So who's going to see the Pope?

Beechwoodspark

Hitman3000 wrote: »

It'll be alot less than the 32million Frank is costing the taxpayer.

Going on her past form her I actually wouldn’t put it past her to submit 32 million claim lol

harr

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t do much eye contact the pope, anyone notice that

Looks like he could be a grumpy enough fecker

Are Am Eye

Here comes the Pope
Maybe he will help us to cope
We're looking for some hope
Oh please throw us a rope
your own crowd
tell them rape is not allowed

Bubbaclaus

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t do much eye contact the pope, anyone notice that

Sign of feeling guilty

Atlantic Dawn

No sign of the Michael D's wolfhounds.

Itssoeasy

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t do much eye contact the pope, anyone notice that

I noticed during the Vatican anthem(didn't know it had one) he looked bored to tears as did president and Mrs Higgins.

FrancieBrady

markodaly wrote: »

By all means, do but you will be a long time looking.

I do not know about you but I do not like hypocrites.

One one hand you have a keyboard warrior giving out about 'good' Catholics, on the other hand the same poster excuses the murder of women and children, because it was for 'the cause'

You think I should let that slide? Do you want me to excuse the murder of women and children?

You go find a post where I excused murder Mark. And stop making a hypocritical fool of yourself here.
If you have to stoop to lies to defend your position you are as bad as the Pope and all the good Catholics and priests.

Alf Veedersane

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t do much eye contact the pope, anyone notice that

Because if you look him in the eyes, it's like staring directly at the sun or something.

#PapalProblems

taytobreath

He doesn’t look steady on his feet either

castletownman

No ceremonial hurl and photo op?

Pope's visit disappoints

Itssoeasy

Minister zappone looked to be throwing a few ****s into the pope when talking to him.

taytobreath

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t do much eye contact the pope, anyone notice that

Sabina looks delighted to meet him.

Alf Veedersane

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t look steady on his feet either

Must have had a skipful last night.

castletownman

castletownman wrote: »

No ceremonial hurl and photo op?

Pope's visit disappoints

No photo of him skulling a pint of guinness either, very poor show in my opinion.

Itssoeasy

I always thought the aras was a bigger building.

President Higgins is fluent in Spanish ?

Itssoeasy

Topgear on Dave wrote: »

taytobreath wrote: »

He doesn’t do much eye contact the pope, anyone notice that

Sabina looks delighted to meet him.

The Irish ambassador to the Vatican looked delighted to meet him aswell.

SeaFields

Hitman3000 wrote: »

It'll be alot less than the 32million Frank is costing the taxpayer.

Realistically this 32m figure is another illustration of media inability to objectively report on things. The event may cost approximately 32m but it will result in spending by the public from which the Exchequer will benefit through VAT, etc. Overall the 32m will probably be recouped from the event.

Itssoeasy

castletownman wrote: »

No ceremonial hurl and photo op?

Pope's visit disappoints

Copybook blotted there.

Alf Veedersane

Itssoeasy wrote: »

I always thought the aras was a bigger building.

President Higgins is fluent in Spanish ?

Yeah there was a big deal made of himself and the wife doing a course before going to visit South America early in the presidency

Itssoeasy

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

Itssoeasy wrote: »

I always thought the aras was a bigger building.

President Higgins is fluent in Spanish ?

Yeah there was a big deal made of himself and the wife doing a course before going to visit South America early in the presidency

Fair play on that then.

Beechwoodspark

Looks like the visit is going very well so far

Taytoland

Hopefully he doesn't make any surprise visits.

Alf Veedersane

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Looks like the visit is going very well so far

RTE lip-readers said that he just said "10/10 would visit again".

Bold statement early on

Itssoeasy

The popes handwritting is a bit hard to read.

the purple tin

Atlantic Dawn wrote: »

No sign of the Michael D's wolfhounds.

Pope Francis is allergic to dog hair.

Itssoeasy

the purple tin wrote: »

Atlantic Dawn wrote: »

No sign of the Michael D's wolfhounds.

Pope Francis is allergic to dog hair.

Is he ? So no papal dog then ?

markodaly

FrancieBrady wrote: »

You go find a post where I excused murder Mark. And stop making a hypocritical fool of yourself here.
If you have to stoop to lies to defend your position you are as bad as the Pope and all the good Catholics and priests.

LOL, I am still laughing at the post where you want SF disbanded for their crimes. Quite a turnaround Francie.

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=106423516

Itssoeasy

Sharon sounding as excited as usual.

DavidLyons_

Itssoeasy wrote: »

Minister zappone looked to be throwing a few ****s into the pope when talking to him.

She a dangerous, nasty piece of work.

Higgins looked very concerned while she put her tuppence in.

batgoat

DavidLyons_ wrote: »

She a dangerous, nasty piece of work.

Higgins looked very concerned while she put her tuppence in.

Dangerous? :pac: This all back to witchcraft conspiracies about her?

ProudDUB

Who is the name of God is that woman commentating on RTE? She's atrocious. Can barely get the words out at times. She is some sort of religious affairs expert?

Hitman3000

DavidLyons_ wrote:

She a dangerous, nasty piece of work.

You're pulling the p*ss right? Frank is the head of one of the world's largest organisations that engaged in systemic child abuse and rape but your issue is with her?

Itssoeasy

DavidLyons_ wrote: »

Itssoeasy wrote: »

Minister zappone looked to be throwing a few ****s into the pope when talking to him.

She a dangerous, nasty piece of work.

Higgins looked very concerned while she put her tuppence in.

Well I'll have to disagree with her being dangerous.

But yes the president did look a bit concerned as it went on.

touts

DavidLyons_ wrote: »

She a dangerous, nasty piece of work.

Higgins looked very concerned while she put her tuppence in.

I don't think she is dangerous. She just thinks she has a right to tell people exactly how little she thinks of them and then thinks they are bigots if they disagree.

I wonder what route she took from her office to the Aras this morning. With her track record on milage I wouldn't be surprised if she claims more miles this morning than the pope.

Itssoeasy

ProudDUB wrote: »

Who is the name of God is that woman commentating on RTE? She's atrocious. Can barely get the words out at times. She is some sort of religious affairs expert?

She needs a drink of water it sounds like.

AtomicHorror

DavidLyons_ wrote: »

She a dangerous, nasty piece of work.

Higgins looked very concerned while she put her tuppence in.

Oh yes, with the 'bortion and the gehys. I'd say you're projecting on Higgins there, I doubt he's concerned about Zappone. She backed his run for a second term, so seems there's no beef.

the purple tin

Itssoeasy wrote: »

Is he ? So no papal dog then ?

He is ok with cartain breeds that don't shed, the same way Obama's daughter is; they had to get a special breed of pet dog when they moved into the whitehouse because of her allergies.

AtomicHorror

Hitman3000 wrote: »

You're pulling the p*ss right? Frank is the head of one of the world's largest organisations that engaged in systemic child abuse and rape but your issue is with her?

But, but, the 'bortion. The geehys.

Itssoeasy

Right there they are.

FrancieBrady

markodaly wrote: »

LOL, I am still laughing at the post where you want SF disbanded for their crimes. Quite a turnaround Francie.

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=106423516

More lies won't help Mark.

Where in that thread did I 'excuse' murder?

The lies the arch Roman Catholics will stoop to is unbelievable.

mojesius

The pope's Smithers looks like zero craic.

AtomicHorror

markodaly wrote: »

By all means, do but you will be a long time looking.

I do not know about you but I do not like hypocrites.

One one hand you have a keyboard warrior giving out about 'good' Catholics, on the other hand the same poster excuses the murder of women and children, because it was for 'the cause'

You think I should let that slide? Do you want me to excuse the murder of women and children?

Of course not. I just don't want you to mistake those points as relevant to this discussion. Or for you to mislead others into mistaking them as relevant.

Itssoeasy

The pope looks like he'd have no problem playing hurling by the way he handled that shovel.

Itssoeasy

mojesius wrote: »

The pope's Smithers looks like zero craic.

His what ?

Are Am Eye

The pope's subordinates get to wear black outfits that can hide food stains and are much easier to keep clean. For going to all the trouble of getting promoted above them Francis has to wear an all white number. Hardly fair.

FrancieBrady

Itssoeasy wrote: »

The pope looks like he have problem playing hurling by the way he handled that shovel.

:eek::eek: what's he doing with a shovel...has it cut up rough already???

Itssoeasy

Are Am Eye wrote: »

The pope's subordinates get to wear black outfits that can hide food stains and are much easier to keep clean. For going to all the trouble of getting promoted above them Francis has to wear an all white number. Hardly fair.

I'd say eating a curry must be a disaster for him.

taytobreath

Itssoeasy wrote: »

His what ?

His aide

Itssoeasy

taytobreath wrote: »

Itssoeasy wrote: »

His what ?

His aide

Ah right.

Itssoeasy

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Itssoeasy wrote: »

The pope looks like he have problem playing hurling by the way he handled that shovel.

:eek::eek: what's he doing with a shovel...has it cut up rough already???

He looked like he could lift and strike no bother.