Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »Sometimes it's just best to let dumb be dumb, thank feck for this forum or his sh/te would be spewing out all over the site.
I think he wants to see a Hollywood movie or cartoon type wound. All obvious and clear.
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Do I need to? He said the wound was in the right rear of the head. You are wrong in your analysis.
Further, let's look what he told the Warren Commission.
Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hill_c.htm
Yup so you've answered your own question. Albeit with yet another a quote mine.Cheerful Spring wrote: »Why don't we see the real large wound on the Zapruder film? You can't find it that why you spinning like crazy on this thread.
A question I've already answered.The bullet shattering.
Because its half of a second of film. Theres bone, brain, scalp and hair there too flapping about everywhere.
Care to explain this though? Do you think hes lying? It completely contradicts what you've said above to prove your point. This was from less than 2 years ago.
0 -
Yup so you've answered your own question. Albeit with yet another a quote mine.
A question I've already answered.
Care to explain this though? Do you think hes lying? It completely contradicts what you've said above to prove your point. This was from less than 2 years ago.
I posted what Clint Hill said while under Oath. He saw a large wound in the right side rear of the head.
At the rear is the back of the head not the front of the head.
You have not answered it, you posted spin. There no large wound to the right side rear of the head on the Zapruder film. Spin will not change this truth
Again more nonsense. Where is he placing his hand? Above the right ear and behind the right ear.
Where he places the hand is consistent with the autopsy findings.
""The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 inches) wide at the largest diameter
He not placing his hand low covering the entire forehead in front of the right ear.0 -
Advertisement
-
-
You seem to get half of your opinions from pictures of where people point to on their heads. Its funny. Embarrassing for you but funny for everyone else. You are incapable of even the most basic means of research.
You claim theres a huge wound at the back of the head (occipital) citing an autopsy quote that says the huge wound is at the side of the head (parietal) as your evidence.
Would be like me Saying "Oswald was the lone shooter" and then posting "There was a gunman on the knoll" as evidence.
I don't even have to post anything now. You just keep contradicting yourself with that quote. Its incredible to watch.
Maybe you do have a comprehension problem?
Do you understand this large wound was seen to be (singular) They were not different wounds at the back of the head?
Autopsy] the exit head wound, clear and not difficult to understand, maybe not for you?
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 in) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
Shall we see the difference.
The green area matches the autopsy findings. The Right side of the head and the rear.
The Red area is where you find the head wound on the Zapruder film. In front of the right ear.
0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Maybe you do have a comprehension problem?
Do you understand this large wound was seen to be (singular) They were not different wounds at the back of the head?
Autopsy] the exit head wound, clear and not difficult to understand, maybe not for you?
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 in) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
Shall we see the difference.
The green area matches the autopsy findings. The Right side of the head and the rear.
The Red area is where you find the head wound on the Zapruder film. In front of the right ear.
That's the left side of his head
0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Maybe you do have a comprehension problem?
Do you understand this large wound was seen to be (singular) They were not different wounds at the back of the head?
Autopsy] the exit head wound, clear and not difficult to understand, maybe not for you?
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 in) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
Shall we see the difference.
The green area matches the autopsy findings. The Right side of the head and the rear.
The Red area is where you find the head wound on the Zapruder film. In front of the right ear.
Ok lets try this again. There was no large wound in the forehead. There was a large wound above the ear at the side of the head. That wound caused brain and blood to spill out of it (force and gravity) and go forward (a shot from the rear) and thats why we see that matter at the front of the head on the Zapruder film.
It is not a wound at the front of the head.
To put it in very simple terms that you may understand. This is how gravity and force works.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »That's the left side of his head
Notice how he - in his normal garden variety conspiracy theorist way - has purposely shortened the parietal area in his latest MS Paint venture to stop at the ear when in reality the parietal bone extends twice as far towards the front of the head, well past the ear and to the front of the temple.
lol!0 -
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »That's the left side of his head
Just when I thought CS couldn't look any more ridiculous...
He posts a self edited photo of the Left hand side of JFKs head in support of his theory...
As for the lack of comprehension that is displayed again and again by him.
I'm more and more convinced that CS isn't a native English speaker and a lot of the positions taken are as the result of his genuinely misunderstanding the syntax and common use of language in a lot of the posts and reports he quote mines and then bases his surmisings on.
At least I hope so, because otherwise there really is a village in a panic looking for him!0 -
Ok lets try this again. There was no large wound in the forehead. There was a large wound above the ear at the side of the head. That wound caused brain and blood to spill out of it (force and gravity) and go forward (a shot from the rear) and thats why we see that matter at the front of the head on the Zapruder film.
It is not a wound at the front of the head.
To put it in very simple terms that you may understand. This is how gravity and force works.
Notice how he - in his normal garden variety conspiracy theorist way - has purposely shortened the parietal area in his latest MS Paint venture to stop at the ear when in reality the parietal bone extends twice as far towards the front of the head, well past the ear and to the front of the temple.
lol!
I know the difference between the right side front and the right side rear of the brain.
You blind if you don't see the large wound is entirely in the right front of the ear.
The large wound was seen above the ear and behind it the right ear.
You find the large gaping hole Clint Hill saw in the right side of the head in the rear?0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
Why did you reduce the size of the parietal bone? Did you not think anyone would notice?
Let's look at the Clint Hill image you posted by the way.
President Kennedy image.
Minimal difference. Where I placed the wound ( in green) matches where Clint placed his hand. He places his hand further back in the head in other photographs0 -
-
-
Cheerful Spring wrote: »You an idiot. The brain is still the same left or right.
If I flipped the photograph the large wound that Kennedy received it not going to change. You creating drama for know reason.
I found pictures of the right side but they were used by conspiracy theorists to highlight injuries. I could not use that photograph, I needed a clear untouched picture to use my MS paint;) Yep finding a right side untouched profile picture of Kennedy is not as easy as you think
So you searched for an image of JFK and couldn't find an untouched right profile.
Funny really as it took me all of 15 seconds to find the attached.
Actually the 1st image returned by Google.
But sure what do I know?
You're the expert researcher and illustrator eh 0 -
-
Ive stated repeatedly I dont place any weight in random images of people pointing at their heads. Or quote mines. Clint Hill is an honest man but he contradicts himself on this topic.
You intentionally shrank an area of the head to line up with your belief system. I wont use the word "theory" as you dont have one. A few pages ago you were posting pictures of him pointing to another part of his head. You cant have both.
And in the interest of fairness Ive no issue with you posting his left side. I see what you were doing - completely wrong mind you - but yeah, fine.
He is a key eyewitness. You even used his opinion to support the lone gunman theory. Then when I showed you where he said the large wound was his no longer reliable
Where he placed the wound is backed up other eyewitnesses.
I did not intentionally shrink the wound. I placed the wound where eyewitnesses saw it.
Clint hill under Oath.
Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/hill_c.htm0 -
So you searched for an image of JFK and couldn't find an untouched right profile.
Funny really as it took me all of 15 seconds to find the attached.
Actually the 1st image returned by Google.
But sure what do I know?
You're the expert researcher and illustrator eh
Does it look anything like the picture I used? I was looking for a picture that up close and his head not turned.
Either way, it's a drama about nothing.0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Does it look anything like the picture I used? I was looking for a picture that up close and his head not turned.
Either way, it's a drama about nothing.
It's not a drama.
It's a clear demonstration of the fact however that you cannot research or present coherent thesis or examples of your own market uppy evidence
As I said that was all of a 15 second search if I was struggling to make a point or convince someone of my veracity I could have found many many more...
Or even, just flipped the image used.0 -
Advertisement
-
It's not a drama.
It's a clear demonstration of the fact however that you cannot research or present coherent thesis or examples of your own market uppy evidence
As I said that was all of a 15 second search if I was struggling to make a point or convince someone of my veracity I could have found many many more...
Or even, just flipped the image used.
This is a clear example of you being annoying. Having a hizzy fit about a Kennedy picture turned the right way.0
Advertisement