Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump presidency discussion thread V

Options
19394969899335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Trump has already tweeted months ago, probably in hope more than expectation, that Stone will not "rat" him out. Let's see if that's true.

    Stone strikes me as a very confident man once he holds the cards. I cannot see him holding out for Trump, unless he expects (or was guaranteed) a pardon.

    Tim O'Brien retweeted once the news broke from December 2018 that Mueller looked for Stone's testimony to congress. We suspected that was a prequel to his indictment and today confirmed it.

    Keep an eye for the testimony of others who have gone to the SC.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Thepoet85 wrote: »
    Those walls must be getting very close for Trump.

    Feel like this is a major development, will be interesting to see how his Twitter account goes today!
    His blatant threatening of Cohen has made me more confident(sadly) that the POTUS is actually directly guilty of impeachable crimes (even though impeachment may not be a feasible route to take.)

    It really is on the shoulders of the Republican party now. They could give him the old heave ho(or at least put manners on him ) at any time.

    It looks to me like it will have to be 2020 elections .


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭circadian


    Yeah these are the charges needed to get him in front of Mueller. I wouldn't be surprised if there were far more serious charges against him to come but the SC will give him the rope to see if he hangs himself like Manafort.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Just in case anyone wondered how that chat went between McConnell and Schumer post voting on those 2 failed Bills...


    https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1088608228026576896


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,635 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Trump has already tweeted months ago, probably in hope more than expectation, that Stone will not "rat" him out. Let's see if that's true.

    Stone strikes me as a very confident man once he holds the cards. I cannot see him holding out for Trump, unless he expects (or was guaranteed) a pardon.

    Tim O'Brien retweeted once the news broke from December 2018 that Mueller looked for Stone's testimony to congress. We suspected that was a prequel to his indictment and today confirmed it.

    Keep an eye for the testimony of others who have gone to the SC.

    Recall that Trump was confident that Manafort wouldn't flip. Look how that turned out. And Cohen.

    ONe thing we can take from any of Trumps tweets about the case is that they are pleas rather than expressions of confidence.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Penn wrote: »
    That's what I'm wondering though, would there be enough there to make him go for a deal with Mueller, or would his likely wealth & legal team be able to keep him out of jail at the very least, meaning he might not go for a deal with Mueller.
    Full indictment details are here:
    https://www.justice.gov/file/1124706/download

    You can jump to the end for the charge sheet. It's one count of obstruction, five counts of giving false statements and one count of witness tampering.

    The last is probably the most serious of the lot, but in any case he's looking at jail time. The evidence is considerable and solid.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Recall that Trump was confident that Manafort wouldn't flip. Look how that turned out. And Cohen.

    Did Manafort really flip though?
    Leroy42 wrote: »
    ONe thing we can take from any of Trumps tweets about the case is that they are pleas rather than expressions of confidence.

    Agreed


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    Oh man, is farage (person 2) being mentioned in this?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Oh man, is farage (person 2) being mentioned in this?
    It sounds awfully like it. This could get very uncomfortable for Nigel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,375 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Roger Stone arrested.... all Fox News is taking about is Clinton and how lives are being ruined by the Muller investigation


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    It sounds awfully like it. This could get very uncomfortable for Nigel.

    Randy Credico I would guess.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Person 1 was a political commentator who worked with an online media publication during
    the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Person 1 spoke regularly with STONE throughout the
    campaign, including about the release of stolen documents by Organization 1.

    Person 2 was a radio host who had known STONE for more than a decade. In testimony
    before HPSCI on or about September 26, 2017, STONE described Person 2 (without naming him)
    as an “intermediary,” “go-between,” and “mutual friend” to the head of Organization 1. In a
    follow-up letter to HPSCI dated October 13, 2017, STONE identified Person 2 by name and
    claimed Person 2 was the “gentleman who confirmed for Mr. Stone” that the head of
    Organization 1 had “‘[e]mails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication.’”

    Corsi and Credico, respectively, I presume.
    After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump
    Campaign official was directed to contact STONE
    about any additional releases and what other
    damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign.

    Who directed the senior campaign official and who was the senior campaign official?
    On or about the
    same day, Person 1 forwarded STONE’s email to an associate who lived in the
    United Kingdom and was a supporter of the Trump Campaign
    .

    Ted Malloch?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,620 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-domestic-abuse-sexual-assault-definition-womens-rights-justice-department-a8744546.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1548350752

    It is a pity that the above is only a distraction manoeuvre and it's sinking without a trace, but almost unnoticed Trump has thrown women's rights in the US back into the 1950's.
    Only physical harm now counts as abuse, emotional abuse is no longer a concern in domestic abuse.
    This is beyond despicable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,702 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Best guesses as to who the Senior Trump Campaign Official is? Likely not Manafort as he left the campaign during some of the period described. Maybe Bannon?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    I wonder is Trump going to tweet something outrageous but unrelated to Mueller soon in an attempt to distract from the Roger Stone story.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    And here it is in all its glory. Stone being arrested.

    It would be full on brown trousers to see all those guys at your front door.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Penn wrote: »
    Best guesses as to who the Senior Trump Campaign Official is? Likely not Manafort as he left the campaign during some of the period described. Maybe Bannon?

    Could be Gates - he was still on the campaign after Manafort left IIRC..


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,507 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    And therein lies the great Theatre of American politics in two Acts: FBI guns & a dozen officers to arrest a entitled, wealthy 66 year old, no doubt staged for the full benefit of the cameras; meanwhile substantive changes to actual functioning of the country's legal system gets changed on a whim - yet barely registers a whimper thanks to the smoke & mirrors of Trumps inanity. It won't even figure in the conversation, especially those who'd shout loudest about Trumps credentials and 'successes'.

    prawnsambo wrote: »
    And here it is in all its glory. Stone being arrested.[/URL]

    It would be full on brown trousers to see all those guys at your front door.
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-domestic-abuse-sexual-assault-definition-womens-rights-justice-department-a8744546.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1548350752

    It is a pity that the above is only a distraction manoeuvre and it's sinking without a trace, but almost unnoticed Trump has thrown women's rights in the US back into the 1950's.
    Only physical harm now counts as abuse, emotional abuse is no longer a concern in domestic abuse.
    This is beyond despicable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    And here it is in all its glory. Stone being arrested.

    It would be full on brown trousers to see all those guys at your front door.

    Stone is credited with coming up with the "Build the Wall" narrative.

    The FBI aren't being paid because of Trump's promise that Mexico would build that wall.

    Nice bit of karma there...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,635 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Stone is credited with coming up with the "Build the Wall" narrative.

    The FBI aren't being paid because of Trump's promise that Mexico would build that wall.

    Nice bit of karma there...

    And probably why CNN got given the details of the raid when it was so secret


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,679 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I just realised these two actually appear in Court today!

    m0008300839350201.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Stone is credited with coming up with the "Build the Wall" narrative.

    The FBI aren't being paid because of Trump's promise that Mexico would build that wall.

    Nice bit of karma there...

    So they arrested Stone as a freebie...?


  • Registered Users Posts: 571 ✭✭✭rosser44


    From the indictment:
    After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign.

    The list of people who can direct a senior campaign advisor is small, the net is definitely closing in.

    Don Jr next please!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,182 ✭✭✭demfad


    I wonder is Trump going to tweet something outrageous but unrelated to Mueller soon in an attempt to distract from the Roger Stone story.

    Venezuala, yesterday?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,685 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Just bringing in another world affair the Admin is getting involved in, Venezuela, I have suspicions that Don is angling to wrap the flag around himself with a foreign war all for distraction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,702 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    rosser44 wrote: »
    From the indictment:



    The list of people who can direct a senior campaign advisor is small, the net is definitely closing in.

    Don Jr next please!!

    CNBC has the Senior Trump Campaign Official as Bannon
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/25/us-special-counsels-office-trump-ally-roger-stone-arrested-in-florida.html

    If so, surely the only ones above him would have been the Trumps themselves?


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    seamus wrote: »
    If Stone goes for a plea deal, a lot of people are in trouble.

    He's basically the link between the Trump campaign and Russia.

    Spoiler: He's an old, wealthy white man. He'll go for the plea deal, he's not cut out for wearing an orange jumpsuit.

    Roger Stone will lie though. Could be very interesting to see if he pulls a Manafort!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,959 ✭✭✭circadian


    Is stone stupid enough to lie? Desperate enough probably, wonder how rational he's looking at this.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement