Syrian boy bullied in Huddersfield

weldoninhio

Grayson wrote: »

Back in that post I edited.

There is nothing in that Guardian piece that tells of any other incidents regarding this boy.

SnakePlissken

Faugheen wrote: »

Anything to say about that or are you just going to continue your mouth-foaming tirade against me.

Mouth foaming tirade? I believe I've been quite cordial, again, you seem to have a rather vivid imagination.

Faugheen wrote: »

I'll defend my views against anyone who wants to call me a bully with no foundation

But you are a bully, and there is a damning foundation on which I base my opinion.

Not once has this poster made any racist claims and yet you have continuously attacked them with some of the vilest accusations I have seen on this forum, your behavior is simply disgusting;

Faugheen wrote: »

Fact is you're using this as a mask for your racist views.

Faugheen wrote: »

You have a problem with it because it involves someone whose skin colour is a little bit brown, don't you?

Faugheen wrote: »

Vile creature.

Faugheen wrote: »

Why don't you prove me wrong, racist?

Faugheen wrote: »

Still waiting for you to condemn the bullying that is being spoken about in this thread, racist.

Faugheen wrote: »

Just know one of them is a racist so you're in good company.

Faugheen wrote: »

Stop looking for whataboutery straight away then, racist.

Faugheen

weldoninhio wrote: »

You spread lies in this thread yesterday. You claimed the child was waterboarded, then claimed that the bully had also broken his arm in a previous incident. Are you're lies less valid than Tommy Robinsons??

The water boarding clearly isn’t a lie, it’s what all the papers are running with. Why can’t I?

And who said he didn’t break his arm, the bully? Again, I go back to the post about bully’s lying through their teeth to save their arses.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon literally pulled his one out of his arse with no foundations.

Now that I’ve answered your whataboutery, why don’t you answer mine?

Billy86

weldoninhio wrote: »

We know he liked a facebook page and he had a go at a fellow schoolchild.

He liked Stephen Yaxley Lennon/Tommy Robinson's fb page which would mean he supported his toxic views about migrants and Muslims,and he then went and attacked a migrant Muslim kid from Syria.

We both know that if a terrorist attack occurred tomorrow and it turned out the perpetrator had read a lot of Islamic extremist content, that you would never attempt to write it off as "he clicked a link and shot some people" and would likely mock anyone who tried to. Yet here you are doing just that when it's a Tommy supporter who reads his crap, attacking immigrant children.

Faugheen

Faugheen wrote:

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon literally pulled his one out of his arse with no foundations.

Do you call Bono Paul Hewson when you speak about him?

And I see you pay the same heed to the actually meaning of the word "literally" as you do the word "racist".

Billy Mays

I thought "Tommy" considers himself a journalist these days. Surely a responsible journalist would try and get the facts straight before wading in like he did?

Or maybe he's just trying to rile up the mouth breathers who hang on his every word?

Faugheen

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Do you call Bono Paul Hewson when you speak about him?

And I see you pay the same heed to the actually meaning of the word "literally" as you do the word "racist".

So your concern isn't that he made up a bare-faced lie but why I refer to him by his real name? Nice priorities there, pal.

He calls himself Tommy Robinson after a member of a football hooligan gang in Luton, the sad bastard.

To answer your question? No I don't call Bono by his real name.

And before you ask why I call Stephen Yaxley-Lennon by his real name - it's because I want to.

Faugheen

SnakePlissken wrote: »

Mouth foaming tirade? I believe I've been quite cordial, again, you seem to have a rather vivid imagination.



But you are a bully, and there is a damning foundation on which I base my opinion.

Not once has this poster made any racist claims and yet you have continuously attacked them with some of the vilest accusations I have seen on this forum, your behavior is simply disgusting;

So, let me get this straight.

This poster hasn't made any racist claims. Fine. However I've based my claims on his behaviour and mannerisms and come to the conclusion that he is a racist. That's unacceptable in your view.

On the flip side, I haven't made any claims that I'm a bully, but it's acceptable for you to make your judgement based on how you perceive my behaviour to be?

Why are you allowed to do that but I can't?

SnakePlissken

Faugheen wrote: »

he made up a bare-faced lie

Sounds like exactly the type of guy you could relate to.

Billy Mays

The "Tommy" fan club get very precious when you call him by his real name for some reason

batgoat

John Sacrimoni wrote: »

Hes a great man.

He just tried to justify bullying a Syrian fifteen year old so your idols are lacking.

John Sacrimoni

batgoat wrote: »

He just tried to justify bullying a Syrian fifteen year old so your idols are lacking.

LOL i was joking mate, i dont pay much attention to Lennon at all and dont really care about what hes doing.

Faugheen

batgoat wrote: »

He just tried to justify bullying a Syrian fifteen year old so your idols are lacking.

And people cried that I called the above poster a racist.

John Sacrimoni

Faugheen wrote: »

And people cried that I called the above poster a racist.

No ones crying stfu mate, acting like a hysterical bìtch on here so you are.

SnakePlissken

Faugheen wrote: »

So, let me get this straight.

This poster hasn't made any racist claims. Fine. However I've based my claims on his behaviour and mannerisms and come to the conclusion that he is a racist. That's unacceptable in your view.

On the flip side, I haven't made any claims that I'm a bully, but it's acceptable for you to make your judgement based on how you perceive my behaviour to be?

Why are you allowed to do that but I can't?

The poster in question made not one racist remark and yet you have openly labelled him as such repeatedly, this I consider groundless.

Conversely, you have continuously directed abuse at one particular poster with terms such as

Faugheen wrote: »

Vile creature.

, which is why I consider you a bully. This is not about my perception of you, you've attacked a poster over the past 24 hours for no reason other than they disagree with you. If you're going to bully so overtly expect to be called out on it.

John Sacrimoni

SnakePlissken wrote: »

The poster in question made not one racist remark and yet you have openly labelled him as such repeatedly, this I consider groundless.

Conversely, you have continuously directed abuse at one particular poster with terms such as , which is why I consider you a bully. This is not about my perception of you, you've attacked a poster over the past 24 hours for no reason other than they disagree with you. If you're going to bully so overtly expect to be called out on it.

Ah sure hes been abusing me on here since the start of the thread not that it bothers me i get a giggle out of it. I try not to stoop to his level because no doubt if i do ill be thread banned.

Faugheen

SnakePlissken wrote: »

The poster in question made not one racist remark and yet you have openly labelled him as such repeatedly, this I consider groundless.

Exactly. You 'consider' it groundless. In your opinion it's groundless.

In my opinion, I think his constant whataboutery and reluctance to call this out for what it was is as a result of racial undertones which is evident in his posts.

SnakePlissken wrote: »

Conversely, you have continuously directed abuse at one particular poster with terms such as , which is why I consider you a bully. This is not about my perception of you, you've attacked a poster over the past 24 hours for no reason other than they disagree with you. If you're going to bully so overtly expect to be called out on it.

So your basis for calling me a bully is me calling someone who had a racial undertone to their posts a racist?

evolving tipperary

You're all bullying each other. Crazy posts flying here from all sides

Faugheen

John Sacrimoni wrote: »

No ones crying stfu mate, acting like a hysterical bìtch on here so you are.

Oh meow. The claws are out.

Ash.J.Williams

John Sacrimoni wrote: »

If he that was an english lad getting bullied you wouldnt hear anything about this. Just saying.

Typical dickhead response

John Sacrimoni

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

Typical dickhead response

Nice.

gw80

They are trying to get the thread closed down.

batgoat

gw80 wrote: »

They are trying to get the thread closed down.

Who are "they"?

weldoninhio

Faugheen wrote: »

The water boarding clearly isn’t a lie, it’s what all the papers are running with. Why can’t I?

And who said he didn’t break his arm, the bully? Again, I go back to the post about bully’s lying through their teeth to save their arses.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon literally pulled his one out of his arse with no foundations.

Now that I’ve answered your whataboutery, why don’t you answer mine?

My whataboutery?? The above is all whataboutery. The only paper that “ran with” waterboarding that I saw was the tabloid Sun, which isn’t exactly an august journal.

I stand corrected, the daily mail also goes the sensationalist route. Whoda thunk it.

Faugheen

weldoninhio wrote: »

My whataboutery?? The above is all whataboutery. The only paper that “ran with” waterboarding that I saw was the tabloid Sun, which isn’t exactly an august journal.

The Sun also ran the bully’s claims yet you were very quick to believe that.

Btw, the Sun, Mirror, Daily Mail and Evening Standard are all running the water boarded line.

It comes down to perceptions really. I think he’s trying to waterboard him, you think not. I think you’re chatting ****e, you think likewise of me.

Truth be told told the real ****e talker is Mr Yaxley-Lennon, which I haven’t seen you get annoyed about as much as what I’ve said.

weldoninhio

Faugheen wrote: »

The Sun also ran the bully’s claims yet you were very quick to believe that.

Btw, the Sun, Mirror, Daily Mail and Evening Standard are all running the water boarded line.

I didn’t believe anything, I put forward an argument based on the 16yos hand written letter. Reading comprehension is on the wane, it seems. 4 sterling papers, bastions of integrity, known for not sensationalising stories. Oh wait, wasn’t the Hillsborough lies the Sun? Didn’t the Mirror hack the phones of a dead child? Daily mail, too many to mention!

weldoninhio

Faugheen wrote: »

Truth be told told the real ****e talker is Mr Yaxley-Lennon, which I haven’t seen you get annoyed about as much as what I’ve said.

This is a thread about an incident in a school in Huddersfield. As far as I am aware Tommy Robinson was not involved in the incident that this thread is about. I believe that Mr Yaxley-Lennon also has his own thread on Boards. Perhaps post in that thread if you wish to discuss him, rather than trying to derail this one??

batgoat

weldoninhio wrote: »

This is a thread about an incident in a school in Huddersfield. As far as I am aware Tommy Robinson was not involved in the incident that this thread is about. I believe that Mr Yaxley-Lennon also has his own thread on Boards. Perhaps post in that thread if you wish to discuss him, rather than trying to derail this one??

Erm, he's entirely relevant to the discussion since he claimed that the fifteen year old was involved in a violent attack which he was not... So not derailing at all. You do seem intent on minimising what occurred though.

Faugheen

weldoninhio wrote: »

This is a thread about an incident in a school in Huddersfield. As far as I am aware Tommy Robinson was not involved in the incident that this thread is about. I believe that Mr Yaxley-Lennon also has his own thread on Boards. Perhaps post in that thread if you wish to discuss him, rather than trying to derail this one??

Hang on, this coming from someone who brought up the Bangor incident?

That had nothing to do with this thread but you brought it up anyway. Why can you do that and I can’t?

Besides, I’m asking you for you opinion about what Stephen Yaxley-Lennon said in relation to this case, so it is very relevant. Why are you refusing to answer it?

98q76e12hrflnk

Faugheen wrote: »

The Sun also ran the bully’s claims yet you were very quick to believe that.

Btw, the Sun, Mirror, Daily Mail and Evening Standard are all running the water boarded line.

It comes down to perceptions really. I think he’s trying to waterboard him, you think not. I think you’re chatting ****e, you think likewise of me.

Truth be told told the real ****e talker is Mr Yaxley-Lennon, which I haven’t seen you get annoyed about as much as what I’ve said.

Do you even take toliet breaks cause you been posting all day?

You should cause your ass must be getting jealous of all the ****e coming out your mouth.

gw80

batgoat wrote: »

Who are "they"?

Not you, your sound.

Faugheen

declan2693 wrote: »

Do you even take toliet breaks cause you been posting all day?

You should cause your ass must be getting jealous of all the ****e coming out your mouth.

Solid contribution. You win a rosette for taking part.

98q76e12hrflnk

Faugheen wrote: »

Solid contribution. You win a rosette for taking part.

Oh the irony!

Gatling

So the attacker was charged with common assault ,no mention of race crime or hate crime and zero mention of the juice squirt ,

So no racial or waterboarding and yet people are still ranting and raving about both



Might be time for some to put the keyboards down and leave the interweb for a few days of r&r

Faugheen

declan2693 wrote: »

Oh the irony!

Getting very touchy today, aren’t we?

weldoninhio

Faugheen wrote: »

Hang on, this coming from someone who brought up the Bangor incident?

That had nothing to do with this thread but you brought it up anyway. Why can you do that and I can’t?

Besides, I’m asking you for you opinion about what Stephen Yaxley-Lennon said in relation to this case, so it is very relevant. Why are you refusing to answer it?

I used it as a comparison to this case. You seem to be using Robinson to wind posters up in here. For example has any newspaper reported anyone named Yaxley-Lennon as lying??

My opinion is that he was should not have made any public statement without verifying it.

Faugheen

Gatling wrote: »

So the attacker was charged with common assault ,no mention of race crime or hate crime and zero mention of the juice squirt ,

So no racial or waterboarding and yet people are still ranting and raving about both



Might be time for some to put the keyboards down and leave the interweb for a few days of r&r

So him saying ”I’ll drown you,” as he’s pouring water towards his mouth means nothing, no?

98q76e12hrflnk

Faugheen wrote: »

Getting very touchy today, aren’t we?

Haha go outside and get some fresh air.

weldoninhio

Faugheen wrote: »

So him saying ”I’ll drown you,” as he’s pouring water towards his mouth means nothing, no?

So if the next viral video shows a kid saying “I’ll kill ya” before a fight, it’ll be attempted murder if he wins the fight??

Gatling

Faugheen wrote: »

So him

Squirting water in another boys face means nothing to me no ,

So what are you claiming now attempted murder??

batgoat

weldoninhio wrote: »

I used it as a comparison to this case. You seem to be using Robinson to wind posters up in here. For example has any newspaper reported anyone named Yaxley-Lennon as lying??

My opinion is that he was should not have made any public statement without verifying it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/syrian-refugee-school-attack-huddersfield-tommy-robinson-family-sue-victim-police-a8659921.html?amp
The family are intending to sue him for defamation, the images he used to show violence in school was also from an entirely unconnected event in Surrey. So ya, he categorically was lying for the sake of propaganda.

Faugheen

batgoat wrote: »

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/syrian-refugee-school-attack-huddersfield-tommy-robinson-family-sue-victim-police-a8659921.html?amp
The family are intending to sue him for defamation, the images he used to show violence in school was also from an entirely unconnected event in Surrey. So ya, he categorically was lying for the sake of propaganda.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tommy-robinson-defends-boy-16-13663113

This claims the mother of the girl denied that the boy was involved too.

Here’s more if you don’t want to go through the hassle of googling it.


http://lmgtfy.com/?t=n&q=Stephen+Yaxley+Lennon+Huddersfield

Faugheen

declan2693 wrote: »

Haha go outside and get some fresh air.

I was doing the garden all morning, kid.

You finish that colouring book yet?

Billy86

Gatling wrote: »

Squirting water in another boys face means nothing to me no ,

You've not watched the video, have you?

ohnonotgmail

weldoninhio wrote: »

This is a thread about an incident in a school in Huddersfield. As far as I am aware Tommy Robinson was not involved in the incident that this thread is about. I believe that Mr Yaxley-Lennon also has his own thread on Boards. Perhaps post in that thread if you wish to discuss him, rather than trying to derail this one??

He wasn't involved in the incident but he used it as an opportunity to push his agenda by posting lies about the kid that was attacked. Funnily enough the attacker is a fan of tommy. how curious.

ohnonotgmail

Gatling wrote: »

Squirting water in another boys face means nothing to me no ,

So what are you claiming now attempted murder??

he held him down by the throat and poured the water over his face. Probably a stretch to call it waterboarding but he is still a violent little thug who will hopefully get a 12 month DTO.

Gatling

Billy86 wrote: »

You've not watched the video, have you?

Yes I did ,

And no there was no waterboarding or attempted murders ,or race crime

Faugheen

Gatling wrote: »

Yes I did ,

And no there was no waterboarding or attempted murders ,or race crime

Who said anything about attempted murders?

That's a little over-dramatic isn't it?

Gatling

Faugheen wrote: »

That's a little over-dramatic isn't it?

Considering you seen an actual waterboarding taking place I cant explain why others are seeing and saying something completely different .

Billy Mays

batgoat wrote: »

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/syrian-refugee-school-attack-huddersfield-tommy-robinson-family-sue-victim-police-a8659921.html?amp
The family are intending to sue him for defamation, the images he used to show violence in school was also from an entirely unconnected event in Surrey. So ya, he categorically was lying for the sake of propaganda.

Wonder will the lads on here be chipping in to the gofundme to pay his ̶L̶e̶g̶a̶l̶ ̶f̶e̶e̶s̶ mortgage