Did anyone see this UFO last Friday

StereoSound

wexie wrote: »

A drone travelling quicker than a commercial airliner?

He sure as hell didn't buy that off Alibaba I guess.

I believe in off this planet life forms but since drones came in they have been coming to our planet a lot more often to visit us. I think a majority of modern day cases of UFO type craft are remote controlled big boys toys from China.

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

what about Astronauts who actually see UFO's in space??

Where is the evidence ?
That's like saying what about the hunters who see big foot or the divers who seen the lough ness monster or the grave digger who seen a ghost,

wexie

StereoSound wrote: »

I believe in off this planet life forms but since drones came in they have been coming to our planet a lot more often to visit us. I think a majority of modern day cases of UFO type craft are remote controlled big boys toys from China.

Oh I absolutely think you may well be right in that.

In this particular case though, considering it was seen by several pilots and judged to be at high speeds (never mind altitude) I don't think it was a drone. Or at least not a commercially available one.

josip

Jerichoholic wrote: »

Nasa have been sending stuff into space since the 60's hoping something will find it. Also sending radio signals and monitoring them constantly, not desperate at all.

Are you referring to the Voyager record etc when you say "stuff"?
That was much more to do with marketing 'space' to Earthlings in order to secure funding for space exploration than a bona fide belief that it would ever be found.
A silent, dark object in interstellar space heading towards nothing in particular, to be discovered by aliens on an interstellar road trip, really?

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Where is the evidence ?
That's like saying what about the hunters who see big foot or the divers who seen the lough ness monster or the grave digger who seen a ghost,

comparing a hunter to an Astronaut?!

one picks up a gun and goes to kill what he can find, the other has does this...

Astronaut requirements have changed with NASA's goals and missions. A pilot's license and engineering experience is still one route a person could take to becoming an astronaut, but it’s no longer the only one. Today, to be considered for an astronaut position, U.S. citizens must meet the following qualifications:

A bachelor's degree in engineering, biological science, physical science, computer science or mathematics.
At least three years of related professional experience obtained after degree completion OR at least 1,000 hours pilot-in-command time on jet aircraft.
The ability to pass the NASA long-duration astronaut physical. Distant and near visual acuity must be correctable to 20/20 for each eye. The use of glasses is acceptable.

Astronaut candidates must also have skills in leadership, teamwork and communications.

NASA's Astronaut Selection Board reviews the applications (a record-breaking 18,300 in 2016) and assesses each candidate's qualifications. The board then invites about 120 of the most highly qualified candidates to NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, for interviews. Of those interviewed, about half are invited back for a second round. Once the final astronauts are selected, they must complete a two-year training period.

With NASA's plans for the future of exploration, new astronauts will fly farther into space than ever before on lunar missions and may be the first to fly on to Mars

such is the level required to become an astronaut they are not going to make up stories for the craic

you should read up on Ex astronaut Edgar Mitchell as well

Immortal Starlight

There’s a starman waiting in the sky
He’d like to come and meet us
But he thinks he’d blow our minds.

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

comparing a hunter to an Astronaut?!

one picks up a gun and goes to kill what he can find, the other has does this...

Astronaut requirements have changed with NASA's goals and missions. A pilot's license and engineering experience is still one route a person could take to becoming an astronaut, but it’s no longer the only one. Today, to be considered for an astronaut position, U.S. citizens must meet the following qualifications:

A bachelor's degree in engineering, biological science, physical science, computer science or mathematics.
At least three years of related professional experience obtained after degree completion OR at least 1,000 hours pilot-in-command time on jet aircraft.
The ability to pass the NASA long-duration astronaut physical. Distant and near visual acuity must be correctable to 20/20 for each eye. The use of glasses is acceptable.

Astronaut candidates must also have skills in leadership, teamwork and communications.

NASA's Astronaut Selection Board reviews the applications (a record-breaking 18,300 in 2016) and assesses each candidate's qualifications. The board then invites about 120 of the most highly qualified candidates to NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, for interviews. Of those interviewed, about half are invited back for a second round. Once the final astronauts are selected, they must complete a two-year training period.

With NASA's plans for the future of exploration, new astronauts will fly farther into space than ever before on lunar missions and may be the first to fly on to Mars

such is the level required to become an astronaut they are not going to make up stories for the craic

you should read up on Ex astronaut Edgar Mitchell as well

So education means one is more trust worthy ?

Do you really believe this with all the recent cases of governments , banker and so on lying to the public ,

Would you believe the word of the President of the USA MR Trump over someone because he is better educated ?

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

comparing a hunter to an Astronaut?!

one picks up a gun and goes to kill what he can find, the other has does this...

Astronaut requirements have changed with NASA's goals and missions. A pilot's license and engineering experience is still one route a person could take to becoming an astronaut, but it’s no longer the only one. Today, to be considered for an astronaut position, U.S. citizens must meet the following qualifications:

A bachelor's degree in engineering, biological science, physical science, computer science or mathematics.
At least three years of related professional experience obtained after degree completion OR at least 1,000 hours pilot-in-command time on jet aircraft.
The ability to pass the NASA long-duration astronaut physical. Distant and near visual acuity must be correctable to 20/20 for each eye. The use of glasses is acceptable.

Astronaut candidates must also have skills in leadership, teamwork and communications.

NASA's Astronaut Selection Board reviews the applications (a record-breaking 18,300 in 2016) and assesses each candidate's qualifications. The board then invites about 120 of the most highly qualified candidates to NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, for interviews. Of those interviewed, about half are invited back for a second round. Once the final astronauts are selected, they must complete a two-year training period.

With NASA's plans for the future of exploration, new astronauts will fly farther into space than ever before on lunar missions and may be the first to fly on to Mars

such is the level required to become an astronaut they are not going to make up stories for the craic

you should read up on Ex astronaut Edgar Mitchell as well

Is that the same Edgar Mitchell who claimed the below , seems like a legit guy ,

Don't let the fact that he was an astronaut with a great Education hide the fact that he is always full of sh*T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"Mitchell claimed that a teenage remote healer living in Vancouver and using the pseudonym "Adam Dreamhealer" helped him heal kidney cancer from a distance. Mitchell said that while he never had a biopsy, "I had a sonogram and MRI that was consistent with renal carcinoma." Adam worked (distantly) on Mitchell from December 2003 until June 2004, when the "irregularity was gone and we haven't seen it since".[2

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Is that the same Edgar Mitchell who claimed the below , seems like a legit guy ,

Don't let the fact that he was an astronaut with a great Education hide the fact that he is always full of sh*T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"Mitchell claimed that a teenage remote healer living in Vancouver and using the pseudonym "Adam Dreamhealer" helped him heal kidney cancer from a distance. Mitchell said that while he never had a biopsy, "I had a sonogram and MRI that was consistent with renal carcinoma." Adam worked (distantly) on Mitchell from December 2003 until June 2004, when the "irregularity was gone and we haven't seen it since".[2

https://www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

https://www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html

But no actually evidence ?

Lines like the below form your link make me laugh, Your basing evidence off this kind a nonsense,

"A certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium "

of course he remained nameless cause its all made up,
All astronauts who want to stay relevant saying vague stuff with no evidence,

You think cause there astronauts they couldn't possible be lying ,You do some have gone on to commit crimes and in general are just the same as everyone eels,

Effects

bangkok wrote: »

what about Astronauts who actually see UFO's in space??

Which astronauts?

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

But no actually evidence ?

Lines like the below form your link make me laugh, Your basing evidence off this kind a nonsense,

"A certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium "

of course he remained nameless cause its all made up,
All astronauts who want to stay relevant saying vague stuff with no evidence,

You think cause there astronauts they couldn't possible be lying ,You do some have gone on to commit crimes and in general are just the same as everyone eels,

did you even read any of it? What about the first guy in that article??

One of the original Mercury Astronauts and the last American to fly in space alone. On May 15, 1963 he shot into space in a Mercury capsule for a 22 orbit journey around the world. During the final orbit, Major Gordon Cooper told the tracking station at Muchea (near Perth Australia) that he could see a glowing, greenish object ahead of him quickly approaching his capsule. The UFO was real and solid, because it was picked up by Muchea's tracking radar. Cooper's sighting was reported by the National Broadcast Company, which was covering the flight step by step; but when Cooper landed, reporters were told that they would not be allowed to question him about the UFO sighting.

Major Cooper was a firm believer in UFOs. Ten years earlier, in 1951 he had sighted a UFO while piloting an F-86 Sabrejet over Western Germany. They were metallic, saucer-shaped discs at considerable altitude and could out-maneuver all American fighter planes. Major Cooper also testified before the United Nations: "I believe that these extra-terrestrial vehicles and their crews are visiting this planet from other planets... Most astronauts were reluctant to discuss UFOs." "I did have occasion in 1951 to have two days of observation of many flights of them, of different sizes, flying in fighter formation, generally from east to west over Europe."

bangkok

Effects wrote: »

Which astronauts?

all of these for a start...

https://www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html

Grayson

bangkok wrote: »

all of these for a start...

https://www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html

was that page created using dreamweaver and originally hosted on angelfire?

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

did you even read any of it? What about the first guy in that article??

One of the original Mercury Astronauts and the last American to fly in space alone. On May 15, 1963 he shot into space in a Mercury capsule for a 22 orbit journey around the world. During the final orbit, Major Gordon Cooper told the tracking station at Muchea (near Perth Australia) that he could see a glowing, greenish object ahead of him quickly approaching his capsule. The UFO was real and solid, because it was picked up by Muchea's tracking radar. Cooper's sighting was reported by the National Broadcast Company, which was covering the flight step by step; but when Cooper landed, reporters were told that they would not be allowed to question him about the UFO sighting.

Major Cooper was a firm believer in UFOs. Ten years earlier, in 1951 he had sighted a UFO while piloting an F-86 Sabrejet over Western Germany. They were metallic, saucer-shaped discs at considerable altitude and could out-maneuver all American fighter planes. Major Cooper also testified before the United Nations: "I believe that these extra-terrestrial vehicles and their crews are visiting this planet from other planets... Most astronauts were reluctant to discuss UFOs." "I did have occasion in 1951 to have two days of observation of many flights of them, of different sizes, flying in fighter formation, generally from east to west over Europe."

Where is the hard evidence ? You can't just believe what these guys say when there retired its hosre sh*t ,life doesn't work like that you need evidence,

One reports Saucer's , which was exact fantasy we made up as human's ,

There is no real evidence because it has never happened, again its like the bogey man, ghost's, big foot its all nonsense

Grayson

yourdeadwright wrote: »

But no actually evidence ?

Lines like the below form your link make me laugh, Your basing evidence off this kind a nonsense,

"A certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium "

of course he remained nameless cause its all made up,
All astronauts who want to stay relevant saying vague stuff with no evidence,

You think cause there astronauts they couldn't possible be lying ,You do some have gone on to commit crimes and in general are just the same as everyone eels,

lol. This is hilarious.

According to the NASA Astronaut Neil Armstrong, the Aliens have a base on the Moon and told us in no uncertain terms to get off and stay off the Moon. According to un-confirmed reports, both Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin saw UFOs shortly after that historic landing on the Moon in Apollo 11 on 21 July 1969. I remember hearing one of the astronauts refer to a "light" in or on a crater during the television transmission, followed by a request from mission control for further information. Nothing more was heard. According to a former NASA employee Otto Binder, unnamed radio hams with their own VHF receiving facilities that bypassed NASA's broadcasting outlets picked up the following exchange:

NASA: Whats there?
Mission Control calling Apollo 11...

Apollo11: These "Babies" are huge, Sir! Enormous!
OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it!
I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there,
Lined up on the far side of the crater edge!
They're on the Moon watching us!



A certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium.

Professor: What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?

Armstrong: It was incredible, of course we had always known
there was a possibility, the fact is, we were
warned off! (by the Aliens). There was never any
question then of a space station or a moon city.

Professor: How do you mean "warned off"?

Armstrong: I can't go into details, except to say that their
ships were far superior to ours both in size and
technology - Boy, were they big! and menacing!
No, there is no question of a space station.

Professor: But NASA had other missions after Apollo 11?

Armstrong: Naturally - NASA was committed at that time, and
couldn't risk panic on Earth. But it really was a
quick scoop and back again.

Grayson

I found a photo of the aliens on the moon.

yourdeadwright

Grayson wrote: »

lol. This is hilarious.

Its like something from a space invader's movie on sci- fi channel , Absolute horse sh*t

Jerichoholic

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Where is the hard evidence ? You can't just believe what these guys say when there retired its hosre sh*t ,life doesn't work like that you need evidence,

One reports Saucer's , which was exact fantasy we made up as human's ,

There is no real evidence because it has never happened, again its like the bogey man, ghost's, big foot its all nonsense

Saucer was used because that's what one of the first UFO's was described as looking like. Which is what they look like. Going by reports of them.

Grayson

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Its like something from a space invader's movie on sci- fi channel , Absolute horse sh*t

It's the plot of three godzilla movies.

http://godzilla.wikia.com/wiki/Moon

The Mysterians
After leaving the planet Mars, the Mysterians dock their Space Station on the dark side of the Moon while they launch plans to invade Earth.

Destroy All Monsters
In order to successfully take control of Earth's kaiju, the Kilaaks build a transmitter tower and a base on the Moon. The JSDF and UN launch an expedition force of humans aboard the Moonlight SY-3 to the Moon, and a battle rages which results in the Humans blowing up the base's entrance, forcing the Kilaaks inside to revert to their metallic forms, and the destruction of the Transmitter Tower, freeing the Kaiju from the alien race's grip.

Godzilla vs. Redmoon
In this unreleased film, the titular antagonist Redmoon lives on the Moon, and comes to Earth to invade. He meets up with Erabus, who also normally lives on the Moon.

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Where is the hard evidence ? You can't just believe what these guys say when there retired its hosre sh*t ,life doesn't work like that you need evidence,

One reports Saucer's , which was exact fantasy we made up as human's ,

There is no real evidence because it has never happened, again its like the bogey man, ghost's, big foot its all nonsense

what about radar and visual evidence? does that not count?

landing marks, physical damage to tree, radiation in the area etc?

Jerichoholic

Did you know that Area 51 didn't exist for decades until they had to admit it did?

I bet you believe everything that politicians tell you too.

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

what about radar and visual evidence? does that not count?

landing marks, physical damage to tree, radiation in the area etc?

Of course I forgot Damage to a tree means an Alien aircraft crashed into it :eek:

Its fantasy , its made up , its nonsense, time to let it go,

Again yes there probably is Aliens life forms out there somewhere but they haven't visited and aren't flying around trying not to be detected with the full beams on in space crafts similar to the ones humans made up in there fantasy's books and stories,

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Of course I forgot Damage to a tree means an Alien aircraft crashed into it :eek:

Its fantasy , its made up , its nonsense, time to let it go,

Again yes there probably is Aliens life forms out there somewhere but they haven't visited and aren't flying around trying not to be detected with the full beams on in space crafts similar to the ones humans made up in there fantasy's books and stories,

tell that to the family members of pilots who went chasing ufos or were abducted by them and never returned home

yourdeadwright

Jerichoholic wrote: »

Did you know that Area 51 didn't exist for decades until they had to admit it did?

I bet you believe everything that politicians tell you too.

So that means it must be full of Alien's right , it couldn't possibly be a test site for Army aircraft or weaponry that they don't want people know about it 110% mean Aliens,

Oh and after its in the papers ,online and everyone on the planet knows about it and where it is , of course that's where they would still keep the Aliens,

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

tell that to the family members of pilots who went chasing ufos or were abducted by them and never returned home

I can't cause there are no families, where there love ones where abducted by Aliens ,

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

I can't cause there are no families, where there love ones where abducted by Aliens ,

maybe you cant tell that to the family of frederick valentich or the others who went missing

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

maybe you cant tell that to the family of frederick valentich or the others who went missing

The Frederick Valentich who had long belief in UFO and basically was a crap at flying ,



"Frederick Valentich had about 150 total hours' flying time and held a class-four instrument rating, which authorised him to fly at night, but only "in visual meteorological conditions." He had twice applied to enlist in the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) but was rejected because of inadequate educational qualifications. He was a member of the Air Training Corps, determined to have a career in aviation. Valentich was studying part-time to become a commercial pilot but had a poor achievement record, having twice failed all five commercial licence examination subjects, and as recently as the previous month had failed three more commercial licence subjects. He had been involved in flying incidents, for example, straying into a controlled zone in Sydney, for which he received a warning, and twice deliberately flying into a cloud, for which prosecution was being considered. According to his father, Guido, Valentich was an ardent believer in UFOs and had been worried about being attacked by them."

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

The Frederick Valentich who had long belief in UFO and basically was a crap at flying ,



"Frederick Valentich had about 150 total hours' flying time and held a class-four instrument rating, which authorised him to fly at night, but only "in visual meteorological conditions." He had twice applied to enlist in the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) but was rejected because of inadequate educational qualifications. He was a member of the Air Training Corps, determined to have a career in aviation. Valentich was studying part-time to become a commercial pilot but had a poor achievement record, having twice failed all five commercial licence examination subjects, and as recently as the previous month had failed three more commercial licence subjects. He had been involved in flying incidents, for example, straying into a controlled zone in Sydney, for which he received a warning, and twice deliberately flying into a cloud, for which prosecution was being considered. According to his father, Guido, Valentich was an ardent believer in UFOs and had been worried about being attacked by them."

whats your point here?? he had an encounter with a ufo and never returned home...

emo72

Jaysus lads. F35s transponders off and fierce stealthy. Or aliens.

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

whats your point here?? he had an encounter with a ufo and never returned home...

He was a brutal polite who crashed simple .

ZERO evidence of a Aliens or UFO's

bangkok

what about roswell?? all who came forward and said it was a crashed ufo that were directly involved it in, even the press release at the time when the military told the press what they found only to back track on that a day later

Mountainsandh

yourdeadwright wrote: »

So that means it must be full of Alien's right , it couldn't possibly be a test site for Army aircraft or weaponry that they don't want people know about it 110% mean Aliens,

Oh and after its in the papers ,online and everyone on the planet knows about it and where it is , of course that's where they would still keep the Aliens,

Fun Fact : There is a terminal in Las Vegas that is un named and un marked for flights to Area 51. The pilots call it Janet for some reason (they had to refer to it by some name i guess, albeit unofficial!) The planes are all white.

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

He was a brutal polite who crashed simple .

ZERO evidence of a Aliens or UFO's

Phoneix lights... thousands of witnesses and video footage

Mountainsandh

Oh, and the cameo men are real and scary !

brainfreeze

Bangkok i've got some magic beans I want to sell you. :cool:

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

what about roswell?? all who came forward and said it was a crashed ufo that were directly involved it in, even the press release at the time when the military told the press what they found only to back track on that a day later

Ahh good aul Roswell , a town In the middle of no where that happened to also have a army Airforce base strange that isn't it .

What are the chance of the aul Aliens traveling through there " hyper dimensions of space " as you put it earlier and then crash in the middle of no where on a nice day near a Air force Base,

Also so strange that the people in a small back water town would want speak to all the big media that arrived , Strangely enough most who where interviewed said they never even seen anything but told the stories of what other's in the town said they seen, Its called hear say ,

Jerichoholic

I presume you don't believe in God then?

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

Ahh good aul Roswell , a town In the middle of no where that happened to also have a army Airforce base strange that isn't it .

What are the chance of the aul Aliens traveling through there " hyper dimensions of space " as you put it earlier and then crash in the middle of no where on a nice day near a Air force Base,

Also so strange that the people in a small back water town would want speak to all the big media that arrived , Strangely enough most who where interviewed said they never even seen anything but told the stories of what other's in the town said they seen, Its called hear say ,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Corso

yourdeadwright

Jerichoholic wrote: »

I presume you don't believe in God then?

Which god ?
here have been over 30 thousand gods worshipped since this earth began , So which one are you asking me about ?
Do you believe in God and if so which one ?

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Corso

,

I like Philly good head on his shoulder's seen the chance to hide the Air force's cock up and make himself some money by writing a book about Aliens like the ones he "found " in Roswell,
How could you not like him done his employers a favour and made himself rich, its a win win when Philly's about ,

Jerichoholic

Best to ignore than get drawn in any further.

yourdeadwright

Jerichoholic wrote: »

Best to ignore than get drawn in any further.

No I don't believe in God why would I ?
If someone told you the story about god when you where in your 20/30's for the first time would you believe it ? you would in your hoop !!!!!!!!

Just like I do in my hoop believe that there are lads flying around in saucer,(that we actually made up in fantasy) from other planets, They have advanced technology and don't wana be seen but always leave there lights on the silly sausages

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

No I don't believe in God why would I ?
If someone told you the story about god when you where in your 20/30's for the first time would you believe it ? you would in your hoop !!!!!!!!

Just like I do in my hoop believe that there are lads flying around in saucer,(that we actually made up in fantasy) from other planets, They have advanced technology and don't wana be seen but always leave there lights on the silly sausages

very mature reply there

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

very mature reply there

don't worry when we do make contact ,with flying Aliens on earth i'll be the first to admit I was wrong ,

I do think there is something out there in deep space it would be silly for us to think we are alone, but Aliens coming here for years in flying saucer's is a little to much for me ,

bangkok

yourdeadwright wrote: »

don't worry when we do make contact ,with flying Aliens on earth i'll be the first to admit I was wrong ,

I do think there is something out there in deep space it would be silly for us to think we are alone, but Aliens coming here for years in flying saucer's is a little to much for me ,

so you believe there are aliens, some who could possibly be billions of years ahead of us in technology and yet dont believe they could have visited earth?

ohnonotgmail

bangkok wrote: »

so you believe there are aliens, some who could possibly be billions of years ahead of us in technology and yet dont believe they could have visited earth?

Have you any idea how far away any possible aliens will be? And you think they came all this way just to anal probe some hillbilly?

bangkok

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Have you any idea how far away any possible aliens will be? And you think they came all this way just to anal probe some hillbilly?

we travelled to the moon and mars to collect some soil samples... maybe that species of alien wanted some dna sample

brainfreeze

bangkok wrote: »

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Corso

You just keep posting wikipedia links that have absolutely nothing other than hearsay. If you really wanted to, you could see what Philip J Corso has said and debunk it with 5 minutes of research. Just because he was in the military with a distinguished career, doesn't mean he wasn't a bit of an attention seeking Walter Mitty in later life. This forum is filled with them.

For example from your wikipedia page.

According to Corso, the reverse engineering of these artifacts indirectly led to the development of accelerated particle beam devices, fiber optics, lasers, integrated circuit chips and Kevlar material.

Sounds good right? Until you look into them, it's almost like a walter witty type made these claims before it was easy to look stuff up.

• Accelerated particle beam came into existence in 1931, nearly 2 decades before Roswell.
• Fiber Optics was first demonstrated in the 1840s, an entire century before Philip J Corso claims it was reverse engineered from crashed Aliens.

That's pretty poor. Two out of his five "revered engineered" advancements don't even fit the timeline. Then you have integrated circuit chips that's concept was invented in Germany in 1949 with even a patented filed, and then the first commercial use used by the British in the early 1950s. Why not the Americans since they "reverse engineered" it? Why would they tell the Germans 3 years after WW2 and let them patent this amazing alien technology, when they just did all the hard work?

This is all absolute nonsense. You would have to completely disregard logic to believe this stuff. This (Aliens visiting earth) is not an evidence based conclusion but instead a belief system based on hearsay. You want this to be true because you want this to be true.

yourdeadwright

bangkok wrote: »

so you believe there are aliens, some who could possibly be billions of years ahead of us in technology and yet dont believe they could have visited earth?

Where did I say they are ahead of us in technology ?
Alien life form could be anything ,could be a worm , who knows, but yes I do not believe any Aliens have visited us in flying saucer's