Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Werewolf: The Game Show
Options
Comments
-
-
-
WerewolfGM wrote: »THANK YOU CONTESTANTS. THIS MORNING'S QUIZ HAS NOW ENDED. THE WINNING CONTESTANT HAS BEEN PM'D AND WILL RECEIVE THEIR PRIZE SHORTLY.
Don't forget to tune in this evening at 9.15pm for tonight's show!
For all interested, the answer we were looking for is Herbert Hoover.
https://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/057_pral.html
Final Mod Note: Sinbad311 has been substituted with Jack Moore. Please give Jack a round of applause as he makes his way to the stage!
0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Barneys posts - Post 1 of 4Hello all, great to be on the show tonight.
I'll take "Wolfie for 200 please"
Necro
"Who is the most wolfie so far? Alex"
Correct.
Not a bad start really
"Wolfie for 400"
MrsFD
"Who is the next most wolfie?"
Two out of two ain't bad.
Not sure who to go with for 600 though.
Nothing mad here, opening fluff most likely. No sign of taskes, if there is then this becomes a little suss, as do someof my own posts to be fair.I disagree with the plan to announce who the captains should protect. Necro did rightly point out the flaws in that one to be fair to him. It won't be telling at all because it would just tell the wolves who not to kill that night.
On the splitting idea though Necro I disagree. I think Pter pointed out a few issues with captains potentially being all together in one group or captains being put in groups where none or only one of their team is. I reckon the captain's just using their own initiative makes most sense.
To be fair, another fair point made here. No complaints. Wolf looking helpful or villager being helpful, you decide as we go on.Did you not get the memo?
A nothing post.Hmm, countdown clock only rattles about for 30 seconds. You've been around a bit longer than that. I'm not buying it :rolleyes:
A nothing post againI'd say QB's example of 1 - 100 is probably more likely than the possibility of on board tasks.
Chiming in, nothing bad here.Picking a number between 1-100 in a backroom and whichever team/sk is closer gets a kill on the first night. That is what you were saying right QB?
Putting words in QBs mouth hereSorry Drumpot, I think I saw Pter's post about it. Must have missed yours.
Nothing bad hereFrom my quick look, five of them would have been 22 or younger so probably not captain. Three played in the 1980 Olympics so were likely team leaders, if not in an official capacity as captain. Those three - Krivokapic, Bebic and Roje are the three most likely to have been captain in my view if there was a captain at all. Krivokapic and Roje were four years older than Bebic so again make them more likely in my eyes. Krivokapic was the keeper whilst Roje had played in the Med Games in 1979 and 1983 so was a mainstay of the team.
But of course it's possible that anyone was captain and also that none of them were captain.
If I was a wolf, this is a great way to be helpful without actually being helpful. He gives his imput on the subject and gets his post count up without ruffling anyones feathers.
That said it could be a villager too, but I would expect Barney to be quieter here if he was a villager.
But nothing to hang him withIf your answer was none of us know for sure then yes, if the mods don't have proof, you were right.
Same as aboveWell, my suspicions are somewhat rough at this stage in the game. Not really suspicions, more thoughts.
Beaker - not sure whether I believe them or not. Seems an unlikely power to have but possible. Him lying wouldn't make him a wolf though.
Necro - Some of your ideas have been a bit out there. Well at least the splitting the village into three anyway. But I'm not sure if that's just a villager trying to come up with a plan or a wolf move.
Sully - not really sure what you're seeing there. Could be missing it but it's not clear to me
MrsFD - my opening post included a nothing claim that she's a wolf and I don't believe she interacted with it. That would be playing it pretty cool if she's a wolf.
Uriel - I'm not in a well or dead so I'd have to be wary of my nemesis.
A read list that ruffles no ones feathers, Im always suspect of this move. As a wolf in previous games, I do be fearful of saying the wrong thing and rubbing someone up the wrong way, similar to Loughc (if he was good as he claimed).
Barney doesnt point the finger at anyone here and is careful to sit on teh fence. Im not buying it and this post had me worried initially yesterday.
I shall post page 2 of 4 shortly0 -
-
-
-
-
Deleted User wrote: »Necro, this whole clock thing is bull**** right?
I don't know what you're talking about
0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Barneys posts , page 2 of 4Splitting the village into three for the captains to pick from, not the overall teams. Sorry that it was not clear.
Clarification post, again could be perceived as getting a post count up, appear helpful. Appear helpful by clarifying things is a good way for a wolf to post.
It again doesnt hang Barney either, lets be clearOkay Pter, what exactly do you think would be original at this time given I only started reading this morning?
Should I pretend that I didn't see some rebuttals to some of the ideas yesterday and then act like I'm poking holes in them for the first time? Or how about rehashing what an FFA is? Or maybe I should say oh Pter was a bit absent yesterday for a while (Oh wait Necro said that).
There's nothing there because we don't really know anything yet. There's very little to go on.
I'm leaning towards Beaker being a goodie, and would like to believe he is a seer.
Taking me at face value. I can see that as a village move. Challenged him with an accusation of trying to pocket me to see his reaction.I'm not bad Beaker, so read it whatever way you'd like.
Defending his reads
:)It wouldn't be a terrible place to be Beaker. I mean there's plenty of room in there.
Response to him trying to pocket me. A cool response.I was asked a question by necro. And responded saying I wasn't certain of anything. Alternatively I could just not have answered the question and not been involved at all. My response is at least generating something. Would you agree that is good?
Laying back on his reads not being solid. Sitting on the fence, non commital to anything. A wolf trait, possibly a RV trait tooI'm not abdicating anything. I was asked a question and responded with my views as they were. Which were admitted pretty bare. Then I was accused for that which I aggressively reacted to. I was also accused of just trying to appear as though I'm following. That second bit is why I mentioned the necro question. My post was a direct response to him.
Same as above.That's what you got from my post? I made the post, it was replying to necro asking me about my views. I then later say I was replying to necro and now it is me trying to abdicate responsibility.
Just to be clear in case anyone thinks I'm trying to abdicate responsibility for not having any solid reads on people I'm not. I owned up to that at the start and am doing so again now.
And I'll look into Lough shortly beaker.
A resonse to see what he thought of Lough..... surprised he didnt have a read on him yet so was suspcious of that fact that he hadnt considering Lough was a focus of attention. Very strange. How was he able to give reads of others and not Lough, who was a focus of the morning to a pointDamn suspicious Necro.
So they both posted shortly after the death notice. It's not like either was a long winded post about their contributions.
Necro's post probably took him less than 5 seconds to write and that's being generous. Hardly surprising that he was first to post given that he also posted at 9.59.
Lough, the timing doesn't bother me really. More so the content, but they may have just been skimming stuff and then on reflection noticed that Virt had posted more than they had thought.
Defending lough to a point. This depends on if Lough was bad or notSulli chimed into semi regularly yesterday. For the talking of having a game to play she hasn't really done a huge amount in terms of trying to participate. Now I haven't been the most active either and it is early on but given how excited she seemed from the first two posts it seems to fizzle out early on.
Focusing on Sully. Can be analyised later.On Lough, he had five posts before the munch I think. So it is conceivable that he didn't follow closely enough to realise Virt was posting. He then says that having read the posts he thinks they could have been an asset, but an hour later says that they weren't memorable. That might mean that they weren't memorable to him on first reading but it is a bit of a change from having said he might have been an asset.
On the challenging Beaker, I think that is fair enough. He might be being strong handed enough in it but if he believes Beaker is lying then why wouldn't he be forceful in his challenging.
Seems to be backing Lough here though his analysis seems fair to be honest.Just on that, fair enough for not liking the read list. I'm not sure what you mean by trying to appear helpful though. Where exactly have I been trying to appear helpful?
I accused him of appear helpful with his read list and this was his response. Fair point made I suppose.That's something I can agree on.
Not sure where Beaker is coming from.
Defending himself.Ah here now, if I was trying to appear helpful I probably would've come up with something better than I what I actually have.
Who am I to say what your doing, Barney you are an excellent player and an excellent bad guy in previous games. Youre very good at playing abad guy who appears good, so excuse me if Im cynical.
page 3 of 4 to come soon.0 -
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
Advertisement