Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Whistleblower: The Maurice McCabe Story on RTE1 now

2»

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 35,318 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Tusla had a rape allegation on file for 2 and a half years........it took them another 6 months to decide that it was not a rape allegation at all-- unreal, unbelievable.

    Charleton's investigation show a copy and paste error of a rape allegation from one file to another.....seriously???
    The barrister pointed out that every mistake that was made were all to the detriment of McCabe, some coincidence.

    Then being accused of sexually abusing his own children.

    The Disclosures Tribunal........"what I like about today is that it is all FÚKIN over", I wouldn't blame him.

    Dave Taylor......a Muppet of the highest order,
    Martin Callinan ......an awful excuse of a man. Charges of some sort really have to be brought.

    Fair play to Drew Harris, straight down to them following his appointment as Garda Commissioner.

    When you add up the amounts of resignations of some of the highest positions that can be held, the sheer volume of media attention etc over the 10 years for the whole Whistleblower saga will go down in history.

    Glad he doesn't have to wear a hoodie anymore.
    Goes to show you what the love a strong woman can do, he has a seriously good wife.


    It really should be made into a film, fiction of course , as if you didn't follow it.........you simply wouldn't believe it !!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,197 ✭✭✭Ceist_Beag


    That Tusla episode is very sinister. Quite how Charleton could conclude it was a simple administration error I do not know. I mean there were fabricated statements from his own children in the file - how could that possibly be put down as a copy and paste error?


Advertisement