advantages of Brexit

First Up

blinding wrote: »

First Up wrote: »

Do you think California has suffered from mass immigration from Nebraska, New Jersey or Alabama? How do you differentiate "'mass immigration" from mobility of labour?

Mass Immigration is when very large numbers of people migrate in to a country .

And many migrate out again. That's what mobility means. Many UK nationals migrate to other countries (and are far less productive than those going the other way.) But of course they are called expatriates

Capt'n Midnight

Spook_ie wrote: »

Yes EU cake and eat it, if the EU are so set on their intransigence of the 4 pillars then why wait nearly 2 years before allowing the UK to look elsewhere in parallel.

Because that's what the Article 50 rules say.


Which country wrote Article 50 and got it inserted in EU rules ?

Go on, take a wild f**king guess.



Here's a clue, it's the same country that insisted that the Galileo GPS system wasn't to be shared to non EU countries and is now looking at spending billions it hasn't got to replicate it.

Spook_ie

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

Because that's what the Article 50 rules say.


Which country wrote Article 50 and got it inserted in EU rules ?

Go on, take a wild f**king guess.



Here's a clue, it's the same country that insisted that the Galileo GPS system wasn't to be shared to non EU countries and is now looking at spending billions it hasn't got to replicate it.

I'll take a guess that it was an EU institution with some British guy as secretary.

Yeah part of the abandoned EU Convention replaced by the Lisbon Treaty, and made sense at the time.

There might be more countries wanting to take advantage of it in the future, like any of the right wing governments objecting to enforced refugee placement which according to Kerr was the original idea.

https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.politico.eu/article/brexit-article-50-lord-kerr-john-kerr/amp/

Skylinehead

Politics, there's brexit threads there already so I won't move this one.