Pedophiles Believe They Should Be A Part Of The LGBT Community

Dr Brown

Is this next on the Liberal Agenda the legalization of Paedophilia ?

https://dailycaller.com/2018/07/09/pedophiles-lgbt-community/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter

Pedophiles are rebranding themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to gain acceptance and be included into the LGBT community, according to several reports from LGBT news sites.
According to Urban Dictionary, the blanket term MAP includes infantophiles (infants), pedophiles (pre-pubescent children), hebephiles (pubescent children), and ephebophiles (post-pubescent children). Some MAPs also refer to themselves as NOMAPs or “Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons”.
These pedophiles seek to be a part of the LGBT+ community, even going so far as to make a “Pride” flag for Gay Pride Month.


The “MAP/NOMAP community” tries to pull at people’s heartstrings by claiming that pedophiles are misunderstood marginalized people, and that as long as their attraction to children is not acted upon — or in some cases when they get permission from the child — that they should not be villainized.
Sites such as “The Prevention Project” claim to be aimed at helping children, posting quotes like the one below, reminiscent of testimonials of struggling gay youth, under headlines like “everyone needs support”.


Many blogs exist on Tumblr showing support for MAPs, claiming that they should be a part of the LGBT community and attempting to create “safe spaces” for these “minor attracted persons”. The blog “Pedophiles about Pedophilia” also presents many sob stories of “marginalized” pedophiles in pretty pastel colors, claiming that they mean no harm and just want to be loved like everyone else as shown in such headlines as “Why Pedophilia And Pedophiles Are Not A Risk To Children”, “Growing Up A Pedophile” and “How I came out as an anti-contact pedophile to the woman I love”.
This name change seems to follow in the liberal trend of rebranding things by giving them more “politically correct” names, but is the next step really normalizing pedophilia?

JMNolan

Phew, what a grenade to throw

Ipso

Sure, just conflate a group you don’t like with child molesters.

TheValeyard

Yer Da sells Avon

Buford T. Justice V once gave me a red card for calling Dr. Brown a homophobe.

I'll just leave that there.

Roger Hassenforder

Ipso wrote: »

Sure, just conflate a group you don’t like with child molesters.

I've a "safe space" for MAPs at the bottom of my garden.
At the back of the barn.

Cabaal

I'll just leave this here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller

Issues by this news source include
- False prostitution allegations
- Encouragement of violence against protesters
- Ties to alleged white nationalist members

What a nonsense story, next week they'll claim murders want to be part of the LGBT community.
This is nothing but an attempt to discredit LGBT community

CerebralCortex

Pedophiles should get support to prevent them harming children based on the sexual preferences. They should be able to come clean about such feelings such that they can be helped to manage their aberrant sexual desires. They're not monsters they're dangerously sick.

Hector Savage

Wouldn't surprise me , Salon had a video of some guy talking about how he loved w*nking over a 5 year old girl , while playing video of a kid dancing in the background.

This was all done in a PROGRESSIVE light.

SICK.


Im obviously not gonna google it , but nothing surprises me with liberals anymore, it's a mental disorder.

TheValeyard

Cabaal wrote: »

I'll just leave this here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller

Issues by this news source include
- False prostitution allegations
- Encouragement of violence against protesters
- Ties to alleged white nationalist members

What a nonsense story, next week they'll claim murders want to be part of the LGBT community.
This is nothing but an attempt to discredit LGBT community

Founder, Neil Patel, a former advisor to Dick Cheney. Alright, I'm done.

The Backwards Man

Hapax Legomenon wrote: »

Buford T. Justice V once gave me a red card for calling Dr. Brown a homophobe.

I'll just leave that there.

Some red cards are worth it.

Cabaal

CerebralCortex wrote: »

Pedophiles should get support to prevent them harming children based on the sexual preferences. They should be able to come clean about such feelings such that they can be helped to manage their aberrant sexual desires. They're not monsters they're dangerously sick.

I'd tend to agree,
its better to identify and to help stop pedo abuse happening by offering support services to the people that know something isn't right with them and want help then to ignore the issue by not offering any support services for them to get help and then being outraged when pedo abuse happens.

Its sick, its disgusting, its dangerous and ignoring it only means it'll continue and it won't change. If providing support services even stops even a hand full of pedo abuse cases thats a good thing for the kids effected by such sickening behavior

sbsquarepants

CerebralCortex wrote: »

Pedophiles should get support to prevent them harming children based on the sexual preferences. .

Absolutely - they should be helped to shuffle on along to the next life, where they can fúck all the little angel kiddies their sick and twisted hearts desire.

Captain Obvious

The Liberal Agenda? By what logic are you pinning paedophile acceptance on liberals? There are literal paedophiles running for office in the US and they are running as Republicans.

"When they get permission from the child".

Jesus Christ. That's enough internet for today.

heisenberg123

Well when you think about it paedophilia is just another sexual orientation albeit an illegal one.
If the LGBT community wants to distinguish themselves as an all-inclusive non conventional/traditional sexual orientation then yes they should allow in pedophiles. 

Doctor Jimbob

This is a well known troll campaign from 4chan or one of those other rectums of the internet.

Not that that fact will stop this thread going to 20 pages of a circle jerk about how awful liberals are.

jam_mac_jam

Is this not Satire? I thought it was a joke?

dr.fuzzenstein

Captain Obvious wrote: »

The Liberal Agenda? By what logic are you pinning paedophile acceptance on liberals? There are literal paedophiles running for office in the US and they are running as Republicans.

There is the answer:

Cabaal wrote: »

I'll just leave this here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Caller

Issues by this news source include
- False prostitution allegations
- Encouragement of violence against protesters
- Ties to alleged white nationalist members

What a nonsense story, next week they'll claim murders want to be part of the LGBT community.
This is nothing but an attempt to discredit LGBT community

Rigtwing propaganda and hatemongering. And extremely clumsy.
How anyone will somehow make a connection between the LGBT community and childmolesters based on this trash is beyond me, but then again people did voe for Trump, so no one should assume basic levels of intelligence.

Cabaal

Captain Obvious wrote: »

There are literal paedophiles running for office in the US and they are running as Republicans.

Spot on!
Not to mention the large list of convicted Republicans

The Backwards Man

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

This is a well known troll campaign from 4chan or one of those other rectums of the internet.

Not that that fact will stop this thread going to 20 pages of a circle jerk about how awful liberals are.

Boards HQ must need the methane from the ****e these posters spout to run the lights I reckon.

Doctor Jimbob

Cabaal wrote: »

Spot on!
Not to mention the large list of convicted Republicans

Well obviously that isn't relevant because...ehh... look over there! Muslims!

tritium

Not exactly a new thing though. Back in the 70’s there was a big push by some of those groups to tag on to the gay rights banner. Oddly it wasn’t generally the gay rights activists that they seemed to actually be looking of for endorsement from. However there were eager listeners in what was known a little later as the looney left, the extreme left wing political spectrum. Harriet Harman of the Labour Party in the UK was certainly sympathetic to Paedophile tights at the time as was the NCCL. Oddly when this came up many years later the Labour Party shamefully circled the wagons double quick to protect their own.


Edit: nothing to do with gay people though, hell they’d have hitched on the neocon wagon if they thought it would work. Just sick ****s who were endorsed by radicals who should have known better. That’s what happens at either extreme of the political spectrum I guess.

partyguinness

CerebralCortex wrote: »

Pedophiles should get support to prevent them harming children based on the sexual preferences. They should be able to come clean about such feelings such that they can be helped to manage their aberrant sexual desires. They're not monsters they're dangerously sick.

I was speaking to a specialist in this area a few years ago. She explained that child abusers genuinely do not see anything wrong with what they are doing.


She was surprising spiritual about describing them. Trying to remember now but she said that are like crows or magpies. Can't quite remember how she put it.



Apparently, it is a little known fact that child abusers tend to have very specific markings on the palms of the hands that can identity high risk offenders.


But yeah they are sick puppies and should not be in this world she said. Like a lot of things I guess.

irishproduce

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Absolutely - they should be helped to shuffle on along to the next life, where they can fúck all the little angel kiddies their sick and twisted hearts desire.

That was once the attitude that was encouraged toward homosexual men.

How Soon Is Now

LGBTQP?

:-) getting just a tad bit ridic now lol!

riffmongous

Hapax Legomenon wrote: »

Buford T. Justice V once gave me a red card for calling Dr. Brown a homophobe.

I'll just leave that there.

Makes sense now why he was so desperate to defend Putin on the mma forum a few minutes ago.

I mean we all no about his other 'traits' from the usual link dump threads but homophobic too

Thoie

Dr Brown wrote: »

Is this next on the Liberal Agenda the legalization of Paedophilia ?

No. Any other questions?

Captain Obvious

partyguinness wrote: »

I was speaking to a specialist in this area a few years ago. She explained that child abusers genuinely do not see anything wrong with what they are doing.

This isn't entirely correct. Some don't, some do. Some feel nothing, some justify it, some regret it.

RasTa

Ah leave Dr Brown alone. He's only asking questions. Such as

COULD THE METRIC SYSTEM DEFRAUD YOUR HOUSE?

or

COULD THE GERMANS DESTROY BRITISH JUSTICE?

and finally

HAVE THE P.C. BRIGADE GIVEN DRIVERS CANCER?

I'm pretty sure all the trolls around these days just use below to start a thread in AH.

http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/

BorneTobyWilde

There are many many countries where being gay is highly illegal , while marrying young girls is very much normal.
It's all cultural.
All comes down to criminality

Liamario

They need to be kept away from minors, but I’m not entirely convinced that these people are sick/mentally ill. They said the same thing about homosexuality and in a lot of places, they still do.

circadian

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

There are many many countries where being gay is highly illegal , while marrying young girls is very much normal.
It's all cultural.
All comes down to criminality

Culturally I'd kerb stomp anyone that tried something with my kids.

Harry Palmr

Please boards.ie get your fingers out and just clean up After Hours.

ElKavo

#NAMBLA

Taytoland

That will be the next push in 10-15 years to make it more acceptable in society from cultural Marxists.

Optimalprimerib

By the end of the year the lgbta acronym will need it's own acronym to keep it from being the whole alphabet.

Cabaal

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

There are many many countries where being gay is highly illegal , while marrying young girls is very much normal.
It's all cultural.
All comes down to criminality

It's a little bit more then that,
- Being gay (two consenting adults)
- Pedo (adult forcing their will on somebody who isn't old enough to give consent or even understand what the hell is happening)

Insect Overlord

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU

Taytoland

Nothing surprises me anymore. I wouldn't even be surprised if it was made more normal in 10-15 years time with the way society is going.

circadian

Taytoland wrote: »

That will be the next push in 10-15 years to make it more acceptable in society from cultural Marxists.

What's a cultural Marxist?

BorneTobyWilde

circadian wrote: »

Culturally I'd kerb stomp anyone that tried something with my kids.

It's mostly a middle east, African thing. Does not happen here thankfully.

circadian

Taytoland wrote: »

Nothing surprises me anymore. I wouldn't even be surprised if it was made more normal in 10-15 years time with the way society is going.

What on earth are you rambling on about?

Doctor Jimbob

Taytoland wrote: »

Nothing surprises me anymore. I wouldn't even be surprised if it was made more normal in 10-15 years time with the way society is going.

What way would that be, exactly?

padd b1975

[Deleted User] wrote: »

"When they get permission from the child".

Jesus Christ. That's enough internet for today.

Yeah, we all know children are only capable of making child like decisions such as what toys to play with or if they've been raised in the wrong gender.

Skylinehead

Well this isn't staying open.

Stay tuned OP, news to come.