Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why the north outside EU changes everything for the island

1678911

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I really can’t see southern Irish unionism rising again, just no appetite for it. Not even in South Dublin:)
    This evening I read an article by a journalist from 2010 saying partition was now accepted and that people were accepting a United Ireland wasn’t feasible. Eight years on and it’s totally different, amazing how identity politics always breaks out in the North. Virtually no one left who was born before partition but nationalism is now on the brink of becoming the majority, killing nationalism with an iron fist didn’t work and the relative kindest of the Belfast Agreeement hasn’t extinguished it either.
    I wonder if the Republicans had focused on civil disobedience rather than violence would we be much closer to a 32 county republic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I really can’t see southern Irish unionism rising again, just no appetite for it. Not even in South Dublin:)
    This evening I read an article by a journalist from 2010 saying partition was now accepted and that people were accepting a United Ireland wasn’t feasible. Eight years on and it’s totally different, amazing how identity politics always breaks out in the North. Virtually no one left who was born before partition but nationalism is now on the brink of becoming the majority, killing nationalism with an iron fist didn’t work and the relative kindest of the Belfast Agreeement hasn’t extinguished it either.
    I wonder if the Republicans had focused on civil disobedience rather than violence would we be much closer to a 32 county republic?

    There was plenty of violence before republicans got involved. People of my dad's generation lived in what was tantamount to a police state. You couldn't disobey, civilly or otherwise.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,813 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    I wouldnt say out stripped. Closed the gap. Or sufficently close to be fully integratable now. That was not the case 100+ years ago.

    I wonder what made the last 100 years different to the previous hundreds of years that allowed this economic miracle to happen?

    Funny trolling all the same, but the sad thing is there are actually some British people out there (in comments sections) who believe in this, if they even realise we aren't Northern Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭flutered


    Last poll I just googled sees the SNP at 41%.
    with more members than the conservitaves, plus they are the party with the most new members this year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭flutered


    You cannot fight wars without money. When you are revising your European history (which I advise you to) look to where Blighty got the money.
    it also cost them their first devalueation of their pound, by 50% roughly as demanded by the u.s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    flutered wrote: »
    it also cost them their first devalueation of their pound, by 50% roughly as demanded by the u.s.

    As Michael Caine might say - 'Not a lot of people know that', particularly the Brexiteer mob hankering after a notion of Britishness that never really existed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭Infini


    swampgas wrote: »
    Ireland has outstripped the UK in many ways. (Our more modern form of democracy (PR-STV) is, in my opinion, a huge part of that.)

    Perhaps the UK could rejoin Ireland and London could be the second city of the expanded new Irish state, ruled from Dublin?

    No? It's about as likely as what you're suggesting, to be honest.

    You could only imagine finding this on adverts.ie one day...

    For sale: One country, Former Empire, Well Worn, Needs new parts, renovating, Optional Troll Spraying.

    For purchase £1Trillion or €1/$1.20. Other currencies accepted as payment!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Are we better off with a hard border? The inconvenience could help rise annoyance with the mad reality of partition.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Are we better off with a hard border? The inconvenience could help rise annoyance with the mad reality of partition.

    Yes, but it would be partition, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. Yet your little thought experiment shows how we must do whatever it takes - whatever it takes - to avoid that.
    While the EU is batting doggedly for us, there are times when you must take matters in your own hands, have courage, overcome obstacles that previously would have seemed insurmountable, and do what you can.
    In the case of the 26, it is Brejoining. Whatever goes on between Westminster and Brussels, we can do that. Minimising the ecomonic shock, guaranteeing no border on the island, and maintaining our historic links with our closest neighbours, with whom we are effectively one and the same in language, culture, history, politics, art, sport, and deep mindset. Enough time has been wasted already, and the rumblings of a no-deal Brexit are growing louder - truly a great threat to this corner of the British Isles.
    The first clear step - and even the most green tinted anti-UK thinker can have no rational objection to it - is to rejoin the Commonwealth. Tout de suite. It will start the nudge of change in the right direction as people come around to the pragmatic, if difficult, decision they will have to make in the next 36 months.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭droidman123


    Yes, but it would be partition, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. Yet your little thought experiment shows how we must do whatever it takes - whatever it takes - to avoid that.
    While the EU is batting doggedly for us, there are times when you must take matters in your own hands, have courage, overcome obstacles that previously would have seemed insurmountable, and do what you can.
    In the case of the 26, it is Brejoining. Whatever goes on between Westminster and Brussels, we can do that. Minimising the ecomonic shock, guaranteeing no border on the island, and maintaining our historic links with our closest neighbours, with whom we are effectively one and the same in language, culture, history, politics, art, sport, and deep mindset. Enough time has been wasted already, and the rumblings of a no-deal Brexit are growing louder - truly a great threat to this corner of the British Isles.
    The first clear step - and even the most green tinted anti-UK thinker can have no rational objection to it - is to rejoin the Commonwealth. Tout de suite. It will start the nudge of change in the right direction as people come around to the pragmatic, if difficult, decision they will have to make in the next 36 months.

    Please stop saying british isles,i was born and raised in dublin and i have never lived in the british isles.i dont care if some people wrongly say its a geographical term,i find it offensive


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 498 ✭✭zapitastas


    Yes, but it would be partition, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. Yet your little thought experiment shows how we must do whatever it takes - whatever it takes - to avoid that.
    While the EU is batting doggedly for us, there are times when you must take matters in your own hands, have courage, overcome obstacles that previously would have seemed insurmountable, and do what you can.
    In the case of the 26, it is Brejoining. Whatever goes on between Westminster and Brussels, we can do that. Minimising the ecomonic shock, guaranteeing no border on the island, and maintaining our historic links with our closest neighbours, with whom we are effectively one and the same in language, culture, history, politics, art, sport, and deep mindset. Enough time has been wasted already, and the rumblings of a no-deal Brexit are growing louder - truly a great threat to this corner of the British Isles.
    The first clear step - and even the most green tinted anti-UK thinker can have no rational objection to it - is to rejoin the Commonwealth. Tout de suite. It will start the nudge of change in the right direction as people come around to the pragmatic, if difficult, decision they will have to make in the next 36 months.

    You mention historic links as if the relationship had been a positive one, not one that culminated in destitution and death on an unimaginable scale


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,468 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Yes, but it would be partition, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. Yet your little thought experiment shows how we must do whatever it takes - whatever it takes - to avoid that.
    While the EU is batting doggedly for us, there are times when you must take matters in your own hands, have courage, overcome obstacles that previously would have seemed insurmountable, and do what you can.
    In the case of the 26, it is Brejoining. Whatever goes on between Westminster and Brussels, we can do that. Minimising the ecomonic shock, guaranteeing no border on the island, and maintaining our historic links with our closest neighbours, with whom we are effectively one and the same in language, culture, history, politics, art, sport, and deep mindset. Enough time has been wasted already, and the rumblings of a no-deal Brexit are growing louder - truly a great threat to this corner of the British Isles.
    The first clear step - and even the most green tinted anti-UK thinker can have no rational objection to it - is to rejoin the Commonwealth. Tout de suite. It will start the nudge of change in the right direction as people come around to the pragmatic, if difficult, decision they will have to make in the next 36 months.

    Give it a rest


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Yes, we have it right now, but post Brexit we will NOT. Unless we become players not spectators.
    We need true political leadership from Leo, Mary Louise, and Miche to communicate this vision.
    Most of Ireland has moved on from its UK bad, independence good obsession. We are a much more sophisticated country than 100 years ago, and are fit to take a pragmatic decision now, and restore Dublin as the second city of the Empire.

    From an economic point of view that's not quite true. The North of Ireland is still under UK jurisdiction. Their economy is essentially managed by Westminster. You think that most people would look at the economy of Northern Ireland and say I wish the rest of Ireland was like that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,580 ✭✭✭swampgas


    Yes, but it would be partition, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. Yet your little thought experiment shows how we must do whatever it takes - whatever it takes - to avoid that.
    No, not at all costs. Some costs are just too high.
    While the EU is batting doggedly for us, there are times when you must take matters in your own hands, have courage, overcome obstacles that previously would have seemed insurmountable, and do what you can.
    In the case of the 26, it is Brejoining. Whatever goes on between Westminster and Brussels, we can do that. Minimising the ecomonic shock, [...]
    The economic shock to Ireland of leaving the EU and joining Brexitania would be enormous. You really are deluded or on a massive wind-up.
    [...] guaranteeing no border on the island, and maintaining our historic links with our closest neighbours, with whom we are effectively one and the same in language, culture, history, politics, art, sport, and deep mindset.
    One and the same? The differences are deep. Never mind the Irish language, the GAA, the Irish music scene, the Irish electoral system, and many other factors, our shared history is hardly something that would encourage Ireland to submit it itself to the tender mercies of a London regime that is currently tearing itself to pieces. We would be thrown to the wolves without a second thought.
    Enough time has been wasted already, and the rumblings of a no-deal Brexit are growing louder - truly a great threat to this corner of the British Isles.
    The first clear step - and even the most green tinted anti-UK thinker can have no rational objection to it - is to rejoin the Commonwealth. Tout de suite. It will start the nudge of change in the right direction as people come around to the pragmatic, if difficult, decision they will have to make in the next 36 months.
    And I'm convinced now that you're just trolling, or posting in a style which is indistinguishable from same.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes, but it would be partition, which is what we want to avoid at all costs. Yet your little thought experiment shows how we must do whatever it takes - whatever it takes - to avoid that.
    While the EU is batting doggedly for us, there are times when you must take matters in your own hands, have courage, overcome obstacles that previously would have seemed insurmountable, and do what you can.
    In the case of the 26, it is Brejoining. Whatever goes on between Westminster and Brussels, we can do that. Minimising the ecomonic shock, guaranteeing no border on the island, and maintaining our historic links with our closest neighbours, with whom we are effectively one and the same in language, culture, history, politics, art, sport, and deep mindset. Enough time has been wasted already, and the rumblings of a no-deal Brexit are growing louder - truly a great threat to this corner of the British Isles.
    The first clear step - and even the most green tinted anti-UK thinker can have no rational objection to it - is to rejoin the Commonwealth. Tout de suite. It will start the nudge of change in the right direction as people come around to the pragmatic, if difficult, decision they will have to make in the next 36 months.


    Which corner of the "British Isles"?
    There is indeed a great threat to Northern Ireland, less of a threat to the Republic, though Brexit will certainly prove disruptive.


    The reality is, however, that economically speaking, Ireland will retain all it's trade links with the EU - whereas Northern Ireland will lose their trade links with - well, - everyone except England, Scotland, and Wales, unless the British Government, and in particular the DUP recognise that pragmatic solutions need to be found, and that Ireland is an Independent Country that will not leave the EU to suit the Loyalist community.


    Any illusions that Ireland has any desire, or intention, to rejoin the Commonwealth, or indeed, Britain, are precisely that: Illusions.


    Or, to phrase it another way: The tail doesn't wag the dog!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Another strand getting the discussion going on the future of the 26, and the other half of the Brejoining equation - the Irexit case being made. Important to get both of these discussions launched, or Ireland risks ending up with a completely misinformed referendum very soon on its future as bad the the Brexit one.

    Meeting today if you can make it:

    https://www.irexitfreedom.ie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Another strand getting the discussion going on the future of the 26, and the other have of the Brejoining equation - the Irexit case being made. Important to get both of these discussions launched, or Ireland risks ending up with a completely misinformed referendum very soon on its future as bad the the Brexit one.


    I wouldn't overly worry about this, thankfully there's very few 'take back control' folks in Ireland at the moment


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,733 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    Meeting today if you can make it
    I was going to buy a ticket but then I saw that the link to do so is https://www.ticketsource.eu/irexit

    DOT FCUKING EU

    No doubt some faceless Eurocrat would have benefited from my purchase.

    I shall not attend as a point of protest and instead will be setting up the Irexitfreedomexit party to get true Irexiteers to leave these traitors.

    We need Rees-Mogglings, not Quislings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 528 ✭✭✭All My Stars Aligned


    Interesting piece in the Irish Times today. Study indicates that a UI would result in a long term 15% drop in the standard of living in the Republic. Never realised how much the UK paid into NI, 12bn p/a. Not a snowballs chance of a UI referendum being pass with those number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,468 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Interesting piece in the Irish Times today. Study indicates that a UI would result in a long term 15% drop in the standard of living in the Republic. Never realised how much the UK paid into NI, 12bn p/a. Not a snowballs chance of a UI referendum being pass with those number.

    There's definitely no chance of flawed or biased analysis there at all at all


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Interesting piece in the Irish Times today. Study indicates that a UI would result in a long term 15% drop in the standard of living in the Republic. Never realised how much the UK paid into NI, 12bn p/a. Not a snowballs chance of a UI referendum being pass with those number.
    It's only €11Bn if we agreed to keep funding stuff like the UK's Atomic Weapons program :rolleyes:

    Removing all the questionable stuff gets it down to €5.7Bn, and that's before we extract a contribution because NI isn't getting cheaper for the UK anytime soon.


    Oh look , someone is using the €11Bn figure for NI subvention to predict up to 15% fall in living standards here on reunification.

    - It's a lot less than €11Bn
    - There's EU funding
    - we can borrow until NI productivity approaches ours
    - our economy grew 2.5% last quarter.
    - the HSE and NHS are slowly converging.
    - the UK could be expected to take on some of the cost for future savings


    SubventionEUR-1-630x472.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 528 ✭✭✭All My Stars Aligned


    lawred2 wrote: »
    There's definitely no chance of flawed or biased analysis there at all at all


    Why would there be?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,857 ✭✭✭professore


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    Before Sean Lemass changed his policies in 1959, I think you mean. He first entered government in 1932 as Minister for Industry and Commerce, and at that time and for long afterwards he was closely associated with de Valera's vision of economic autonomy, self-sufficiency, tariff barriers, and an economy dominated by state-owned effective monopolies.

    To be fair to Lemass, he recognised from the early 1950s that this wasn't working and a change was needed, but couldn't persuade de Valera. It wasn't until Dev decided to leave government and go to the Park that Lemass could actually implement a new policy.

    But, yes, this was the turning point. Since the late 1950s, the economic performance of the Republic has consistently outperformed that of Northern Ireland. I'm not sure at what point we might say that the Republic caught up with, and then overtook, NI; I think the answer probably depend on which measurement you use - Gross domestic product? Household income? Something else? But, whatever measurement you pick, the answer is likely to be that the Republic overtook NI some decades ago, and is now ahead by a wide margin.

    My gut feeling is sometime in the late 80s.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Interesting piece in the Irish Times today. Study indicates that a UI would result in a long term 15% drop in the standard of living in the Republic. Never realised how much the UK paid into NI, 12bn p/a. Not a snowballs chance of a UI referendum being pass with those number.

    Which is why it is really only in the Breunion scenario that this makes sense, so that the 12bn/pa continues.
    True republicans will not be put off by the cost though - if that is the price of a united Ireland, it is not really a question of money. But there are few people interested in a united ireland these days - they have pretty much died out.
    But as part of the UK, with funding transfer continuing, so no particular burden on the south, or on the contrary, efficiencies and a minimisation of the Brexit hit, it can make economic sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    Sinn Fein also exploring, and promoting an analysis of, the Breunion option:

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-won-t-rule-out-union-jack-over-leinster-house-h2b39hcff

    Suddenly, after all the aspiration for union for decades, it seems the greatest resistance is coming from the southern establishment. Is this what is hitting FF support ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    Listen up guys and gals. The DLA bill for republican west Belfast alone would make a priest blush. They must be the sickest community on gods Green earth.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Sinn Fein also exploring, and promoting an analysis of, the Breunion option:

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-won-t-rule-out-union-jack-over-leinster-house-h2b39hcff

    Suddenly, after all the aspiration for union for decades, it seems the greatest resistance is coming from the southern establishment. Is this what is hitting FF support ?

    Obvious troll is obvious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Listen up guys and gals. The DLA bill for republican west Belfast alone would make a priest blush. They must be the sickest community on gods Green earth.

    The entire north is ill - it's one of the poorest regions in western Europe. You should be forever grateful that we're willing to take it on because Britain certainly doesn't give a shit about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭droidman123


    A union jack would never fly over leinster house,might as well suggest an italian or american or icelandic flag,ridiculous.when we have a united ireland,anyone that doesnt want to live here is free to leave anytime they want


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,420 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Sinn Fein also exploring, and promoting an analysis of, the Breunion option:

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/we-won-t-rule-out-union-jack-over-leinster-house-h2b39hcff

    Suddenly, after all the aspiration for union for decades, it seems the greatest resistance is coming from the southern establishment. Is this what is hitting FF support ?

    You do know that Breunion is the movement trying to get the UK back into the EU. You have been doing it wrong all along.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Listen up guys and gals. The DLA bill for republican west Belfast alone would make a priest blush. They must be the sickest community on gods Green earth.

    The entire north is ill - it's one of the poorest regions in western Europe. You should be forever grateful that we're willing to take it on because Britain certainly doesn't give a shit about it.

    Hi big balls. Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south? And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions.... ffs. Grow up....


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Listen up guys and gals. The DLA bill for republican west Belfast alone would make a priest blush. They must be the sickest community on gods Green earth.

    The entire north is ill - it's one of the poorest regions in western Europe. You should be forever grateful that we're willing to take it on because Britain certainly doesn't give a shit about it.

    Hi big balls. Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south? And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions.... ffs. Grow up....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    A union jack would never fly over leinster house,might as well suggest an italian or american or icelandic flag,ridiculous.when we have a united ireland,anyone that doesnt want to live here is free to leave anytime they want

    There is the very real prospect that Brexit and what it does to the UK might consign the Union Jack to the bin of history.

    Interesting times ahead for flag designers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Hi big balls. Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south? And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions.... ffs. Grow up....

    In the top ten actually.

    poorest-northern-europe.png?w=600&ssl=1


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south?

    They're all sold-off ages ago.
    And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions

    Yes it is. It's in the top ten poorest regions in western Europe with 8 of the remaining 9 in Britain.

    Britain is in trouble and the clowns in the DUP seem determined to make everything worse by supporting Brexit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭droidman123


    There is the very real prospect that Brexit and what it does to the UK might consign the Union Jack to the bin of history.

    Interesting times ahead for flag designers.

    I have always had the opinion that the union jack flag,like the swaztika flag should be banned for what it represented.i cannot fathom how that flag is accepted worldwide.the sooner it is dismantled and put in the same grave as the swaztika the better


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    There is the very real prospect that Brexit and what it does to the UK might consign the Union Jack to the bin of history.

    Interesting times ahead for flag designers.

    I have always had the opinion that the union jack flag,like the swaztika flag should be banned for what it represented.i cannot fathom how that flag is accepted worldwide.the sooner it is dismantled and put in the same grave as the swaztika the better

    The Irish tricolour should be banned too then. Draped over the coffins of kid killers like the Ira. Would you agree with it being dismantled too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    There is the very real prospect that Brexit and what it does to the UK might consign the Union Jack to the bin of history.

    Interesting times ahead for flag designers.

    I have always had the opinion that the union jack flag,like the swaztika flag should be banned for what it represented.i cannot fathom how that flag is accepted worldwide.the sooner it is dismantled and put in the same grave as the swaztika the better

    The Irish tricolour should be banned too then. Draped over the coffins of kid killers like the Ira. Would you agree with it being dismantled too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south?

    They're all sold-off ages ago.
    And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions

    Yes it is. It's in the top ten poorest regions in western Europe with 8 of the remaining 9 in Britain.

    Britain is in trouble and the clowns in the DUP seem determined to make everything worse by supporting Brexit.

    We will be fine Tom. Maybe the west Belfast sicknotes are bring8ng us down. Everyone here seems to be driving a bmw and lives in big houses. If that’s poor then I’m a monkeys uncle...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    timthumbni wrote: »
    We will be fine Tom. Maybe the west Belfast sicknotes are bring8ng us down. Everyone here seems to be driving a bmw and lives in big houses. If that’s poor then I’m a monkeys uncle...

    ^^ ^^ As good an example of fingers in the ears as you will get. Well done Tim.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    We will be fine Tom. Maybe the west Belfast sicknotes are bring8ng us down. Everyone here seems to be driving a bmw and lives in big houses. If that’s poor then I’m a monkeys uncle...

    ^^ ^^ As good an example of fingers in the ears as you will get. Well done Tim.

    Yes francie, the world will stop turning when we in the uk leave the Eu....... or maybe not. Anyway you lot down south had better hope it goes smoothly or else the ghost estates will be popping up again down your way...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,127 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Yes francie, the world will stop turning when we in the uk leave the Eu....... or maybe not. Anyway you lot down south had better hope it goes smoothly or else the ghost estates will be popping up again down your way...

    Nobody has suggested it will 'stop turning'. What is suggested is that a region that is already in the top ten poorest regions in western Europe will get even poorer as it fights for resources with the other regions in the union that are also in that top ten.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Hi big balls. Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south? And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions.... ffs. Grow up....

    Oh yes you are.........

    http://inequalitybriefing.org/graphics/briefing_43_UK_regions_poorest_North_Europe.pdf


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    Hi big balls. Do I have to remind you of ghost estates in the south? And NO, we aren’t one of the poorest regions.... ffs. Grow up....

    Oh yes you are.........

    http://inequalitybriefing.org/graphics/briefing_43_UK_regions_poorest_North_Europe.pdf

    Well if we are poorest then I’m still quite happy. I see inner London top. I wouldn’t want to live there if I was paid to do so. What are they basing these things on.? GDP, earnings? If so that means the square of feck all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    In fact I see this is based on an EU source. About as reliable as Gerry Adams sugesting his brother as a baby sitter......


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    timthumbni wrote: »
    In fact I see this is based on an EU source. About as reliable as Gerry Adams sugesting his brother as a baby sitter......


    :rolleyes:

    Brexiteers eh. Failing yet again when comes to any intellectual arguments about this whole thing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 528 ✭✭✭All My Stars Aligned


    The same study I referenced earlier also stated that although GDP per head was lower in the north that that in the south the standard of living was higher. I believe that nobody knows what impact the UK leaving the EU will have on the UK or the ROI, be that by a hard or soft exit. Economists are wide of the mark more times then not in my opinion, recent history tells me that. However if the figures in the study are correct and the UK continues to subsidies NI as it is currently doing and the standard of living remains above that of the south it is not inconceivable that those in the north would choose to remain part of the UK.

    I firmly believe that a referendum on a united Ireland would result in a no vote in the south if it meant such a massive financial burden would result.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    timthumbni wrote: »
    In fact I see this is based on an EU source. About as reliable as Gerry Adams sugesting his brother as a baby sitter......
    People in richest areas of England have 19 more years of good health than poorest parts of country, report says


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    In fact I see this is based on an EU source. About as reliable as Gerry Adams sugesting his brother as a baby sitter......


    :rolleyes:

    Brexiteers eh. Failing yet again when comes to any intellectual arguments about this whole thing.

    Oh I’m quite confident. The EU is only a country club, not a jail right? We will be fine. I wasn’t even particularly caring about leaving the Eu. I voted leave btw but since the vote I’m very much more for it for it now.

    Plenty of so called intellectuals were communists and supported the soviet regime.. Plenty of these so called smart people are idiots when it comes to real life.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,845 ✭✭✭timthumbni


    timthumbni wrote: »
    In fact I see this is based on an EU source. About as reliable as Gerry Adams sugesting his brother as a baby sitter......


    :rolleyes:

    Brexiteers eh. Failing yet again when comes to any intellectual arguments about this whole thing.

    Oh I’m quite confident. The EU is only a country club, not a jail right? We will be fine. I wasn’t even particularly caring about leaving the Eu. I voted leave btw but since the vote I’m very much more for it for it now.

    Plenty of so called intellectuals were communists and supported the soviet regime.. Plenty of these so called smart people are idiots when it comes to real life.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement