Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Probate: Husband Transfers Assets to Son to Thwart Wife's Legal Right Share

Options
  • 04-11-2018 2:17pm
    #1
    MattHolohan
    Registered Users Posts: 4 ✭


    I'm sitting for the QLTT this week and this question has come up on prior exams but was not covered in my review materials.

    What happens when a husband transfers assets to his son prior to his death, with the intent of preventing the assets from passing to his wife (either through divorce decree, intestate distribution, or legal right share)? Is it any different if a husband transfers assets to himself and his son as joint tenants with survivorship?

    What are the wife's remedies here when the husband dies?
    Tagged:


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Victor
    Registered Users Posts: 78,404 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    IANAL, but surely the (former?) wife only has rights to what she has rights to. There is no automatic right to an inheritance.

    Presumably she has rights to:
    * what she owns, partially or otherwise;
    * what has been granted to her by any separation / divorce agreement / order;
    * what she has statutory rights to.


  • Options
    #3
    MattHolohan
    Registered Users Posts: 4 ✭MattHolohan


    Under the Succession Act the wife has a legal right to 1/3 of the estate if there are children (1/2 if there are not) if the husband dies testate, and 1/2 (or all of it if no issue) if the husband dies intestate. At least that's what they taught me in the probate review session. The fact that the examiners are asking about this suggests that there's some mechanism by which the wife can unwind the transfers to the son to restore the estate before she takes her share.


  • Options
    #4
    Victor
    Registered Users Posts: 78,404 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    So, if the (still married) husband owns the family home in his name and transfers it to the son before death, the widow would have a claim on the house. Note also the FHPA. I don't know the mechanism use to do the unwinding.

    Similarly, if the wife is entitled under a divorce settlement to (say) a pension, but the husband disposes of all assets to the son, then some unwinding must be allowed.


  • Options
    #5
    4ensic15
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Victor wrote: »
    So, if the (still married) husband owns the family home in his name and transfers it to the son before death,
    The transfer to the son would be void under the family Home protection Act 1976. The wife woulod sue the son for the return of the house to the estate.
    Victor wrote: »
    Similarly, if the wife is entitled under a divorce settlement to (say) a pension, but the husband disposes of all assets to the son, then some unwinding must be allowed.

    Transfers of assets to defeat a creditor can be set aside. The bankruptcy officers in the High Court have to do it all the time.


  • Options
    #6
    MattHolohan
    Registered Users Posts: 4 ✭MattHolohan


    Thanks! Happen to know what section of the Family Home Protection Act that falls under?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    4ensic15
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    MattHolohan wrote: »
    Thanks! Happen to know what section of the Family Home Protection Act that falls under?

    I've done enough of your homework. Time to look at the statute book online.


  • Options
    #8
    MattHolohan
    Registered Users Posts: 4 ✭MattHolohan


    Fair enough. Thanks again. I think this has to do with the Family Home Protection Act's requirement that the non-owning spouse must consent to a conveyance of the family home.


Advertisement