Ivanka is Anonymous!

CelticRambler

Think about it: the GOP witch-hunters are staying the NYT op-ed piece is worthless because the writer won't say who they are, and if they had any balls they'd stand up and resign. But who's the one person in the White House who can't resign - because she'll be DT's daughter forever? And with a WH leakier than a collander, who's the one person who could warrant the NYT's offer anonymity? :cool:

We've heard that the White House is forensically analysing the words and phrases to identify the writer. Ivanka's proven herself to be masterful at reworking words to mean something else (think of her "complicit" interview) - and who'd have spent enough time with Mike Pence to absorb some of his vocabulary (e.g. "lodestar")

Most commentators say that the op-ed piece has backfired in it's attempt to reassure the public, seeming instead to suggest that the president is being manipulated by unelected hands. Well, Ivanka has a history of errors of judgement, e.g. posting her own "happy family" pic at the height of the Border Babies crisis. :eek:

It's long been said that she was supposed to be a "moderating influence" on her daddy, but she's unashamedly a True Blue Republican capitalist, which fits perfectly with the assertion that the WH Resistance is proud of what they have been able to do. :mad:

And in one of his campaign rants, Trump said himself that it could be a woman. He might not have thought things through, but as the proverb goes children and fools tell the truth.

Stabbed in the back by his own progeny - so Shakespearian!

razorblunt

Maybe it was one her stand ins?

I thought some analysis on the speech patters indicated it might be Spence?
Then again the media might be trolling Trump at this stage.

seamus

It wouldn't surprise me to see Ivanka steamroll her old man to feather her own nest; he has bred progeny just as amoral as he is.

But there's very little in it for her to destabilise the White House. If/When Trump is declared unfit and Pence takes over, the Trump clan will be ejected from the administration and all their little shady deals and corruption will no longer be protected. In fact, the Republicans will likely move quickly to throw all the Trumps under the bus and claim that they've cleaned up the place.

Odhinn

CelticRambler wrote: »

Think about it: the GOP witch-hunters are staying the NYT op-ed piece is worthless because the writer won't say who they are, and if they had any balls they'd stand up and resign. But who's the one person in the White House who can't resign - because she'll be DT's daughter forever? And with a WH leakier than a collander, who's the one person who could warrant the NYT's offer anonymity? :cool:

Also, technically, she doesn't have balls, afaik.