.trust.org//item/20180414100600-sebl1/

Tigerbaby

Please God, to have a secular, peaceful non-religious Syria. Oh right, thats what we had up to 2011 until the "colour" revolutions tried to impose the head-choppers on it.

Freedom and democracy, **** yeah!

God Bless Putin.

lovingly,

Tigerbaby

cnocbui

Tigerbaby wrote: »

Please God, to have a secular, peaceful non-religious Syria. Oh right, thats what we had up to 2011 until the "colour" revolutions tried to impose the head-choppers on it.

Freedom and democracy, **** yeah!

God Bless Putin.

lovingly,

Tigerbaby

Mass torture and murder does not equate with peaceful in my reckoning. Stop with the utterly false portrayal of a wretched regime.

Gatling

cnocbui wrote: »

Mass torture and murder does not equate with peaceful in my reckoning. Stop with the utterly false portrayal of a wretched regime.

Expect some replies of they need a strong man to keep them in check

Tigerbaby

Really Yellow Mountain,

In a vacuum, is it better to have some oxygen than none?

What is your aspirational nation state? Considering the neighbourhood.

And what would you replace Syria with? Saudi?

Syria is the last bastion of an even moderately secular state in the Fertile Crescent.

God Bless Putin and Assad, saving us from the Washington and Wall Street "Bankers". If only we'd wake up and realise it.

cnocbui

Tigerbaby wrote: »

Really Yellow Mountain,

In a vacuum, is it better to have some oxygen than none?

What is your aspirational nation state? Considering the neighbourhood.

And what would you replace Syria with? Saudi?

Syria is the last bastion of an even moderately secular state in the Fertile Crescent.

God Bless Putin and Assad, saving us from the Washington and Wall Street "Bankers". If only we'd wake up and realise it.

Jordan.

mulbot

cnocbui wrote: »

OPCW reports: http://news.trust.org//item/20180414100600-sebl1/

Is that an OPCW report or a report from the French? I can't seem to find where they say they've identified chemicals used by Syrian Forces

cnocbui

Gatling wrote: »

Expect some replies of they need a strong man to keep them in check

Isn't there one of these peace loving and well behaved 'strong men' in the Kremlin?

cnocbui

mulbot wrote: »

Is that an OPCW report or a report from the French? I can't seem to find where they say they've identified chemicals used by Syrian Forces

You didn't read it so you didn't see it.

mulbot

mulbot wrote: »

Is that an OPCW report or a report from the French? I can't seem to find where they say they've identified chemicals used by Syrian Forces

"On the basis of this overall assessment and on the intelligence collected by our services, and in the absence to date of chemical samples analysed by our own laboratories..."

Silly me,just saw this in the report...

Gatling

cnocbui wrote: »

Isn't there one of these peace loving and well behaved 'strong men' in the Kremlin?

Yeah they don't need democratic elections they're Slavs and salvics need strong paronoid men ruling them ,
So I've been told on here