Tommy Robinson jailed

thebull85

dav3 wrote: »

Never heard of them.

They do sound like nutters all right.

Can you elaborate?

dav3

thebull85 wrote: »

Can you elaborate?

Yes

thebull85

dav3 wrote: »

Yes

Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.

It wasn't a medical diagnosis.

FTA69

thebull85 wrote: »

Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.

We could say you’re a nutter if you think calling Asian people “Pakis” is ok. Listen mate if you want to go around advocating the use of the word “Paki” and supporting groups that want to deport non whites then crack on but don’t be doing the snowflake routine when someone calls you a racist.

thebull85

FTA69 wrote: »

We could say you’re a nutter if you think calling Asian people “Pakis” is ok. Listen mate if you want to go around advocating the use of the word “Paki” and supporting groups that want to deport non whites then crack on but don’t be doing the snowflake routine when someone calls you a racist.

No one called me a racist.

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

It wasn't a medical diagnosis.

who asked you? your buddy can answer for himself.

thebull85

FTA69 wrote: »

We could say you’re a nutter if you think calling Asian people “Pakis” is ok.

Who said it was ok to call Asian people pakis?

FTA69

thebull85 wrote: »

Who said it was ok to call Asian people pakis?

You. You were moaning that you’re not allowed call people Pakis as it’s not a racist term.

WinnyThePoo

thebull85 wrote: »

Who said it was ok to call Asian people pakis?

Do really think this 20 questions charade is fooling anybody.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

who asked you? your buddy can answer for himself.

It is a discussion forum. all are free to comment. or do you not like free speech?

thebull85

FTA69 wrote: »

You. You were moaning that you’re not allowed call people Pakis as it’s not a racist term.

I think you need to read the posts before you jump the gun there, chief. I never mentioned the word Asians once.

thebull85

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Do really think this 20 questions charade is fooling anybody.

You gonna answer my original question or just spout out of you?

dav3

thebull85 wrote: »

Are you implying these people have mental health issues? I assume so since you are calling them nutters.

Calm yourself down there princess.

I don't think those nutters would appreciate you assuming they all have mental health issues.

It appears the 'Irish' branch is made up entirely of Polish and bizarrely ulster unionists. Although maybe not that bizarre.

thebull85

dav3 wrote: »

It appears the 'Irish' branch is made up entirely of Polish and bizarrely ulster unionists. Although maybe not that bizarre.

So you didnt see the Belfast protest i take it?

Odhinn

thebull85 wrote: »

So you didnt see the Belfast protest i take it?

....belfast protests by who?

Taytoland

jooksavage wrote: »

Taytoland wrote: »

So Bloody Mary didn't exist and the burning of Protestants didn't happen. Of course it happened. One of the reasons Guy Fawkes happened is because he wanted to return England back to the one true faith and get rid of the heretics. You had Catholic resistance for centuries.

We were drawing parallels between todays anti-Islam hysteria and 18-19TH CENTURY anti-Catholicism. You've dragged us all the way back to 1605 to support your argument.... which, FUNNILY ENOUGH, is exactly what the ringleaders of the Gordon riots reached for (and it was considered reaching even then). Turf mentioned Antonia Fraser earlier. Her book is the King and the Catholics. Recommended.

Read her book on the gunpowder plot and you will learn more about traitor Guy Fawkes wanting to restore the one true faith which he and his buddies wanted to overthrow England.

FTA69

Odhinn wrote: »

....belfast protests by who?

By all the Loyalist thickos giving Nazi salutes presumably.

thebull85

FTA69 wrote: »

By all the Loyalist thickos giving Nazi salutes presumably.

Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.

well that is a matter of opinion. i can say without fear of contradiction that they are most definitely thick.

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well that is a matter of opinion. i can say without fear of contradiction that they are most definitely thick.

Anybody giving Nazi salutes is thick ill agree with you on that one.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Anybody giving Nazi salutes is thick ill agree with you on that one.

i was referring to the people who support the likes of tommy robinson. I doubt there was an IQ over 80 at the violent protest in london.

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i was referring to the people who support the likes of tommy robinson. I doubt there was an IQ over 80 at the violent protest in london.

Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

wes

thebull85 wrote: »

Ive seen that, personally i dont think paki is a racist word and a lot of pakistanis ive met and worked with have described themselves as paki, lets be real here why is it ok to call an austrailian an aussie, or a british person a brit.

But you cant call a pakistani a paki?

Its bull****.

This is complete and utter nonsense. No Pakistani refers to themselves as a "Paki", its Pakistani, unless they are trying to reclaim the word, but that in that context its much like the n-word in that its ok for people from that group to say it.

BTW, my family is from the Azad Kashmir, so I can tell you very clearly no one in the Pakistani community would use that term to describe themselves.

The term is racist term and pretending otherwise is utterly absurd and quite frankly farcical to claim otherwise.

Its a slur aimed at anyone who is South Asian regardless of the national origin of there parents. To pretend otherwise, is simple farce.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

Well at least you live up to the stereotype.

wes

thebull85 wrote: »

Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

Calls some one else a key board warrior and then post the most key board warrior thing possible :rolleyes:. Nothing more amusing than far right poster supporting people who made there hatred for them abundantly clear.

thebull85

wes wrote: »

This is complete and utter nonsense. No Pakistani refers to themselves as a "Paki", its Pakistani, unless they are trying to reclaim the word, but that in that context its much like the n-word in that its ok for people from that group to say it.

BTW, my family is from the Azad Kashmir, so I can tell you very clearly no one in the Pakistani community would use that term to describe themselves.

The term is racist term and pretending otherwise is utterly absurd and quite frankly farcical to claim otherwise.

But why is it ok to use the word Brit or Aussie, is it a case that we are only allowed shorten certain words.

The Backwards Man

If the Gardai ever find a traffic cone in one of their horseboxes they'll know who to suspect now.

thebull85

wes wrote: »

Calls some one else a key board warrior and then post the most key board warrior thing possible :rolleyes:. Nothing more amusing than far right poster supporting people who made there hatred for them abundantly clear.

Im no keyboard warrior, if your buddy wants come call me a thick to my face it can be organised.

AfterLife

thebull85 wrote: »

Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.

There's no doubting we have our own share of dumb *****.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

But why is it ok to use the word Brit or Aussie, is it a case that we are only allowed shorten certain words.

Context. Its not that hard to understand. It really isn't. One would have to willfully try hard not to understand.

thebull85

AfterLife wrote: »

There's no doubting we have our own share of dumb *****.

Tell me about it.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Im no keyboard warrior, if your buddy wants come call me a thick to my face it can be organised.

I'm not his buddy. And i'm very choosy about the company i keep.

FTA69

thebull85 wrote: »

Yeah, loyalist nazis waving Irish tricolours.. I dont think so.

As shocking as it may seem to you there are plenty of Irish people who support the likes of Tommy Robinson and they are not nazis.

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/free-tommy-robinson-rally-in-belfast-photos-36994601.html

Lol. Look at these proud sons of Ulster here.

wes

thebull85 wrote: »

But why is it ok to use the word Brit or Aussie, is it a case that we are only allowed shorten certain words.

Oh dear, :rolleyes: I shouldn't have to explain this. Racist use the term "Paki" to racially abuse people of South Asian origin. The term "Brit" or "Aussie" are not used to racially abuse white people. Seriously man you need to learn what context is, otherwise it will be impossible for you to understand the world around you.

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Context. Its not that hard to understand. It really isn't. One would have to willfully try hard not to understand.

Calling some a paki b*astard or an brit b*stard or an aussie c*nt, whatever way you want to put it is wrong.

Referring to someone as a brit, an aussie or a paki is not racist.

Grayson

thebull85 wrote: »

Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

Because you'd have a ripping retort that you can't express over the internet? Or because you'd smack him?

Dude, when you resort to that kind of argument, you've lost the argument.

ohnonotgmail

FTA69 wrote: »

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/free-tommy-robinson-rally-in-belfast-photos-36994601.html

Lol. Look at these proud sons of Ulster here.

Low IQ thugs the lot of them.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Calling some a paki b*astard or an brit b*stard or an aussie c*nt, whatever way you want to put it is wrong.

Referring to someone as a brit, an aussie or a paki is not racist.

people from pakistan would disagree with you. History disagrees with you.

tritriagain

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i was referring to the people who support the likes of tommy robinson. I doubt there was an IQ over 80 at the violent protest in london.

You can back that up can you. I'm no fan of tr but labelling all his supporters thick is really just burying your head in the sand and avoiding the most important issue i.e why do so many people across Europe feel such anger and disconnection from the social and economic future of their Homeland .it's there, and to ignore it is asking for trouble in the long term.

thebull85

Grayson wrote: »

Because you'd have a ripping retort that you can't express over the internet? Or because you'd smack him?

I wouldnt do anything, because i know he wouldnt call me it to my face.

dav3

thebull85 wrote: »

Ah you're just a little keyboard warrior, calling people thick over the internet. Im a Tommy Robinson supporter and i tell you one thing you wouldnt call me a thick to me face.

Please tell me this is a parody account.

ohnonotgmail

tritriagain wrote: »

You can back that up can you. I'm no fan of tr but labelling all his supporters thick is really just burying your head in the sand and avoiding the most important issue i.e why do so many people across Europe feel such anger and disconnection from the social and economic future of their Homeland .it's there, and to ignore it is asking for trouble in the long term.

but they are thick. Why else would they be taken in as they have?

ohnonotgmail

dav3 wrote: »

Please tell me this is a parody account.

i really dont think it is.

The Backwards Man

Educationally marginalised sounds better than thick to be honest.

But yeah, if you support Mr Lennnon, you need help.

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

people from pakistan would disagree with you. History disagrees with you.

As i said before, pakistanis ive met here and in the UK have referred to themselves as "pakis" actually it was mostly said like "im paki". Id no problem being called a mick or a paddy (also not racist) in England and i think anyone that has a problem with that is an extremly delicate person.

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

As i said before, pakistanis ive met here and in the UK have referred to themselves as "pakis" actually it was mostly said like "im paki". Id no problem being called a mick or a paddy (also not racist) in England and i think anyone that has a problem with that is an extremly delicate person.

I refer you to my previous answer where i mentioned context. Some black people refer to themselves as n*gger. do you think you can call them by that name?

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I refer you to my previous answer where i mentioned context. Some black people refer to themselves as n*gger. do you think you can call them by that name?

Id never call anyone a n*gger, we know the origins of that word. However paki is short for pakistani its a little bit different.

I dont know the origins of the word paki. People will probably say it originated in England in the 50s but id doubt that very much.

thebull85

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Well at least you live up to the stereotype.

Challenge someone to call me a thick to my face, what stereotype am i living up to?

ohnonotgmail

thebull85 wrote: »

Id never call anyone a n*gger, we know the origins of that word. However paki is short for pakistani its a little bit different.

I dont know the origins of the word paki. People will probably say it originated in England in the 50s but id doubt that very much.

and you would be wrong. As i said history is not on your side. Though it first appeared in the 1960s not the 1950s. It is most definitely a racial slur. But as a tommy supporter you dont want to see that.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6740445.stm