Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

To those who believe WTC 7 didn't fall due to fire, how did it fall?

Options
1…3233353738…102

Comments

  • Options
    #1022
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    DublinWriter wrote: »
    Check out Kurt Sonnenfeld's video showing what looks like a Thermite charge coming late to the party:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYj6PAJRZEg

    Full version here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KGaOj6S69E

    Sonnenfeld was FEMAs official videographer that day. Check out his later story.

    That is not thermite.
    That is not what it looks like.

    Thermite cannot demolish a building.

    Why did this charge go off late?
    Where are the reports of this happening elsewhere?
    Where are the reports of the injuries caused by random thermite burns and the blindness caused by the intense light released by the reaction?

    This video is utterly meaningless.
    You will ignore all of these questions.


  • Options
    #1023
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Wrong thermate contains all the ingredients of thermite. Thermate is different from thermite as it contains sulphur and barium nirate. The sulphar in the thermate attacks the steel and that why thermate melts the steel at low temperatures.
    Cool.
    Source for this please.


  • Options
    #1024
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    A couple of us can see it just a reflection of the two firemen in the picture.
    Yup. You also saw a different plane hit the pentagon.

    There is nothing to reflect the image, this explanation of yours is a pathetic attempt to avoid the obvious.


  • Options
    #1025
    DublinWriter
    Registered Users Posts: 9,557 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    All your points refuted and your questions answered:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g&t=303s
    King Mob wrote: »
    That is not thermite.
    That is not what it looks like.

    Thermite cannot demolish a building.

    Why did this charge go off late?
    Where are the reports of this happening elsewhere?
    Where are the reports of the injuries caused by random thermite burns and the blindness caused by the intense light released by the reaction?

    This video is utterly meaningless.
    You will ignore all of these questions.


  • Options
    #1026
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    DublinWriter wrote: »
    All your points refuted and your questions answered:
    No, they are not.
    The points are never refuted by a youtube video.

    You dodged the questions. You can't answer them.

    I'm done pretending with you people.

    Thermite cannot be used to demolish a skyscraper.
    Thermite cannot produce a pool of molten metal.

    You guys are exactly the same as the people claiming it was space lasers and holograms.
    There is no difference.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1027
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    Yup. You also saw a different plane hit the pentagon.

    There is nothing to reflect the image, this explanation of yours is a pathetic attempt to avoid the obvious.

    There is a difference I was working on the assumption the plane was only seen in one location before impacting the Pentagon. When I found out eyewitnesses saw the plane in a different area near the Pentagon that changes everything we know about the event.

    You still think that's a man with no legs and hands standing in a yellow liquid. You agreed with me it was reflection then you changed your mind again about it.


  • Options
    #1028
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    You agreed with me it was reflection then you changed your mind again about it.
    No cheerful, I didn't.


  • Options
    #1029
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,516 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    King Mob wrote: »
    The Yellow liquid he is refering to is the picture of the man using the angle grinder.
    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108391334&postcount=640

    There's no need to explain it.

    Ahhhh the magic mirror that survived a building collapse :pac:


  • Options
    #1030
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    Cool.
    Source for this please.

    I already have provided a video of engineer cutting steel and steel connections with thermate. You did not bother watching the video. So you continue to make baseless claims on this thread. Then you claim it can't be done but you don't even look at the evidence provided.


  • Options
    #1031
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Ahhhh the magic mirror that survived a building collapse :pac:
    Apparently it's a big piece of glass that fell and stayed intact, then also survived the collapse of the building and then also stayed intact and perfectly clear and reflective despite the work going on around it and despite being right next to a pool of molten metal for weeks.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1032
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    I already have provided a video of engineer cutting steel and steel connections with thermate. You did not bother watching the video. So you continue to make baseless claims on this thread. Then you claim it can't be done but you don't even look at the evidence provided.
    That is not a source for that claim.

    Also, lol. "Baseless claims..."


  • Options
    #1033
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    No cheerful, I didn't.

    Yes you did you don't even remember your own posts now. It was only when greenbo talked about what caused the reflection you changed your mind.

    You guys actually think that's a real person standing there Jesus, I can only laugh at this.


  • Options
    #1034
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Yes you did you don't even remember your own posts now.
    No cheerful, I didn't. :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #1035
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    That is not a source for that claim.

    Also, lol. "Baseless claims..."

    Yes it is their countless experiments he did to see if the debunkers were right. He debunked the debunkers he was able to cut through steel using thermate.


  • Options
    #1036
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Yes it is their countless experiments he did to see if the debunkers were right. He debunked the debunkers he was able to cut through steel using thermate.
    Ok. If you say so.


  • Options
    #1037
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    Apparently it's a big piece of glass that fell and stayed intact, then also survived the collapse of the building and then also stayed intact and perfectly clear and reflective despite the work going on around it and despite being right next to a pool of molten metal for weeks.

    You obviously are unaware pieces of glass from WTC towers are held in museums. Do you want me to debunk your nonsense no glass could have survived in the rubble? I not saying it was glass I just gave it as an example. Something else in the rubble could be causing the reflections of the two firemen.


  • Options
    #1038
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    Ok. If you say so.

    I provided the video of this no need to take my word for it:cool:


  • Options
    #1039
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Something else in the rubble could be causing the reflections of the two firemen.
    Ok. Something else such as...?


  • Options
    #1040
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    Ok. Something else such as...?

    Who knows the picture resolution is too low to tell.

    Maybe get out your magnifying glass and take a better look.

    What happened to his face hand and legs they just vanish from his body? Why would a worker be standing in a yellow burning liquid, crazy?

    465448.png


  • Options
    #1041
    GreeBo
    Registered Users Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    You obviously are unaware pieces of glass from WTC towers are held in museums. Do you want me to debunk your nonsense no glass could have survived in the rubble? I not saying it was glass I just gave it as an example. Something else in the rubble could be causing the reflections of the two firemen.

    52f2a19dd90fd93808c06339905ae803.jpg

    zoolander-video-still_cxfrkf.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1042
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Who knows the picture resolution is too low to tell.
    No I'm curious. What else could it possibly be.
    I'm not going to answer any of your questions. I just wanna see how silly your explanation can get here.

    If it wasn't a big huge piece of glass, what was it?

    Also,
    picture resolution is too low to tell.
    What happened to his face hand and legs they just vanish from his body?
    lol


  • Options
    #1043
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    DublinWriter wrote: »
    All your points refuted and your questions answered:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g&t=303s

    He doesn't watch videos that show real evidence. He prefers to believe he is right in his own head.


  • Options
    #1044
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    GreeBo wrote: »
    reference
    I think he also doesn't get the idea of perspective, so you might need to find that gif of Father Ted and Dougal and the cows...


  • Options
    #1045
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    I think he also doesn't get the idea of perspective, so you might need to find that gif of Father Ted and Dougal and the cows...

    Isn't there a photography forum on board.ie? Go ahead ask someone on there and I bet you will be disappointed. Show them the full the picture. And images you claim are people


  • Options
    #1046
    GreeBo
    Registered Users Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Isn't there a photography forum on board.ie? Go ahead ask someone on there and I bet you will be disappointed. Show them the full the picture. And images you claim are people

    Isn't there a WTC museum? Go ahead and find us some examples of intact glass.
    The image I posted is actually an image taken from the WTC museum and is off actual glass...but I'm sure you can find some intact pieces, they just used those small pieces because it was easier...


  • Options
    #1047
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    Isn't there a photography forum on board.ie? Go ahead ask someone on there and I bet you will be disappointed. Show them the full the picture. And images you claim are people
    No thanks.
    You're welcome to however.

    So if it wasn't a big piece of glass, what was it?
    Hologram?
    Effect of a space laser?
    Lizard people magic?


  • Options
    #1048
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    GreeBo wrote: »
    Isn't there a WTC museum? Go ahead and find us some examples of intact glass.
    The image I posted is actually an image taken from the WTC museum and is off actual glass...but I'm sure you can find some intact pieces, they just used those small pieces because it was easier...

    #Two big pieces rare but was found.

    http://photobucket.com/gallery/user/911conspiracytv/media/bWVkaWFJZDoxNDIxNjg5MQ==/?ref=


  • Options
    #1049
    GreeBo
    Registered Users Posts: 27,161 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    #Two big pieces rare but was found.

    http://photobucket.com/gallery/user/911conspiracytv/media/bWVkaWFJZDoxNDIxNjg5MQ==/?ref=

    Sorry, they are "big pieces"?


  • Options
    #1050
    King Mob
    Registered Users Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Cheerful Spring wrote: »
    #Two big pieces rare but was found.

    http://photobucket.com/gallery/user/911conspiracytv/media/bWVkaWFJZDoxNDIxNjg5MQ==/?ref=
    Lol.
    So that was what was reflecting the image?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1051
    Cheerful Spring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    King Mob wrote: »
    No thanks.
    You're welcome to however.

    So if it wasn't a big piece of glass, what was it?
    Hologram?
    Effect of a space laser?
    Lizard people magic?

    Of course, why not surprised. If I ask someone on photography forum and they say its reflections will you accept it then? I don't want to be wasting my time on this if you are just continue to ignore evidence?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement