Donald Trump is the President Mark IV (Read Mod Warning in OP)

Itssoeasy

I mean fair play for him getting into Yale but Richard Harris got Oscar nominations and I think a golden globe and he was a fair lad to take a pint.

ricero

The liberal democrats are disgusting to try destroy a mans reputation like this.

The swamp is alive and well unfortunately.

Jelle1880

ricero wrote: »

The liberal democrats are disgusting to try destroy a mans reputation like this.

The swamp is alive and well unfortunately.

I think he's doing a good job of that on his own.

But yeah it's always the democrats' fault of course :pac:

prawnsambo

ricero wrote: »

The liberal democrats are disgusting to try destroy a mans reputation like this.

The swamp is alive and well unfortunately.

Don't be disingenuous. They're all at it. But this didn't need to be carried out in the public gaze. A bit of due diligence before nomination would avoid all this.

aloyisious

And Sen Hirono got Grassley to enter 4 letters from committee members to him, to the President as well as the Dir of the FBI, requesting an FBI investigation into the judge in relation to the sex offences alleged against the judge, and Grassley had to agree to the letters being put on the committee record. Implicit in his agreement is that the request, and the letter contents, are all legitimate and legal.

MadYaker

ricero wrote: »

The liberal democrats are disgusting to try destroy a mans reputation like this.

The swamp is alive and well unfortunately.

I think the accusations are credible. But you'd have to be seriously naive to think that the democrats aren't making the most of the opportunity and using this as a political tool. Just when you thought American politics couldn't get any dirtier.

Harry Palmr

prawnsambo wrote: »

I'm older than you and I know that's bollocks.



You could have been in nappies and it didn't just mean happy.

The Gay Divorcee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gay_Divorcee

That's how old MM is.

RobertKK

Boomer is an idiot, so clearly going with leading questions and trying to avoid context.

prawnsambo

Harry Palmr wrote: »

The Gay Divorcee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gay_Divorcee

That's how old MM is.

I know for a fact that we were both born after 1934.

Jelle1880

RobertKK wrote: »

Boomer is an idiot, so clearly going with leading questions and trying to avoid context.

His name is actually Booker.
Rich though, complaining about 'trying to avoid context'

ECO_Mental

oh my god here comes the weasel himself Ted Cruz...:mad::mad:

SimonTemplar

Ugh, this tool!

Jim Bob Scratcher

Itssoeasy

Ah here's ted Cruz. A horrible person. Sorry I say ted but of course ted isn't his first name btw so him and his supporters thinking it's funny have a go at Beto O' Rourke who name is actually Robert of which Beto is a common knickname for Robert.

enfant terrible

Good point by Cruz, you know when the new york times won't publish two claims against a super conservative judge, then their bogus. Must of killed them.

Jelle1880

enfant terrible wrote: »

Good point by Cruz, you know when the new york times won't publish two claims against a super conservative judge, then their bogus. Must of killed them.

So the New York Times all of a sudden is no longer fake news ?

Water John

Fienstein clarifies.

Itssoeasy

Water John wrote: »

Fienstein clarifies.

It's not as if she hasn't done it before.

Itssoeasy

Ted Cruz is blood pressure rising.

TomOnBoard

They're really trying to shoot the messenger(Feinstein) now... Because she didn't give the message... Allegedly...

Water John

GOP strategy of big Fienstein/Dem conspiarcy goes up in smoke.

Itssoeasy

enfant terrible wrote: »

Good point by Cruz, you know when the new york times won't publish two claims against a super conservative judge, then their bogus. Must of killed them.

Or maybe just maybe they couldn't get the required sources to report responsibly.

Rjd2

Feinstein had a Chinese spy working for her for years which she was unaware of and she expects us to believe that she or her team did not leak the letter?:pac:

Itssoeasy

Kamala Harris up now.

aloyisious

And she's taking no time-wasting from the judge, refusing to take waffle from him, saying she's taking them as NO's to her questions.

TomOnBoard

aloyisious wrote: »

And she's taking no time-wasting from the judge, refusing to take waffle from him, saying she's taking them as NO's to her questions.

Do the duration of the witness's answers get taken out of the questioner's 5-minutes?

Rjd2

He can't answer this question at all.

Itssoeasy

TomOnBoard wrote: »

aloyisious wrote: »

And she's taking no time-wasting from the judge, refusing to take waffle from him, saying she's taking them as NO's to her questions.

Do the duration of the witness's answers get taken out of the questioner's 5-minutes?

I think it's just five minutes in total so yes it probably does take away from a senators time.

Water John

Yes, that's why you're getting long answers

Itssoeasy

Rjd2 wrote: »

He can't answer this question at all.

Which question ?