Jurassic Werewolf - Isla Tacano

Brendan WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Ugh, is it possible Derry was the seer and used the vote situation to tell us something?

Another possibility we can't rule out

Isla WW wrote: »

I was thinking the same but about someone else

Desmond WW wrote: »

Wait, I think I gotcha.

But timing makes no sense unless there's a n0 peek...

And it'd be wrong anyways.

Isla WW wrote: »

Perhaps, but we don't know about a day0 peek for sure or even if we have a seer

Desmond WW wrote: »

Isla, think for a sec about the timings before going down that rabbit hole.

Firstly, a n0 peek when the switching of the islands is happening on d1 makes no sense.

It'd be like winning the lottery twice first in peeking a baddie, then landing on the same island as them.

Plus I'd expect a peek like that to be guiding the lynch rather than taking a back seat.

Plus... do you think the player you're referring to is stupid enough not to kill said seer this morning in that scenario?

Were you not suggesting something similar Desmond? But about Derry being the seer?

I could be reading that wrong, but now that there seems to be a suggesting that a potential seer voted for you that you are saying that it's very unlikely, if not completely unlikely.

Brendan WW

I realise by the way that you weren't exactly strong in your views about Derry but you did raise the possibility.

Desmond WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Were you not suggesting something similar Desmond? But about Derry being the seer?

I could be reading that wrong, but now that there seems to be a suggesting that a potential seer voted for you that you are saying that it's very unlikely, if not completely unlikely.

Yeah the timings would match up better though.

Derry only came out with the 'catch a wolf, kill a wolf' on Henry after the lynch.

Isla WW

Im not saying your wrong, its not a theory im setting my stall up on.

But it is possible to perhaps peek on night zero, then its all luck if you get switched to the same island as yiur peek subject.

If I was the seer, which Im not, and if I peeked someone bad, then Id signal it in my lynch vote rather than announcing it. But again, its just what id do.

Desmond WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry WW
Bring it on Fcukers.

Nah on a serious note, I voted Doire earlier, not changing now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pter
*SOMEONE* keeps voting with their normal boards account, Henry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry WW
Thats how it was always done is it not?



Why was there only 4 people voting for Henry?
Henry says he voted for me earlier, and that he is not changing now, then we get irrefutable evidence that he has been vote swapping all over the place.


Why does a villager lie about when/how they place there vote?


Find a wolf, lynch a wolf, or did you not spot this at the time when i posted it?

@Brendan, check the timing which is what I'm referring to.

Isla WW

Wait, i might as well say this now as I think me and desmond are talking about two different things.

Im talking about Hollys vote.

Tegan WW

D0 is before the game begins so why would a peek be allowed? Sounds like muddying waters to confuse the village tbh

Desmond WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Im not saying your wrong, its not a theory im setting my stall up on.

But it is possible to perhaps peek on night zero, then its all luck if you get switched to the same island as yiur peek subject.

If I was the seer, which Im not, and if I peeked someone bad, then Id signal it in my lynch vote rather than announcing it. But again, its just what id do.

Isla WW wrote: »

Wait, i might as well say this now as I think me and desmond are talking about two different things.

Im talking about Hollys vote.

I know exactly what you're talking about, I'm pointing out the timings being different.

D1, nothing to go on players all over the shop and a bonafide caught wolf guiding proceedings...??

You just let it happen?

Brendan WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Wait, i might as well say this now as I think me and desmond are talking about two different things.

Im talking about Hollys vote.

I think that's exactly was Desmond thinks you are talking about. And doesn't like that idea that much.

Isla WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

D0 is before the game begins so why would a peek be allowed? Sounds like muddying waters to confuse the village tbh

Oh would you stop trying to rubbish theories

Fact us day zero peeks have haopened before so im entitled to speak of them.

Maybe your just scared of where this conversation leads

Desmond WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

I think that's exactly was Desmond thinks you are talking about. And doesn't like that idea that much.

Ugh, because it makes NO sense that's why

Brendan WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

@Brendan, check the timing which is what I'm referring to.

Ah I see now. I thought you were just talking about the vote. Fair enough.

Isla WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

I know exactly what you're talking about, I'm pointing out the timings being different.

D1, nothing to go on players all over the shop and a bonafide caught wolf guiding proceedings...??

You just let it happen?

To keep my cover and see where they go..... perhaps I do

Brendan WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Ugh, because it makes NO sense that's why

I get you now Desmond, and now that I understand your point about Derry I don't see the contradiction I thought there was in your argument.

Henry WW

Derry first brought up my voting before lynch. If you think there was no n0 seer peak, the timing is wrong.

Desmond WW

Ok, not NO sense but it's an incredibly unlikely scenario and one I know for definite is impossible... well, because I'm not a wolf! :pac:

Isla WW

I get what your saying Desmond, im just saying this.

If i was a seer, and caught a wolf, personally i wouldn't come out on day 1.

I dont think anyone lead the village yday.

So as seer i would see what moves the caught wokf would make.

Its all guess work and from the side of what id do.

I dont believe Holly is the seer, just putting out there my thoughts at one stage.

Brendan WW

Derry WW wrote: »

You vote earlier and you're not changing,


yet.


okay then....

Derry WW wrote: »

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry WW
Bring it on Fcukers.

Nah on a serious note, I voted Doire earlier, not changing now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pter
*SOMEONE* keeps voting with their normal boards account, Henry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry WW
Thats how it was always done is it not?



Why was there only 4 people voting for Henry?
Henry says he voted for me earlier, and that he is not changing now, then we get irrefutable evidence that he has been vote swapping all over the place.


Why does a villager lie about when/how they place there vote?


Find a wolf, lynch a wolf, or did you not spot this at the time when i posted it?

Henry WW wrote: »

Derry first brought up my voting before lynch. If you think there was no n0 seer peak, the timing is wrong.

He didn't really make much of it until after that lynch though. He noted it and then brought it up after the lynch, which may have been when he got a peek.

Desmond WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Derry first brought up my voting before lynch. If you think there was no n0 seer peak, the timing is wrong.

If that's the case then fair enough. Care to quote the post?

Isla WW

I was just thinking Holly could have been the seer, i dont now.

She could have had a day zero peek and signalled her peek in her vote. All guesswork on my part.

Desmond WW

Isla WW wrote: »

I was just thinking Holly could have been the seer, i dont now.

She could have had a day zero peek and signalled her peek in her vote. All guesswork on my part.

If Holly was the seer and peeked me then tried to signal that re: votes, I'd have killed her this morning if I was a wolf.

But it's all moot anyways as I'm not a wolf :pac:

Henry WW

Derry WW wrote: »

You vote earlier and you're not changing,


yet.


okay then....

Desmond WW wrote: »

If that's the case then fair enough. Care to quote the post?

Above, referenced in the Derrys quote you posted, last sentence.

Brendan WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

If Holly was the seer and peeked me then tried to signal that re: votes, I'd have killed her this morning if I was a wolf.

But it's all moot anyways as I'm not a wolf :pac:

Well if you twigged what she was trying to do then maybe yes you would have killed her.

Isla WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

If Holly was the seer and peeked me then tried to signal that re: votes, I'd have killed her this morning if I was a wolf.

But it's all moot anyways as I'm not a wolf :pac:

Well, a wolf in that situation may take holly out, they may well also suspect that a bg may have protected her, like if i was the bg and spotted it too.

Rabbit holes eh

Riona WW

Hi guys, not able to post from my phone in work cos im on my feet and swamped (eluded to the shambles that is my work in the other thread but one lad quit/got fired last friday and another lad has a broken leg and both have not been replaced), but should be able to post a bit more now that I am at a computer.

Saw someone asking about me and someone else, not sure who, not voting from our day1 FFAs and to be honest mine is simple enough. The top 3 names from the collated FFAs were not on my FFA so I went with 1 of those seemingly being run. Seems a lot has happened since then anyway

Henry WW

Folks, if you think the seer peaked someone, they could have peaked a good player also, maybe we need to discuss the village lists also.

Desmond WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Well, a wolf in that situation may take holly out, they may well also suspect that a bg may have protected her, like if i was the bg and spotted it too.

Rabbit holes eh

What I would or wouldn't have done is redundant anyways as I ain't a wolf.

Desmond WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Folks, if you think the seer peaked someone, they could have peaked a good player also, maybe we need to discuss the village lists also.

Well here's the crux of the issue.

Basically it's all conjecture and theories right now. I was just trying to highlight it's MORE likely that Derry was a seer who peeked you as opposed to Holly who peeked me (and I know this isn't possible re: me)

I'm not saying I necessarily go to bat for that theory and call for your lynch but the timings sync better than Isla's theory regarding Holly.

Isla WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

What I would or wouldn't have done is redundant anyways as I ain't a wolf.

Redundant to you, i dont know what you are yet

Desmond WW

Isla WW wrote: »

Redundant to you, i dont know what you are yet

Lol, the seer/priest will know if I die/get peeked.

I'm comfortable in my own skin, but I ain't claiming nothing aside from that I'm team good