Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fulham Owner trying to buy Wembley

2»

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wembley would be regarded as a far greater historic landmark than Croker.

    I really don't think it would. The events you list have a place in British sporting history, but not national history. Unlike Bloody Sunday and the massacre at Croke Park, which were part of the history curriculum that every Irish schoolchildren studied for decades. Hosting the European Cup Final has no real historical significance at all compared to "scene of a massacre, because those who attended that venue were seen as an enemy"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    I really don't think it would. The events you list have a place in British sporting history, but not national history. Unlike Bloody Sunday and the massacre at Croke Park, which were part of the history curriculum that every Irish schoolchildren studied for decades. Hosting the European Cup Final has no real historical significance at all compared to "scene of a massacre, because those who attended that venue were seen as an enemy"
    I was speaking in terms of the grander World stage.
    Wembley is a still a renowned stadium the World over (along with the events it's hosted). Croker is not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭lassykk


    Rekop dog wrote: »
    But it's all open to perception though. People attach their own significance to things. If you think holding a 100 year grudge is a valid reason for not allowing the hypothetical example of a English side move to Croker I believe you're being as hateful as those nationalist opposing the Wembley sale. Most extreme nationalist fronts at their core are racist/sectarianist/xenophobic.

    Ha, I forgot about this thread but I think it's hilarious that me stating Wembley and Croke Park are not comparable due to the history of what happened at both stadiums somehow makes me hateful / racist / sectarian / xenophobic :rolleyes:

    I would have no personal issue with anyone using Croke Park of any nationality for any reasonable purpose.

    The point I was making is that the historical significance of the venue versus Wembley is completely different. That has nothing to do with perception either. Nothing on the same scale of Bloody Sunday has ever happened in Wembley (thankfully) and comparing both venues from a historical standpoint is not reasonable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Offer withdrawn.


Advertisement