Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pat Kenny NIMBYism

13»

Comments

  • #102
    awec
    Administrators Posts: 54,509 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    patrickbrophy18 wrote: »
    I posted this on Facebook and might as well post it here too. This whole talk about "seriously injurious to the setting, amenity and appreciation of neighbouring properties" comes off as though the site in question should also be treated as an extension of amenities to neighbouring residents.

    I would like to remind the residents of "neighbouring properties" that the only amenities they own are those WITHIN the confines of their walls. I had a look at the plans which weren't bad looking. They were quite smart looking actually. It will be very rich (no pun intended) to hear the head objector complaining about the housing crisis in future NewsTalk broadcasts.
    You should probably remind yourself about planning permission and what it entails while you're at it.


  • #103
    Franz Von Peppercorn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    elperello wrote: »
    There is no contradiction between wanting to see a good Government housing policy and wanting sustainable proper development in your own area.

    Ah, there is Ted.


  • #104
    Assetbacked
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    elperello wrote: »
    I am not supporting the type of situation you refer to above just supporting the right of individuals to take part in the planning process.

    Proper sustainable development is what we need but taking away the rights of individuals will not deliver that.

    The current situation is not sustainable - people who are renting are losing more and more money every year; and ending up with less cash with each passing year. In fact, the boomier it gets the worse off workers are! This screams that something is at breaking point in the economy.

    Emergency measures to fix the solution - no objection to house-building planning applications or something along those lines is required to break an unsustainable situation.


  • #105
    elperello
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,267 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »
    Ah, there is Ted.

    No there is not.
    Suggestions on this thread that would seek to "weaponise" the planning system are unhelpful and will do nothing to improve matters.


Advertisement