Gameweek 14 matchday

km79

KevIRL wrote: »

Don't think it's final.

Can’t be sure sane only has one assist
20-4 with 5 to play
4 of them against each other
HEWT

Islander13

S.M.B. wrote: »

Am I right in thinking those City bonus points look final? Sterling with just the two?

Defo not final. Same as FT

Cantona's Collars

42 so far without BP's added and 4 to play. Gotta be happy with that considering the carnage that some went through today.

Chesty08

Two disaster weeks in a row!!!

spock.

Maddison yellow cost him 3 points, uuggh

Ace2007

Irish Kid has done his hammy -
Obafemi off, Gabbiadini on

Benimar

spock. wrote: »

Maddison yellow cost him 3 points, uuggh

Yeah, that’s a sickener

SlickRic

It'll be 26 from 6.

Salah (c) and Hazard will determine how good or bad the week is.

Ace2007

Shaw off, Dalot on

km79

Shaw injured

Ace2007

Marital on, Rashford off

That's only 3 goals in 28 games for Rashford :eek:

KevIRL

Martial cameo. Think I'd prefer digne off the bench tbh

Ace2007

Big Rom off, Lingard on

Ace2007

FT 2-2

Marital might just get one more GW from me

spock.

After review, there is no assist awarded for Man City’s first goal. Sane's cross/pass was deflected by the goalkeeper, changing its intended destination #FPL #MCIBOU

munster87

spock. wrote: »

After review, there is no assist awarded for Man City’s first goal. Sane's cross/pass was deflected by the goalkeeper, changing its intended destination #FPL #MCIBOU

Nice

spock.

I'm biased but I do think it was a shot.

S.M.B.

My initial thoughts were it was an attempted pass and not a shot.

Lemlin

km79 wrote: »

http://twitter.com/FPLSWOT/status/1068916162493329408

Seems to touch it

Looks like a shot to me.

Islander13

I thought the only question was whether he touched it. If they say he touched it then he was defo trying to score. Biggest FPL travesty since the dodgy McAuley goal two years ago

sicknotexi

munster87 wrote: »

Nice

So dumb, it was a clear toe poke towards goal. Any effort that is saved has its path changed. Big mistake by the fpl decisions panel there. This is the same panel that judged Kane touched the ball last season remember for his phantom goal.

Alonso got a deflected shot a few weeks ago that was ten times worse than that. Sane's action assisted the goal(he got a touch, the ball was on target). Not sure how that can not be an assist.

Scorpion Sting

Islander13 wrote: »

I thought the only question was whether he touched it. If they say he touched it then he was defo trying to score. Biggest FPL travesty since the dodgy McCauley goal two years ago

McAuley did get a touch on that though.

KevIRL

It was lukaku's assist anyway

Father Hernandez

Not a Sane owner but I’d be v annoyed if I was. Inconsistency from FPL HQ is awful at times

Pete_Cavan

Was also going to mention the Alonso one mentioned above. Also Trippier got an assist for a shot which hit an arm and a penalty given. Whether it was a shot, pass or whatever has never mattered before, why should it matter for Sane?

sicknotexi

Father Hernandez wrote: »

Not a Sane owner but I’d be v annoyed if I was. Inconsistency from FPL HQ is awful at times

It really is. People say it evens itself out over a season but that's nonsense.

Anyway that's my last comment on it.

normanoffside

https://twitter.com/yugamsahni/status/1068955962076098560

spock.

I'm secretly hoping they overturn their decision.
Happened with Suarez a few years ago.

Markx

spock. wrote: »

I'm secretly hoping they overturn their decision.
Happened with Suarez a few years ago.

In the litany of bad decisions they've made down the years, this could be the worst. Usually I can see their argument but this is the first time I've thought there's a little underhandedness at play. The explanation is in no way logical.

wonski

Suarez one was funny, because changing it was against their own rules